Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
Research ArticleNew Research, Neuronal Excitability

Regulation of Physical Microglia–Neuron Interactions by Fractalkine Signaling after Status Epilepticus

Ukpong B. Eyo, Jiyun Peng, Madhuvika Murugan, Mingshu Mo, Almin Lalani, Ping Xie, Pingyi Xu, David J. Margolis and Long-Jun Wu
eNeuro 29 December 2016, 3 (6) ENEURO.0209-16.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0209-16.2016
Ukpong B. Eyo
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ukpong B. Eyo
Jiyun Peng
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jiyun Peng
Madhuvika Murugan
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Madhuvika Murugan
Mingshu Mo
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
3Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangdong, 510120, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mingshu Mo
Almin Lalani
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ping Xie
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pingyi Xu
3Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangdong, 510120, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Margolis
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David J. Margolis
Long-Jun Wu
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Long-Jun Wu

Abstract

Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, perform elaborate surveillance in which they physically interact with neuronal elements. A novel form of microglia–neuron interaction named microglial process convergence (MPC) toward neuronal axons and dendrites has recently been described. However, the molecular regulators and pathological relevance of MPC have not been explored. Here, using high-resolution two-photon imaging in vivo and ex vivo, we observed a dramatic increase in MPCs after kainic acid– or pilocarpine-induced experimental seizures that was reconstituted after glutamate treatment in slices from mice. Interestingly, a deficiency of the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) decreased MPCs, whereas fractalkine (CX3CL1) treatment increased MPCs, suggesting that fractalkine signaling is a critical regulator of these microglia–neuron interactions. Furthermore, we found that interleukin-1β was necessary and sufficient to trigger CX3CR1-dependent MPCs. Finally, we show that a deficiency in fractalkine signaling corresponds with increased seizure phenotypes. Together, our results identify the neuroglial CX3CL1–CX3CR1 communication axis as a modulator of potentially neuroprotective microglia–neuron physical interactions during conditions of neuronal hyperactivity.

  • epilepsy
  • fractalkine
  • glutamate
  • interleukin-1β
  • microglia
  • seizure

Significance Statement

Microglia, the immune cells of the brain, are exquisitely sensitive to disturbances in brain homeostasis and are critical for proper neuronal function. Seizures are a common disorder of the brain. However, the dynamics of microglial interactions with neurons after such conditions are not known. Using high-resolution real-time imaging in living mouse brain tissues, we have discovered an interesting phenomenon wherein brain microglia physically interact with neurons after hyperactive conditions. Specifically, we have elucidated relevant mechanisms and molecular signaling cascades governing these interactions. In addition, our findings suggest neuroprotective roles for microglial interaction with neurons. Together, our results suggest that enhancing microglial function during seizures may serve beneficial therapeutic functions.

Introduction

Epilepsy is a significant health concern affecting 50–65 million people globally (Thurman et al., 2011) and is comorbid with stroke and traumatic brain injury (Temkin, 2009; Ravizza et al., 2011). Seizures in epilepsy are mainly due to abnormal hypersynchrony of neuronal activities (Fisher et al., 2005), which could be caused by an imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission (Dalby and Mody, 2001; Sharma et al., 2007). However, therapeutic antiepileptic strategies targeting neuronal mechanisms have proved insufficient in a significant number of patients (Kwan and Brodie, 2006). Therefore, there is a need to develop novel alternative and complementary strategies for seizure treatment.

Recently, a role for neuroinflammation has become increasingly appreciated in the pathological progression of epilepsy (Devinsky et al., 2013; Vezzani et al., 2013; Eyo et al., 2016). Microglia are the predominant source of inflammation in the brain and are now recognized to play significant roles in brain homoeostasis (Hanisch and Kettenmann, 2007; Ransohoff and Perry, 2009). Particularly, microglia make transient physical interactions with neuronal elements and, in doing so, are suggested to monitor and alter synaptic activity (Wake et al., 2009; Tremblay et al., 2010; Kato et al., 2016). Moreover, neuronal hyperactivity, including after status epilepticus, triggered increasing microglial process extension to interact with neurons (Dissing-Olesen et al., 2014; Eyo et al., 2014). Previous studies reported a novel microglia–neuron physical interaction named microglial process convergence (MPC) toward neuronal dendrites under conditions of reduced extracellular calcium (Eyo et al., 2015) as well as after repetitive neuronal stimulation (Kato et al., 2016). However, molecular regulators guiding MPC and whether they are functionally relevant in epilepsy remain to be elucidated.

Fractalkine (CX3CL1) is a neuronal chemokine, whose receptor (CX3CR1) is principally expressed by microglia in the CNS (Cardona et al., 2006). Given the distinct expression of fractalkine and its receptor in neurons and microglia, respectively, this communication axis presents a potentially unique avenue for microglia–neuron interactions. Indeed, fractalkine signaling was shown to regulate learning and memory (Maggi et al., 2011), social behaviors (Zhan et al., 2014), and microglial neurotoxicity during inflammation and stroke (Cardona et al., 2006; Tang et al., 2014). Under epileptic conditions, recent studies found that fractalkine deficiency resulted in reduced dendritic complexity and delayed maturation of adult newborn neurons (Xiao et al., 2015). However, the exact role of fractalkine signaling in seizure-induced microglia–neuron physical interactions has not been investigated. In the current study, we found that experimentally induced seizures triggered increased MPCs toward neuronal dendrites, which are regulated by fractalkine and interleukin (IL)-1β signaling. Moreover, reduced MPCs correlated with worsened seizure phenotypes. Our study reveals a novel regulation of microglia–neuron physical interaction by fractalkine signaling that is relevant during seizures.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Both male and female mice were used in accordance with institutional guidelines, as approved by the animal care and use committee at the university. Heterozygous (CX3CR1GFP/+) and homozygous (CX3CR1GFP/GFP) GFP reporter mice expressing GFP under control of the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) promoter (Jung et al., 2000) and transgenic mice expressing YFP (Feng et al., 2000), or a genetically encoded calcium sensor, i.e GCaMP2.2/GCaMP3.3 (Chen et al., 2012) in a subset of pyramidal neurons under the control of the Thy1 promoter were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. The CX3CR1GFP/GFP line as a knock-in GFP mouse line that serves as a CX3CR1 knockout mouse in this study. P2Y12 knockout mice were originally donated by Dr. Michael Dailey at the University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA).

Slice preparation

Freshly isolated brain slices were prepared from 3- to 5-week-old mice. Briefly, mice were anesthetized and swiftly decapitated. Brains from decapitated mice were carefully removed and placed in ice-cold oxygenated (95% O2 and 5% CO2) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) with the following composition (in mm): NaCl, 124; NaHCO3, 25; KCl, 2.5; NaH2PO4, 1; CaCl2, 2; MgSO4, 2; glucose, 10; and sucrose added to make 300–320 mOsmol. Coronal slices (300 µm) were prepared and transferred to a recovery chamber for ≥30 min with oxygenated ACSF with the same composition as above at room temperature before imaging.

Preparation for in vivo imaging

Thirty- to sixty-day-old mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. We used 5% isoflurane for induction for up to 1 min in a chamber until the mouse was still, and 1.5%–2% for surgery for 15–30 min in the stereotactic frame. Under anesthesia, the mouse head was secured with ear bars on a heating pad and in a stereotactic frame, and a thin skull window was made with a high-speed dental drill. A head plate was glued to the skull around the cranial window, and the plate was screwed into a customized stage and placed under the two-photon microscope. Mice were maintained under light anesthesia (1% isoflurane) on the imaging stage for the duration of imaging and killed immediately after.

Two-photon imaging

Experiments were conducted at room temperature with slices maintained in oxygenated ACSF with the same composition as above in a perfusion chamber at a flow rate of ∼2 mL/min. Microglia from heterozygous (CX3CR1GFP/+) and homozygous (CX3CR1GFP/GFP) GFP reporter mice expressing GFP under control of the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) promoter (Jung et al., 2000) and neurons from and transgenic mice expressing YFP (Feng et al., 2000), or a genetically encoded calcium sensor, i.e. GCaMP2.2/GCaMP3.3 (Chen et al., 2012) under the control of the Thy-1 promoter were typically imaged using a two-photon microscope (Scientifica) with a Ti:Sapphire laser (Mai Tai; Spectra Physics) tuned to 890–900 nm with a 40× water-immersion lens (0.8 NA; Olympus). Fluorescence was detected using two photomultiplier tubes in whole-field detection mode and a 565-nm dichroic mirror with 525-/50-nm (green channel) and 620-/60-nm (red channel) emission filters. The laser power was maintained at ≤25 mW, and images were collected at 50–120 µm from the slice surface, or at <40 mW, 50–120 µm of the cortical surface in vivo. For imaging microglial and neuronal YFP dynamics, 15 consecutive z-stack images were collected at 3-µm intervals every minute while 10 consecutive z-stack images were collected at 2-µm intervals every 30 s during imaging in GCaMP2.2 tissues. For in vivo imaging, 20 consecutive z-stack images were collected at 1.5-µm intervals every minute.

Drugs

Glutamate and NMDA were purchased from Sigma. 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, kainic acid, tetrodotoxin (TTX), D-AP5, (+)-α-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine, and dihydroxyphenylglycine were purchased from Tocris. Recombinant mouse fractalkine (472-FF-02), IL-1β (401-ML), function-blocking fractalkine antibody (α-CX3CL1; MAB571), and IL-1ra (480-RM) were purchased from R&D Systems. Stock solutions of all drugs (except TTX) were made in water and diluted to the appropriate working concentrations in ACSF. TTX stock was diluted in citric acid (pH 4.8). The drugs were applied to the slices through a bath perfusion.

Experimental seizure models

Thirty- to sixty-day-old mice were i.p. injected with kainic acid at 18–22 mg/kg or pilocarpine at 300 mg/kg. Seizure behavior was monitored under a modified Racine scale as follows: (1) freezing behavior; (2) rigid posture with raised tail; (3) continuous head bobbing and forepaws shaking; (4) rearing, falling, and jumping; (5) continuous occurrence of level 4; and (6) loss of posture and generalized convulsion activity (Racine, 1972; Avignone et al., 2008). Mice that progressed to at least stage 3 were killed at 2 h, and microglial dynamics were subsequently monitored in the slices generated. Alternatively, mice were used for microglial imaging in vivo. To block NMDA receptors, AP5 (3 µg in 5 µL ACSF) was applied through a previously implanted cannula for intracerebroventricular delivery 15 min before and 30 min after i.p. injection of kainic acid.

Statistical analysis

Quantification of process convergence events was done manually through time-lapse movies. Events were identified when microglial processes spontaneously converged toward a focal point. These converging processes were redirected from normal random surveillance (extension/retraction) toward the focal region and terminated their convergence within minutes from one to four nearby microglia. This is best visualized in the movies presented (Movies 1–5). We noticed a variability in the sizes of the focal convergences from ∼2 to 8 µm. To avoid arbitrary selection of these events, analysis was done by counting all the observed events irrespective of size so as not to bias our analysis/quantification. At least five slices and two animals were used for each experimental condition. The frequency of occurrence of these events was determined in our typical 330 × 330 × 45-µm field of view from 30-min long imaging sessions in slices and 220 × 220 × 45-µm field of view from 60-min long imaging sessions in vivo. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test was used to establish significance.

Results

Experimental seizures trigger microglial process convergence

The existence of a novel form of microglia–neuron physical interaction termed microglial process convergence (MPCs) was reported that increased upon extracellular calcium reduction (Eyo et al., 2015), a paradigm known to lead to epileptiform burst activity (Bikson et al., 1999) and prolonged neuronal depolarization (Kato et al., 2016). Typically, MPCs consist of several microglial processes that spontaneously converge at distinct sites and make transient focal aggregations (see movies). To determine whether these phenomena are present during epileptic conditions, we induced experimental seizures (at least stage 3 seizures along a modified Racine scale) by intraperitoneal injection of kainic acid (18–22 mg/kg) or pilocarpine (300 mg/kg; Fig. 1a). Two hours after seizure induction, brain slices were generated from mice and monitored for MPC events by time-lapse two-photon microscopy. We detected a significant number of these events in real time in cortical slices after both kainic acid– and pilocarpine-induced seizures (Fig. 1b–e; Movie 1). The MPC events were maintained independently of ionotropic glutamate receptor function and action potential firing (Fig. 1f, g). However, when NMDA receptors were antagonized during seizures by a 15-min pre- and 30-min posttreatment of AP5 (3 µg in 5 µL ACSF) with kainic acid treatment, the number of MPCs was significantly reduced (Fig. 1h), indicating that NMDA receptors are required for the induction of seizure-induced MPC events. To exclude the possibility that seizure-induced MPCs occur because of the brain slice preparation, we used in vivo two-photon microscopy to monitor microglial dynamics in the intact cortex after 2 h of kainic acid treatment. Consistent with our observations in brain slices, we found a significant increase in the occurrence of MPCs in vivo after kainic acid treatment (Fig. 1i–l).

Movie 1.

Microglial process convergence occurs after seizures. Representative time-lapse movies taken from CX3CR1GFP/+ mouse slices showing MPCs events. Slices were generated from the brains of mice 2 h after kainic acid treatment. Several MPCs events are identified (white arrows). This movie is 140 min long and is sped up 120×.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Experimental seizures trigger microglial process convergence (MPCs). a, Seizure scores after intraperitoneal delivery of pilocarpine (300 mg/kg) and kainic acid (18–22 mg/kg). b–d, Representative images of MPCs in acute slices from mice after kainic acid treatment. c, d, Time-lapse images of boxed regions in b showing converging microglial process foci identified with white arrows. e, Quantitation of MPCs under control, pilocarpine, and kainic acid treatment (n = 9–14 slices each). f, g, Ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists and action potential blockers fail to block pilocarpine- (f) or kainic acid– (g) induced MPCs (n = 5–9 slices each). h, NMDA receptor antagonism during kainic acid–induced seizures reduces MPCs (n = 8–12 slices each). i–k, Representative images of MPCs in vivo from mice after kainic acid treatment. j, k, Time-lapse images of boxed regions in i showing MPC foci identified with white arrows. l, Quantification of MPCs in vivo after kainic acid–induced seizures (n = 4–5 mice each). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Transient glutamate treatment mimics seizure-induced MPCs

Seizures are known to result from an increase in neuronal excitation that corresponds with an increase in glutamate release in the brain (Cavus et al., 2005, 2008). To simulate and study the mechanisms underlying seizure-induced MPCs, we treated slices from naive mice with glutamate (1 mm) to mimic seizure activities. Interestingly, whereas vehicle treatment did not increase the occurrence of MPCs, 10 min of glutamate treatment was able to significantly increase MPC events (Fig. 2a–c; Movie 2), and this increase persisted for up to 3 h after treatment (Fig. 2d, e).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Transient glutamate treatment mimics seizure-induced MPCs. a–c, Images from a time-lapse sequence showing converging microglial processes in a slice after glutamate (10 mm) treatment for 10 min. b, c, Time-lapse images of boxed regions in a showing converging microglial processes foci identified with white arrows. d, e, Schematic of sites of process convergence events (d) and quantified summary (e) showing increased occurrence after glutamate treatment (red arrowhead in e, n = 3 slices each). f, g, Quantification of the number of process convergence events under different conditions showing a role for NMDA receptors (n = 5–14 slices each). *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001 compared with control and #p < 0.01 compared with previous condition in the respective graphs.

Movie 2.

Glutamate induces MPCs. Representative time-lapse movie taken from slices excised from a CX3CR1GFP/+ mouse previously exposed to 10 min of 1 mm glutamate. Three MPC events can be seen in different regions of the slice and are identified with white arrows. This movie is 75 min long and is sped up 180×.

Consistent with seizure-induced MPCs, glutamate-induced MPCs required NMDA receptor activation for their induction, since they were blocked by coapplication of AP5 (50 µm) with glutamate (Fig. 2f). However, antagonists for non-NMDA glutamate receptors (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, 10 µm), voltage-gated sodium channels (TTX, 1 µm), and metabotropic glutamate receptors [(+)-α-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine, 200 µm] could not inhibit glutamate-induced MPCs (Fig. 2f). Moreover, activation of the NMDA receptor was sufficient to trigger MPCs, whereas activation of non-NMDA glutamate receptors (by kainic acid) failed to induce MPCs without NMDA receptors (Fig. 2g).

Although 1 mm glutamate (10-min) treatment yielded robust increases in MPCs, lower concentrations (0.1–0.5 mm) for the same duration or 1 mm glutamate for shorter durations (2–5 min) were also able to increase MPC numbers significantly, although less robustly (Fig. 3a–d). In these different conditions, MPCs exhibited similar features with regard to the maximum distance from which they responded and the time to complete the convergence (Fig. 3e, f). Finally, because glutamate can lead to excitotoxicity, we confirmed via calcium imaging in Thy1-GCaMP3.3 and Thy1-GCaMP2.2 mice that after a 10-min, 1-mm glutamate treatment, cortical neurons continued to exhibit somatic and dendritic calcium responses, suggesting that the initial glutamate treatment did not render these cortical neurons functionally unresponsive (Fig. 4).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Characteristics of glutamate-induced MPCs. a–d, Schematic representation (a, c) and quantitative summary (b, d) showing the occurrence of MPC events at various glutamate concentrations for 10 min (a, b) and various time points at 1 mm (c, d). n = 6–11 slices each. e, f, Microglia respond from similar distances in all conditions of glutamate exposure tested. Glutamate-induced MPCs show similar features in the different conditions. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with control.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Neurons respond functionally to multiple hits of glutamate. Images (a, b) and time series (a′, b′) data showing intracellular calcium transients in neuronal somata (top) and dendrites (bottom) from GCaMP2.2 mouse slices after repeated glutamate (1 mm) treatment in cortical layer II/III.

We confirmed that both seizure- and glutamate-induced MPCs require P2Y12 receptors (Fig. 5a–c), similar to MPC during [Ca2+]o reduction (Eyo et al., 2015). Furthermore, we confirmed that the glutamate-induced events terminated on neuronal dendrites like the [Ca2+]o reduction-induced events (Eyo et al., 2015; Fig. 5d, e; Movie 3). We next compared several characteristics of [Ca2+]o reduction– and glutamate-induced MPCs and found MPCs are more robust when induced by [Ca2+]o reduction, with >90% of microglia exhibiting MPCs in a 30-min time frame compared with only ∼50% of microglia after glutamate treatment (Fig. 5f, g). However, other features were similar between the two induction methods, including onset time, duration of completed contact, and distance from which responding cells completed contact (Fig. 5h–j). Together, these results highlight a distinction between the occurrence of glutamate-induced and [Ca2+]o reduction–induced MPCs.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Comparison between calcium reduction–induced and glutamate-induced MPCs. a–c, Quantitative summary of MPC events in slices from wild-type and P2Y12-deficient mice after pilocarpine-induced seizures (a), kainic acid–induced seizures (b) and 10-min glutamate treatment (c) (n = 3–7 slices each). d, Example of a converging microglial (green) process (arrow) terminating on a neuronal dendrite (red) after glutamate treatment in a slice from a double transgenic CX3CR1GFP/+:Thy1YFP/+ mouse. f, g, Schematic representation of sites of convergence foci (f) and quantitative summary data (g) showing sites and number of cells that respond during the different treatments. h–j, Various features of MPCs are similar between the two methods of convergence (n = 6–12 slices each). ***p < 0.001.

Movie 3.

Glutamate-induced MPCs targets neuronal dendrites. Representative time-lapse movie taken from slices excised from a CX3CR1GFP/+;Thy1YFP/+ mouse previously exposed to 10 min of glutamate. A microglial process (green) convergence event terminating on a labeled dendrite (red) is identified with a white arrow. This movie is 48 min long and is sped up 240×.

Because astrocytes can also release ATP (Ben Achour and Pascual, 2012; Torres et al., 2012) to mediate MPCs, we investigated contributions by astrocyte connexins to MPC induction with carbenoxolone (100 µm). MPC numbers in response to glutamate treatment remained unchanged in the presence of carbenoxolone (n = 8; 13.5 ± 2.4 events per 30 min) compared to in its absence (n = 6; 12.1 ± 1.2 events per 30 min). Moreover, wholesale inhibition of astrocyte metabolism by fluoroacetate (2–10 mM), which we have found reduces spontaneous astrocyte calcium transients (Eyo et al., 2015), did not change MPC numbers (12.7 ± 1.8 events per 30 min without fluoroacetate compared to 11.9 ± 1.2 events per 30 min with fluoroacetate; n = 7–8). Together, these data suggest that astrocytes might not directly participate in glutamate-induced MPCs.

Fractalkine signaling is necessary and sufficient to trigger MPCs

To determine a molecular regulator of seizure- and glutamate-induced MPCs, we turned to fractalkine (CX3CL1-CX3CR1) signaling, which has been shown to be a paramount signaling mechanism for microglia–neuron interactions (Paolicelli et al., 2014). To this end, we performed imaging in slices generated after either glutamate treatment or experimental seizures induced by kainic acid or pilocarpine from CX3CR1GFP/+ and CX3CR1GFP/GFP mice. Interestingly, we found a significant reduction in the number of MPC events in CX3CR1GFP/GFP mice compared with CX3CR1GFP/+ mice (Fig. 6a–e; Movie 4), although the number of MPC events in basal conditions was not different between the genotypes (Fig 6f). In addition, this reduction in the number of MPCs did not result from a difference in the number of microglia in our imaging fields of view between genotypes (38.9 ± 1.0 cells per field of view in CX3CR1GFP/+ slices compared to 38.1 ± 1.3 cells per field of view in CX3CR1GFP/GFP slices) or in various features of the convergence events such as the time to complete the convergence (data not shown). Next, we asked whether exogenous fractalkine (CX3CL1) is sufficient to induce MPCs in cortical slices. Indeed, we found that bath application of CX3CL1 (200 ng/mL) increased MPC occurrence in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ mice (Fig. 6g, h) but failed to do so in slices from CX3CR1GFP/GFP mice (Fig. 6i). Together, these results indicate that fractalkine signaling is sufficient for MPC induction and is required for glutamate- and seizure-induced MPCs.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Fractalkine signaling is necessary and sufficient to trigger MPCs. a, b, Images from a time-lapse sequence (a) and summary schematic (b) showing converging microglial processes in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ and CX3CR1GFP/GFP after glutamate treatment. c–f, Quantification of MPC numbers in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ and CX3CR1GFP/GFP after glutamate treatment (c), kainic acid–induced seizures (d), and pilocarpine-induced seizures (e) showing reduced events in CX3CR1GFP/GFP slices as well as under basal conditions (f; n = 7–13 slices each). g–i, Quantified summary of MPC numbers after CX3CL1 (200 ng/mL) application in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ (g, h) and CX3CR1GFP/GFP (i) mice (n = 6–8 slices each). ***p < 0.001.

Movie 4.

Microglial process convergence in fractalkine receptor heterozygote (left) and knockout (right) slices after glutamate treatment. Representative time-lapse movie taken from CX3CR1GFP/+ (i.e., CX3CR1+/–, left) and CX3CR1GFP/GFP (i.e., CX3CR1–/–, right) slices showing several MPC events (arrows) after a 10-min glutamate (1 mm) treatment. This movie is 30 min long and is sped up 180×.

Glutamate-induced MPCs requires IL-1β

We attempted to determine factors downstream of fractalkine signaling that may directly induce MPCs. Because of the widespread evidence of fractalkine signaling regulating IL-1β (Cardona et al., 2006; Dénes et al., 2008; Rogers et al., 2011), we investigated its role in MPCs. Interestingly, we found that application of 30 ng/mL recombinant mouse IL-1β significantly increased MPCs in slices (Fig. 7a, b; Movie 5). This increase occurred independently of action potential firing, as the number of events were similar with IL-1β only (n = 6; 16.5 ± 1.4 events per 30 min) or IL-1β pretreated (30 min) and cotreated with TTX (1 µm; n = 8; 14.0 ± 1.4 events per 30 min). In addition, IL-1β also induced a significant increase of MPC events from mice deficient in CX3CR1 (CX3CR1GFP/GFP; Fig. 7c). To determine whether IL-1β functions downstream of CX3CL1-induced MPC (Fig. 6), we applied CX3CL1 with IL-1ra (100 ng/mL) to antagonize IL-1β function. In these experiments, IL-1ra significantly reduced the occurrence of MPCs (Fig. 7d). Finally, to confirm roles for fractalkine and IL-1β signaling in glutamate-induced MPCs, we performed glutamate experiments in the presence of either fractalkine neutralizing antibody (α-CX3CL1) or IL-1ra. Consistent with the foregoing results, glutamate failed to significantly increase MPCs in the presence of α-CX3CL1 (Fig. 7e, g) or IL-1ra (Fig. 7f, g). Together, these results indicate that glutamate-induced MPCs requires fractalkine and IL-1β signaling.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Glutamate-induced MPCs requires IL-1β. a–c, Quantified summary (a, c) and schematic representation (b) showing that IL-1β (30 ng/mL) increases MPCs in slices from both CX3CR1GFP/+ and CX3CR1GFP/GFP mice (n = 6–17 slices). d, CX3CL1-induced MPCs is blocked by IL-1ra (100 ng/mL), an IL-1β antagonist, in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ mice (n = 8–9 slices each). e–g, Glutamate-induced MPCs fails to occur in the presence of function-blocking CX3CL1 antibodies and is reduced in the presence of IL-1ra (n = 10–12 slices each). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Movie 5.

IL-1β increases MPCs. Representative time-lapse movie taken from CX3CR1GFP/+ showing that IL-1β (30 ng/mL) increases the occurrence of MPCs (arrows). This movie is 70 min long and is sped up 180×.

Neuroprotective potential of MCP

Our results indicate that MPCs generated after neuronal hyperactivity were promoted by fractalkine (Fig. 7) and purinergic (Fig. 5) signaling. To gain insights into the potential functional significance of these observations, we investigated the consequence of a deficiency of fractalkine signaling on acute seizures. It has previously been documented that in P2Y12–/– mice, kainic acid treatment resulted in worsened seizure phenotypes (Eyo et al., 2014). Interestingly, we now report that a deficiency in the CX3CR1 receptor similarly resulted in increased seizure behaviors in response to kainic acid treatment (Fig. 8a, b). In addition, at the concentrations used, 55.6% of wild-type, 64.3% of CX3CR1GFP/+, and 82.8% of CX3CR1GFP/GFP mice seized up to at least stage 3 on the modified Racine scale after kainic acid treatment (Fig. 8c). Moreover, whereas none of the wild-type and only 7.1% of the CX3CR1GFP/+ mice died, 27.3% of the CX3CR1GFP/GFP mice died within the first 2 h of kainic acid treatment. These results indicate that a CX3CR1 deficiency results in increased seizure phenotypes and animal mortality that correlates with decreased MPCs.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Neuroprotective potential of MPCs. a, b, Behavioral seizure scores in aged-matched wild type (n = 7), CX3CR1GFP/+ (n = 11), and CX3CR1GFP/GFP (n = 9) mice treated with kainic acid through time (a) and on average (b). c, Pie chart showing the percentage of mice from the seizure experiments that progressed to at least stage 3 seizures (red) along the Racine scale during the 2 h of seizure monitoring after kainic acid treatment. ***p < 0.001.

Discussion

In the current study, we investigated the real-time dynamics of microglia–neuron interactions after experimental seizures and glutamate-induced hyperactivity using two-photon microscopy. We extend the findings of previous studies and show that, in addition to depleted extracellular calcium conditions and repeated neuronal stimulation, MPCs are induced in experimental seizure models and by glutamate application. We further delved into the mechanism of MPC induction and show that NMDA receptors are required to trigger these interactions. Furthermore, we determined a molecular regulation of the MPC phenomena by fractalkine signaling through IL-1β release (Fig. 9). Finally, we correlated the CX3CR1-dependent role in MPC generation with neuroprotection during acute seizures. Our results suggest a neuroprotective bidirectional microglial–neuronal communication axis after status epilepticus and provide novel evidence for microglial–neuronal physical interactions in acute epilepsy in the brain.

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

Model for glutamate-induced MPCs by fractalkine receptor–dependent signaling through IL-1β. Our results suggest a bidirectional mechanism of MPC in which (1) excessive glutamate release (2) activates neuronal NMDA receptors, which results in (3) the release of fractalkine from neuronal membranes that activates microglial fractalkine receptors. (4) Fractalkine receptor activation subsequently triggers IL-1β release from microglia, which in turn increases neuronal excitability to elicit (5) a localized release of ATP at specific dendritic hotspots. Finally, (6) ATP released from these hotspots attracts microglial processes via P2Y12 receptor to converge at the release site.

Microglial process convergence: a distinct form of microglial–neuronal physical interactions

In this study, we report MPCs, a novel form of microglia–neuron physical interactions, that are dramatically increased after status epilepticus. It is important to note that the seizure-induced MPC event described here is distinct from the transient process extension phenomena previously reported (Dissing-Olesen et al., 2014; Eyo et al., 2014), even though both are NMDA and P2Y12 dependent. They are different in that although (a) process extension is exhibited by all processes (global) at a given time point after glutamate/NMDA treatment, MPCs are exhibited by select processes at a given time point in a focalized (local) manner, (b) process extension occurs only immediately after glutamate/NMDA treatment, MPCs persist for hours even after the withdrawal of the inducing agent, and (c) process extension is mechanistically independent of fractalkine signaling, whereas MPCs require it. These and other considerations indicate that MPCs represent a novel form of microglia–neuron physical interactions distinct from NMDA-dependent microglial process extension.

More importantly, MPCs triggered during hyperactive neuronal conditions as reported here are also distinct from MPCs previously reported under reduced [Ca2+]o conditions (Eyo et al., 2015) and repeated neuronal depolarization (Kato et al., 2016) for several reasons. First, MPCs under reduced [Ca2+]o conditions do not require NMDA receptors or action potentials, as they are not blocked with AP5 treatment (data not shown). Although low extracellular calcium levels are known to occur in epileptic contexts (Wadman et al., 1985; Heinemann et al., 1986; Konnerth et al., 1986), removal of extracellular calcium or doubling the extracellular calcium concentration did not alter the occurrence of MPCs in response to glutamate (data not shown), suggesting that glutamate-induced MPCs are not regulated by extracellular calcium concentrations. Similarly, MPCs after repeated neuronal stimulation required action potentials (Kato et al., 2016), whereas seizure-induced MPCs did not. Second, MPCs under reduced [Ca2+]o conditions are not modulated by fractalkine signaling, as they are unaltered in CX3CR1GFP/GFP mice. Third, MPCs elicited after repeated neuronal stimulation are directed toward axons, whereas the reported seizure-induced MPCs in our study are directed toward dendrites. However, because the various phenomena require microglial P2Y12 receptors, it is likely that the localized ATP release is similar under the different conditions. However, it remains to be determined whether common mechanisms are used to release ATP from neuronal dendrites in reduced [Ca2+]o conditions, repeated neuronal stimulation, and after status epilepticus. Together, these considerations indicate that we have uncovered a unique form of microglia–neuron physical interactions in response to seizure activities in the brain.

The mechanism of MPCs

Microglial interactions with neuronal elements in real time have been widely evidenced (Wake et al., 2009; Tremblay et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012; Dissing-Olesen et al., 2014; Eyo et al., 2014, 2015; Kato et al., 2016). However, factors that modulate such interactions have not been identified. Over the last decade, a wealth of data has shown important roles for fractalkine signaling between microglia and neurons in the developing and mature CNS (Limatola and Ransohoff, 2014; Paolicelli et al., 2014), but this unique signaling axis has not been sufficiently interrogated with regard to microglia–neuron physical interactions. Here, we found that fractalkine signaling is critical for this interaction, showing reduced MPCs in CX3CR1-deficient tissues after glutamate application and in two seizure models. Although fractalkine signaling did not play a significant role in microglial process outgrowth to neuronal NMDA receptor activation (Dissing-Olesen et al., 2014) or microglial interactions with the axon initial segment of neurons (Baalman et al., 2015), it would be of interest to determine whether fractalkine signaling regulation is also present in previously described interactions such as the bulbous presynaptic, postsynaptic, and somata contacts of neurons by microglial processes (Wake et al., 2009; Tremblay et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012).

Our results suggest the following bidirectional mechanism for MPCs on to neuronal dendrites: after increased glutamate release, (1) neuronal NMDARs activation results in (2) the release of CX3CL1 from neuronal membranes that (3) activates microglial CX3CR1. CX3CR1 activation subsequently (4) triggers IL-1β release (presumably from microglia), which in turn (5) acts on neuronal dendrites triggering localized release of ATP that then elicits the localized convergence of microglial processes through P2Y12 receptors (Fig. 9). Consistent with our results, previous studies reported that cultured cortical neurons release CX3CL1 after an acute transient exposure to glutamate in an NMDAR-dependent manner (Chapman et al., 2000; Noda et al., 2011), and CX3CL1 treatment increases IL-1β levels in CNS tissues (Johnston et al., 2004; Clark et al., 2015). These lines of evidence strongly imply a role for fractalkine signaling–dependent release of IL-1β in seizure-/glutamate-induced MPCs. IL-1β, itself, is known to trigger ATP release when applied to slices (Sperlágh et al., 2004), and seizures increase IL-1β levels (Avignone et al., 2008), with microglia as the primary cells secreting IL-1β early during seizures (Eriksson et al., 1999; Vezzani et al., 1999, 2008b). Moreover, this release has been linked, at least in part, to a prior NMDAR activation (Eriksson et al., 2000; Jander et al., 2000). Presumably, the mechanism of action for IL-1β occurs through activating its receptors, which are predominantly expressed by neurons in the naive CNS (Ban et al., 1991; Ban, 1994). Consistent with our model, IL-1β has been shown to enhance neuronal excitability (Vezzani et al., 2008a; Vezzani and Viviani, 2014). Moreover, IL-1β depresses GABAergic neurotransmission (Wang et al., 2000), indirectly enhancing glutamatergic neurotransmission. Thus, IL-1β may induce MPCs by concomitantly enhancing NMDAR function and inhibiting GABAergic neuronal inhibition, resulting in an overall increase in neuronal excitability. Alternatively, IL-1β may trigger the opening of as-yet-unidentified channels through which ATP may be released in a localized fashion to mediate the defined convergence. Although the precise mechanism by which IL-1β acting on neurons would trigger ATP release remains to be determined, ATP and ADP are widely recognized to mediate microglial process chemotaxis through P2Y12Rs (Honda et al., 2001; Davalos et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2007).

The pathological relevance of MPCs

Because glutamate transporters efficiently limit the extracellular concentration of glutamate, it is unlikely that our findings are relevant for healthy brain conditions. Consistent with this fact, we detected a low MPC frequency in both naive brain slices and the intact cortex in vivo. However, because we found that the phenomenon could be elicited by shorter durations and lower concentrations of glutamate, we cannot rule out the possibility that MPCs could be triggered in the healthy brain during periods of intense physiological activity. In any case, our data suggest that the phenomenon is most relevant for conditions in which there is (even transient) increase in extracellular glutamate levels. Localized puff applications of glutamate did not reliably elicit MPCs (data not shown), suggesting that more global (rather than local) alterations in glutamate-dependent network activity are required for MPC induction. Indeed, we were able to observe an increase in MPCs in both brain slices and in vivo after experimental seizures, when global synchronized increases in neuronal network activities are known to occur.

In summary, we report here the existence of a novel microglia–neuron physical interaction phenomenon, microglial process convergence, or MPCs, that occurs after elevated glutamate levels in the murine cortex and is relevant during epileptic pathologies. Furthermore, we have determined some of the key players in the mechanism underlying the bidirectional communication between microglia and neurons, such as fractalkine signaling, IL-1β release, and P2Y12R-induced chemotaxis. Our results show a correlation between reduced MPCs (Figs. 5 and 7) and increased seizure severity and animal mortality with genetic depletion of microglial P2Y12 receptors (Eyo et al., 2014) and CX3CR1 receptors (Fig. 8). Although this relationship is not clearly causal between the two phenomena, it is suggestive of a neuroprotective relationship between MPCs and seizure consequences.

Footnotes

  • Authors report no conflict of interest.

  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [R01NS088627] [100000065]; HHS | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [100000066].

  • Received July 17, 2016.
  • Revision received November 22, 2016.
  • Accepted December 20, 2016.
  • Copyright © 2016 Eyo et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. Avignone E, Ulmann L, Levavasseur F, Rassendren F, Audinat E (2008) Status epilepticus induces a particular microglial activation state characterized by enhanced purinergic signaling. J Neurosci 28:9133–9144. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1820-08.2008 pmid:18784294
  2. Baalman K, Marin MA, Ho TS, Godoy M, Cherian L, Robertson C, Rasband MN (2015) Axon initial segment-associated microglia. J Neurosci 35:2283–2292. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3751-14.2015 pmid:25653382
  3. Ban E, Milon G, Prudhomme N, Fillion G, Haour F (1991) Receptors for interleukin-1 (alpha and beta) in mouse brain: mapping and neuronal localization in hippocampus. Neuroscience 43:21–30. pmid:1833666
  4. Ban EM (1994) Interleukin-1 receptors in the brain: characterization by quantitative in situ autoradiography. Immunomethods 5:31–40. pmid:7842248
  5. Ben Achour S, Pascual O (2012) Astrocyte-neuron communication: functional consequences. Neurochem Res 37:2464–2473. doi:10.1007/s11064-012-0807-0 pmid:22669630
  6. Bikson M, Ghai RS, Baraban SC, Durand DM (1999) Modulation of burst frequency, duration, and amplitude in the zero-Ca(2+) model of epileptiform activity. J Neurophysiol 82:2262–2270. pmid:10561404
  7. Cardona AE, Pioro EP, Sasse ME, Kostenko V, Cardona SM, Dijkstra IM, Huang D, Kidd G, Dombrowski S, Dutta R, Lee JC, Cook DN, Jung S, Lira SA, Littman DR, Ransohoff RM (2006) Control of microglial neurotoxicity by the fractalkine receptor. Nat Neurosci 9:917–924. doi:10.1038/nn1715 pmid:16732273
  8. Cavus I, Kasoff WS, Cassaday MP, Jacob R, Gueorguieva R, Sherwin RS, Krystal JH, Spencer DD, Abi-Saab WM (2005) Extracellular metabolites in the cortex and hippocampus of epileptic patients. Ann Neurol 57:226–235. doi:10.1002/ana.20380 pmid:15668975
  9. Cavus I, Pan JW, Hetherington HP, Abi-Saab W, Zaveri HP, Vives KP, Krystal JH, Spencer SS, Spencer DD (2008) Decreased hippocampal volume on MRI is associated with increased extracellular glutamate in epilepsy patients. Epilepsia 49:1358–1366. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01603.x pmid:18410365
  10. Chapman GA, Moores K, Harrison D, Campbell CA, Stewart BR, Strijbos PJ (2000) Fractalkine cleavage from neuronal membranes represents an acute event in the inflammatory response to excitotoxic brain damage. J Neurosci 20:RC87. pmid:10899174
  11. Chen Q, Cichon J, Wang W, Qiu L, Lee SJ, Campbell NR, Destefino N, Goard MJ, Fu Z, Yasuda R, Looger LL, Arenkiel BR, Gan WB, Feng G (2012) Imaging neural activity using Thy1-GCaMP transgenic mice. Neuron 76:297–308. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.011 pmid:23083733
  12. Clark AK, Gruber-Schoffnegger D, Drdla-Schutting R, Gerhold KJ, Malcangio M, Sandkühler J (2015) Selective activation of microglia facilitates synaptic strength. J Neurosci 35:4552–4570. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2061-14.2015 pmid:25788673
  13. Dalby NO, Mody I (2001) The process of epileptogenesis: a pathophysiological approach. Curr Opin Neurol 14:187–192. pmid:11262734
  14. Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, Littman DR, Dustin ML, Gan WB (2005) ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci 8:752–758. doi:10.1038/nn1472 pmid:15895084
  15. Dénes A, Ferenczi S, Halász J, Környei Z, Kovécs KJ (2008) Role of CX3CR1 (fractalkine receptor) in brain damage and inflammation induced by focal cerebral ischemia in mouse. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28:1707–1721. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2008.64 pmid:18575457
  16. Devinsky O, Vezzani A, Najjar S, De Lanerolle NC, Rogawski MA (2013) Glia and epilepsy: excitability and inflammation. Trends Neurosci 36:174–184. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.11.008 pmid:23298414
  17. Dissing-Olesen L, LeDue JM, Rungta RL, Hefendehl JK, Choi HB, MacVicar BA (2014) Activation of neuronal NMDA receptors triggers transient ATP-mediated microglial process outgrowth. J Neurosci 34:10511–10527. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0405-14.2014 pmid:25100586
  18. Eriksson C, Zou LP, Ahlenius S, Winblad B, Schultzberg M (2000) Inhibition of kainic acid induced expression of interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist mRNA in the rat brain by NMDA receptor antagonists. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 85:103–113. pmid:11146112
  19. Eriksson C, Van Dam AM, Lucassen PJ, Bol JG, Winblad B, Schultzberg M (1999) Immunohistochemical localization of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and interleukin-1beta converting enzyme/caspase-1 in the rat brain after peripheral administration of kainic acid. Neuroscience 93:915–930. pmid:10473257
  20. Eyo UB, Murugan M, Wu LJ (2016) Microglia-neuron communication in epilepsy. Glia 65:5–18.
  21. Eyo UB, Peng J, Swiatkowski P, Mukherjee A, Bispo A, Wu LJ (2014) Neuronal hyperactivity recruits microglial processes via neuronal NMDA receptors and microglial P2Y12 receptors after status epilepticus. J Neurosci 34:10528–10540. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0416-14.2014 pmid:25100587
  22. Eyo UB, Gu N, De S, Dong H, Richardson JR, Wu LJ (2015) Modulation of microglial process convergence toward neuronal dendrites by extracellular calcium. J Neurosci 35:2417–2422. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3279-14.2015 pmid:25673836
  23. Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, Nerbonne JM, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR (2000) Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 28:41–51. pmid:11086982
  24. Fisher RS, van Emde Boas W, Blume W, Elger C, Genton P, Lee P, Engel J Jr. (2005) Epileptic seizures and epilepsy: definitions proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE). Epilepsia 46:470–472. doi:10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.66104.x
  25. Hanisch UK, Kettenmann H (2007) Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat Neurosci 10:1387–1394. doi:10.1038/nn1997 pmid:17965659
  26. Heinemann U, Konnerth A, Pumain R, Wadman WJ (1986) Extracellular calcium and potassium concentration changes in chronic epileptic brain tissue. Adv Neurol 44:641–661. pmid:3518350
  27. Honda S, Sasaki Y, Ohsawa K, Imai Y, Nakamura Y, Inoue K, Kohsaka S (2001) Extracellular ATP or ADP induce chemotaxis of cultured microglia through Gi/o-coupled P2Y receptors. J Neurosci 21:1975–1982. pmid:11245682
  28. Jander S, Schroeter M, Stoll G (2000) Role of NMDA receptor signaling in the regulation of inflammatory gene expression after focal brain ischemia. J Neuroimmunol 109:181–187. pmid:10996220
  29. Johnston IN, Milligan ED, Wieseler-Frank J, Frank MG, Zapata V, Campisi J, Langer S, Martin D, Green P, Fleshner M, Leinwand L, Maier SF, Watkins LR (2004) A role for proinflammatory cytokines and fractalkine in analgesia, tolerance, and subsequent pain facilitation induced by chronic intrathecal morphine. J Neurosci 24:7353–7365. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1850-04.2004 pmid:15317861
  30. Jung S, Aliberti J, Graemmel P, Sunshine MJ, Kreutzberg GW, Sher A, Littman DR (2000) Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol Cell Biol 20:4106–4114. pmid:10805752
  31. Kato G, Inada H, Wake H, Akiyoshi R, Miyamoto A, Eto K, Ishikawa T, Moorhouse AJ, Strassman AM, Nabekura J (2016) Microglial contact prevents excess depolarization and rescues neurons from excitotoxicity. eNeuro 3:0004.16. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0004-16.2016
  32. Konnerth A, Heinemann U, Yaari Y (1986) Nonsynaptic epileptogenesis in the mammalian hippocampus in vitro. I. Development of seizurelike activity in low extracellular calcium. J Neurophysiol 56:409–423. pmid:3760928
  33. Kwan P, Brodie MJ (2006) Refractory epilepsy: mechanisms and solutions. Expert Rev Neurother 6:397–406. doi:10.1586/14737175.6.3.397 pmid:16533143
  34. Li Y, Du XF, Liu CS, Wen ZL, Du JL (2012) Reciprocal regulation between resting microglial dynamics and neuronal activity in vivo. Dev Cell 23:1189–1202. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.027 pmid:23201120
  35. Limatola C, Ransohoff RM (2014) Modulating neurotoxicity through CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling. Front Cell Neurosci 8:229. doi:10.3389/fncel.2014.00229 pmid:25152714
  36. Maggi L, Scianni M, Branchi I, D’Andrea I, Lauro C, Limatola C (2011) CX(3)CR1 deficiency alters hippocampal-dependent plasticity phenomena blunting the effects of enriched environment. Front Cell Neurosci 5:22. doi:10.3389/fncel.2011.00022 pmid:22025910
  37. Noda M, Doi Y, Liang J, Kawanokuchi J, Sonobe Y, Takeuchi H, Mizuno T, Suzumura A (2011) Fractalkine attenuates excito-neurotoxicity via microglial clearance of damaged neurons and antioxidant enzyme heme oxygenase-1 expression. J Biol Chem 286:2308–2319. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.169839 pmid:21071446
  38. Paolicelli RC, Bisht K, Tremblay ME (2014) Fractalkine regulation of microglial physiology and consequences on the brain and behavior. Front Cell Neurosci 8:129. doi:10.3389/fncel.2014.00129 pmid:24860431
  39. Racine RJ (1972) Modification of seizure activity by electrical stimulation. II. Motor seizure. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 32:281–294. pmid:4110397
  40. Ransohoff RM, Perry VH (2009) Microglial physiology: unique stimuli, specialized responses. Annu Rev Immunol 27:119–145. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132528 pmid:19302036
  41. Ravizza T, Balosso S, Vezzani A (2011) Inflammation and prevention of epileptogenesis. Neurosci Lett 497:223–230. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.02.040 pmid:21362451
  42. Rogers JT, Morganti JM, Bachstetter AD, Hudson CE, Peters MM, Grimmig BA, Weeber EJ, Bickford PC, Gemma C (2011) CX3CR1 deficiency leads to impairment of hippocampal cognitive function and synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci 31:16241–16250. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3667-11.2011 pmid:22072675
  43. Sharma AK, Reams RY, Jordan WH, Miller MA, Thacker HL, Snyder PW (2007) Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: pathogenesis, induced rodent models and lesions. Toxicol Pathol 35:984–999. doi:10.1080/01926230701748305 pmid:18098044
  44. Sperlágh B, Baranyi M, Haskó G, Vizi ES (2004) Potent effect of interleukin-1 beta to evoke ATP and adenosine release from rat hippocampal slices. J Neuroimmunol 151:33–39. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.02.004 pmid:15145601
  45. Tang Z, Gan Y, Liu Q, Yin JX, Liu Q, Shi J, Shi FD (2014) CX3CR1 deficiency suppresses activation and neurotoxicity of microglia/macrophage in experimental ischemic stroke. J Neuroinflammation 11:26. doi:10.1186/1742-2094-11-26 pmid:24490760
  46. Temkin NR (2009) Preventing and treating posttraumatic seizures: the human experience. Epilepsia 50: Suppl 2:10–13. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.02005.x pmid:19187289
  47. Thurman DJ, et al. (2011) Standards for epidemiologic studies and surveillance of epilepsy. Epilepsia 52: Suppl 7:2–26. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03121.x pmid:21899536
  48. Torres A, Wang F, Xu Q, Fujita T, Dobrowolski R, Willecke K, Takano T, Nedergaard M (2012) Extracellular Ca(2)(+) acts as a mediator of communication from neurons to glia. Sci Signal 5:ra8. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002160 pmid:22275221
  49. Tremblay ME, Lowery RL, Majewska AK (2010) Microglial interactions with synapses are modulated by visual experience. PLoS Biol 8:e1000527. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000527 pmid:21072242
  50. Vezzani A, Viviani B (2014) Neuromodulatory properties of inflammatory cytokines and their impact on neuronal excitability. Neuropharmacology 96(Pt A):70–82.
  51. Vezzani A, Balosso S, Ravizza T (2008a) The role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. Brain Behav Immun 22:797–803. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2008.03.009 pmid:18495419
  52. Vezzani A, Ravizza T, Balosso S, Aronica E (2008b) Glia as a source of cytokines: implications for neuronal excitability and survival. Epilepsia 49: Suppl 2:24–32. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01490.x pmid:18226169
  53. Vezzani A, Aronica E, Mazarati A, Pittman QJ (2013) Epilepsy and brain inflammation. Exp Neurol 244:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.09.033 pmid:21985866
  54. Vezzani A, Conti M, De Luigi A, Ravizza T, Moneta D, Marchesi F, De Simoni MG (1999) Interleukin-1beta immunoreactivity and microglia are enhanced in the rat hippocampus by focal kainate application: functional evidence for enhancement of electrographic seizures. J Neurosci 19:5054-5065.
  55. Wadman WJ, Heinemann U, Konnerth A, Neuhaus S (1985) Hippocampal slices of kindled rats reveal calcium involvement in epileptogenesis. Exp Brain Res 57:404–407. pmid:2982635
  56. Wake H, Moorhouse AJ, Jinno S, Kohsaka S, Nabekura J (2009) Resting microglia directly monitor the functional state of synapses in vivo and determine the fate of ischemic terminals. J Neurosci 29:3974–3980. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4363-08.2009 pmid:19339593
  57. Wang S, Cheng Q, Malik S, Yang J (2000) Interleukin-1beta inhibits gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor current in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292:497–504. pmid:10640285
  58. Wu LJ, Vadakkan KI, Zhuo M (2007) ATP-induced chemotaxis of microglial processes requires P2Y receptor-activated initiation of outward potassium currents. Glia 55:810–821. doi:10.1002/glia.20500 pmid:17357150
  59. Xiao F, Xu JM, Jiang XH (2015) CX3 chemokine receptor 1 deficiency leads to reduced dendritic complexity and delayed maturation of newborn neurons in the adult mouse hippocampus. Neural Regen Res 10:772–777. doi:10.4103/1673-5374.156979 pmid:26109952
  60. Zhan Y, Paolicelli RC, Sforazzini F, Weinhard L, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Vyssotski AL, Bifone A, Gozzi A, Ragozzino D, Gross CT (2014) Deficient neuron-microglia signaling results in impaired functional brain connectivity and social behavior. Nat Neurosci 17:400–406. doi:10.1038/nn.3641 pmid:24487234

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Christian Lüscher, University of Geneva

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Alfonso Araque.

Authors have satisfactorily addressed the concerns raised about the previous version.

I have no further comments.

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.