Abstract
In Experiment 1, olfactory bulbectomized and control rats were trained using operant conditioning to determine the taste threshold of aqueous amyl acetate. Concentrations below gustatory threshold were used in Experiments 2–5 to compare the effectiveness of odors with various concentrations of saccharin as cues for illness. The results showed the following: (1) The effectiveness of odor and taste was directly related to concentration; (2) the strength of an aversion to a concentration of taste could be matched by an appropriate concentration of an odor; (3) odor was as effective as taste with CS-US delays of 4 h; and (4) an effective odor potentiated an aversion to an otherwise ineffective taste. The results challenge the privileged role accorded tastes in food aversion learning and the manner in which tastes are held to interact with odors according to the sensory-and-gate channeling analysis of potentiation (Rusiniak, Hankins, Garcia, & Brett, 1979).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, L. M. (1976). CS duration, amount, and concentration effects in conditioning taste aversions.Learning & Motivation,7, 265–273.
Best, M. R., Batson, J. D., Meachum, C. L., Brown, E. R., &Ringer, M. (1985). Characteristics of taste-mediated environmental potentiation in rats.Learning & Motivation,16, 190–209.
Best, M. R., &Meachum, C. L. (1986). The effect of stimulus preexposure on taste-mediated environmental conditioning: Potentiation and overshadowing.Animal Learning & Behavior,14, 1–5.
Bouton, M. E., Jones, D. L., McPhillips, S. A., &Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Potentiation and overshadowing in odor-aversion learning: Role of method of odor presentation, the distal-proximal cue distinction and the conditionability of odor.Learning & Motivation,17, 115–138.
Brosvic, G., &Slotnick, B. M. (1986). Absolute and intensity-difference taste thresholds in the rat: Evaluation of an automated multi-channel gustometer.Physiology & Behavior,38, 711–717.
Domjan, M. (1980). Ingestional aversion learning: Unique and general processes. In J. Rosenblatt, R. Hinde, C. Beer, & M. Busnel (Eds.),Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 275–336). New York: Academic Press.
Domjan, M. (1983). Biological constraints on instrumental and classical conditioning: Implications for general process theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 215–277). New York: Academic Press.
Domjan, M., &Wilson, N. E. (1972). Specificity of cue to consequence in aversion learning in the rat.Psychonomic Science,26, 143–145.
Dragoin, W. B. (1971). Conditioning and extinction of taste aversions with variations in intensity of the CS and UCS in two strains of rats.Psychonomic Science,22, 303–305.
Durlach, P. J., &Rescorla, R. A. (1980). Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: An analysis in terms of within compound associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,6, 175–187.
Field, B., &Slotnick, B. M. (1987). An inexpensive multi-purpose amplifier for behavioral studies.Physiology & Behavior,40, 127–129.
Garcia, J., Hankins, W. G., &Rusiniak, K. W. (1974). Behavioral regulations of the milieu interne in man and rat.Science,185, 824–831.
Garcia, J., &Koelling, R. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science,4, 123–124.
Garcia, J., Lasiter, P. S., Bermudez-Rattoni, F., &Deems, D. A. (1985). A general theory of aversion learning. In N. S. Braveman & P. Bronstein (Eds.),Experimental assessments and clinical applications of conditioned food aversions (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 443, pp. 8–21). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Garcia, J., McGowan, B. K., Erwin, F. R., &Koelling, R. A. (1968). Cues: Their effectiveness as a function of the reinforcer.Science,160, 794–795.
Garcia, J., McGowan, B. K., &Green, K. F. (1972). Biological constraints on conditioning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 3–27). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Garcia, J., &Rusiniak, K. W. (1980). What the nose learns from the mouth. In D. Muller-Schwarze & R. M. Silverstein (Eds.),Chemical signals: Vertebrates and aquatic invertebrates (pp. 141–156). New York: Plenum.
Garcia, J., Rusiniak, K. W., Keifer, S.W., &Bermudez-Rattoni, F. (1982). The neural integration of feeding and drinking habits. In C. D. Woody (Ed.),Conditioning: Representation of involved neural functions (pp. 567–579). New York: Plenum.
Grill, H. J. (1985). Introduction: Physiological mechanisms in conditioned taste aversions. In N. S. Braveman & P. Bronstein (Eds.),Experimental assessments and clinical applications of conditioned food aversions (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 443, pp. 67–88). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Kucharski, D., &Spear, N. E. (1985). Potentiation and overshadowing in preweanling and adult rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 15–34.
LoLordo, V. M., &Droungas, A. (1989). Selective associations and adaptive specializations: Taste aversions and phobias. In S. B. Klein & R. Mowrer (Eds.),Contemporary learning theories: Instrumental conditioning theory and the impact of biological constraints on learning (pp. 145–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1983).Conditioning and associative learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, C., &Cain, W. S. (1980). Taste and olfaction: Independence vs. interaction.Physiology & Behavior,24, 601–605.
Murphy, C., Cain, W. S., &Bartoshuk, L. M. (1977). Mutual action of taste and olfaction.Sensory Processes,1, 204–211.
Nachman, M., &Ashe, J. H. (1973). Learned taste aversions in rats as a function of dosage, concentration, and route of administrations of LiCl.Physiology & Behavior,10, 73–78.
Palmerino, C. C., Rusiniak, K., &Garcia, J. (1980). Flavor-illness aversions: The peculiar roles of odor and taste in memory for poison.Science,208, 753–755.
Panhuber, H. (1982). Effect of odor quality and intensity on conditioned odor aversion learning in the rat.Physiology & Behavior,28, 149–154.
Rusiniak, K. W., Hankins, W. G., Garcia, J., &Brett, L. P. (1979). Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste in rats.Behavioral & Neural Biology,25, 1–17.
Rusiniak, K. W., Palmerino, C. C., Rice, A. G., Forthman, D. L., &Garcia, J. (1982). Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste with toxin but not shock in rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,96, 527–539.
Taukulis, H. K. (1974). Odor aversions produced over long CS-US delays.Behavioral Biology,10, 505–510.
Westbrook, R. F., Homewood, J., Horn, K., &Clarke, J. C. (1983). Flavour-odour compound conditioning: Odour potentiation and flavour attenuation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35B, 13–33.
Yamamoto, T., Shimura, T., Sako, N., Yasoshima, Y., &Sakai, N. (1994). Neural substrates for conditioned taste aversion in the rat.Behavioural Brain Research,65, 123–137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council and the NIMH.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Slotnick, B.M., Westbrook, F. & Darling, F.M.C. What the rat’s nose tells the rat’s mouth: Long delay aversion conditioning with aqueous odors and potentiation of taste by odors. Animal Learning & Behavior 25, 357–369 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199093
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199093