Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
Correction

Correction: Horikawa and Ojima. Cortical Activation Patterns Evoked by Temporally Asymmetric Sounds and Their Modulation by Learning (eNeuro March/April 2017, 4(2) e0241-16.2017 1-19 https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0241-16.2017)

eNeuro 25 May 2017, 4 (3) ENEURO.0169-17.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0169-17.2017

In the article “Cortical Activation Patterns Evoked by Temporally Asymmetric Sounds and Their Modulation by Learning” by Junsei Horikawa and Hisayuki Ojima, which appeared on e0241-16.2017 of the March/April 2017 issue, authors provided a misleading legend for Figure 6. Since the figure includes not only response traces evoked by F but also those evoked by revF, the description “evoked by the first F segment” in the second sentence should be changed to “evoked by the first segment.” This correction would help readers understand differences in response signals evoked by the temporally asymmetric sounds. Figure 6 legend has been corrected on the online PDF version and displayed below.

Figure 6. Trial-unique response traces recorded at the maxP. Temporal traces of the response signals (dF/Fmax, %) evoked by the first segment at the channels where the spatiotemporal maxP within the AI is evoked. The sound waveforms below traces show the delay times and duration of the stimulus sounds (F and revF). The time of maxP is indicated by the dotted line for each trace. F, normal natural sound. revF, time-reversed version of F.

  • Copyright © 2017 the authors

Synthesis

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: NONE. Note: If this manuscript was transferred from JNeurosci and a decision was made to accept the manuscript without peer review, a brief statement to this effect will instead be what is listed below.

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.