Skip to main content
Log in

Uncovering continuous and transient monitoring profiles in event-based prospective memory

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study implemented response time distribution modeling to better characterize context-specific attention dynamics underlying task interference due to possessing a prospective memory intention. During a three-phase paradigm in which prospective memory cues appeared only in the final phase, prospective memory performance was better when participants were informed at encoding of the context in which cues were to appear than when participants were not informed. Additionally, task interference increased during the third phase when the cue context was previously specified. Ex-Gaussian parameter estimates revealed that task interference during the third phase was due to a greater relative frequency of longer latencies, rather than an overall increase in latencies across all trials, suggesting that participants relied primarily on transient, rather than continuous, monitoring processes to support cue detection. Functionally, variability in transient and continuous monitoring profiles was predictive of prospective memory cue detection. More generally, the results from the present study suggest that ex-Gaussian parameter estimation procedures may provide a fruitful avenue for better understanding how attention is differentially allocated to ongoing tasks, what processes might underlie monitoring behavior, and how this behavior is related to eventual intention fulfillment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, S., & Heathcote, A. (2001). Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: A matter of some moment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 514–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2011). Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry the power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 160–166.

  • Brewer, G. A. (2011). Analyzing response time distributions: Methodological and theoretical suggests for prospective memory researchers. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 219, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewitt, M. R., Hicks, J. L., Ball, B. H., & Knight, J. B. (2012). Encountering items previously paired with prospective memory target events can serve to reactivate intentions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 981–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Williford, C. L., Pagan, J. L., & Dismukes, R. K. (2003). Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 147–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guynn, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2001). Remembering to perform actions: A different type of memory? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 25–48). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, A., Brown, S. D., & Cousineau, D. (2004). QMPE: Estimating Lognormal, Wald and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter dependent lower bound. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. B., Meeks, J. T., Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., Brewer, G. A., & Hicks, J. L. (2011). An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 298–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1037–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 861–870.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 798–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, D. M., & Abney, D. H. (2012). A comparison of transfer-appropriate processing and multi-process frameworks for prospective memory performance. Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 190–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, B., & Rey-Mermet, A. (2012). Beyond monitoring: After-effects of responding to prospective memory targets. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1644–1653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, B., Zimmermann, T. D., & Perrig, W. J. (2006). Retrieval experience in prospective memory: Strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval. Memory (Hove, England), 14(7), 872–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowinski, J. L., & Dismukes, K. R. (2005). Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: The importance of associative cueing. Memory (Hove, England), 13(6), 649–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süb, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429.

  • Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (2000). Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 506–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, C. S., Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Duchek, J. M., & McCabe, D. P. (2010). Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology, 24(3), 300–315.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Lakey, C. E., & Young, D. L. (2010). Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive control and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation. Intelligence, 38(1), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R., Krompinger, J., & Bowry, R. (2005). Disruptions of preparatory attention contribute to failures of prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 502–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Hunter Ball.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ball, B.H., Brewer, G.A., Loft, S. et al. Uncovering continuous and transient monitoring profiles in event-based prospective memory. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 492–499 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0700-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0700-8

Keywords

Navigation