Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Neuronal Excitability

T-Type Calcium Channels Contribute to Burst Firing in a Subpopulation of Medial Habenula Neurons

Casey R. Vickstrom, Xiaojie Liu, Yuqi Zhang, Lianwei Mu, Thomas J. Kelly, Xudong Yan, Meng-ming Hu, Shana T. Snarrenberg and Qing-song Liu
eNeuro 27 July 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0201-20.2020; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0201-20.2020

Abstract

Action potential (AP) burst firing caused by the activation of low-voltage-activated T-type Ca2+ channels is a unique mode of neuronal firing. T-type channels have been implicated in diverse physiological and pathophysiological processes, including epilepsy, autism, and mood regulation, but the brain structures involved remain incompletely understood. The medial habenula (MHb) is an epithalamic structure implicated in anxiety-like and withdrawal behavior. Previous studies have shown that MHb neurons fire tonic APs at a frequency of ∼2–10 Hz or display depolarized low-amplitude membrane oscillations. Here, we report in C57BL/6J mice that a subpopulation of MHb neurons are capable of firing transient, high-frequency AP bursts mediated by T-type channels. Burst firing was observed following rebounding from hyperpolarizing current injections or during depolarization from hyperpolarized membrane potentials in ∼20% of MHb neurons. It was rarely observed at baseline but could be evoked in MHb neurons displaying different initial activity states. Further, we show that T-type channel mRNA, in particular Cav3.1, is expressed in the MHb in both cholinergic and substance P-ergic neurons. Pharmacological Cav3 antagonism blocked both burst firing and evoked Ca2+ currents in MHb neurons. Additionally, we observed high-frequency AP doublet firing at sustained depolarized membrane potentials that was independent of T-type channels. Thus, there is a greater diversity of AP firing patterns in MHb neurons than previously identified, including T-type channel-mediated burst firing, which may uniquely contribute to behaviors with relevance to neuropsychiatric disease.

  • burst
  • calcium
  • habenula
  • T-type channel

Significance Statement

Previous studies have reported that medial habenula (MHb) neurons solely fire tonic action potentials (APs) at ∼2–10 Hz or display depolarized low amplitude membrane oscillations. In contrast, we found that a subpopulation of MHb neurons fire high-frequency AP bursts that share the characteristics of T-type Ca2+ channel-mediated low threshold spikes and were blocked by pharmacological antagonism of T-type Ca2+ channels. T-type Ca2+ channel mRNA, especially Cav3.1, is expressed in the MHb in both cholinergic and substance P-ergic neurons. T-type channel-independent AP doublets were also observed in MHb neurons at sustained depolarized membrane potentials. Thus, there is a greater diversity of AP firing patterns in MHb neurons than previously recognized, including T-type Ca2+ channel-mediated burst firing.

Introduction

Burst action potential (AP) firing mediated by the activation of low-voltage-activated T-type Ca2+ channels is a unique mode of neuronal activity that occurs in various neuronal populations, particularly in thalamic, septal, and sensory neurons (Perez-Reyes, 2003; Cheong and Shin, 2013; Lambert et al., 2014). This burst firing has been shown to mediate important physiological and pathophysiological processes, including the synchronization of the thalamocortical circuit and the generation of rhythmic neuronal activity during normal sleep (Huguenard and McCormick, 2007), spike-wave discharges in absence epilepsy (Huguenard and McCormick, 2007), and neuropathic pain (Bourinet et al., 2016). Additionally, mutations in T-type Ca2+ channel genes have been implicated in epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder, and schizophrenia (Weiss and Zamponi, 2020). There are three distinct T-type Ca2+ channel genes: CACNA1G, CACNA1H, and CACNA1I, which encode the pore-forming α1 subunits known as Cav3.1, Cav3.2, and Cav3.3, respectively (Perez-Reyes, 2003). In contrast to the other voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, T-type Ca2+ channels have unique features, including low-voltage activation, rapid voltage-dependent inactivation, and the generation of transient currents that can trigger a brief burst of high-frequency APs (Llinás and Jahnsen, 1982; Perez-Reyes, 2003; Cheong and Shin, 2013). As a large proportion of T-type Ca2+ channels are inactivated at typical resting membrane potentials (Vm), neuron hyperpolarization can de-inactivate T-type Ca2+ channels and trigger a burst of APs, a phenomenon called “rebound bursting” (Llinás and Jahnsen, 1982; Perez-Reyes, 2003; Cheong and Shin, 2013). Burst firing can have unique functional consequences, including information encoding by enhancing signal-to-noise ratio, facilitation of neuropeptide release, and increasing the reliability of synaptic transmission (Lisman, 1997; Schultz et al., 1997; van den Pol, 2012).

The habenula is a phylogenetically conserved epithalamic brain structure that is broadly classified into medial [medial habenula (MHb)] and lateral (LHb) subnuclei (Sutherland, 1982; Antolin-Fontes et al., 2015; Boulos et al., 2017). The MHb regulates anxiety-like and depressive-like behavior (Görlich et al., 2013; Hsu et al., 2014, 2016), fear extinction (Soria-Gómez et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016), nicotine intake and withdrawal (Fowler et al., 2011; Frahm et al., 2015; Zhao-Shea et al., 2015; Tuesta et al., 2017), opioid withdrawal (Boulos et al., 2020), and stress responsivity in zebrafish (Agetsuma et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010; Mathuru and Jesuthasan, 2013). There is well-documented evidence that neurons of the LHb are capable of firing bursts of APs mediated by T-type Ca2+ channel activation (Wilcox et al., 1988; Chang and Kim, 2004; Cui et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). Recent work has shown that LHb burst firing contributes to the development of depressive-like behavior in rodents and that the rapid antidepressant effects of ketamine are mediated by blockade of LHb burst firing (Cui et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). In contrast, previous electrophysiological studies report that MHb neurons solely fire tonic, regular APs at a frequency between ∼2 and 10 Hz (Kim and Chang, 2005; Kim and Chung, 2007; Görlich et al., 2013; Sakhi et al., 2014; Shih et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2016; Otsu et al., 2018; Weiss et al., 2018; Arvin et al., 2019; Ge et al., 2019).

In this study, we identified a subpopulation of MHb neurons that are capable of firing high-frequency AP bursts. Although only ∼7% of MHb neurons displayed burst firing at baseline, ∼20% displayed burst firing following membrane hyperpolarization or with depolarization from a hyperpolarized Vm. Burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm was blocked by the selective T-type Ca2+ channel antagonist Z944 (Tringham et al., 2012). We identified robust expression of Cav3.1 mRNA predominantly in the lateral MHb using RNAscope in situ hybridization, which co-localized with tachykinin-1 (Tac1) and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), markers which define neurons of the dorsal and ventral MHb, respectively. These neurons have distinct anatomic projections to the interpeduncular nucleus and have unique roles in regulating anxiety-like and depressive-like behavior and nicotine dependence (Molas et al., 2017). Thus, MHb neuron burst firing, especially that mediated by T-type channel activation, is a previously unidentified mode of neuronal activity that could regulate diverse behaviors relevant to neuropsychiatric disorders.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the Medical College of Wisconsin animal care committee’s regulations. C57BL/6J mice were given ad libitum access to food and water and housed four to five per cage in a temperature (23 ± 1°C) and humidity-controlled room (40–60%) with a 14/10 h light/dark cycle. All experiments were performed on adult male or female C57BL/6J mice (8–10 weeks old). C57BL/6J mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Experiments were performed between zeitgeber time (ZT)8 and ZT14, where ZT0 is lights on.

Slice preparation and electrophysiology

Mice were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation and decapitated. The brain was trimmed and embedded in 3% low-melting-point agarose, and coronal slices containing the MHb (200 μm thick) were cut using a vibrating slicer (Leica VT1200s). Slices were prepared in a NMDG-based solution containing the following: 92 mm NMDG, 2.5 mm KCl, 1.25 mm NaH2PO4, 26 mm NaHCO3, 20 mm HEPES, 25 mm glucose, 2 mm thiourea, 5 mm Na-ascorbate, 3 mm Na-pyruvate, 0.5 mm CaCl2·2H2O, and 7 mm MgSO4 (pH 7.3–7.4 with HCl). Artificial CSF (ACSF), containing the following: 119 mm NaCl, 3 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 1.25 mm NaH2PO4, 25 mm NaHCO3, and 10 mm glucose, was gradually spiked-in to the NMDG-containing solution after slice cutting in 5-min intervals for a total of 20 min at room temperature, similar to a previously described approach (Ting et al., 2018). Some slices were cut in a sucrose-based solution containing the following: 68 mm sucrose, 78 mm NaCl, 3 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 1.25 mm NaH2PO4, 25 mm NaHCO3, and 25 mm glucose. These slices were incubated in the same solution for 20 min after cutting. The slices were then allowed to recover for at least 1 h in ACSF. All solutions were saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2.

Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made using patch-clamp amplifiers (Multiclamp 700B) under infrared differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using DigiData 1550B digitizers and the analysis software pClamp 10.7 (Molecular Devices). Signals were filtered at 2 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz. Recordings were performed in the presence of the AMPA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione disodium salt (CNQX; 10 μm) and GABAA receptor antagonist picrotoxin (50 μm) unless otherwise stated. For before-and-after comparisons, the selective T-type Ca2+ channel antagonist Z944 (3 μm), the NMDA receptor antagonists (RS)−3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP; 5 μm) or D-(-)−2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5; 50 μm), or CNQX (20 μm) were bath perfused in ACSF in recordings where neurons fired apparent bursts, and current protocols that induced bursting before drug perfusion were repeated after drug perfusion. Ca2+ current recordings used two different voltage protocols to evoked Ca2+ currents. For determining the voltage dependence of activation, neurons were first held for 1 s at −90 mV, followed by a 320-ms step to progressively more depolarized holding potentials in 5-mV increments, beginning at −90 mV and finishing at −30 mV, followed by return to −90 mV holding for 500 ms. Neurons were held at −70 mV between sweeps. For determining the voltage dependence of inactivation, neurons were first held for 3.6 s at progressively more depolarized membrane potentials in 5-mV increments, beginning at −120 mV and finishing at −50 mV. After this initial holding potential, neurons were stepped to −50 mV for 320, followed by holding at −90 mV for 1 s. Neurons were held at −70 mV between sweeps. Glass pipettes (3–6 MΩ) for current clamp recordings were filled with an internal solution containing the following: 140 mm K-gluconate, 5 mm KCl, 10 mm HEPES, 0.2 mm EGTA, 2 mm MgCl2, 4 mm Mg-ATP, 0.3 mm Na2GTP, and 10 mm Na2-phosphocreatine (pH 7.2 with KOH). Glass pipettes for voltage clamp recordings of Ca2+ currents were filled with an internal solution containing the following: 135 mm tetramethyl ammonium (TMA)-OH, 10 mm EGTA, 2 mm MgCl2, and 40 mm HEPES, titrated to pH 7.2 with hydrofluoric acid (HF; Todorovic and Lingle, 1998). Series resistance (15–30 MΩ) was monitored throughout all recordings, and data were discarded if the resistance changed by >20%. Liquid junction potentials were not corrected for. All recordings were performed at 32 ± 1°C using an automatic temperature controller (Warner Instruments).

RNAscope in situ hybridization

Mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and transcardially perfused with 0.1 m sodium PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 4% sucrose-PBS (pH 7.4). After perfusion, the brain was removed and postfixed in the same fixative for 4 h at 4°C and was then dehydrated in increasing concentrations of sucrose (20% and 30%) in 0.1 m PBS at 4°C and frozen on dry ice. Coronal MHb sections (10 μm) were cut with a Leica cryostat and mounted on Superfrost Plus microscope slides (Fisher Scientific). Probes targeting the mRNA transcripts of Cav3.1 (target region: base pairs 1263–2886 of Mus musculus CACNA1G, NM_009783.3), Cav3.2 (target region: base pairs 2287–4243 of M. musculus CACNA1H, NM_021415.4), Cav3.3 (target region: base pairs 1259–2600 of M. musculus CACNA1I, NM_001044308.2), ChAT (target region: base pairs 1090–1952 of M. musculus ChAT, NM_009891.2), and Tac1 (target region: base pairs 20–1034 of M. musculus tachykinin 1, NM_009311.2) were designed by and purchased from Advanced Cell Diagnostics Inc. The experiment was conducted as per the manufacturer’s instructions for the RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent V2 Assay. Stained slides were mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen) and imaged on a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope. A probe targeting Bacilus subtilis protein DapB was used as a negative control, whereas probes targeting the ubiquitously expressed Polr2a, PPIB, and UBC served as positive controls.

Statistics and data analysis

Paired t tests were used to analyze bursting before and after drug perfusion in current clamp recordings. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used to analyze the effect of Z944 on evoked Ca2+ currents. Expression of T-type channel mRNA was analyzed by one-way ANOVA on ranks for Cav3.1, Cav3.2, and Cav3.3 from MHb slices because of non-normally distributed data (Shapiro–Wilk p < 0.05), followed by Dunn’s post hoc multiple comparison testing. Cav3.1 expression in the medial versus lateral MHb was analyzed by unpaired t test. The voltage-dependencies of activation and inactivation were described by the following Boltzmann functions: Activation:G(V) = Gmax/(1 + exp [− (V−V50)/k]) Inactivation:I(V) = Imax/(1 + exp[(V−V50)/k])

Results

Diverse electrophysiological states of MHb neurons

Cell-attached and whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made to determine the activity state of MHb neurons at baseline. In whole-cell recordings, an assessment was made in the first few seconds to avoid alteration of cell state by the internal solution. MHb neurons exhibited a variety of distinct activity states at baseline. About half (66 of 130, 50.8%) of MHb neurons exhibited spontaneous, tonic AP firing at a frequency of ∼2–10 Hz (Fig. 1A,F). About a third (43 of 130, 33.1%) were electrophysiologically silent (Fig. 1B,F). A minority (12 of 130, 9.2%) of MHb neurons exhibited depolarized low-amplitude membrane oscillations (DLAMOs; Fig. 1C,F), characterized by oscillatory fluctuations in membrane potential (Vm; Sakhi et al., 2014). Additionally, we observed a small population of neurons that exhibited high-frequency AP firing. At baseline, most spontaneously high-frequency AP firing MHb neurons fired AP doublets at a frequency of ∼75–125 Hz at an average resting Vm of −45.2 ± 1.5 mV (Fig. 1D; 8 of 130 total neurons, 6.2%; Fig. 1F), whereas one neuron spontaneously fired long trains of APs on top of a prominent depolarized plateau potential followed by an afterdepolarization (Fig. 1E; 1 of 130 total neurons, 0.8%; Fig. 1F). The average intraburst frequency was 27.2 ± 1.8 Hz, and the average interburst interval was 2.3 ± 0.6 s in this neuron. The average resting Vm in silent cells was significantly more hyperpolarized relative to that in tonic, silent, DLAMO, and depolarized doublet firing MHb neurons (Fig. 1G). Thus, MHb neurons display a variety of electrophysiological states at baseline, including high-frequency AP firing that has not been previously reported.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Diverse activity states of MHb neurons. MHb neurons displayed diverse activity states at baseline. The majority of neurons exhibited tonic AP firing (A), whereas others were silent (B), displayed DLAMOs (C), fired AP doublets at depolarized membrane potentials (D), or bursted at a hyperpolarized membrane potential (E). F, Percent of MHb neurons that displayed different activity states at baseline. G, Average resting membrane potential of different cell states; *p < 0.05 versus silent. Hyp., hyperpolarized.

Burst firing from hyperpolarized membrane potentials

Although burst firing in MHb neurons has not been previously reported, neurons of the nearby LHb and thalamus display burst firing that resembles the hyperpolarized burst firing we observed, which is mediated by the activation of T-type Ca2+ channels (Wilcox et al., 1988; Perez-Reyes, 2003; Chang and Kim, 2004; Cheong and Shin, 2013; Lambert et al., 2014; Cui et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). T-type channels are a member of the low-voltage activated (LVA) family of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Perez-Reyes, 2003; Cheong and Shin, 2013). They can be activated by low-level membrane depolarization, though sustained depolarization leads to channel inactivation and can cause a switch to tonic firing (McCormick and Pape, 1990). We thus tested whether depolarization of MHb neurons from a hyperpolarized Vm can trigger burst firing and whether prolonged depolarization causes a transition to tonic firing.

In a silent MHb neuron, a depolarization step (10 pA) from the resting Vm (−63 mV) triggered high-frequency AP firing (AP frequency = 85 Hz) that resembled the hyperpolarized burst firing observed in Figure 1E, in that it fired a train of APs on top of a depolarized plateau potential and was followed by a large afterdepolarization (Fig. 2A). When the Vm was changed to −58 mV through constant current injection (10 pA), the same depolarization step (10 pA) triggered transient burst firing at 34 Hz, followed by tonic firing at 3.5 Hz. When the Vm was further depolarized to −52 mV by 20-pA constant current injection, the 10-pA depolarization step triggered tonic firing at 3.8 Hz. Similarly, ramp depolarization (0 to +50 pA ramp, 5-s duration) from a resting Vm of −75 mV triggered initial burst firing in an MHb neuron (Fig. 2B). As the Vm became more depolarized during the ramp, burst firing transitioned to tonic firing. Burst firing remained when the Vm was more hyperpolarized than approximately −55 mV but transitioned to tonic firing as the Vm depolarized above this level. At a Vm of −44 mV, only repetitive tonic firing was observed. In a different MHb neuron, initial burst firing to ramp depolarization was similarly observed from a resting Vm of −68 mV, but burst firing was not observed with constant current injection to −57 or −53 mV before the ramp (Fig. 2C). Ramp depolarization-induced burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm (<−60 mV before ramp) triggered initial burst firing in 30 of 152 MHb neurons (19.7%). Burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm that is abolished by holding the neuron at depolarized potentials suggests that T-type channel activation contributes to the initial burst firing.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Depolarization from hyperpolarized membrane potentials triggered burst firing in a subset of MHb neurons. A, Step depolarization triggered burst firing from a resting Vm of −63 mV. With constant current injection to a Vm of −58 mV, step depolarization triggered initial burst firing followed by tonic firing. With constant current injection to a Vm of −52 mV, step depolarization triggered solely tonic firing. B, Ramp depolarization from a Vm <−60 mV triggered initial burst firing in 30 of 152 MHb neurons (19.7%). Tonic firing was observed as the Vm depolarized above approximately −55 mV. C, Bursting was observed when the Vm was −68 mV before ramp depolarization but was abolished with constant current injection to −57 or −53 mV before the ramp.

T-type channels are nearly completely inactivated when neurons are held at a Vm >−60 mV (Perez-Reyes, 2003; Cheong and Shin, 2013). As the average Vm of tonic neurons was −47.0 ± 1.5 mV, it is possible that membrane hyperpolarization may convert these neurons to burst firing neurons. In a tonic firing cell with a resting Vm of −40 mV, ramp hyperpolarization (0 to −20 pA, 5 s) converted tonic firing to burst firing (Fig. 3A). Tonic firing resumed after the Vm spontaneously depolarized above −50 mV. Thus, MHb neuron firing states can be interchangeable depending on their Vm.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Hyperpolarization triggered burst firing in a subset of MHb neurons. A, Ramp hyperpolarization in a tonic firing neuron with a resting Vm of −40 mV converted tonic firing to burst firing. B, Progressively longer hyperpolarizing current injections triggered rebound burst firing in an MHb neuron. C, Progressively greater hyperpolarizing current injections triggered rebound burst firing in an MHb neuron. D, A 1.5-s-long hyperpolarizing current injection triggered rebound burst firing in an MHb neuron. E, Baseline state of MHb neurons that displayed burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm (<−60 mV).

We evaluated whether the offset of a prolonged hyperpolarizing current step could induce rebound burst firing. A series of hyperpolarizing current steps (0 to −50 pA, Δ50 ms) triggered rebound burst firing in an MHb neuron (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, as the hyperpolarization duration lengthened, the high-frequency rebound burst was converted to a single AP with a pronounced afterdepolarization, subsequently followed by a spontaneous, high-frequency AP burst. Similarly, progressively greater hyperpolarizing current steps (0 to −80 pA, Δ20 pA, 100 ms) triggered rebound burst firing (Fig. 3C). Rebound burst firing following the offset of a prolonged hyperpolarizing current step (≥1 s, −50 pA) was observed in 19.3% (29 of 150) neurons recorded (Fig. 3D). Burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm could be observed in MHb neurons from all baseline activity states but was most commonly observed in tonic firing neurons (Fig. 3E). Thus, depolarization from a hyperpolarized Vm, or hyperpolarization alone, can trigger burst firing in ∼20% of MHb neurons.

T-type channel expression in the MHb

T-type channels are encoded by three genes: CACNA1G, CACNA1H, and CACNA1I, which encode the pore-forming α1 subunits Cav3.1, Cav3.2, and Cav3.3 (Perez-Reyes, 2003). We used RNAscope fluorescent in situ hybridization (Wang et al., 2012) to determine whether mRNA for T-type channels is expressed in the MHb and to determine the cell populations that express these channels. We found that mRNA for Cav3.1 was abundantly expressed in the MHb, including in both Tac1+ and ChAT+ neurons (Fig. 4). Expression of Cav3.2 and Cav3.3 was also observed in the MHb in both Tac1+ and ChAT+ neurons, albeit at significantly lower levels than Cav3.1 (Fig. 5A,B). Cav3.1 expression was significantly greater in the lateral MHb relative to the medial MHb (Fig. 5C). Thus, mRNA for T-type channels, in particular Cav3.1, are expressed in the MHb in both major neuron populations.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Cav3.1 is expressed in the MHb. RNAscope in situ hybridization demonstrated that mRNA for Cav3.1 is expressed in the MHb, in particular its lateral aspect. Both Tac1+ and ChAT+ neurons express Cav3.1 mRNA.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

T-type channel expression in the MHb. A, RNAscope in situ hybridization for Cav3.1, Cav3.2, and Cav3.3 mRNA in the MHb with Tac1 and ChAT. B, Expression of Cav3.1 is significantly greater than Cav3.2 and Cav3.3 expression, and Cav3.3 expression is significantly greater than Cav3.2 in the MHb; ***p < 0.001. C, Cav3.1 expression is significantly greater in the lateral MHb than the medial MHb; ***p < 0.001.

Dependence of bursting on T-type channels

We recorded the locations of MHb neurons that displayed high-frequency AP firing from a hyperpolarized Vm. Of the 35 neurons where location information was recorded, 27 of 35 (77.1%) of these neurons were in the lateral or central MHb (Fig. 6), consistent with the highest Cav3 expression in this area. We therefore tested whether pharmacological blockade of T-type channels affected burst firing in MHb neurons in this region. MHb neurons that exhibited ramp depolarization-induced burst firing from a Vm <−60 mV were bath-perfused with the selective T-type channel antagonist Z944 (3 μm). Z944 significantly reduced the number of bursts per ramp (before Z944: 2.7 ± 0.4, after Z944: 0.2 ± 0.1; t(5) = 6.2, p = 0.002, n = 6; Fig. 7). Further, Z944 abolished burst firing in a neuron that bursted with ramp depolarization from a Vm of −75 mV but not from a Vm of −54 mV (data not shown). MHb neurons that exhibited rebound bursting were bath-perfused with Z944 (Fig. 8). With 1.5-s hyperpolarizing current pulses, Z944 significantly reduced the number of rebound bursts (before Z944: 1.4 ± 0.4, after Z944: 0.1 ± 0.1; t(5) = 2.9, p = 0.035, n = 6) and rebound AP frequency (before Z944: 87.6 ± 21.8 Hz, after Z944: 13.2 ± 3.8 Hz; t(6) = 3.7, p = 0.010, n = 7; Fig. 8A–C). With 100-ms hyperpolarizing current pulses, Z944 significantly reduced the number of rebound bursts (before Z944: 1.2 ± 0.2, after Z944: 0.0 ± 0.0; t(4) = 6.0, p = 0.004, n = 5) and rebound AP frequency (before Z944: 49.2 ± 15.5 Hz, after Z944: 5.6 ± 3.6 Hz; t(5) = 3.0, p = 0.029, n = 6; Fig. 8D–F). Thus, T-type channel activation contributes to both depolarization-induced burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm and rebound burst firing.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Location of neurons that bursted from a hyperpolarized membrane potential. Neurons that bursted from a Vm <−60 mV were predominantly located in the lateral and central MHb. Map includes neurons that bursted to ramp depolarization and/or to step hyperpolarization.

Figure 7.
Figure 7.

The selective T-type channel antagonist Z944 blocked ramp depolarization-induced burst firing from hyperpolarized membrane potentials. A, Representative traces demonstrating the effect of Z944 to block ramp-induced burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm. B, The number of bursts per ramp was significantly reduced following Z944 perfusion; **p < 0.01.

Figure 8.
Figure 8.

The selective T-type channel antagonist Z944 blocked rebound burst firing. Representative traces demonstrating the effect of Z944 to block rebound burst firing following 1.5-s (A) or 100-ms (D) hyperpolarization. The number of bursts and rebound AP frequency were significantly reduced following 1.5-s (B, C) or 100-ms (E, F) hyperpolarization after Z944 perfusion; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

A previous study found that NMDA and AMPA receptor activation contributes to burst firing in the LHb (Yang et al., 2018). In MHb neurons which exhibited ramp depolarization-induced burst firing from a Vm <−60 mV, the NMDA receptor antagonists CPP (5 μm) or AP-5 (50 μm) were bath-perfused. Neither CPP nor AP-5 significantly affected the number of bursts per ramp (before CPP: 6.0 ± 1.2, after CPP: 6.8 ± 1.1; t(3) = −1.42, p = 0.25, n = 4; before AP-5: 3.2 ± 0.7, after AP-5: 2.4 ± 0.4; t(4) = 1.4, p = 0.24, n = 5) or the average number of APs per burst (before CPP: 2.3 ± 0.2, after CPP: 2.2 ± 0.1; t(3) = 0.65, p = 0.57, n = 4; before AP-5: 2.1 ± 0.1, after AP-5: 2.4 ± 0.2; t(4) = −2.3, p = 0.08, n = 5). Similarly, the AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX did not significantly affect the number of bursts per ramp (before CNQX: 3.2 ± 0.7, after CNQX: 2.6 ± 0.5; t(4) = 2.5, p = 0.07, n = 5) or the average number of APs per burst (before CNQX: 2.1 ± 0.1, after CNQX: 2.1 ± 0.1; t(4) = 0.02, p = 0.99, n = 5). Therefore, tonic synaptic glutamate does not contribute to depolarization-induced burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm in MHb neurons in brain slices.

Voltage-gated Ca2+ currents in MHb neurons

Next, we tested whether voltage-gated Ca2+ currents could be evoked in MHb neurons, and we determined the voltage dependence of their activation and inactivation. Ca2+ currents were recorded similarly to previous studies (Joksimovic et al., 2017; Stamenic and Todorovic, 2018), using an internal solution that caused rapid rundown of high-voltage activated (HVA) Ca2+ currents (Todorovic and Lingle, 1998). Ca2+ current activation was studied using a step depolarization protocol where MHb neurons were stepped to progressively more depolarized holding potentials for 320 ms after initially holding neurons at −90 mV for 1 s (Fig. 9A). Rapid inward currents were evoked, and the conductance versus voltage relationship was fit with a Boltzmann function. The average voltage of half-activation (V50) in the absence of Z944 was −47.9 mV. There was a significant effect of Z944 to reduce Ca2+ current amplitude (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures: F(1,79) = 246.4, p < 0.001; Holm–Sidak post hoc test: p < 0.001). Thus, Ca2+ currents can be evoked in MHb neurons and are sensitive to T-type channel blockade.

Figure 9.
Figure 9.

Voltage-gated Ca2+ currents in MHb neurons. A, top, Representative currents induced by step depolarization from −90 mV to progressively more depolarized test potentials in the absence of Z944. Bottom, Voltage dependence of activation for voltage-gated Ca2+ currents before and after Z944 perfusion. B, top, Representative currents evoked by step depolarization to −50 mV after different initial test potentials. Bottom, Voltage dependence of inactivation for voltage-gated Ca2+ currents.

The voltage dependence of Ca2+ current inactivation was determined by holding MHb neurons for 3.6 s at progressively more depolarized membrane potentials before a 320-ms step to −50 mV (Fig. 9B). Rapid inward currents were evoked when neurons were pre-held at hyperpolarized membrane potentials but were not evoked when pre-held at more depolarized potentials. A plot of the current versus initial holding voltage was fit with a Boltzmann function. The average voltage of half-inactivation (V50) was −92.6 mV. These voltages of half-activation and half-inactivation are consistent with those measured for T-type channels in the rat subiculum using an identical internal solution and voltage protocols (Joksimovic et al., 2017). Collectively, these results indicate that evoked Ca2+ currents in MHb neurons are likely to be mediated by T-type channels.

Depolarized AP doublets

Eight of 130 total neurons (6.2%) spontaneously fired AP doublets and had an average Vm of −43.9 ± 1.5 mV (Fig. 1D). As T-type channels are likely completely inactivated at this Vm, we aimed to further characterize the electrophysiological characteristics of depolarized AP doublet firing. In a depolarized (Vm = −44 mV) neuron displaying both spontaneous AP doublets and single spikes with a large afterdepolarization, low-level ramp depolarization (5 pA, 5 s) increased AP doublet firing at a Vm of −39 mV (Fig. 10A). In a different MHb neuron that spontaneously fired AP doublets at a Vm of −48 mV, membrane hyperpolarization (−50 pA, 300 ms) briefly converted depolarized AP doublet firing to tonic firing at a Vm of −53 mV, followed by a return to AP doublet firing with spontaneous depolarization to a Vm of −48 mV (Fig. 10B). Spontaneous AP doublets at depolarized membrane potentials were not blocked by perfusion with Z944 (Fig. 10C; n = 5). Thus, AP doublet firing at sustained depolarized potentials does not require T-type channel activation.

Figure 10.
Figure 10.

AP doublet firing at depolarized membrane potentials is not T-type channel mediated. A, AP doublet firing at depolarized membrane potentials could be enhanced by low-level ramp depolarization. B, Hyperpolarization caused a transition to tonic firing in depolarized AP doublet firing neurons, which returned to AP doublet firing on subsequent spontaneous depolarization. C, Depolarized AP doublet firing was not blocked by perfusion of Z944.

Discussion

In this study, we found that a subpopulation of MHb neurons are capable of firing high-frequency AP bursts from a hyperpolarized Vm that strongly resemble burst firing mediated by T-type Ca2+ channel activation (Llinás and Jahnsen, 1982; McCormick and Pape, 1990; Cheong and Shin, 2013; Lambert et al., 2014). This burst firing could be induced by rebounding from membrane hyperpolarization or depolarization from a hyperpolarized Vm, whereas depolarization from a Vm > −60 mV led to tonic AP firing or depolarized AP doublet firing. Using RNAscope in situ hybridization, we identified robust mRNA expression of the T-type Ca2+ channel Cav3.1 primarily in the lateral MHb, where it co-localized with both ChAT and Tac1, markers which define the ventral and dorsal MHb, respectively (Molas et al., 2017). Expression of Cav3.2 and Cav3.3 was also observed in the MHb but was comparatively sparse. Hyperpolarization-induced and depolarization-induced burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm, and evoked Ca2+ currents, were blocked by bath perfusion of the selective Cav3 antagonist Z944. Thus, a subpopulation of MHb neurons are capable of high-frequency burst firing, in contrast to previous reports of exclusive tonic firing by MHb neurons, with burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm sensitive to T-type channel blockade.

Interestingly, single-cell RNA sequencing of the mouse habenula revealed that transcriptomically defined clusters of MHb neurons heterogeneously express Cav3.1 (Hashikawa et al., 2019). The highest Cav3.1 expression was observed in neuron clusters located in the lateral aspect of both the dorsal and ventral MHb and in clusters which express Tac1 or ChAT, consistent with our results. This study also identified mRNA for Cav3.3 in some MHb clusters. A previous autoradiographic ISH study concluded that mRNA for Cav3.1 was expressed in the LHb but not the MHb (Talley et al., 1999), and hyperpolarization-induced rebound burst firing mediated by T-type channels has been observed in the LHb (Cui et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018).

Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels fall into two broad categories: HVA and LVA channels (Perez-Reyes, 2003; Cheong and Shin, 2013). T-type Ca2+ channels are LVA channels, whereas the other families of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, including L-type, P/Q-type, N-type, and R-type channels, are HVA channels. Unique properties of T-type Ca2+ channels differentiate them from the HVA family. In contrast to HVA channels, T-type Ca2+ channels require less membrane depolarization to open and rapidly inactivate with prolonged depolarization, leading to low-threshold Ca2+ spikes (LTS) that can trigger a burst of Na+ and K+-mediated APs on top of the Ca2+-mediated LTS. In neurons with a resting membrane potential of −60 mV, the majority of T-type Ca2+ channels are inactivated, such that membrane hyperpolarization alleviates inactivation and leads to rebound burst firing on subsequent depolarization (Perez-Reyes, 2003; Cheong and Shin, 2013). In more hyperpolarized neurons, depolarization can trigger burst firing, but sustained and/or stronger depolarization inactivates T-type Ca2+ channels and prevents burst firing (Perez-Reyes, 2003; Cheong and Shin, 2013).

We observed that ∼20% of MHb neurons burst fired to ramp depolarization from a hyperpolarized Vm or displayed rebound burst firing. This bursting was observed in neurons that originally displayed all types of activity states at baseline, indicating that although T-type channel-mediated bursting is rare at resting conditions, a larger population of MHb neurons are capable of burst firing. Interestingly, the LHb similarly has a low percentage of spontaneously bursting neurons at baseline in Sprague Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice, whereas congenitally learned helpless rats and mice exposed to chronic restraint stress have a substantially greater percentage of LHb neurons that burst at baseline (Yang et al., 2018). It is possible that the percentage of MHb neurons displaying different activity states may be altered in behavioral states regulated by the MHb, such as elevated anxiety-like states or nicotine withdrawal.

We also found that some neurons burst fired during ramp depolarization but did not exhibit rebound bursting following 100-ms or 1.5-s hyperpolarization. This is likely because depolarization following hyperpolarization is necessary for T-type Ca2+ channel activation. Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, in particular HCN3 and HCN4, are expressed in the MHb in rodents (Monteggia et al., 2000; Santoro et al., 2000; Notomi and Shigemoto, 2004; Görlich et al., 2013). Consistent with this, depolarizing current sag was frequently observed with 1.5-s hyperpolarization (Fig. 3D), which is a hallmark of HCN channel activation (Biel et al., 2009). It is thus likely that HCN channel activation can provide the rebound depolarization necessary to activate T-type Ca2+ channels in some MHb neurons.

In addition to burst firing from a hyperpolarized Vm, some neurons displayed high-frequency AP doublet firing at depolarized potentials (average Vm = −45.2 ± 1.5 mV). This AP doublet firing was not affected by T-type channel blockade. This is unsurprising, as T-type channels are likely completely inactivated at these depolarized potentials. The ionic conductances mediating this depolarized burst firing remain unknown. In neurons in other brain regions, persistent Na+ current can contribute to afterdepolarization and promote burst firing (Azouz et al., 1996; Brumberg et al., 2000; Su et al., 2001). It is possible that persistent Na+ current or other ionic conductances mediate this depolarized burst firing.

In summary, we demonstrated that a subpopulation of MHb neurons are capable of high-frequency AP firing, in contrast to previous reports that MHb neurons solely fire tonic APs at a frequency of ∼2–10 Hz. Two distinct modes of high-frequency AP firing were observed, including T-type channel-mediated bursting and T-type channel-independent AP doublets. T-type channel-mediated bursting occurred from a previously hyperpolarized Vm, whereas T-type channel-independent bursting remained with sustained depolarization and was not blocked by Z944. Cav3 mRNA was expressed in the MHb, most notably Cav3.1 in the lateral MHb, consistent with the predominant location of bursting MHb neurons. Thus, T-type Ca2+ channels may contribute to the regulation of behaviors relevant to neuropsychiatric disease by shaping the frequency and pattern of MHb neuron AP firing.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants MH115536 (to C.R.V.), MH121454, DA047269, and DA035217 (to Q.-s.L.). It was also partially funded through the Research and Education Initiative Fund, a component of the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin endowment at the Medical College of Wisconsin. C.R.V. is a member of the Medical Scientist Training Program at Medical College of Wisconsin, which is partially supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Training Grant T32-GM080202.

  • Received May 19, 2020.
  • Revision received July 3, 2020.
  • Accepted July 6, 2020.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. Agetsuma M, Aizawa H, Aoki T, Nakayama R, Takahoko M, Goto M, Sassa T, Amo R, Shiraki T, Kawakami K, Hosoya T, Higashijima S, Okamoto H (2010) The habenula is crucial for experience-dependent modification of fear responses in zebrafish. Nat Neurosci 13:1354–1356. doi:10.1038/nn.2654 pmid:20935642
  2. Antolin-Fontes B, Ables JL, Görlich A, Ibañez-Tallon I (2015) The habenulo-interpeduncular pathway in nicotine aversion and withdrawal. Neuropharmacology 96:213–222. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.11.019 pmid:25476971
  3. Arvin MC, Jin XT, Yan Y, Wang Y, Ramsey MD, Kim VJ, Beckley NA, Henry BA, Drenan RM (2019) Chronic nicotine exposure alters the neurophysiology of habenulo-interpeduncular circuitry. J Neurosci 39:4268–4281. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2816-18.2019 pmid:30867261
  4. Azouz R, Jensen MS, Yaari Y (1996) Ionic basis of spike after-depolarization and burst generation in adult rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. J Physiol 492:211–223. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021302
  5. Biel M, Wahl-Schott C, Michalakis S, Zong X (2009) Hyperpolarization-activated cation channels: from genes to function. Physiol Rev 89:847–885. doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2008 pmid:19584315
  6. Boulos LJ, Darcq E, Kieffer BL (2017) Translating the habenula-from rodents to humans. Biol Psychiatry 81:296–305. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.003 pmid:27527822
  7. Boulos LJ, Ben Hamida S, Bailly J, Maitra M, Ehrlich AT, Gavériaux-Ruff C, Darcq E, Kieffer BL (2020) Mu opioid receptors in the medial habenula contribute to naloxone aversion. Neuropsychopharmacology 45:247–255. doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0395-7 pmid:31005059
  8. Bourinet E, Francois A, Laffray S (2016) T-type calcium channels in neuropathic pain. Pain 157 [Suppl 1]:S15–S22.
  9. Brumberg JC, Nowak LG, McCormick DA (2000) Ionic mechanisms underlying repetitive high-frequency burst firing in supragranular cortical neurons. J Neurosci 20:4829–4843. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-13-04829.2000
  10. Chang SY, Kim U (2004) Ionic mechanism of long-lasting discharges of action potentials triggered by membrane hyperpolarization in the medial lateral habenula. J Neurosci 24:2172–2181. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4891-03.2004 pmid:14999068
  11. Cheong E, Shin HS (2013) T-type Ca2+ channels in normal and abnormal brain functions. Physiol Rev 93:961–992. doi:10.1152/physrev.00010.2012 pmid:23899559
  12. Choi K, Lee Y, Lee C, Hong S, Lee S, Kang SJ, Shin KS (2016) Optogenetic activation of septal GABAergic afferents entrains neuronal firing in the medial habenula. Sci Rep 6:34800. doi:10.1038/srep34800 pmid:27703268
  13. Cui Y, Yang Y, Ni Z, Dong Y, Cai G, Foncelle A, Ma S, Sang K, Tang S, Li Y, Shen Y, Berry H, Wu S, Hu H (2018) Astroglial Kir4.1 in the lateral habenula drives neuronal bursts in depression. Nature 554:323–327. doi:10.1038/nature25752 pmid:29446379
  14. Fowler CD, Lu Q, Johnson PM, Marks MJ, Kenny PJ (2011) Habenular α5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake. Nature 471:597–601. doi:10.1038/nature09797 pmid:21278726
  15. Frahm S, Antolin-Fontes B, Görlich A, Zander J-F, Ahnert-Hilger G, Ibañez-Tallon I (2015) An essential role of acetylcholine-glutamate synergy at habenular synapses in nicotine dependence. Elife 4:e11396. doi:10.7554/eLife.11396 pmid:26623516
  16. Ge F, Mu P, Guo R, Cai L, Liu Z, Dong Y, Huang YH (2019) Chronic sleep fragmentation enhances habenula cholinergic neural activity. Mol Psychiatry. Advance online publication. Retrieved April 12, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0419-z.
  17. Görlich A, Antolin-Fontes B, Ables JL, Frahm S, Slimak MA, Dougherty JD, Ibañez-Tallon I (2013) Reexposure to nicotine during withdrawal increases the pacemaking activity of cholinergic habenular neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:17077–17082. doi:10.1073/pnas.1313103110 pmid:24082085
  18. Hashikawa Y, Hashikawa K, Basiri ML, Liu Y, Johnston NL, Ahmad OR, Stuber GD (2019) Transcriptional and spatial resolution of cell types in the mammalian habenula. bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/772376.
  19. Hsu YW, Wang SD, Wang S, Morton G, Zariwala HA, de la Iglesia HO, Turner EE (2014) Role of the dorsal medial habenula in the regulation of voluntary activity, motor function, hedonic state, and primary reinforcement. J Neurosci 34:11366–11384. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1861-14.2014 pmid:25143617
  20. Hsu YW, Morton G, Guy EG, Wang SD, Turner EE (2016) Dorsal medial habenula regulation of mood-related behaviors and primary reinforcement by tachykinin-expressing habenula neurons. eNeuro 3:ENEURO.0109-16.2016. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0109-16.2016
  21. Huguenard JR, McCormick DA (2007) Thalamic synchrony and dynamic regulation of global forebrain oscillations. Trends Neurosci 30:350–356. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.007 pmid:17544519
  22. Joksimovic SM, Eggan P, Izumi Y, Joksimovic SL, Tesic V, Dietz RM, Orfila JE, DiGruccio MR, Herson PS, Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Zorumski CF, Todorovic SM (2017) The role of T-type calcium channels in the subiculum: to burst or not to burst? J Physiol 595:6327–6348. doi:10.1113/JP274565 pmid:28744923
  23. Kim U, Chang SY (2005) Dendritic morphology, local circuitry, and intrinsic electrophysiology of neurons in the rat medial and lateral habenular nuclei of the epithalamus. J Comp Neurol 483:236–250. doi:10.1002/cne.20410 pmid:15678472
  24. Kim U, Chung LY (2007) Dual GABAergic synaptic response of fast excitation and slow inhibition in the medial habenula of rat epithalamus. J Neurophysiol 98:1323–1332. doi:10.1152/jn.00575.2007 pmid:17615126
  25. Lambert RC, Bessaïh T, Crunelli V, Leresche N (2014) The many faces of T-type calcium channels. Pflugers Arch 466:415–423. doi:10.1007/s00424-013-1353-6 pmid:24043572
  26. Lee A, Mathuru AS, Teh C, Kibat C, Korzh V, Penney TB, Jesuthasan S (2010) The habenula prevents helpless behavior in larval zebrafish. Curr Biol 20:2211–2216. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.025 pmid:21145744
  27. Lisman JE (1997) Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable. Trends Neurosci 20:38–43. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10070-9
  28. Llinás R, Jahnsen H (1982) Electrophysiology of mammalian thalamic neurones in vitro. Nature 297:406–408. doi:10.1038/297406a0 pmid:7078650
  29. Mathuru AS, Jesuthasan S (2013) The medial habenula as a regulator of anxiety in adult zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits 7:99. doi:10.3389/fncir.2013.00099 pmid:23750127
  30. McCormick DA, Pape HC (1990) Properties of a hyperpolarization-activated cation current and its role in rhythmic oscillation in thalamic relay neurones. J Physiol 431:291–318. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018331 pmid:1712843
  31. Molas S, DeGroot SR, Zhao-Shea R, Tapper AR (2017) Anxiety and nicotine dependence: emerging role of the habenulo-interpeduncular axis. Trends Pharmacol Sci 38:169–180. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2016.11.001 pmid:27890353
  32. Monteggia LM, Eisch AJ, Tang MD, Kaczmarek LK, Nestler EJ (2000) Cloning and localization of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel family in rat brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 81:129–139. doi:10.1016/s0169-328x(00)00155-8 pmid:11000485
  33. Notomi T, Shigemoto R (2004) Immunohistochemical localization of Ih channel subunits, HCN1-4, in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol 471:241–276. doi:10.1002/cne.11039 pmid:14991560
  34. Otsu Y, Lecca S, Pietrajtis K, Rousseau CV, Marcaggi P, Dugué GP, Mailhes-Hamon C, Mameli M, Diana MA (2018) Functional principles of posterior septal inputs to the medial habenula. Cell Rep 22:693–705. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.064 pmid:29346767
  35. Perez-Reyes E (2003) Molecular physiology of low-voltage-activated t-type calcium channels. Physiol Rev 83:117–161. doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2002 pmid:12506128
  36. Sakhi K, Belle MD, Gossan N, Delagrange P, Piggins HD (2014) Daily variation in the electrophysiological activity of mouse medial habenula neurones. J Physiol 592:587–603. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2013.263319 pmid:24247982
  37. Santoro B, Chen S, Luthi A, Pavlidis P, Shumyatsky GP, Tibbs GR, Siegelbaum SA (2000) Molecular and functional heterogeneity of hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels in the mouse CNS. J Neurosci 20:5264–5275. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-14-05264.2000
  38. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR (1997) A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275:1593–1599. doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 pmid:9054347
  39. Shih PY, Engle SE, Oh G, Deshpande P, Puskar NL, Lester HA, Drenan RM (2014) Differential expression and function of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in subdivisions of medial habenula. J Neurosci 34:9789–9802. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0476-14.2014 pmid:25031416
  40. Soria-Gómez E, Busquets-Garcia A, Hu F, Mehidi A, Cannich A, Roux L, Louit I, Alonso L, Wiesner T, Georges F, Verrier D, Vincent P, Ferreira G, Luo M, Marsicano G (2015) Habenular CB1 receptors control the expression of aversive memories. Neuron 88:306–313. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.035 pmid:26412490
  41. Stamenic TT, Todorovic SM (2018) Cytosolic ATP relieves voltage-dependent inactivation of T-type calcium channels and facilitates excitability of neurons in the rat central medial thalamus. eNeuro 5:ENEURO.0016-18.2018. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0016-18.2018
  42. Su H, Alroy G, Kirson ED, Yaari Y (2001) Extracellular calcium modulates persistent sodium current-dependent burst-firing in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 21:4173–4182. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-12-04173.2001
  43. Sutherland RJ (1982) The dorsal diencephalic conduction system: a review of the anatomy and functions of the habenular complex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 6:1–13. doi:10.1016/0149-7634(82)90003-3 pmid:7041014
  44. Talley EM, Cribbs LL, Lee JH, Daud A, Perez-Reyes E, Bayliss DA (1999) Differential distribution of three members of a gene family encoding low voltage-activated (T-type) calcium channels. J Neurosci 19:1895–1911. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-06-01895.1999
  45. Ting JT, Lee BR, Chong P, Soler-Llavina G, Cobbs C, Koch C, Zeng H, Lein E (2018) Preparation of acute brain slices using an optimized N-methyl-D-glucamine protective recovery method. J Vis Exp. Advance online publication. Retrieved Feb 26, 2018. doi: 10.3791/53825.
  46. Todorovic SM, Lingle CJ (1998) Pharmacological properties of T-type Ca2+ current in adult rat sensory neurons: effects of anticonvulsant and anesthetic agents. J Neurophysiol 79:240–252. doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.240
  47. Tringham E, Powell KL, Cain SM, Kuplast K, Mezeyova J, Weerapura M, Eduljee C, Jiang X, Smith P, Morrison JL, Jones NC, Braine E, Rind G, Fee-Maki M, Parker D, Pajouhesh H, Parmar M, O'Brien TJ, Snutch TP (2012) T-type calcium channel blockers that attenuate thalamic burst firing and suppress absence seizures. Sci Transl Med 4:121ra119.
  48. Tuesta LM, Chen Z, Duncan A, Fowler CD, Ishikawa M, Lee BR, Liu XA, Lu Q, Cameron M, Hayes MR, Kamenecka TM, Pletcher M, Kenny PJ (2017) GLP-1 acts on habenular avoidance circuits to control nicotine intake. Nat Neurosci 20:708–716. doi:10.1038/nn.4540 pmid:28368384
  49. van den Pol AN (2012) Neuropeptide transmission in brain circuits. Neuron 76:98–115. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.014 pmid:23040809
  50. Wang F, Flanagan J, Su N, Wang LC, Bui S, Nielson A, Wu X, Vo HT, Ma XJ, Luo Y (2012) RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. J Mol Diagn 14:22–29. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.08.002 pmid:22166544
  51. Weiss N, Zamponi GW (2020) Genetic T-type calcium channelopathies. J Med Genet 57:1–10. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106163 pmid:31217264
  52. Weiss T, Bernard R, Bernstein HG, Veh RW, Laube G (2018) Agmatine modulates spontaneous activity in neurons of the rat medial habenular complex-a relevant mechanism in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression? Transl Psychiatry 8:201. doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0254-z pmid:30250120
  53. Wilcox KS, Gutnick MJ, Christoph GR (1988) Electrophysiological properties of neurons in the lateral habenula nucleus: an in vitro study. J Neurophysiol 59:212–225. doi:10.1152/jn.1988.59.1.212 pmid:3343602
  54. Yang Y, Cui Y, Sang K, Dong Y, Ni Z, Ma S, Hu H (2018) Ketamine blocks bursting in the lateral habenula to rapidly relieve depression. Nature 554:317–322. doi:10.1038/nature25509 pmid:29446381
  55. Zhang J, Tan L, Ren Y, Liang J, Lin R, Feng Q, Zhou J, Hu F, Ren J, Wei C, Yu T, Zhuang Y, Bettler B, Wang F, Luo M (2016) Presynaptic excitation via GABAB receptors in habenula cholinergic neurons regulates fear memory expression. Cell 166:716–728. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.026 pmid:27426949
  56. Zhao-Shea R, DeGroot SR, Liu L, Vallaster M, Pang X, Su Q, Gao G, Rando OJ, Martin GE, George O, Gardner PD, Tapper AR (2015) Increased CRF signalling in a ventral tegmental area-interpeduncular nucleus-medial habenula circuit induces anxiety during nicotine withdrawal. Nat Commun 6:6770. doi:10.1038/ncomms8625

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Pablo Castillo, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Hailan Hu.

Your manuscript has been evaluated by two experts in the field. Both agree on the significance of your findings and important contribution of your study. However, as you will see below, they also raised some comments that you should address in the revision.

Editor’s note: summary plots (bar graphs: figs. 1G, 5B,C) should include individual measurements.

REVIEWER 1

In this manuscript, the authors characterized the firing patterns of MHb neurons using slice electrophysiology. In contrast to previous reports showing solely tonic firing, the authors identified five firing patterns in the MHb. They then focused on the bursting characteristic. Although only ∼5% MHb neurons display burst firing at the baseline, through ramp-up current injection combined with hyperpolarization or depolarization to move membrane potential into the right range for T-VSCC deinactivation, the authors were able to induce burst firing in 20% MHb neurons. These bursts can be blocked by a T-VSCC antagonist Z944. RNAscope confirmed expression of T-VSCC, especially Cav3.1, in the MHb. Collectively, this study provides valuable information for future studies on MHb function. I have just a few questions for authors to clarify before its warranty for publication.

1.Since depolarization currents through AMPA receptors under the physiological condition may provide the drive to activate T-VSCC, they authors should try to exclude CNQX from their recording solution to see whether the percentahge of neurons capable of firing bursts may be even higher.

2.The burst firing in the neighboring LHb was found to depend on both T-VSCCs and NMDA receptors. The authors should test whether NMDA receptors are also required for the MHb bursts.

3.The authors noted that “Of the 26 neurons where location information was recorded, 18 of 26 (69.2%) of these neurons were in the lateral or central MHb”. It would be nice to show a schematic map indicating the locations of different types of neurons.

REVIEWER 2

This study characterizes a low-voltage-activated T-type Ca2+ in mediating a unique mode of neuronal firing in medial habenular neurons. The studies are systematically designed and carefully carried out, and the data quality is high. The narrative is clear, and the conclusions are well supported by the results. This carefully characterized firing patterns of MHb neurons and the underlying ionic mechanisms are important for us to better understand the neural encoding by MHb neurons under physiological and pathological conditions. One minor concern is listed below.

Fig. 5: Cav3.1 mRNA expression density in the MHb is shown to be very different between 5B and 5C. This needs to be clarified.

Author Response

We thank the reviewers for their time and effort in critiquing this manuscript. Please find below our point-to-point responses to the critiques raised. New edits in the manuscript have been labeled with blue font.

REVIEWER 1

In this manuscript, the authors characterized the firing patterns of MHb neurons using slice electrophysiology. In contrast to previous reports showing solely tonic firing, the authors identified five firing patterns in the MHb. They then focused on the bursting characteristic. Although only ∼5% MHb neurons display burst firing at the baseline, through ramp-up current injection combined with hyperpolarization or depolarization to move membrane potential into the right range for T-VSCC deinactivation, the authors were able to induce burst firing in 20% MHb neurons. These bursts can be blocked by a T-VSCC antagonist Z944. RNAscope confirmed expression of T-VSCC, especially Cav3.1, in the MHb. Collectively, this study provides valuable information for future studies on MHb function. I have just a few questions for authors to clarify before its warranty for publication.

1.Since depolarization currents through AMPA receptors under the physiological condition may provide the drive to activate T-VSCC, they authors should try to exclude CNQX from their recording solution to see whether the percentage of neurons capable of firing bursts may be even higher.

We directly tested whether AMPA receptor activation affects burst firing in MHb neurons by perfusing CNQX onto MHb neurons that bursted on ramp depolarization from a membrane potential < -60 mV. With this before-and-after comparison from the same cell, we found that CNQX did not significantly affect the number of bursts per ramp or the average number of APs per burst. MHb neurons display sparse spontaneous AMPAR-EPSCs (averaged at ∼0.2 Hz) with small amplitude (mean = 8 pA) in adult mouse slices (PMID: 27793697). We confirmed this finding in our slices. In addition, high-intensity electrical stimulation evoked small or no EPSCs in MHb neurons. Thus, glutamate input to MHb neurons in slice recordings is very weak. It is likely that excitatory inputs do not play a significant role in driving burst firing in MHb neurons, particularly in brain slice conditions.

2.The burst firing in the neighboring LHb was found to depend on both T-VSCCs and NMDA receptors. The authors should test whether NMDA receptors are also required for the MHb bursts.

We have now tested the effect of NMDA receptor blockade on burst firing in MHb neurons. We tested whether perfusion of the NMDAR antagonist CPP (5 μM) or AP-5 (50 μM) affected burst firing to ramp depolarization from a hyperpolarized Vm. This before-and-after comparison revealed that NMDAR blockade did not significantly affect the number of bursts per ramp or the average number of APs per burst. This lack of NMDAR requirement differs from that observed in the LHb. However, as mentioned above, tonic glutamate input to MHb neurons in slice recordings is weak. This likely explains why burst firing in MHb neurons is not affected by tonic NMDAR activation.

3.The authors noted that “Of the 26 neurons where location information was recorded, 18 of 26 (69.2%) of these neurons were in the lateral or central MHb”. It would be nice to show a schematic map indicating the locations of different types of neurons.

We have now provided a map indicating the locations of these bursting neurons in Fig. 6. We also added new bursting neurons from our most recent recordings and now indicate that of the 35 neurons where location information was recorded, 27 of 35 (77%) were in the lateral or central MHb.

REVIEWER 2

This study characterizes a low-voltage-activated T-type Ca2+ in mediating a unique mode of neuronal firing in medial habenular neurons. The studies are systematically designed and carefully carried out, and the data quality is high. The narrative is clear, and the conclusions are well supported by the results. This carefully characterized firing patterns of MHb neurons and the underlying ionic mechanisms are important for us to better understand the neural encoding by MHb neurons under physiological and pathological conditions. One minor concern is listed below.

Fig. 5: Cav3.1 mRNA expression density in the MHb is shown to be very different between 5B and 5C. This needs to be clarified.

Cav3.1 mRNA expression density in Fig. 5B reflects its expression in the entire MHb, containing both the medial and lateral regions. Fig. 5C shows the expression of Cav3.1 in each region of the MHb separately. The average expression density of Cav3.1 in the lateral MHb is 0.011 puncta/μm2, whereas its average expression density in the medial MHb is 0.002 puncta/μm2. The expression density in the entire MHb (0.066 puncta/μm2) is essentially equal to the mean of these expression densities (0.0065 puncta/μm2).