Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Development

JNK Signaling Regulates Cellular Mechanics of Cortical Interneuron Migration

Skye E. Smith, Nicholas K. Coker and Eric S. Tucker
eNeuro 31 July 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0132-20.2020; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0132-20.2020
Skye E. Smith
1Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506
2Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506
3WVU Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas K. Coker
1Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric S. Tucker
1Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506
3WVU Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eric S. Tucker

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Aberrant migration of inhibitory interneurons can alter the formation of cortical circuitry and lead to severe neurologic disorders including epilepsy, autism, and schizophrenia. However, mechanisms involved in directing the migration of interneurons remain incompletely understood. Using a mouse model, we performed live-cell confocal microscopy to explore the mechanisms by which the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway coordinates leading process branching and nucleokinesis, two cell biological processes that are essential for the guided migration of cortical interneurons. Pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling disrupts the kinetics of leading process branching, rate and amplitude of nucleokinesis, and leads to the rearward mislocalization of the centrosome and primary cilium to the trailing process. Genetic loss of Jnk from interneurons also impairs leading process branching and nucleokinesis, suggesting that important mechanics of interneuron migration depend on the intrinsic activity of JNK. These findings highlight key roles for JNK signaling in leading process branching, nucleokinesis, and the trafficking of centrosomes and cilia during interneuron migration, and further implicates JNK signaling as an important mediator of cortical development.

  • cerebral cortex
  • development
  • GABAergic interneuron
  • intracellular signaling
  • live imaging
  • neuronal migration

Significance Statement

Unlike their excitatory counterparts, inhibitory interneurons are generated in the ventral forebrain and migrate long distances to reach the cerebral cortex. Although many factors influencing the guided migration of cortical interneurons have been elucidated, the role of intracellular signaling pathways in interneuron migration have remained elusive. Here, we show with single cell resolution that the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway coordinates multiple cellular mechanisms that direct the migration of cortical interneurons, including leading process branching, nucleokinesis, and the subcellular positioning of the centrosome-cilia complex. Furthermore, we show that cortical interneuron migration depends on the intrinsic activity of JNK. These results provide new insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling cortical interneuron migration in normal and pathologic brain development.

Introduction

During embryonic development, cortical interneurons are born in the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) and caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE) of the ventral forebrain and then migrate long distances to reach the place of their terminal differentiation in the overlying cerebral cortex (Wichterle et al., 1999; Nery et al., 2002; Xu et al., 2004; Miyoshi et al., 2010). While navigating their environments, cortical interneurons must integrate extracellular guidance cues with intracellular machinery to reach the cortex, travel in tangentially oriented migratory streams, and disembark from streams at the correct time and place to properly infiltrate the cortical plate. Two cellular mechanisms that enable interneurons to make these complex migratory decisions are leading process branching, where cortical interneurons dynamically remodel their leading processes to sense and respond to extracellular guidance cues, and nucleokinesis, where interneurons propel their cell bodies forward in the selected direction of migration (Polleux et al., 2002; Ang et al., 2003; Nadarajah et al., 2003; Moya and Valdeolmillos, 2004; Bellion et al., 2005). Moreover, proper positioning and signaling from two subcellular organelles, the centrosome and primary cilium, have been implicated in the guided migration of cortical interneurons (Higginbotham et al., 2012; Yanagida et al., 2012; Luccardini et al., 2013, 2015). Failure to coordinate these cellular and subcellular events can alter cortical interneuron migration and impair the development of cortical circuitry, which may underlie severe neurologic disorders such as autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and epilepsy (Kato and Dobyns, 2005; Hildebrandt et al., 2011; Meechan et al., 2012; Volk et al., 2015). While progress has been made on elucidating the complex molecular mechanisms underlying nucleokinesis and leading process branching (Tsai and Gleeson, 2005; Baudoin et al., 2012; Godin et al., 2012; Silva et al., 2018), the intracellular signaling pathways that regulate these cellular mechanisms remain largely unknown.

The c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNKs) are evolutionarily conserved members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) super-family (Davis, 2000; Chang and Karin, 2001). The JNK proteins are encoded by three genes, Jnk1 (Mapk8), Jnk2 (Mapk9), and Jnk3 (Mapk10). JNKs phosphorylate numerous substrates in response to extracellular stimuli to mediate physiological processes including cellular proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and migration (Davis, 2000).

JNK signaling has been implicated in multiple aspects of brain development, including neuronal migration in the cerebral cortex (Hirai et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2007; Westerlund et al., 2011; Yamasaki et al., 2011; Myers et al., 2014, 2020; Zhang et al., 2016). Indeed, our laboratory previously demonstrated that JNK function is required for the proper timing of interneuron entry into the cerebral cortex (Myers et al., 2014), as well as the tangential progression of interneurons in migratory streams (Myers et al., 2020). However, these previous studies did not assess the influence of JNK on the cellular mechanics of individual cortical interneurons during migration.

In the current study, we extend on those findings by using a combination of pharmacological and genetic manipulations in an MGE explant cortical cell coculture assay to demonstrate that interneurons require JNK-signaling to regulate leading process branching and nucleokinesis. JNK-inhibited MGE interneurons dramatically slow their migration while displaying more variable speeds, and exhibit decreased migratory displacement. Concomitantly, JNK-inhibited interneurons display significant defects in leading process branching with decreased growth cone splitting frequency and interstitial side branch duration, as well as disrupted nucleokinesis and swelling dynamics. Genetic ablation of Jnk from MGE interneurons results in leading process branching defects, which were similar to pharmacologic inhibition, and nucleokinesis defects, which were distinct. Nevertheless, migratory deficits resulting from interneuron-specific loss of JNK function indicates that interneurons have a cell-intrinsic requirement for JNK signaling during migration. In addition, we discovered a novel role for JNK signaling in the dynamic localization of the centrosome and primary cilium in migrating interneurons. Surprisingly, the centrosomes and the primary cilia of JNK-inhibited interneurons aberrantly localized to the cell body or trailing process, regardless of whether the leading process contained a swelling. These findings implicate the JNK pathway as a key intracellular mediator of leading process branching, nucleokinesis, and organelle dynamics in migrating MGE interneurons.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Animals were housed and cared for by the Office of Laboratory Animal Resources at West Virginia University. Timed-pregnant dams [day of vaginal plug = embryonic day (E)0.5] were euthanized by rapid cervical dislocation at E14.5, and mouse embryos were immediately harvested for tissue culture. CF-1 (Charles River) or C57BL/6J dams (stock #000664; The Jackson Laboratory) were crossed to hemizygous Dlx5/6-Cre-IRES-EGFP (Dlx5/6-CIE; Stenman et al., 2003) males maintained on a C57BL/6J background to achieve timed pregnancies at E14.5. To generate JNK triple knock-out embryos at E14.5, Jnk1fl/fl; Jnk2−/−; Jnk3−/− dams were crossed to Dlx5/6-CIE; Jnk1fl/+; Jnk2−/−; Jnk3+/− males maintained on a C57BL/6J background. All animal procedures were performed in accordance to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at West Virginia University.

MGE explant cortical cell coculture

Eight-well chamber coverslip slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific 155411) were coated with a solution of poly-L-lysine (Sigma P5899) and laminin (Sigma L2020) diluted in sterile water (Polleux and Ghosh, 2002), incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2, and rinsed with sterile water before cell plating. E14.5 Dlx5/6-CIE+ and Dlx5/6-CIE- embryos were sorted by GFP fluorescence and dissected in ice-cold complete HBSS (cHBSS; Tucker et al., 2006). Cortices were dissected from the negative brains and pooled together for dissociation (Polleux and Ghosh, 2002). After dissociation, 250 µl of cell suspension diluted to 1680 cells/µl was added to each well and allowed to settle for 2 h. MGE explants were dissected from GFP+ brains and plated on top of cortical cells. Cultures were grown for 24 h before treatments and live imaging. Two E14.5 timed-pregnant dams were used for each genetic experiment. Dlx5/6-CIE+ and Dlx5/6-CIE- embryos were obtained from a Dlx5/6-Cre-IRES-EGFP x C57BL/6J cross, while cTKO embryos were obtained by crossing a Dlx5/6-CIE; Jnk1fl/+; Jnk2−/−; Jnk3+/− male to a Jnk1fl/fl; Jnk2−/−; Jnk3−/− dam. MGE explants from Dlx5/6-CIE+ wild-type (WT) and cTKO embryos were dissected and plated into separate wells containing a monolayer of Dlx5/6-CIE- WT cortical cells. Cultures were grown 24 h before live imaging.

Electroporations

Intact ventral forebrains were microdissected from Dlx5/6-CIE+ embryos and placed on thin slices of 3% low-melting point agarose (Fisher BP165-25) in cHBSS. Agar slices containing ventral forebrain tissue were placed onto a positive genepaddles electrode (5 × 7 mm; Harvard Apparatus Inc #45-0123) from a BTX ECM 830 squarewave electroporation system under a stereo microscope. Endotoxin-free plasmid DNA (1–3 mg/ml) for Cetn2-mCherry and Arl13b-tdTomato (gift from Eva Anton) was injected into the MGE with a picospritzer (6 ms/spritz; General Valve Picospritzer II), a negative genepaddles electrode (5 × 7 mm; Harvard Apparatus Inc #45-0123) containing a droplet of cHBSS was lowered to the tissue, and electroporated (5 × 60 mV/5-ms pulse length/200-ms interval pulses). Electroporated MGE explants were then dissected, plated as above, and grown for 48 h before imaging.

Live imaging experiments

Cultures were treated with pre-warmed 37°C serum-free media containing a 1:1000 dilution of DMSO for vehicle control or 20 μm SP600125 pan-JNK inhibitor (Enzo Life Sciences BML-EI305-0010) and immediately transferred to a Zeiss 710 Confocal Microscope with stable environmental controls maintained at 37°C with 5% humidified CO2. Multiposition time-lapse z-series were acquired at 10-min intervals over a 12-h period with a 20× Plan-Apo objective (Zeiss) for overall migration analysis, nucleokinesis distance, and swelling distance measurements. For measurements requiring higher temporal and spatial resolution, such as swelling duration, branch dynamics, and visualization of subcellular structures in electroporated cells, cultures were imaged using multiposition time-lapse z-series at 2- to 2.5-min intervals over a 4- to 10-h period with a 40× C-apochromat 1.2-W M27 objective (Zeiss).

Live imaging analyses

4D live imaging movies were analyzed using Imaris 9.5.1 (Bitplane) software. Movies collected at 20× were evaluated in the first 12 h of each recording. Individual interneurons were manually tracked by placing a “spot” in the center of the cell body in each frame of the movie for a minimum of 4 h. Tracks were discontinued if a cell remained stationary for 60 contiguous minutes, or if the tracked cell could no longer be unambiguously identified. All tracks from each movie were averaged together for dynamic analyses, which included migratory speed, distance, displacement, and track straightness. Displacement was normalized to the minimum track length of 4 h to account for differences in the total times of tracked cells. For pharmacology data, a minimum of 10 cells were tracked from n = 11 movies 127 cells/condition) obtained over four experimental days. Genetic data were acquired from a minimum of 10 cells measured from n = 13 control movies (five WT embryos, 130 cells) and n = 12 conditional triple knock-out (cTKO) movies (five cTKO embryos, 120 cTKO cells), each obtained over four experimental days.

The distance of each nucleokinesis event was measured from the front of the cell body before and after translocation. For swelling analyses, a swelling was defined as a cytoplasmic dilation in the leading process. Swelling distance was measured from the front of the cell body to the most distal portion of the swelling. For pharmacological data, 50 cells were measured from n = 10 movies obtained over four experimental days in each condition. For genetic data, nucleokinesis distance measurements included 50 cells sampled from n = 10 movies obtained over four experimental days (five cTKO embryos, five WT embryos). Pharmacological swelling duration data were obtained from 43 control cells measured from n = 10 control movies, and 53 treated cells from n = 6 SP600125 movies collected over four experimental days. Genetic swelling duration was obtained from 37 WT cells from n = 6 WT movies with five WT embryos, and 38 cTKO cells from n = 6 cTKO movies obtained over four experimental days with four cTKO embryos.

For branching analyses, a growth cone split was defined as a bifurcation emerging from the tip of the leading process. An interstitial side branch was defined as a branch arising from the leading process that did not originate from the growth cone. Interneurons had to remain in frame and distinguishable from surrounding cells for a minimum of 3 h to be included in branching analyses. Interstitial side branches had to form de novo, persist for a minimum of 10 min, and the branch could not become the new leading process. In pharmacological experiments, frequency data for interstitial side branch formation were obtained by measuring n = 19 control cells from eight movies and n = 19 SP600125 cells from 10 movies recorded over five experimental days. Data for interstitial side branch duration were obtained from n = 52 branches from 14 control cells and n = 52 branches from 18 SP600125 cells measured from 10 movies/condition collected over five experimental days. Data for growth cone splitting were obtained from n = 19 control cells from eight movies and n = 19 SP600125 cells from 10 movies collected over five experimental days. In genetic experiments, data for interstitial side branch frequency were obtained by measuring n = 11 cells from six movies/condition collected over four experimental days. Data for side branch duration were obtained from n = 34 branches in 10 WT cells and n = 28 branches in 10 cTKO cells recorded from six movies/condition collected over four experimental days. The frequency of growth cone splitting in genetic experiments were obtained from n = 11 cells in six movies/genotype collected over four experimental days.

For electroporation experiments, centrosome and ciliary localization and distance from the front of the cell body were manually tracked and recorded using Imaris software. For centrosome measurements, n = 20 cells were analyzed from 11 movies in each condition obtained over five experimental days. For primary cilia measurements, n = 20 cells were analyzed from 15 movies in each condition obtained over six experimental days. Two-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s LSD post hoc analyses were performed to determine statistical differences for organelle localization (Prism Version 8 using GraphPad Software). Statistical significances were determined by χ2 test for the presence of organelles to a formed swelling over time (Prism Version 8 using GraphPad Software). Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests were used to determine statistical differences between groups for distance measurements. Length of primary cilia were measured in Imaris based on Arl13b-tdTomato expression. Any cilia that extended outside of the Z-stack were excluded from analyses. Data represent the average ciliary length measured over time per cell. A total of n = 17 control and n = 15 SP600125 cells collected over 13 movies and six experimental days were analyzed. Statistical differences between ciliary length measurements were determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests. Confocal micrographs were uniformly adjusted for levels, brightness, and contrast in Imaris for movie preparation, and Adobe Photoshop for figure images.

Statistics

Data were analyzed and graphs were produced using Prism Version 8 (GraphPad Software) or estimation coding software (Ho et al., 2019). For estimation statistics, data are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots. A total of 5000 bootstrap samples were taken, and the 95% confidence interval is bias corrected. For graphs not containing estimation statistics, data are presented in scatter plots with solid lines corresponding to the mean ± SEM as indicated in figures and results text. Statistical details can be found in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Summary of statistical analyses

Results

Pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling disrupts MGE interneuron migration in vitro

In order to determine the cellular mechanisms by which JNK signaling influences cortical interneuron migration, we examined the migratory dynamics of individual cortical interneurons grown from MGE explants in control or JNK-inhibited conditions. MGE explants from E14.5 Dlx5/6-Cre-IRES-EGFP (Dlx5/6-CIE)-positive embryos were cultured on top of a Dlx5/6-CIE-negative (WT) monolayer of dissociated cortical cells for 24 h (Fig. 1A). We then treated cultures with SP600125, a pan inhibitor of JNK signaling (Bennett et al., 2001), or vehicle control and immediately performed live-cell imaging for 12 h (Fig. 1A). We treated cultures with 20 μm SP600125 since this concentration of inhibitor caused significant deficiencies in interneuron migration without altering cell viability in previous dosage series and live imaging experiments (Myers et al., 2014, 2020). At the beginning of the imaging period (time 0), the field of view was placed at the distal edge of interneuron outgrowth (Fig. 1B,C).

Extended Data Figure 1-1

JNK inhibition results in migratory deficits of cortical interneurons regardless of average migratory speed. A, Average migratory speed of individual interneurons in control and JNK inhibited conditions. Red dashed lines highlight cells migrating at the same average speed (35–40 µm/h). Data are individual data points with 5000 bootstrap sampling distribution with the mean difference between control and SP600125-treated conditions on the right y-axis. In each condition, n = 127 cells from 11 movies obtained over four experimental days. Quantification of migratory properties in interneurons migrating at 35–40 µm/h revealed significant disruptions in maximum migration speed (B), and speed variation (C), but not displacement (D), or straightness (E) during JNK inhibition. A total of n = 13 control cells and n = 14 SP600125-treated cells collected from six to seven movies over four experimental days were within the 35–40 µm/h average speed. F–L, Quantification of nucleokinesis dynamics in control and JNK-inhibition interneurons traveling at the same average migratory speed. Cortical interneurons treated with 20 µm SP600125 have significantly shorter average swelling distances (F), smaller average translocation distances (G), no change in short translocation distances (H), and a significant reduction in large translocation distances (I) compared to controls. SP600125 had no effect on average nucleokinesis frequency (J), pause duration (K), or large translocation distance frequency (L) when compared to controls. M–O, Quantification of leading process branching dynamics in control and JNK-inhibited interneurons traveling at the same average migratory speed. Interneurons treated with SP600125 have significantly reduced growth cone split frequencies (M), with no disruptions in side branch frequency (N) or duration (O). In each condition, n = 5 cells were analyzed from five movies collected over four experimental days with n = 13 control and n = 14 SP600125 side branches. Data are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots (Student’s t test; ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

Many control interneurons migrated into the field of view by 12 h of imaging (Fig. 1B; Movie 1), but SP600125-treated cells failed to progress through the frame and appeared to move slower (Fig. 1C; Movie 2). To assess potential differences in their migratory dynamics, we tracked individual cells to evaluate how JNK inhibition affects interneuron migration on a single cell level (Fig. 1B,C, representative cell tracks). The migratory speeds of JNK-inhibited interneurons were significantly slower than controls, including the maximum (values = mean ± SEM; control: 132.28 ± 4.25 µm/h; SP600125: 78.02 ± 1.69 µm/h; p = 1.68 × 10−10), mean (control: 54.62 ± 2.54 µm/h; SP600125: 26.48 ± 0.94 µm/h; p = 1.68 × 10−9), and minimum (control: 6.64 ± 0.91 µm/h; SP600125: 1.96 ± 0.21 µm/h; p = 7.17 × 10−5) migratory speeds (Fig. 1D). While JNK-inhibited interneurons migrated slower, speed variation, which is the ratio of track SD to track mean speed, was significantly increased in SP600125-treated conditions (control: 0.62 ± 0.02; SP600125 0.76 ± 0.02; p = 0.00,019; Fig. 1E). Because of the decrease in migratory speed, the migratory displacement of SP600125-treated interneurons was also significantly reduced compared with control interneurons (control: 156.93 ± 10.37 µm; SP600125: 75.76 ± 4.04 µm; p = 4.73 × 10−7; Fig. 1F). Despite these changes in overall migratory dynamics, JNK-inhibited interneurons displayed no change in their migratory straightness (control: 0.71 ± 0.03; SP600125: 0.68 ± 0.02; p = 0.45; Fig. 1G). Collectively, these data demonstrate that JNK inhibition impairs the migratory speed and displacement of MGE interneurons in an MGE explant cortical cell coculture assay, confirming previous results in ex vivo slice culture experiments (Myers et al., 2020).

Movie 1.

Live imaging of MGE interneurons under control conditions. Movie clip 1, E14.5 Dlx5/6-CIE MGE explant cortical cell co-culture imaged live for 12 h in control conditions. Interneurons robustly migrate from the margin of the MGE explant to fill the field of view. Movie clip 2, Three MGE interneurons tracked for the duration of the recording.

Movie 2.

Live imaging of MGE interneurons under 20 μm SP600125 conditions. Movie clip 1, E14.5 Dlx5/6-CIE MGE explant cortical cell co-culture imaged for 12 h in SP600125 conditions. Interneurons slowly migrate from the margin of the explant, sparsely populating the field of view. Movie clip 2, Three MGE interneurons tracked for the duration of the recording.

JNK signaling regulates branching dynamics of migrating MGE interneurons

Migrating cortical interneurons repeatedly extend and retract leading process branches to sense extracellular guidance cues and establish a forward direction of movement (Polleux et al., 2002; Bellion et al., 2005; Yanagida et al., 2012). Leading process branching normally occurs through two mechanisms: growth cone splitting at the distal end of the leading process, and formation of interstitial side branches along the length of the leading process (Martini et al., 2009; Lysko et al., 2011).

To determine whether JNK inhibition affected leading process morphology, we first measured the length of leading processes over time from live-imaged Dlx5/6-CIE positive MGE interneurons. Maximum (control: 84.96 ± 4.45 µm; SP600125: 85.14 ± 4.02 µm/h; p = 0.977), mean (control: 60.39 ± 2.88 µm; SP600125: 60.14 ± 2.56 µm; p = 0.947), or minimum lengths (control: 37.40 ± 2.47 µm; SP600125: 37.81 ± 2.72 µm; p = 0.912) of leading processes of SP600125-treated interneurons remained unchanged (Fig. 2C). However, when we analyzed the dynamic behavior of leading processes, significant differences were found between interneurons in control and SP600125-treated conditions (Fig. 2; Movies 3, 4). In control conditions, migrating MGE interneurons show frequent initiation of new branches from growth cone splitting at the tip of their leading processes (Fig. 2A; Movie 3, clip 1). In JNK-inhibited conditions, interneurons still underwent growth cone splitting, but the frequency appeared to be reduced (Fig. 2B; Movie 4, clip1). When we measured the rate of growth cone splitting, JNK-inhibited interneurons had a statistically significant reduction compared with controls (control: 1.83 ± 0.17 splits/h; SP600125 1.15 ± 0.20 splits/h; p = 0.01; Fig. 2D). In addition to branching from their growth cones, MGE interneurons extend and retract interstitial side branches from their leading processes. To determine whether JNK inhibition impacted the frequency and duration of interstitial branching, we measured the rate in which new side branches formed and determined the amount of time each newly generated branch was retained. Both control and SP600125-treated interneurons extended side branches at similar frequencies (control: 1.18 ± 0.19 branches/h; SP600125:1.22 ± 0.17 branches/h; p = 0.89; Fig. 2E–G; Movies 3, 4, clip 2). However, the duration of time in which de novo side branches persisted was significantly reduced in interneurons treated with JNK inhibitor (control: 28.77 ± 2.53 min; SP600125: 21.19 ± 1.76 min; p = 0.02; Fig. 2H).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

JNK signaling regulates the dynamic migratory properties of MGE interneurons. A, Schematic diagram of MGE explant cortical cell coculture assay with pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling. B, C, Individual cell tracks (pseudo-colored by time) from four interneurons in control (B) or 20 μm SP600125 (C) treated cultures imaged live for 12 h. D-G, Quantification of interneuron migratory properties revealed significant disruptions in migration speed (D), speed variation (E), and displacement (F), but not straightness (G), during JNK inhibition. For each condition, a minimum of 10 cells were tracked from n = 11 movies (127 cells/condition) obtained over four experimental days. Data are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots. The values of both groups are plotted on the left axes with the mean difference between groups plotted on the right axes as a bootstrap resampling distribution. The mean difference is depicted as a large black dot with the 95% confidence interval indicated by the ends of the vertical error bar; ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, Student’s t test. Time in hours. Scale bar: 50 µm. In addition, a subset of MGE interneurons in control and JNK inhibited conditions were analyzed to determine whether JNK signaling influenced migratory properties of cells traveling at the same average speed (Extended Data Fig. 1-1).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Migrating MGE interneurons require intact JNK signaling for proper leading process branching. A, B, Time series depicting growth cone (GC) splitting from control (A) or JNK-inhibited (B) MGE interneurons. Closed arrowhead = GC, open arrowhead = new GC branch. C, Quantification of leading process length; n = 10 cells were measured from eight movies/condition obtained over four experimental days. D, Quantification of GC splitting frequency; n = 19 control cells from eight movies and n = 19 SP600125 cells from 10 movies were measured. E, F, Interstitial side branching from control (E) or JNK-inhibited (F) interneurons. Closed arrowhead = new side branch. G, Quantification of interstitial side branch frequency of control and SP600125-treated interneurons; n = 19 control cells from eight movies; n = 19 SP600125 cells from 10 movies. H, Quantification of interstitial side branch duration in control and JNK-inhibited conditions; n = 52 branches from 14 control cells and 18 SP600125 cells were measured from 10 movies/condition. All branching data were from movies obtained over five experimental days. Data are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots; *p < 0.05, Student’s t test. Time in minutes. Scale bar: 15 µm.

Movie 3.

Leading process branching dynamics of MGE interneurons under control conditions. Movie clip 1, Interneuron undergoing growth cone splitting over the course of 1 h in control conditions. First growth cone split is marked with an open arrowhead. Movie clip 2, MGE interneuron extending an interstitial side branch (open arrowhead) over the course of 1 h. Only side branches persisting for 10 min were measured (see Materials and Methods).

Movie 4.

Leading process branching dynamics of MGE interneurons under 20 μm SP600125 conditions. Movie clip 1, SP600125-treated interneuron undergoing one growth cone splitting event (marked by open arrowhead) over the course of 1 h. Movie clip 2, SP600125-treated interneuron extending a short-lived interstitial side branch (open arrowhead) over the course of 1 h.

Here, we found that initiation of branching from growth cone splitting was significantly reduced during JNK inhibition. Also, we found that JNK-inhibited interneurons formed side branches at similar rates to controls, but these branches were shorter-lived. Our data indicate that JNK influences branching dynamics of migratory MGE interneurons by regulating the rate of growth cone splitting, and by promoting the stability of newly formed side branches.

Acute loss of JNK signaling impairs nucleokinesis and cytoplasmic swelling dynamics of migrating MGE interneurons

Since pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling disrupted the overall migratory properties and leading process branching dynamics of MGE interneurons, we further examined the role for JNK in nucleokinesis, an obligate cell biological process in neuronal migration (Bellion et al., 2005; Yanagida et al., 2012). To closely examine the movement of interneuron cell bodies during migration, we imaged cultures at higher spatial and temporal resolution and analyzed the effect of JNK inhibition on nucleokinesis (Fig. 3). Time-lapse recordings show that under control conditions, a single cycle of nucleokinesis starts with the extension of a cytoplasmic swelling into the leading process and ends with the translocation of the cell body into the swelling (Fig. 3A; Movie 5, clip 1). Although JNK-inhibited interneurons still engaged in nucleokinesis, the distance of individual nucleokinesis events were disrupted (Fig. 3B,H; Movie 5, clip 2). When we measured the mean distance that cell bodies translocated over time (Fig. 3C, diagram), JNK-inhibited interneurons advanced significantly shorter distances compared with control cells (control: 14.87 ± 0.32 µm; SP600125: 8.50 ± 0.39 µm; p = 2.36 × 10−10; Fig. 3C). Thus, while cell bodies of JNK-inhibited interneurons still translocated forward into the leading process, the distance of their movement was reduced.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling impairs nucleokinesis in migrating MGE interneurons. A, B, Time series of a control (A) and SP600125-treated (B) interneuron undergoing a single cycle of nucleokinesis. Closed arrowhead = leading process swelling, n = nucleus. C–E, Cortical interneurons treated with JNK inhibitor have significantly shorter somal translocation distances (C), decreased frequency of nucleokinesis (D), and increased pause duration (E) compared with controls. C, Cartoon showing how the distance (d) that an interneuron cell body translocates over time was measured. In each condition, 50 cells were measured from n = 10 movies obtained over four experimental days. F, Cartoon showing how the distance (d) that a swelling extends from a cell body was measured. JNK-inhibited cells display significantly decreased distance of swelling extension. G, Swelling duration is significantly increased in JNK-inhibited interneurons. A total of 43 control cells were measured from n = 10 control movies and 53 treated cells were measured from n = 6 SP600125 (SP) movies, each obtained over four experimental days. H, Histogram showing nuclear translocation over time for a single cell in each condition. Distance traveled between two points is plotted and every movement above 5 µm (gray dashed line) is considered to be a nucleokinesis event. Data in C–G are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots; ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, Student’s t test. Time in minutes. Scale bar: 15 µm.

Movie 5.

Nucleokinesis of MGE interneurons in control and JNK-inhibited conditions. Movie clip 1, Interneuron undergoing multiple nucleokinesis events in control conditions. Movie clip 2, SP600125-treated interneuron engaging in nucleokinesis at a slower rate than control. Open arrowheads mark translocating cell body in both clips.

Since cortical interneurons appeared to have slower kinetics of nucleokinesis under JNK inhibition (Fig. 3B), we measured the rate of nucleokinesis in control and JNK-inhibited conditions. Upon treatment with SP600125, interneurons completed significantly fewer translocation events per hour (control: 2.50 ± 0.06 events/h; SP600125: 1.73 ± 0.06 events/h; p = 1.92 × 10−8; Fig. 3D). Along with this, interneurons in JNK-inhibited cultures displayed longer pauses between the initiation of nucleokinesis events (control: 31.21 ± 1.05 min; SP600125: 40.71 ± 0.58 min; p = 1.45 × 10−7; Fig. 3E). Because nuclear translocation is preceded by swelling extension, we measured the average distance from the soma to the swelling before translocation (Fig. 3F, diagram) and found that SP600125-treated interneurons did not extend cytoplasmic swellings as far as controls (control: 13.13 ± 0.38 µm; SP600125: 11.34 ± 0.30 µm; p = 0.002; Fig. 3F). Since JNK-inhibited interneurons paused for longer periods of time, we asked whether this was strictly because of delayed nuclear propulsion toward the swelling, or whether the dynamics of swelling extension were also affected. Interneurons treated with SP600125 displayed significantly longer lasting cytoplasmic swellings (control: 11.27 ± 0.99 min; SP600125: 18.31 ± 1.33 min; p = 0.0005; Fig. 3G), indicating that swelling duration is concomitantly increased with pause duration. Finally, the frequency and amplitude of nuclear translocations that exceed a minimum distance of 5 μm was notably reduced when individual control and JNK-inhibited cells were compared (Fig. 3H).

In order to determine whether JNK inhibition altered the migratory properties of interneurons that traveled at similar average speeds, we assessed a subset of control and SP600125-treated MGE interneurons migrating 35–40 µm/h (Extended Data Fig. 1-1A). When MGE interneurons traveled at the same average speed, the minimum speed, displacement, and straightness were unaffected by JNK inhibition (Extended Data Fig. 1-1B–E). However, the maximum speed that MGE interneurons traveled in SP600125-treated conditions was significantly less than that of controls (Extended Data Fig. 1-1B). This decrease in maximum speed under JNK inhibition likely contributed to the significant decrease in the speed variation of MGE interneurons (Extended Data Fig. 1-1C). We next asked whether interneurons traveling at the same average speed had impairments to nucleokinesis under JNK inhibition. The average distance that JNK-inhibited MGE interneurons extended a swelling from the cell body as well as the average distance traveled during nucleokinesis were both significantly less than controls (Extended Data Fig. 1-1F,G), with no changes in frequency or pausing (Extended Data Fig. 1-1J,K). Moreover, JNK-inhibition led to a significant reduction in the distance of large nucleokinesis events (Extended Data Fig. 1-1I). These data likely explain why we found a significant decrease in the maximum speed that MGE interneurons traveled under JNK inhibition. Additionally, when we analyzed leading process branching, MGE interneurons treated with SP600125 had a significant reduction in growth cone split frequency with no changes in side-branch frequency or duration (Extended Data Fig. 1-1M–O).

Together, these data point to a role for JNK signaling in regulating the dynamics of nucleokinesis and leading process branching in migrating MGE interneurons, regardless of the average migratory speed that they travel.

Complete genetic loss of JNK impairs nucleokinesis and leading process branching of migrating MGE interneurons in vitro

In order to determine that migratory deficits seen with pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling were specific to the loss of JNK function in cortical interneurons, and not because of JNK inhibition of the cortical feeder cells, we genetically ablated all three JNK genes from interneurons by using mice containing the Dlx5/6-CIE transgene to conditionally remove Jnk1 from Jnk2;Jnk3 double knock-out embryos (Dlx5/6-CIE;Jnk1fl/fl;Jnk2−/−;Jnk3−/−). MGE explants from Dlx5/6-CIE+ WT or conditional triple knockout (cTKO) brains were cultured on a WT cortical feeder layer and imaged live (Fig. 4A). We tracked individual interneurons over time to assess the overall migratory properties of WT and cTKO interneurons (Fig. 4B,C). While there were no changes in migratory speed (Fig. 4D), cTKO interneurons exhibited greater variations in migratory speed compared with WT cells (WT: 0.54 ± 0.01; cTKO: 0.59 ± 0.02; p = 0.02; Fig. 4E). We also found that cTKO interneurons have shorter migratory displacements than WT interneurons (WT: 195.06 ± 6.80 µm; cTKO: 165.99 ± 12.49 µm; p = 0.05; Fig. 4F). Additionally, the track straightness of cTKO interneurons was decreased (WT: 0.77 ± 0.02; cTKO: 0.71 ± 0.02; p = 0.03; Fig. 4G). The combination of increased speed variability and decreased migratory straightness explain why cTKO interneurons exhibited shorter migratory displacements. Together, these data indicate that cTKO interneurons migrating on WT cortical cells have subtle yet statistically significant deficits in their overall migratory dynamics, which closely match previous findings from ex vivo cTKO slice cultures (Myers et al., 2020).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Genetic removal of JNK signaling impairs migratory properties and leading process dynamics of MGE interneurons. A, Diagram of MGE explant assay with Dlx5/6-CIE+ WT or JNK cTKO explants cultured on WT cortical feeder cells. B, C, Four individual cell tracks (pseudo-colored by time) from WT or cTKO interneurons imaged live for 12 h. D–G, Quantification of migratory properties reveals no alterations in migratory speed (D), but significant disruptions to speed variation (E), displacement (F), and straightness (G) between control and cTKO interneurons. A total 120 WT cells were measured from n = 13 control movies and 130 cTKO cells were measured from n = 12 cTKO movies, each obtained over four experimental days. H, I, cTKO interneurons have significantly decreased growth cone split frequency (H) without changes in interstitial side branch frequency (I); n = 11 cells measured from six movies/condition collected over four experimental days. J, Side branches from cTKO interneurons are significantly shorter-lived than controls; n = 34 branches were measured from 10 WT cells and n = 28 branches were measured from 10 cTKO cells recorded from six movies/condition obtained over four experimental days. Data are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots; *p < 0.05, Student’s t test. Time in hours. Scale bar: 50 µm.

To determine the genetic requirement for JNK signaling in branching, we analyzed leading process branching dynamics of cTKO and WT interneurons (Movies 6, 7). cTKO interneurons displayed a significant reduction in the frequency of growth cone splitting compared with WT interneurons (WT: 1.92 ± 0.18 splits/h; cTKO: 1.30 ± 0.11 splits/h; p = 0.04; Fig. 4H; Movies 6, 7, clip 1). In addition, genetic removal of JNK signaling from interneurons resulted in no change in side branch initiation (WT: 1.43 ± 0.15; cTKO:1.32 ± 0.20 branches/h; p = 0.66; Fig. 4I), but significant decreases in the duration that side branches persisted (WT: 25.51 ± 3.39 min; cTKO:17.29 ± 1.71 min; p = 0.05; Fig. 4J; Movies 6, 7, clip 2). These data corroborate the findings from our pharmacological analyses and establish a cell intrinsic role for JNK signaling in controlling leading process branching dynamics.

Movie 6.

Leading process branching dynamics of WT MGE interneurons. Movie clip 1, WT interneuron undergoing multiple growth cone splitting events (open arrowhead) over the course of 1 h. Movie clip 2, WT interneuron extending an interstitial side branch (open arrowhead) over the course of 1 h.

Movie 7.

Leading process branching dynamics of cTKO MGE interneurons. Movie clip 1, cTKO interneuron undergoing fewer growth cone splits (open arrowhead) over the course of 1 h compared to control. Movie clip 2, cTKO interneuron extending a short-lived interstitial side branch (open arrowhead) over the course of 1 h.

Since we found alterations to overall migratory properties and branching dynamics, we next analyzed migrating cTKO interneurons for defects in nucleokinesis. Although cTKO interneurons engaged in nucleokinesis, the kinetics of nucleokinesis were significantly altered compared with WT interneurons (Fig. 5). The average distance cTKO cells traveled forward during nucleokinesis was significantly shorter compared with that of the WT cells (WT: 15.08 ± 0.28 µm; cTKO: 14.16 ± 0.26 µm; p = 0.03; Fig. 5A–C). However, unlike during acute pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling, cTKO interneurons displayed increased rates of nucleokinesis (Fig. 5A,B; Movie 8). Genetic ablation of JNK signaling in migrating MGE interneurons resulted in increased frequency of translocation events (WT: 2.76 ± 0.05 events/h; cTKO: 3.22 ± 0.11 events/h; p = 0.002; Fig. 5D). While both WT and cTKO cells paused after the completion of a nucleokinesis event (after the cell body moves into the swelling), cTKO cells spent significantly less time pausing before they extended a new swelling (WT: 32.10 ± 0.62 min; cTKO 27.01 ± 1.02 min; p = 0.0005; Fig. 5E). When we measured the duration of time that cytoplasmic swellings persisted, the swellings in cTKO interneurons were significantly shorter-lived (WT: 10.47 ± 0.62 min; cTKO: 7.86 ± 0.19 min; p = 0.003; Fig. 5F). These data likely explain why we did not observe an overall change in migratory speeds between cTKO and WT interneurons. While cTKO interneurons are not migrating as far during each translocation event they are initiating nucleokinesis at a faster rate, thus moving at similar speeds compared with controls.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Genetic removal of Jnk disrupts nucleokinesis in migrating MGE interneurons. A, WT cortical interneuron undergoing a single nucleokinesis event. B, cTKO cortical interneuron completing two nucleokinesis events over the same interval of time. Closed arrowhead = leading process swelling, n = nucleus. C–E, cTKO interneurons have significantly decreased translocation distance (C), increased translocation frequency (D), and decreased pause duration (E) compared with WT interneurons. In each condition, 50 cells were measured from n = 10 movies obtained over four experimental days. F, cTKO interneurons have decreased swelling duration compared with WT interneurons. A total of 37 WT cells were measured from n = 6 WT movies and 38 cTKO cells were measured from n = 6 cTKO movies, each obtained over four experimental days. Data are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, Student’s t test. Time in minutes. Scale bar: 15 µm.

Movie 8.

Nucleokinesis in WT and cTKO MGE interneurons. Movie clip 1, WT interneuron undergoing nucleokinesis. Movie clip 2, cTKO interneuron engaging in nucleokinesis at a higher rate than control. Open arrowheads mark translocating cell body in both clips.

Collectively, our data indicate that genetic removal of Jnk alters the migratory behavior of MGE interneurons, reinforcing our pharmacological findings. While the phenotypes observed with conditional removal of Jnk from migrating interneurons were not identical to pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling, the results from our genetic experiments clearly indicate that interneurons have a cell intrinsic requirement for Jnk in leading process branching dynamics and nucleokinesis.

Subcellular localization and dynamic behavior of the centrosome and primary cilia in migrating MGE interneurons depend on intact JNK-signaling

The cytoplasmic swelling emerges from the cell body during nucleokinesis and contains multiple subcellular organelles involved in the forward movement of cortical interneurons (Bellion et al., 2005; Martini and Valdeolmillos, 2010; Yanagida et al., 2012). One organelle involved in nucleokinesis is the centrosome, which translocates from the cell body into the swelling during nucleokinesis. The centrosome is tethered to the nucleus through a perinuclear cage of microtubules and acts to generate a forward pulling force on the nucleus during nucleokinesis (Bellion et al., 2005; Umeshima et al., 2007). Disruptions in centrosome motility and positioning are thought to underly nucleokinesis defects seen in other studies of neuronal migration (Solecki et al., 2009; Luccardini et al., 2013, 2015; Silva et al., 2018). Since we found significant defects in nucleokinesis of MGE interneurons with both pharmacological and genetic loss of JNK function, we sought to determine whether centrosome dynamics were also disrupted during JNK inhibition.

To visualize the centrosome and study the role of JNK signaling in centrosome dynamics in migrating MGE interneurons, we live-imaged Dlx5/6-CIE+ cells expressing a red-fluorescent centrosome marker, Cetn2-mCherry (Fig. 6A). In control cells, the centrosome moved correctly into the cytoplasmic swelling (Fig. 6B; Movie 9, clip 1), with centrioles occasionally splitting between the soma and swelling preceding nucleokinesis (Fig. 6B, frames 0:00–0:10 min), as reported elsewhere (Bellion et al., 2005; Umeshima et al., 2007). Upon JNK-inhibition, the centrosome often maintained a position near the soma regardless of the presence of a swelling (Fig. 6C; Movie 9, clips 2, 3). Moreover, in many JNK-inhibited cells, the centrosome moved backwards into the trailing process, even when the cell body translocated forward (Fig. 6C; Movie 9, clips 2, 3). When we tracked the positioning of the centrosome over time, the centrosome of JNK-inhibited cells spent significantly more time in the trailing process and less time in the leading process (p = 0.0001; Fig. 6D). Additionally, when a swelling was formed in front of the soma, the centrosome of JNK-inhibited cells spent significantly less time inside of the swelling than controls (control: 66.64 ± 5.99%; SP600125: 16.08 ± 5.52% of time; p = 0.0001; Fig. 6E). When we measured the average maximal distance that the centrosome was displaced from the somal front, the centrosome of JNK-inhibited interneurons maintained a significantly closer position to the leading pole of the soma compared with controls (control: 9.93 ± 0.99 µm; SP600125: 6.73 ± 0.88 µm; p = 0.03; Fig. 6F). This was not surprising since the soma-to-swelling distance in JNK-inhibited interneurons was decreased (Fig. 3E). However, when we compared the average maximal rearward distance between the centrosome and somal front, the centrosome of JNK-inhibited interneurons was significantly further behind that of controls (control: 9.40 ± 0.77 µm; SP600125: 19.75 ± 1.94 µm; p = 1.48 × 10−5; Fig. 6F).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Centrosomes are mislocalized in MGE interneurons during JNK inhibition. A, Diagram depicting ex vivo electroporation of MGE tissue and subsequent culture of MGE explants on cortical feeder cells. B, An interneuron expressing a fluorescently tagged centrosome protein (Centrin2; Cetn2-mCherry) shows translocation of the centrosome into the cytoplasmic swelling before nucleokinesis in control conditions. C, A Cetn2-mCherry expressing interneuron treated with SP600125 shows aberrant rearward movement of the centrosome into the trailing process. Arrowhead = Cetn2-mCherry. D, Scatter plot of centrosome distribution over time (centrosome: two-way ANOVA: F(2,114) = 13.82; p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001). Error bars represent mean ± SEM, post hoc by Fisher’s LSD ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. E, Scatter plot depicting centrosome occupancy of a formed swelling over time (χ2 test; ****p < 0.0001). Error bars represent mean ± SEM. F, Average maximum distance the centrosome traveled from the soma front (Student’s t test; ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). In each condition, n = 20 cells were measured from 11 movies obtained over five experimental days. Data in F are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots. Time in minutes. Scale bar: 7.5 µm.

Movie 9.

Centrosome dynamics in MGE interneurons under control and SP600125-treated conditions. Movie clip 1, Control interneuron electroporated with centrosomal marker Cetn2- mCherry. The centrosome moves from the cell body into the cytoplasmic swelling under control conditions. Movie clip 2, SP600125-treated interneuron electroporated with Cetn2-mCherry. The centrosome moves from the cell body into the trailing process under SP600125 conditions. Movie clip 3, A second SP600125-treated interneuron electroporated with Cetn2-mCherry. The centrosome separates into two centrioles and moves from the cell body into the trailing process and back under SP600125 conditions. Open arrowheads mark Cetn2-mCherry expressing interneurons in all clips.

Since we found defects in centrosome dynamics, we wanted to determine whether primary cilia, which normally extend from the mother centriole and house receptors important for the guided migration of cortical interneurons (Baudoin et al., 2012; Higginbotham et al., 2012), were also perturbed in interneurons following JNK-inhibition. In order to study the localization of cilia in migrating interneurons, we performed live-cell confocal imaging on Dlx5/6-CIE+ MGE cells expressing Arl13b-tdTomato, a red-fluorescent cilia marker.

Almost identical to that of our centrosome analyses, we found significant alterations in the dynamic positioning of primary cilia in migrating MGE interneurons (Fig. 7). In control cells, the primary cilium moved into the cytoplasmic swelling before nuclear translocation (Fig. 7A; Movie 10, clip 1). However, on JNK inhibition, the cilium was frequently positioned in the soma and often moved into the trailing process as the cell body translocated forward (Fig. 7B; Movie 10, clips 2, 3). Overall, the cilium spent significantly more time in the cell soma and behind the cell in the trailing process, and significantly less time in the leading process of JNK-inhibited cells (p = 0.0001; Fig. 7C). Additionally, the primary cilia in JNK-inhibited interneurons failed to spend as much time in formed cytoplasmic swellings as controls (control: 73.73 ± 7.81% of time; SP600125: 33.85 ± 8.20% of time; p = 0.0001; Fig. 7D). When we measured the maximal distance behind the somal front, the cilia of JNK-inhibited interneurons were also positioned further behind the cell body than controls, matching our centrosome findings (control: 9.71 ± 1.16 µm; SP600125: 16.09 ± 2.10 µm; p = 0.02; Fig. 7E). Despite being mispositioned during JNK inhibition, the length of Arl13b-tdTomato labeled primary cilia remained unchanged over time (control: 2.75 ± 0.12 µm; SP600125: 2.65 ± 0.12 µm; p = 0.56; Fig. 7F), suggesting that the formation and maintenance of primary cilia were not interrupted. Taken together, our data indicate that JNK signaling plays a critical role in the dynamic movement and positioning of the centrosome and primary cilium in migrating interneurons.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Primary cilium localization in MGE interneurons is disrupted during JNK inhibition. A, An interneuron expressing a fluorescently tagged primary ciliary marker (Arl13b-tdTomato) shows translocation of the primary cilium into the cytoplasmic swelling before nucleokinesis in control conditions. B, An interneuron expressing Arl13b-tdTomato shows aberrant rearward movement of the primary cilium into the trailing process when treated with SP600125. Arrowhead = Arl13b-tdTomato. C, Scatter plot of primary cilium distribution over time (two-way ANOVA: F(2,114) = 12.13; p < 0.0001). Error bars represent mean ± SEM, post hoc by Fisher’s LSD ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. D, Scatter plot depicting primary cilium occupancy of a formed swelling over time (χ2 test; ****p < 0.0001). E, Average maximum distance the primary cilium traveled from the soma front (Student’s t test; **p < 0.01). In each condition, n = 20 cells were measured from 15 movies obtained over six experimental days. F, Average ciliary length measured over time. In each condition, n = 17 control and n = 15 SP600125 (SP) cells were measured over 13 movies and six experimental days. Data in E, F are presented as Gardner–Altman estimation plots. Student’s t test; ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Time in minutes. Scale bar: 7.5 µm.

Movie 10.

Dynamics of primary cilia in MGE interneurons under control and SP600125-treated conditions. Movie clip 1, Interneuron electroporated with primary ciliary marker Arl13b-tdTomato. The cilium moves from the cell body into the cytoplasmic swelling under control conditions. Movie clip 2, Interneuron electroporated with Arl13b-tdTomato in SP600125-treated conditions. The cilium moves from the cell body into the trailing process under SP600125 conditions. Movie clip 3, A second interneuron expressing Arl13b-tdTomato under SP600125-treated conditions. The primary cilium moves from the cell body into the trailing process and returns to the cell body without ever entering the swelling. Open arrowheads mark Arl13b-tdTomato expressing interneurons in all clips.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that migrating MGE interneurons rely on the JNK signaling pathway to properly undergo leading process branching and nucleokinesis. Pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling in an in vitro assay resulted in reduced migratory speed and displacement with an increase in speed variation of migrating interneurons. Concomitant with these alterations in migratory properties, JNK-inhibited interneurons displayed decreased initiation of branches arising from growth cone tips, decreased persistence of interstitial side branches, as well as shorter, less frequent nucleokinesis events. Even when comparing interneurons that traveled at the same average speed, we found pronounced decreases in large nucleokinesis events, maximum migratory speeds, and growth cone branching of JNK-inhibited interneurons. Importantly, we extended our pharmacological findings by using a cTKO mouse line to completely remove Jnk from MGE interneurons and not the cortical feeder cells on which they were grown. cTKO interneurons migrating on WT feeder cells had decreased migratory displacement without reductions in overall migratory speed, apparently resulting from migratory trajectories that had more variable speeds and reduced track straightness compared with controls. cTKO interneurons displayed decreased growth cone branching and interstitial side branch duration, as well as shorter, more frequent nucleokinesis events. Therefore, our results indicate that MGE interneurons have a cell-intrinsic requirement for JNK in the coordination of leading process branching and nucleokinesis. Finally, we found a novel role of JNK signaling in regulating the dynamic positioning of two organelles involved in nucleokinesis: the centrosome and primary cilium. Centrosomes and primary cilia failed to properly translocate into a leading process swelling and spent significantly more time mislocalized to the trailing process of JNK-inhibited interneurons. In summary, we find that loss of JNK signaling impairs cellular and subcellular kinetics of MGE interneuron migration.

Cytoskeletal regulation during leading process branching and nucleokinesis of migrating interneurons

Leading process branching and nucleokinesis, the two main features of guided interneuron migration, rely on the coordination of actomyosin and microtubule-based cytoskeletal networks. Leading process branches initially form through membrane protrusions containing a F-actin meshwork, which are then stabilized by microtubules to allow for the emergence of the nascent branch (Martini et al., 2009; Spillane et al., 2011; Lysko et al., 2014; Peyre et al., 2015). Nucleokinesis is thought to be mediated through the combination of the forward pulling forces from microtubules at the front of the cell and pushing forces from actomyosin contraction at the rear (Bellion et al., 2005; Martini et al., 2009; Martini and Valdeolmillos, 2010). While mechanisms underlying these processes are still under investigation, molecular mediators of microtubule and actin dynamics in migrating interneurons have begun to emerge. Interestingly, disruptions to these cytoskeletal regulators result in migratory deficits that are reminiscent of those seen following the loss of JNK function.

For instance, p27kip1, a microtubule associated protein, coordinates both actomyosin contraction and microtubule organization to control leading process branching and nucleokinesis in migrating interneurons (Godin et al., 2012). Conditional deletion of p27kip1 from post-mitotic interneurons resulted in slower migratory speed, increased frequency of nucleokinesis, and shorter distance of translocations. Similarly, cTKO interneurons had shorter translocation distances and increased rates of nucleokinesis. In addition, p27kip1 knock-out interneurons displayed shorter-lived side branches, similar to our findings with both pharmacological and genetic loss of JNK. JNK signaling was reported to regulate p27kip1 phosphorylation during cancer cell migration (Kim et al., 2012), suggesting a possible link between JNK signaling and this molecular mediator of cellular migration.

Another important regulator of nucleokinesis and leading process branching is the microtubule associated protein doublecortin (Dcx; Kappeler et al., 2006; Friocourt et al., 2007), which is a downstream target of JNK signaling in neurons (Gdalyahu et al., 2004; Jin et al., 2010). Cortical interneurons lacking Dcx show a decreased duration of interstitial side branches, and significantly shorter nuclear translocation distances with no overall changes in migratory speed (Kappeler et al., 2006), similar to what we found in cTKO interneurons. Thus, it is possible that JNK signaling fine-tunes leading process branching and nucleokinesis in cortical interneurons by phosphorylating Dcx.

Recently, the role of the elongator complex, specifically the enzymatic core Elp3, was found to control both leading process branching and nucleokinesis through the regulation of actomyosin activity (Tielens et al., 2016). MGE interneurons devoid of Elp3 displayed nucleokinesis and leading process branching defects strikingly similar to our pharmacological results, including decreased migratory speed, translocation frequency, nucleokinesis amplitude, and frequency of growth cone splitting (Tielens et al., 2016). Moreover, the Elongator complex was found to potentiate JNK activity during cellular stress in HeLa and HEK293 cells (Holmberg et al., 2002; Kojic and Wainwright, 2016). This suggests that the Elongator complex may potentiate the activity of JNK to phosphorylate effector proteins required for proper migration of interneurons.

Despite the possible connections, it is currently unknown whether JNK signaling is linked to the function of cytoskeletal regulators in migrating cortical interneurons. Future studies will be required to unravel the exact molecular mechanisms underlying how JNK coordinates leading process branching and nucleokinesis during cortical interneuron migration.

Position and function of the centrosome and primary cilium during cortical interneuron migration

During the migration cycle of cortical interneurons, a cytoplasmic swelling containing two interconnected organelles, the centrosome and primary cilium, extends ahead of the soma into the leading process (Bellion et al., 2005; Tsai and Gleeson, 2005). Disruptions to the movement, positioning, or function of these organelles have been found in neurons with migratory deficits (Baudoin et al., 2012; Higginbotham et al., 2012; Luccardini et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2015; Nakamuta et al., 2017; Matsumoto et al., 2019), suggesting centrosomes and cilia play essential roles in neuronal migration.

Migratory olfactory bulb interneurons require DOCK7, a member of the DOCK180 family of atypical Rac/Cdc42 guanine nucleotide exchange factors, for migration (Nakamuta et al., 2017). Knock-down of DOCK7 led to unstable movement of the centrosome from the swelling back into the cell body (Nakamuta et al., 2017), which was attributed to slower migration of olfactory bulb interneurons devoid of DOCK7. We observed similar migratory deficits and disrupted centrosome positioning in MGE interneurons treated with JNK inhibitor. Interestingly, knock-down of DOCK7 was previously shown to reduce JNK phosphorylation during Schwann cell development and migration (Yamauchi et al., 2008, 2011).

Furthermore, inactivation of the cell adhesion molecule N-cadherin from MGE interneurons leads to mislocalization of the centrosome to the rear of the cell body (Luccardini et al., 2013). JNK-inhibition not only impeded the forward progression of centrosomes into the swelling, but also led to their unobstructed movement into the trailing process. Interestingly, JNK-inhibition has been reported to decrease N-cadherin levels and cellular migration of myofibroblasts (De Wever et al., 2004), which suggests a potential role for JNK signaling in the regulation of N-cadherin during migration. While mechanisms that control the positioning of the centrosome in migrating neurons remain to be explored, JNK signaling may help synchronize the activity of cell adhesion molecules, cytoskeletal proteins, and cytoplasmic machinery that are critically involved in centrosome motility.

Finally, disruptions to ciliary proteins including Arl13b, Kif3a, and IFT88 or to the sonic hedgehog (Shh) signal transduction pathway all result in cortical interneuron migratory deficits (Baudoin et al., 2012; Higginbotham et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2017). Conditional deletion of Arl13b disrupts the formation of the primary cilium from the centrosome and the localization/transport of key receptors known to be critical for interneuron migration, including C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (Cxcr4), neuregulin-1 receptor (ErbB4), and the serotonin receptor 6 (5-Htr6; Riccio et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011; Higginbotham et al., 2012). Dominant negative knock-down of Kif3a, a molecular motor required for cilium-specific Shh signal transduction, results in rearward movement of the centrosome of migrating olfactory bulb interneurons (Matsumoto et al., 2019), suggesting that functional primary cilia are necessary for the proper localization of the centrosome-cilium complex. Interestingly, the protein kinase A (PKA) signaling pathway appears to the regulate nucleokinesis through the centrosome-cilia complex of migratory olfactory bulb interneurons, since removal of cyclic AMP production from the primary cilium or delocalization of PKA from the centrosome resulted in disrupted nucleokinesis and centrosome movement (Stoufflet et al., 2019). Thus, cortical interneurons may require the function of signal transduction machinery inside the primary cilium for the centrosome-cilium complex to localize correctly, and to sense and respond to environmental guidance cues that promote directed migration of interneurons. Additionally, cortical interneurons lacking Arl13b exhibited leading process branching defects, suggesting that the primary cilium may have cytoskeletal functions along with its role in transducing guidance signals (Higginbotham et al., 2012). While JNK signaling does not appear to be necessary for the formation or stabilization of the primary cilium, it does control the dynamic subcellular position of the centrosome-ciliary complex during MGE interneuron migration. Future studies are needed to determine whether loss of JNK signaling impairs the localization of centrosome and cilia by disrupting ciliary signaling, and whether mislocalized cilia can compromise the guided migration of cortical interneurons in vivo.

Cellular influences of JNK signaling during cortical interneuron migration

In previously published work from ex vivo slice cultures, pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling led to slowed migration and shorter migratory displacement, while genetic loss of Jnk from interneurons did not change migratory speed, but led to shorter displacement distances (Myers et al., 2020). Here, we confirmed the requirement for JNK in interneuron migration using an in vitro coculture assay and extended these observations to include a detailed assessment of the individual cellular and subcellular mechanics of leading process branching and nucleokinesis. Loss of JNK function disrupted leading process branching and nucleokinesis of MGE interneurons and led to significant alterations of their migratory properties. The requirement of JNK in interneuron migration could be multifactorial, however, and regulate interneuron migration through intrinsic mechanisms, extrinsic mechanisms, or both. Since SP600125 treatment inhibits JNK function in all cells of the MGE explant cortical cell coculture assay, we cannot exclude the possibility that JNK inhibition disrupts cell-cell interactions between interneurons and the cortical feeder cells on which they are grown. To determine whether migrating MGE interneurons have a cell-autonomous requirement for JNK signaling, we genetically removed Jnk from interneurons and cultured them on WT cortical cells. Although we found migratory deficits in cTKO interneurons that were indicative of an intrinsic function for JNK, the deficits we uncovered were distinct from pharmacological experiments, suggesting that there may be additive effects when JNK is simultaneously removed from both populations of cells. Both pharmacological inhibition and genetic removal of Jnk resulted in consistent leading process branching phenotypes with decreased growth cone splitting and short-lived interstitial side branches. When we analyzed nucleokinesis, however, the kinetics of movement were opposite: JNK-inhibited cells completed nucleokinesis at slower rates, whereas cTKO cells completed at faster rates. These data imply that cortical interneuron migration is dependent on both intrinsic and extrinsic requirements for JNK signaling. Indeed, regulation of leading process branching in cortical interneurons may be dominated by an intrinsic function of JNK signaling, since the exclusive genetic loss of JNK from interneurons matches the combined pharmacological loss of JNK from both interneurons and cortical cells. Meanwhile, JNK signaling may influence nucleokinesis through both cell-intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms, which could explain departures in the rates of nucleokinesis between JNK-inhibited and cTKO interneurons. While the exact mechanisms that cortical interneurons use to navigate their environment remain to be fully elucidated, we have found that JNK signaling exerts fine-tune control over cell biological processes required for proper interneuron migration.

Conclusions

Using a combination of pharmacological and genetic approaches, we found a novel requirement for JNK signaling in MGE interneuron leading process branching and nucleokinesis. Our findings are also the first to implicate the JNK signaling pathway as a key intracellular regulator of the dynamic positioning of multiple subcellular organelles involved in interneuron migration. The exact molecular mechanisms controlling JNK signaling in interneuron migration remain to be determined. Therefore, identifying the upstream activators and downstream targets of JNK signaling will provide further insight into the role of JNK signaling in cortical development and disease.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements: We thank Dr. Amanda Ammer and Dr. Karen Martin for their excellent microscopy support.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant R01NS082262 (to E.S.T.). Live-imaging experiments were performed in the West Virginia University (WVU) Imaging Facilities, which were supported by the WVU Cancer Institute, the WVU Health Science Center Office of Research and Graduate Education, and NIH Grants P20RR016440, P30GM103488, P20GM121322, U54GM104942, P30GM103503, and P20GM103434.

  • Received April 4, 2020.
  • Revision received July 1, 2020.
  • Accepted July 15, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 Smith et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. Ang ES, Haydar TF, Gluncic V, Rakic P (2003) Four-dimensional migratory coordinates of GABAergic interneurons in the developing mouse cortex. J Neurosci 23:5805–5815. pmid:12843285
  2. Baudoin JP, Viou L, Launay PS, Luccardini C, Espeso Gil S, Kiyasova V, Irinopoulou T, Alvarez C, Rio JP, Boudier T, Lechaire JP, Kessaris N, Spassky N, Métin C (2012) Tangentially migrating neurons assemble a primary cilium that promotes their reorientation to the cortical plate. Neuron 76:1108–1122. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.027 pmid:23259947
  3. Bellion A, Baudoin JP, Alvarez C, Bornens M, Métin C (2005) Nucleokinesis in tangentially migrating neurons comprises two alternating phases: forward migration of the Golgi/centrosome associated with centrosome splitting and myosin contraction at the rear. J Neurosci 25:5691–5699. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1030-05.2005 pmid:15958735
  4. Bennett BL, Sasaki DT, Murray BW, O'Leary EC, Sakata ST, Xu W, Leisten JC, Motiwala A, Pierce S, Satoh Y, Bhagwat SS, Manning AM, Anderson DW (2001) SP600125, an anthrapyrazolone inhibitor of Jun N-terminal kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13681–13686. doi:10.1073/pnas.251194298 pmid:11717429
  5. Chang L, Karin M (2001) Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades. Nature 410:37–40. doi:10.1038/35065000 pmid:11242034
  6. Davis RJ (2000) Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases. Cell 103:239–252. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00116-1 pmid:11057897
  7. De Wever O, Westbroek W, Verloes A, Bloemen N, Bracke M, Gespach C, Bruyneel E, Mareel M (2004) Critical role of N-cadherin in myofibroblast invasion and migration in vitro stimulated by colon-cancer-cell-derived TGF-beta or wounding. J Cell Sci 117:4691–4703. doi:10.1242/jcs.01322 pmid:15331629
  8. Friocourt G, Liu JS, Antypa M, Rakic S, Walsh CA, Parnavelas JG (2007) Both doublecortin and doublecortin-like kinase play a role in cortical interneuron migration. J Neurosci 27:3875–3883. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4530-06.2007 pmid:17409252
  9. Gdalyahu A, Ghosh I, Levy T, Sapir T, Sapoznik S, Fishler Y, Azoulai D, Reiner O (2004) DCX, a new mediator of the JNK pathway. EMBO J 23:823–832. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600079 pmid:14765123
  10. Godin JD, Thomas N, Laguesse S, Malinouskaya L, Close P, Malaise O, Purnelle A, Raineteau O, Campbell K, Fero M, Moonen G, Malgrange B, Chariot A, Metin C, Besson A, Nguyen L (2012) p27(Kip1) is a microtubule-associated protein that promotes microtubule polymerization during neuron migration. Dev Cell 23:729–744. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.08.006 pmid:23022035
  11. Guo J, Higginbotham H, Li J, Nichols J, Hirt J, Ghukasyan V, Anton ES (2015) Developmental disruptions underlying brain abnormalities in ciliopathies. Nat Commun 6:7857. doi:10.1038/ncomms8857 pmid:26206566
  12. Guo J, Otis JM, Higginbotham H, Monckton C, Cheng J, Asokan A, Mykytyn K, Caspary T, Stuber GD, Anton ES (2017) Primary cilia signaling shapes the development of interneuronal connectivity. Dev Cell 42:286–300.e4. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2017.07.010 pmid:28787594
  13. Higginbotham H, Eom TY, Mariani LE, Bachleda A, Hirt J, Gukassyan V, Cusack CL, Lai C, Caspary T, Anton ES (2012) Arl13b in primary cilia regulates the migration and placement of interneurons in the developing cerebral cortex. Dev Cell 23:925–938. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.019 pmid:23153492
  14. Hildebrandt F, Benzing T, Katsanis N (2011) Ciliopathies. N Engl J Med 364:1533–1543. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1010172 pmid:21506742
  15. Hirai S, Cui DF, Miyata T, Ogawa M, Kiyonari H, Suda Y, Aizawa S, Banba Y, Ohno S (2006) The c-Jun N-terminal kinase activator dual leucine zipper kinase regulates axon growth and neuronal migration in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 26:11992–12002. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2272-06.2006 pmid:17108173
  16. Ho J, Tumkaya T, Aryal S, Choi H, Claridge-Chang A (2019) Moving beyond P values: data analysis with estimation graphics. Nat Methods 16:565–566. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0470-3 pmid:31217592
  17. Holmberg C, Katz S, Lerdrup M, Herdegen T, Jäättelä M, Aronheim A, Kallunki T (2002) A novel specific role for I kappa B kinase complex-associated protein in cytosolic stress signaling. J Biol Chem 277:31918–31928. doi:10.1074/jbc.M200719200 pmid:12058026
  18. Jin J, Suzuki H, Hirai S, Mikoshiba K, Ohshima T (2010) JNK phosphorylates Ser332 of doublecortin and regulates its function in neurite extension and neuronal migration. Dev Neurobiol 70:929–942. doi:10.1002/dneu.20833 pmid:20715151
  19. Kappeler C, Saillour Y, Baudoin JP, Tuy FP, Alvarez C, Houbron C, Gaspar P, Hamard G, Chelly J, Métin C, Francis F (2006) Branching and nucleokinesis defects in migrating interneurons derived from doublecortin knockout mice. Hum Mol Genet 15:1387–1400. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl062 pmid:16571605
  20. Kato M, Dobyns WB (2005) X-linked lissencephaly with abnormal genitalia as a tangential migration disorder causing intractable epilepsy: proposal for a new term, “interneuronopathy.” J Child Neurol 20:392–397. doi:10.1177/08830738050200042001 pmid:15921244
  21. Kim H, Jung O, Kang M, Lee MS, Jeong D, Ryu J, Ko Y, Choi YJ, Lee JW (2012) JNK signaling activity regulates cell-cell adhesions via TM4SF5-mediated p27(Kip1) phosphorylation. Cancer Lett 314:198–205. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2011.09.030 pmid:22014979
  22. Kojic M, Wainwright B (2016) The many faces of elongator in neurodevelopment and disease. Front Mol Neurosci 9:115. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2016.00115 pmid:27847465
  23. Luccardini C, Hennekinne L, Viou L, Yanagida M, Murakami F, Kessaris N, Ma X, Adelstein RS, Mège RM, Métin C (2013) N-cadherin sustains motility and polarity of future cortical interneurons during tangential migration. J Neurosci 33:18149–18160. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0593-13.2013 pmid:24227724
  24. Luccardini C, Leclech C, Viou L, Rio JP, Métin C (2015) Cortical interneurons migrating on a pure substrate of N-cadherin exhibit fast synchronous centrosomal and nuclear movements and reduced ciliogenesis. Front Cell Neurosci 9:286. doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00286 pmid:26283922
  25. Lysko DE, Putt M, Golden JA (2011) SDF1 regulates leading process branching and speed of migrating interneurons. J Neurosci 31:1739–1745. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3118-10.2011 pmid:21289183
  26. Lysko DE, Putt M, Golden JA (2014) SDF1 reduces interneuron leading process branching through dual regulation of actin and microtubules. J Neurosci 34:4941–4962. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4351-12.2014 pmid:24695713
  27. Martini FJ, Valdeolmillos M (2010) Actomyosin contraction at the cell rear drives nuclear translocation in migrating cortical interneurons. J Neurosci 30:8660–8670. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1962-10.2010 pmid:20573911
  28. Martini FJ, Valiente M, López Bendito G, Szabó G, Moya F, Valdeolmillos M, Marín O (2009) Biased selection of leading process branches mediates chemotaxis during tangential neuronal migration. Development 136:41–50. doi:10.1242/dev.025502 pmid:19060332
  29. Matsumoto M, Sawada M, García-González D, Herranz-Pérez V, Ogino T, Bang Nguyen H, Quynh Thai T, Narita K, Kumamoto N, Ugawa S, Saito Y, Takeda S, Kaneko N, Khodosevich K, Monyer H, García-Verdugo JM, Ohno N, Sawamoto K (2019) Dynamic changes in ultrastructure of the primary cilium in migrating neuroblasts in the postnatal brain. J Neurosci 39:9967–9988. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1503-19.2019 pmid:31685650
  30. Meechan DW, Tucker ES, Maynard TM, LaMantia AS (2012) Cxcr4 regulation of interneuron migration is disrupted in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:18601–18606. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211507109 pmid:23091025
  31. Miyoshi G, Hjerling-Leffler J, Karayannis T, Sousa VH, Butt SJ, Battiste J, Johnson JE, Machold RP, Fishell G (2010) Genetic fate mapping reveals that the caudal ganglionic eminence produces a large and diverse population of superficial cortical interneurons. J Neurosci 30:1582–1594. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4515-09.2010 pmid:20130169
  32. Moya F, Valdeolmillos M (2004) Polarized increase of calcium and nucleokinesis in tangentially migrating neurons. Cereb Cortex 14:610–618. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh022 pmid:15054076
  33. Myers AK, Meechan DW, Adney DR, Tucker ES (2014) Cortical interneurons require Jnk1 to enter and navigate the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 34:7787–7801. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4695-13.2014 pmid:24899703
  34. Myers AK, Cunningham JG, Smith SE, Snow JP, Smoot CA, Tucker ES (2020) JNK signaling is required for proper tangential migration and laminar allocation of cortical interneurons. Development 147:dev180646. doi:10.1242/dev.180646
  35. Nadarajah B, Alifragis P, Wong RO, Parnavelas JG (2003) Neuronal migration in the developing cerebral cortex: observations based on real-time imaging. Cereb Cortex 13:607–611. doi:10.1093/cercor/13.6.607 pmid:12764035
  36. Nakamuta S, Yang YT, Wang CL, Gallo NB, Yu JR, Tai Y, Van Aelst L (2017) Dual role for DOCK7 in tangential migration of interneuron precursors in the postnatal forebrain. J Cell Biol 216:4313–4330. doi:10.1083/jcb.201704157 pmid:29089377
  37. Nery S, Fishell G, Corbin JG (2002) The caudal ganglionic eminence is a source of distinct cortical and subcortical cell populations. Nat Neurosci 5:1279–1287. doi:10.1038/nn971 pmid:12411960
  38. Peyre E, Silva CG, Nguyen L (2015) Crosstalk between intracellular and extracellular signals regulating interneuron production, migration and integration into the cortex. Front Cell Neurosci 9:129. doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00129 pmid:25926769
  39. Polleux F, Ghosh A (2002) The slice overlay assay: a versatile tool to study the influence of extracellular signals on neuronal development. Sci STKE 2002:pl9. doi:10.1126/stke.2002.136.pl9 pmid:12060788
  40. Polleux F, Whitford KL, Dijkhuizen PA, Vitalis T, Ghosh A (2002) Control of cortical interneuron migration by neurotrophins and PI3-kinase signaling. Development 129:3147–3160. pmid:12070090
  41. Riccio O, Potter G, Walzer C, Vallet P, Szabó G, Vutskits L, Kiss JZ, Dayer AG (2009) Excess of serotonin affects embryonic interneuron migration through activation of the serotonin receptor 6. Mol Psychiatry 14:280–290. doi:10.1038/mp.2008.89 pmid:18663366
  42. Silva CG, Peyre E, Adhikari MH, Tielens S, Tanco S, Van Damme P, Magno L, Krusy N, Agirman G, Magiera MM, Kessaris N, Malgrange B, Andrieux A, Janke C, Nguyen L (2018) Cell-intrinsic control of interneuron migration drives cortical morphogenesis. Cell 172:1063–1078.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.031 pmid:29474907
  43. Solecki DJ, Trivedi N, Govek EE, Kerekes RA, Gleason SS, Hatten ME (2009) Myosin II motors and F-actin dynamics drive the coordinated movement of the centrosome and soma during CNS glial-guided neuronal migration. Neuron 63:63–80. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.028 pmid:19607793
  44. Spillane M, Ketschek A, Jones SL, Korobova F, Marsick B, Lanier L, Svitkina T, Gallo G (2011) The actin nucleating Arp2/3 complex contributes to the formation of axonal filopodia and branches through the regulation of actin patch precursors to filopodia. Dev Neurobiol 71:747–758. doi:10.1002/dneu.20907 pmid:21557512
  45. Stenman J, Toresson H, Campbell K (2003) Identification of two distinct progenitor populations in the lateral ganglionic eminence: implications for striatal and olfactory bulb neurogenesis. J Neurosci 23:167–174. pmid:12514213
  46. Stoufflet J, Chaulet M, Doulazmi M, Fouquet C, Dubacq C, Métin C, Trembleau A, Vincent P, Caillé I (2019) Primary cilium cAMP regulates cyclic saltatory neuronal migration at the centrosome. bioRvix. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765925.
  47. Tielens S, Huysseune S, Godin JD, Chariot A, Malgrange B, Nguyen L (2016) Elongator controls cortical interneuron migration by regulating actomyosin dynamics. Cell Res 26:1131–1148. doi:10.1038/cr.2016.112 pmid:27670698
  48. Tsai LH, Gleeson JG (2005) Nucleokinesis in neuronal migration. Neuron 46:383–388. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.013 pmid:15882636
  49. Tucker ES, Polleux F, LaMantia AS (2006) Position and time specify the migration of a pioneering population of olfactory bulb interneurons. Dev Biol 297:387–401. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.009 pmid:16790240
  50. Umeshima H, Hirano T, Kengaku M (2007) Microtubule-based nuclear movement occurs independently of centrosome positioning in migrating neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16182–16187. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708047104 pmid:17913873
  51. Volk DW, Chitrapu A, Edelson JR, Lewis DA (2015) Chemokine receptors and cortical interneuron dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 167:12–17. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.031
  52. Wang X, Nadarajah B, Robinson AC, McColl BW, Jin JW, Dajas-Bailador F, Boot-Handford RP, Tournier C (2007) Targeted deletion of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 gene in the nervous system causes severe brain developmental defects and premature death. Mol Cell Biol 27:7935–7946. doi:10.1128/MCB.00226-07 pmid:17875933
  53. Wang Y, Li G, Stanco A, Long JE, Crawford D, Potter GB, Pleasure SJ, Behrens T, Rubenstein JL (2011) CXCR4 and CXCR7 have distinct functions in regulating interneuron migration. Neuron 69:61–76. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.005 pmid:21220099
  54. Westerlund N, Zdrojewska J, Padzik A, Komulainen E, Björkblom B, Rannikko E, Tararuk T, Garcia-Frigola C, Sandholm J, Nguyen L, Kallunki T, Courtney MJ, Coffey ET (2011) Phosphorylation of SCG10/stathmin-2 determines multipolar stage exit and neuronal migration rate. Nat Neurosci 14:305–313. doi:10.1038/nn.2755 pmid:21297631
  55. Wichterle H, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Herrera DG, Alvarez-Buylla A (1999) Young neurons from medial ganglionic eminence disperse in adult and embryonic brain. Nat Neurosci 2:461–466. doi:10.1038/8131 pmid:10321251
  56. Xu Q, Cobos I, De La Cruz E, Rubenstein JL, Anderson SA (2004) Origins of cortical interneuron subtypes. J Neurosci 24:2612–2622. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5667-03.2004 pmid:15028753
  57. Yamasaki T, Kawasaki H, Arakawa S, Shimizu K, Shimizu S, Reiner O, Okano H, Nishina S, Azuma N, Penninger JM, Katada T, Nishina H (2011) Stress-activated protein kinase MKK7 regulates axon elongation in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 31:16872–16883. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1111-11.2011 pmid:22090513
  58. Yamauchi J, Miyamoto Y, Chan JR, Tanoue A (2008) ErbB2 directly activates the exchange factor Dock7 to promote Schwann cell migration. J Cell Biol 181:351–365. doi:10.1083/jcb.200709033 pmid:18426980
  59. Yamauchi J, Miyamoto Y, Hamasaki H, Sanbe A, Kusakawa S, Nakamura A, Tsumura H, Maeda M, Nemoto N, Kawahara K, Torii T, Tanoue A (2011) The atypical guanine-nucleotide exchange factor, dock7, negatively regulates schwann cell differentiation and myelination. J Neurosci 31:12579–12592. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2738-11.2011 pmid:21880919
  60. Yanagida M, Miyoshi R, Toyokuni R, Zhu Y, Murakami F (2012) Dynamics of the leading process, nucleus, and Golgi apparatus of migrating cortical interneurons in living mouse embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:16737–16742. doi:10.1073/pnas.1209166109 pmid:23010922
  61. Zhang F, Yu J, Yang T, Xu D, Chi Z, Xia Y, Xu Z (2016) A novel c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling complex involved in neuronal migration during brain development. J Biol Chem 291:11466–11475. doi:10.1074/jbc.M116.716811 pmid:27026702

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Alfonso Represa, INSERM

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below.

The manuscript investigated the role of Jnk signaling for cortical interneuron migratory behaviors and provided evidence that it affects multiple modes of migratory behaviors. Using interneuron-specific, conditional genetic models of Jnk1, Jnk2, and Jnk3, pharmacological inhibition of JNK signaling, and live imaging of the interneuron, the authors show that inhibition of JNK signaling in interneurons disrupts the kinetics of leading process branching, rate and amplitude of nucleokinesis, and kinetics of the centrosome and primary cilium to the trailing process. The mechanism of how JNK signaling regulates migratory behaviors was not elucidated.

There are several important issues to be addressed:

1. In pharmacological experiments, the authors analyzed the behavior of interneurons on feeder cells of the cortex in the presence and absence of a pan-JNK inhibitor, SP600125. How can the authors exclude the possibility that the observed changes in interneuron behaviors were indirectly caused by feeder neurons, which might also be affected by SP600125?

2. In an article published earlier (Development (2020) 147, dev180646. doi:10.1242/dev.180646), results very similar to those in Figures 1 and 4 were reported. In this study, cortical slices were used but the same pharmacological agent and knockout mice were used. This needs to be clearly stated /commented in the ms.

3. The authors also genetically ablated all three JNK genes from interneurons by using mice containing the Dlx5/6-CIE transgene to conditionally remove Jnk1 from Jnk2;Jnk3 double knockout embryos (Dlx5/6-CIE;Jnk1fl/fl;Jnk2-/-;Jnk3-/-). Although they claim that the results are "similar" to those of pharmacological experiments, this is not that truthful. For example, while the migratory speed is greatly reduced by the addition of SP600125 (Figure 1D), it was virtually unaffected (Figure 4D).

4. The major effect of SP600125 is a reduction of migration speed. Other phenotypes may have resulted from delayed migration. To address this issue, the authors could compare the migratory behaviors of neurons with a similar speed between SP600125-treated and untreated cultures.

5. The methods of data sampling are not sufficiently described. For each analysis, the number of cells and the number of cultures should be clarified, and if there was a variation among cultures, it should also be described.

6. Quantification requires definitions of parameters to be quantified. Please provide the definitions of growth cone splitting, side branch, cytoplasmic swelling, and the nucleus.

7. Have authors evaluated the changes in primary cilia length in migrating MGE interneurons, in addition to their cellular localization (related to Figure 6) ?, this may help to provide a comprehensive representation of primary cilia dynamics during interneuronal migration. Similarly, inclusion of basic changes in primary cilia in conditional triple knockout (cTKO) interneurons in vivo will further strengthen the impact of this manuscript.

8. In discussion, incorporation of recent studies on cilia driven signaling mechanisms in migrating neurons (Stoufflet et al., 2019) and other neuronal migration related studies (Guo et al., 2015) would be useful.

9. Histogram data in figures must be presented as Box and Whisker, or even better scatter plot.

Author Response

Author response:

1. In pharmacological experiments, the authors analyzed the behavior of interneurons on feeder cells of the cortex in the presence and absence of a pan-JNK inhibitor, SP600125. How can the authors exclude the possibility that the observed changes in interneuron behaviors were indirectly caused by feeder neurons, which might also be affected by SP600125?

We are unable to completely exclude the possibility that changes in interneuron migratory behavior in SP600125 experiments result from non-cell autonomous effects of JNK inhibition. It is unlikely that all influence of JNK on interneuron migration is extrinsic in origin however, since we demonstrate that genetic loss of JNK signaling exclusively from interneurons recapitulates important aspects of our pharmacological findings (Results page 14 lines 329-335). Nevertheless, phenotypic differences observed between pharmacological inhibition of JNK and genetic ablation of JNK from interneurons may arise from differences in cell intrinsic versus extrinsic requirements. These concepts are now clarified in the Discussion page 24-25 lines 575-595.

2. In an article published earlier (Development (2020) 147, dev180646. doi:10.1242/dev.180646), results very similar to those in Figures 1 and 4 were reported. In this study, cortical slices were used but the same pharmacological agent and knockout mice were used. This needs to be clearly stated /commented in the ms.

Thank you for this suggestion. We now explicitly state how the current study both corroborates and extends previously published work in the introduction page 3 lines 57-66, results page 10 lines 232-235; page 15 lines 344-346, and discussion page 24 lines 566-572 sections.

3. The authors also genetically ablated all three JNK genes from interneurons by using mice containing the Dlx5/6-CIE transgene to conditionally remove Jnk1 from Jnk2;Jnk3 double knockout embryos (Dlx5/6-CIE;Jnk1fl/fl;Jnk2-/-;Jnk3-/-). Although they claim that the results are "similar" to those of pharmacological experiments, this is not that truthful. For example, while the migratory speed is greatly reduced by the addition of SP600125 (Figure 1D), it was virtually unaffected (Figure 4D).

Results obtained from analyzing migratory properties of cTKO interneurons were indeed distinct from pharmacological inhibition, particularly with respect to migratory speed and nucleokinesis. Although branching was comparably affected between experimental manipulations, frequency of nucleokinesis, as well as overall migration speed, were not. We adjusted language throughout the manuscript to reflect these important distinctions more accurately (Abstract page 1 lines 10-12; Introduction pages 3-4 lines 71-75; Results page 16 lines 376-381; Discussion page 19 lines 452-461 and page 24-25 lines 575-595).

4. The major effect of SP600125 is a reduction of migration speed. Other phenotypes may have resulted from delayed migration. To address this issue, the authors could compare the migratory behaviors of neurons with a similar speed between SP600125-treated and untreated cultures.

In order to fully address this suggestion, we analyzed the migratory behavior of individual interneurons traveling at the same average migratory speed in control and JNK inhibited conditions. Intriguingly, we found statistically significant reductions in the distance of large nucleokinesis events and concomitant reductions in the maximum migratory speeds obtained under JNK inhibition, even when the average speed that interneurons traveled was not impaired. We also found branching anomalies in cells that traveled at similar average migratory speeds, suggesting features of nucleokinesis and branching are interrupted independent of speed following JNK inhibition. These data are contained in a completely new Extended Data figure (Fig. 1-1) and are explained in the text of the results pages 13-14 lines 306-326 and discussion page 19 lines 449-452 sections.

5. The methods of data sampling are not sufficiently described. For each analysis, the number of cells and the number of cultures should be clarified, and if there was a variation among cultures, it should also be described.

The requested information pertaining to data sampling is now more adequately described in the methods section on pages 6-8 lines 142-181; 187-191.

6. Quantification requires definitions of parameters to be quantified. Please provide the definitions of growth cone splitting, side branch, cytoplasmic swelling, and the nucleus.

Definitions of measured parameters are now explicitly stated in methods pages 7 lines 148-151; 159-164.

7. Have authors evaluated the changes in primary cilia length in migrating MGE interneurons, in addition to their cellular localization (related to Figure 6) ?, this may help to provide a comprehensive representation of primary cilia dynamics during interneuronal migration. Similarly, inclusion of basic changes in primary cilia in conditional triple knockout (cTKO) interneurons in vivo will further strengthen the impact of this manuscript.

In order to address this suggestion, we measured the length of cilia over time in cells migrating in control or JNK inhibited conditions. Interestingly, we did not find any differences in the length of cilia, irrespective of subcellular localization, between control and SP600125 treated interneurons. This finding suggests that JNK signaling is not required for the formation or maintenance of cilia, but rather for directing cilia to the correct location. These new data are now included in Fig. 7F and described in the text of the results pages 18-19 lines 436-439 and discussion page 24 lines 559-564 sections.

Although we agree that analyses of interneuron cilia in cTKO brains would strengthen the manuscript, these studies proved too challenging to include in this revised submission. The dynamic behavior of cilia makes analyses of static fixed images from in vivo brain sections difficult to quantitatively analyze and interpret. Future work will be needed to examine dynamic subcellular distribution and function of cilia in migrating cTKO interneurons.

8. In discussion, incorporation of recent studies on cilia driven signaling mechanisms in migrating neurons (Stoufflet et al., 2019) and other neuronal migration related studies (Guo et al., 2015) would be useful.

We agree and have incorporated these recent findings into our discussion section page 22 lines 516-520 and page 23 lines 549-553.

9. Histogram data in figures must be presented as Box and Whisker, or even better scatter plot.

In response to this suggestion and editorial recommendations, we have re-analyzed our data using estimation statistics as described in methods page 9 lines 196-201 and the corresponding figure legends. Histograms have been completely removed and replaced by scatter plots in each figure. For estimation statistics, data are presented in scatterplot format with confidence intervals for the mean difference between groups indicated on the right side of each graph.

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.