Next Article in Journal
Inhibition of Aberrant α(1,2)-Fucosylation at Ocular Surface Ameliorates Dry Eye Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Memantine Prevents the WIN 55,212-2 Evoked Cross-Priming of Ethanol-Induced Conditioned Place Preference (CPP)
Previous Article in Journal
Critical Roles of Lysophospholipid Receptors in Activation of Neuroglia and Their Neuroinflammatory Responses
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms22157861
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Reversing the Psychiatric Effects of Neurodevelopmental Cannabinoid Exposure: Exploring Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions for Symptom Improvement

by
Marta De Felice
1 and
Steven R. Laviolette
1,2,*
1
Addiction Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
2
Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(15), 7861; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157861
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Revised: 21 July 2021 / Accepted: 22 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exposure to Phytocannabinoids: Exploring Central Effects and Toxicity)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neurodevelopmental exposure to psychoactive compounds in cannabis, specifically THC, is associated with a variety of long-term psychopathological outcomes. This increased risk includes a higher prevalence of schizophrenia, mood and anxiety disorders, and cognitive impairments. Clinical and pre-clinical research continues to identify a wide array of underlying neuropathophysiological sequelae and mechanisms that may underlie THC-related psychiatric risk vulnerability, particularly following adolescent cannabis exposure. A common theme among these studies is the ability of developmental THC exposure to induce long-term adaptations in the mesocorticolimbic system which resemble pathological endophenotypes associated with these disorders. This narrative review will summarize recent clinical and pre-clinical evidence that has elucidated these THC-induced developmental risk factors and examine how specific pharmacotherapeutic interventions may serve to reverse or perhaps prevent these cannabis-related risk outcomes.

1. Introduction

Cannabis is one of the most widely used psychoactive drugs for recreational and medical purposes. The increasing legalization of marijuana around the world strengthens the need to pursue clinical and pre-clinical investigations into its potential detrimental consequences, especially in developing brains. Adolescence is a period of profound neurodevelopmental vulnerability in which crucial structural and functional neural changes occur, but it is also a common life-stage for drug experimentation. Analysis of cannabis use revealed that in European countries up to one-third of adolescents (12 to 17 years) smoke cannabis and 1.2% of them consume it regularly [1], whereas a progressive increase of use from 14% to 44% was reported among high school American teens [2]. In addition, a recent Canadian Cannabis Survey reported that, in 2020, the percentage of cannabis use in youth (16 to 24 years) was approximately two-fold higher than in older people (>25 years), and 31% of people aged 16 to 19 and 20 to 24 reported increased consumption of cannabis due to COVID-19 [3]. Such findings were concomitant with a reduction in perceived risks, since fewer participants (66% in 2020 vs. 75% in 2019) believed that daily cannabis smoke can increase the vulnerability for mental health disorders [3]. These trends are highly concerning given that age of onset, frequency, and duration of exposure have been reported as significant risk factors for a wide array of cannabis-related pathophenotypes. In fact, sustained exposure to the main psychoactive marijuana phytochemical, Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), induces overstimulation of cannabinoid receptors type 1 (CB1Rs) and may profoundly impact the physiological development of the endocannabinoid system (ECS). Notably, while CB1R endogenous ligands, such as anandamide (AEA), are subjected to metabolic control through a complex system of biosynthetic and degradative enzymes, THC largely escapes these neuroregulatory control mechanisms, resulting in more sustained and less regulated neurophysiological effects [4].
Clinical and pre-clinical evidence has revealed numerous long-lasting detrimental effects induced by chronic cannabis use during adolescence. Specifically, developmental THC exposure has been associated with a wide range of cognitive impairments and enhanced vulnerability for neuropsychiatric disorders, concomitant with significant neuroanatomical abnormalities and maladaptations in the mesocorticolimbic system [5,6,7].
Importantly, the relative potency of THC appears to have a crucial role in cannabis pathology. Over the past decades, THC concentration has increased progressively while no changes were observed in the levels of cannabidiol (CBD) [8,9], the main non-psychoactive constituent of cannabis and which has been found to protect against various THC-related effects [10,11,12]. Young subjects consuming high-THC cannabis strains (e.g., sinsemilla) were more likely to develop anxiety and cannabis use disorder [13] as well as to experience psychiatric-like symptoms [14,15] and frequent relapses [16].
Therefore, adolescence represents a vulnerable developmental window during which external insults can induce profound remodeling in brain maturation and functionality, leading to pathological phenotypes later in life. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of long-lasting behavioral alterations and brain development aberrations following chronic cannabinoids exposure during adolescence in human and animal models. Moreover, we identify pharmacotherapeutic targets aiming to minimize, reverse, or prevent these cannabis-related pathological outcomes.

2. Long-Lasting Consequences of Sustained Cannabis Use during Adolescence: Clinical Evidence

Over the last decades, a plethora of epidemiologic studies have shown an association between sustained exposure to cannabis during adolescence and an enhanced vulnerability for various neuropsychiatric disorders later in life. This effect was reported for the first time in a large-scale population analysis in 1987 by Andréasson and colleagues, which demonstrated that heavy consumers of cannabis exhibited six-fold higher risks than non-users to develop schizophrenia at adulthood [17]. The age of onset of cannabis use has been considered a significant risk factor for psychopathological outcomes. Indeed, both positive and negative dimensions of psychosis were observed in subjects using cannabis for the first time before the age of 16 [18]. In addition, early cannabis consumption has been associated with greater risk of depression phenotypes and anxiety [19,20] as well as cognitive alterations [21]. Chronic cannabis exposure before age 17 has been found to induce long-lasting neurocognitive decrements in IQ, working memory, executive functioning, decision making, impulsivity, attention, and scholastic performances [22,23,24]. A correlation between cognitive impairments and neurostructural maladaptations has been suggested by Jacobus and colleagues in prospective investigations over 3 and 6 years. These authors reported that cannabis users exhibited not only poorer attention and memory, but also reduced white and gray matter integrity as well as thicker frontal and temporal cortices [25]. Consistently, white matter integrity was reduced in prefrontal, limbic, parietal, and cerebellar tracts in young marijuana users [26], and an opposite pattern in cortical thickness was associated with the onset of use, highlighting thicker cortices in early- vs. late-onset users [27]. Magnetic resonance imaging scans also revealed that heavy marijuana consumption induced increased thickness in the bilateral lingual, right superior temporal, right inferior parietal, and left paracentral regions, and a decreased in right caudal middle frontal, bilateral insula, and bilateral superior frontal cortices [28].
Other studies have also provided evidence of how marijuana exposure may impact brain structure development during neurodevelopmental epochs. For example, analyses of brain volume measures revealed smaller cortical gray matter and larger white matter volumes in marijuana users who started before age 17 [29]. Moreover, morphological changes have been detected in thalamus, hippocampus, parahippocampus, and amygdala [30,31,32,33], and profound impairments in axonal connectivity were observed in the corpus callosum and in the right fimbria of the hippocampus [34], which may underlie the long-term cognitive impairments observed in cannabis-related pathology.
At the neurochemical level, dysfunctions in the balance between the excitatory and inhibitory pathways have been considered as potential mechanisms underlying cannabis-related disturbances. Indeed, repeated stimulation of CB1Rs during brain maturation may interfere with normal neurodevelopmental processes, especially in frontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum, in which CB1Rs expression progressively increases until adulthood [35]. Although no clinical studies to our knowledge have yet reported long-lasting consequences on GABAergic and glutamatergic systems following adolescent cannabis exposure, aberrations have been observed in young chronic smokers [36] and in cannabis users in an early stage of psychosis [37]. Such abnormalities are consistent with those observed in neuropsychiatric disorders. Indeed, post-mortem analyses in schizophrenic patients revealed a reduction in cortical levels of the enzyme glutamate decarboxylase (GAD-67), which mediate GABA synthesis and release [38]. Moreover, decreased in the levels of GAT-1 and GABAA receptor subunits have been reported [39,40,41]. Similar alterations in GAD-67 and GABAA receptors were also observed in patients with major depression [42,43,44].
Furthermore, the consequences of adolescent marijuana use on dopaminergic system function have been investigated in both clinical and pre-clinical studies. For example, sustained cannabis exposure has been associated with reduced dopamine (DA) release within the striatum, which was related to the onset and duration of use [45,46]. Moreover, the Catechol-Methyl-Transferase (COMT) and Akt genes have been examined, due to their role in DA regulation and psychosis. Caspi and colleagues demonstrated that a functional polymorphism in COMT gene moderates the emergence of psychosis at adulthood, following chronic adolescent cannabis use [47]. This phenomenon was not observed after acute consumption in young smokers, which was mediated instead by a genetic variation of the Akt gene [48]. Consistently, the same polymorphism of the Akt gene has been directly linked to enhanced susceptibility for cannabis-related psychopathology [49]. In addition, investigations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene, a neurotrophin involved in neuronal growth, differentiation, and survival, pointed out a deregulation in BDNF production as a consequence of frequent cannabis use in adolescence [50]. Cannabis use at young age and BDNF variations have been also correlated with the onset of psychosis [51].
Taken together, this evidence highlights the role of neuronal and genetic markers in the association between early cannabis use and vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders, providing potential approaches for novel therapeutic strategies to prevent and/or reverse the pathophysiological sequelae induced by chronic marijuana consumption during adolescence. However, the majority of human clinical studies are correlational in nature and are limited in their ability to dissociate causal vs. correlative measures, either temporally or functionally. Accordingly, pre-clinical studies primarily using rodent models of adolescent brain development have been exceptionally important for identifying the specific functional roles in various biomarkers linked to adolescent cannabinoid exposure. In addition, there is now emerging coherence between many such pre-clinical studies and reported effects in clinical populations, leading to increased opportunities for the identification of pharmacological or other therapeutic interventions aimed at reversing the pathophysiological effects of adolescent cannabinoid exposure.

3. Effects of THC Exposure during Adolescence: Insight from Neurodevelopmental Animal Models

3.1. Risks for Schizophrenia and Cognitive Impairments

Pre-clinical investigations on adolescent neurodevelopmental cannabis exposure have been crucial to model cannabinoid-related endophenotypes comparable to those reported in schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric diseases. Studies in animal models provide the advantage of identifying cannabinoid-induced neuroadaptations, while precisely controlling drug concentration and the age window of exposure, as well as allowing for mechanistic approaches for preventing or reverting observed psychopathological phenotypes. The need for improving the translational value of these models have led to the development of more precise definitions of adolescence in rodents as the periods between postnatal days (PND) 21 and 60, which can be further dissected in three phases: early, middle, and late adolescence, starting at PND 21, PND 34, and PND 46, respectively [52].
While schizophrenia is undoubtedly a uniquely human disease, various behavioral paradigms with high validity have been used to investigate schizophrenia-like features following adolescent cannabinoid exposure. For example, the measurement of sensorimotor gating in prepulse inhibition (PPI) paradigms is one of the most widely used assays to investigate sensory filtering impairments in various neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and autism. Indeed, the inability to filter out irrelevant sensory information is a core endophenotype in schizophrenia [53]. Chronic THC exposure during middle adolescence in rodents (PND 35–45) has been found to significantly disrupt sensorimotor gating at adulthood [54,55]. Notably, this effect was neither observed directly after adolescent THC exposure [55], nor when THC was administered to adult rats (PND 65–75) [54].
Social cognition and memory impairments are other core endophenotypes of schizophrenia disorders [56]. Neurodevelopmental THC exposure during adolescence in animal models has been found to induce cognitive schizophrenia-like deficits [57,58]. For example, significant long-term abnormalities in social interaction memory were observed in adolescent rats chronically treated with THC [54,59]. Similarly, short-term and working memory performances were altered when specific tasks (e.g., novel and spatial object recognition, radial arm maze, T maze, Morris water maze) were carried out in both males and females [59,60,61,62,63]. These THC-induced effects on memory have not been reported consistently among studies [64,65,66,67]. However, the route of administration and dosing regimen of THC used across study protocols, as well as variations in behavioral paradigm techniques may account for such discrepancies. Relevant long-lasting deficits have been also observed during the paired-associates learning task, which assess for associative learning and visual memory deficits. Specifically, adolescent THC-exposed rats required more trials than controls to reach the accuracy criterion of 80% at adulthood [55].

3.2. Risks for Depressive Like-Phenotype and Long-Term Anxiety

Considerable evidence has shown that adolescent cannabinoid exposure in rodents leads to long-term dysregulation in emotional processing, resulting in anxiety and depressive-like symptoms. In fact, adult rats chronically exposed to THC during adolescence, when placed in an inescapable water cylinder during the Porsolt Forced Swim Test (FST), stopped moving earlier and/or spent longer time immobile [57,58,68]. These behaviors, which are considered as measures of despair and resignation, have been found to be greater in females [69,70]. Furthermore, adolescent THC exposure has been found to induce anhedonia-like behaviors, demonstrated by reduced interest in rewarding stimuli measured in sucrose and palatable food preference tests [68,70,71]. These findings support the role of cannabis consumption during adolescence in the susceptibility for developing mood disorders at adulthood, also showing consistency with the remarkable gender differences reported in depression.
In regard to anxiety-related disorders, results reported following adolescent THC exposure are less consistent. Chronic THC treatment during adolescence induced long-lasting anxiety in the light-dark box test [54], a paradigm based on the aversion of rodents to bright environments. Nonetheless, when other assays were performed, adolescent THC has been found to induce either no changes, anxiety- or anxiolytic-like effects. Specifically, adult rats treated with low doses of THC from PND 30 to 50 spent less time and made less entries in the open arms during the Elevated Plus Maze test [68]. On the other hand, studies reported no long-term differences in THC-exposed males and females [71,72] as well as in C57Bl/6J and DBA/2J male mice [63,65]. In addition, THC has been also found to induce strain-specific anxiolytic effects in Lewis rats, which spent more time in the open arms compared both their vehicle counterpart and THC-exposed Fischer344 rats [73]. These findings may highlight the role of genetic backgrounds and differential vulnerabilities in THC-induced maladaptations. Indeed, one study reported no affective dysregulations in adult Long-Evans rats following chronic adolescent THC exposure [74]. Lastly, contrasting findings have been reported when thigmotaxis in the Open Field test was considered. This anxiety index is based on the preference of rodents to stay close to the walls rather than exploring the open arena of an enclosed test environment, related to a rodent’s natural avoidance of predator vulnerability. Using this assay, THC exposure during adolescence has variably been reported to reduce [75], increase [60], or not alter [68,71] the thigmotaxis index at adulthood, again suggesting a complex interplay between genetic background and relative vulnerability to THC-induced anxiety phenotypes.

4. Neurobiological Mechanisms Underlying THC-Related Detrimental Consequences

Several neural and molecular pathways have been investigated to elucidate the mechanisms underlying THC-induced pathology (Figure 1). Chronic cannabinoid exposure is able to downregulate CB1R expression in several brain regions [76,77,78], interfering with the normal development of the endocannabinoid system and neurocircuitries during adolescence. This impact on neural remodeling may lead to the emergence of neuropsychiatric phenotypes and negatively affect long-term cognitive processing, mainly mediated by the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Indeed, THC exposure during adolescence has been found to alter the PFC pyramidal neurons, disrupting the gene networks associated with cell morphogenesis, cytoskeletal organization and dendritic development as well as provoking a premature pruning of dendritic spines [79]. Moreover, aberrations in cortical glutamatergic and GABAergic systems have been previously observed in rodent models of adolescent THC exposure. For example, several pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that THC exposure during adolescence induced a decrease of basal GABA levels and GABA receptor proteins as well as a remarkable loss of GAD-67 [76,80,81], associated with hyperactive states of PFC pyramidal neurons [59]. These disturbances in the inhibitory/excitatory balance have been correlated with abnormal oscillation patterns [81], which are directly implicated in sensory processing and cognitive impairments [82,83]. Moreover, the increased firing rate of PFC glutamatergic neurons following adolescent THC exposure has been found to drive a sub-cortical DAergic hyperactivity in ventral tegmental area (VTA), underlying schizophrenia-like phenotypes [54]. In support of this, previous investigations have shown that activation of CB1Rs in PFC modulated emotional and memory salience through functional interaction with the mesolimbic DAergic system [84]. Such disturbances in DAergic signaling may result from neurodevelopmental alterations in DA downstream molecular pathways. In particular, adolescent THC exposure has been shown to significantly down-regulate the PFC expression of several molecular substrates related to psychiatric disorders, such as Akt-308, GSK-3, mTOR, p70S6K, and β-catenin [54].
Furthermore, THC-induced deficits in cognitive and memory functions could be attributed to disruptions in the hippocampus (HC) and PFC connection pathways. For example, sustained adolescent THC exposure has been found to lead to sex-dependent downregulation and disrupted functionality of CB1Rs [85] as well as reduction in hippocampal volume and neurogenesis [62,70]. In addition, Zamberletti and colleagues reported an enhanced expression of pre- and post-synaptic hippocampal biomarkers (e.g., synaptophysin and PSD95) and specific AMPA and NMDA receptor subunits, concomitant with neuroinflammatory processes [86]. At the functional level, long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), two processes critical for memory-related synaptic plasticity, have been reported to be impaired by adolescent THC exposure in dental gyrus (DG) and PFC, respectively [87]. Moreover, THC exposure has been shown to induce abnormal changes in DA transmission as well as in serotonin (5HT) transporter (SERT) expression levels and serotonergic activity in both the PFC and HC. Specifically, in male rats, DOPAC/DA turnover rates were increased in HC and decreased in PFC, while tissue DA levels were increased only in PFC [62]. In addition, SERT levels were enhanced only in HC, the 5HT metabolite 5-HIAA was significantly increased in both PFC and HC, while the ratio 5-HIAA/5HT was increased in PFC but decreased in HC [60]. These findings were concomitant with changes in BDNF protein expression levels PFC and HC [62], revealing sex-specific differences exclusively in PFC [60].
Due to the relevance of these neural pathways in cognitive processes, such changes in the neurobiology of PFC and HC may represent specific biomarkers for THC-induced memory impairments. In addition, dysfunction in HC may also account for the affective and emotional impairments induced by adolescent THC exposure, due to its ability to regulate mesolimbic DA activity states. Indeed, the pathway ventral HC-nucleus accumbens (NA) has been previously investigated for its pro-depressant role in depressive-like animal model [88]. Although no study to our knowledge has yet studied the HC-NA circuit specifically following THC exposure, it has been shown that acute intra-HC cannabinoid receptor activation can potently modulate neural activity states within the NA shell (NAsh) and controls the formation of emotional associative memory [89]. In addition, local administration of THC in ventral HC was found to induce anxiety-related phenotypes, associated with increased VTA DA activity, decreased VTA GABAergic, and disruption in β, γ, ε oscillation patterns, through an ERK-signaling mechanism [90]. Notably, abnormalities in synaptic excitatory/inhibitory balance in HC and PFC as well as the hyper-DAergic activity in VTA induced by THC may in turn impact on dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) activity. Specifically, a recent study has demonstrated that chronic THC exposure during adolescence induced persistent anxious and depressive-like behaviors, concomitant with a hypoactivity of 5HT neurons in DRN [68].
Taken together, the evidence highlighted above underscores that the cognitive impairments, anxiety, as well as psychiatric-like manifestations associated with neurodevelopmental THC exposure may result from profound maladaptations in a variety of neural circuits and associated molecular signaling pathways, all of which concomitantly serve as important biomarkers for various neuropsychiatric disorders.

5. Therapeutic Perspective: Potential Intervention for Mitigate the Neuropsychiatric Risks

According to the literature reviewed above, sustained cannabis exposure during adolescence induces long-lasting cognitive impairments and neuropsychiatric-like phenotypes, associated with robust dysfunction of the mesocorticolimbic system. Functionally, the profound dysregulation in sub-cortical DAergic signaling has been associated with disturbances in GABAergic vs. glutamatergic balance in the PFC, leading to dysregulated control of VTA DA transmission via PFC > VTA pathways [81,84]. That considered, novel pharmacotherapeutic interventions targeting the cortical inhibitory/excitatory signaling have now been examined aimed to either minimize, revert, or prevent such cannabis-induced detrimental effects. Renard and colleagues [59] demonstrated that THC-induced neuronal and behavioral abnormalities could be reversed in adulthood by pharmacologically restoring physiological GABA tone directly in the PFC. Specifically, pharmacological agonist activation of GABAA receptors in the PFC at adulthood reversed short-term and social memory impairments as well as reduced anxiety and alterations in exploratory behavior induced by THC exposure during adolescence. Notably, these manipulations of PFC GABAergic neurotransmission also normalized the long-lasting sub-cortical DAergic hyperactivity (Table 1). These findings corroborate the crucial role of cortical GABAergic hypofunction in adolescent THC-induced pathological outcomes and underscore the potential therapeutic benefits of targeting cortical GABAergic tone to mitigate cannabis-related neuropsychiatric side-effects [81]. Importantly, these promising benefits of GABAergic compounds have been already observed in schizophrenic patients, in which the administration of a benzodiazepine-like agent selective for GABAA receptors was shown to improve cognitive performance and attenuated schizophrenia-related abnormalities in frontal gamma oscillatory activity [91]. Future studies are required to see if similar interventions into the GABAergic system may be therapeutic for the reversal of cannabis-induced neuropsychiatric side-effects following long-term adolescent exposure.
Concomitant to the loss of GABAergic inhibition, chronic THC exposure during adolescence was found to induce a remarkable potentiation in firing and bursting activity of PFC pyramidal neurons [54,59], consistent with the dysregulation of GABA/Glutamate balance within this region. Thus, modulation of glutamatergic dysfunction has been proposed as a potential pharmacological intervention to prevent or reverse THC-induced psychopathology. Specifically, L-theanine, an amino acid analogue of L-glutamate and L-glutamine derived from green tea leaves, has been investigated due to its established therapeutic properties in anxiety, schizophrenia and depressive phenotypes [92,93,94,95]. Research in our laboratory has recently demonstrated that co-administration of L-theanine with THC in a neurodevelopmental rodent model of adolescent THC exposure, was able to powerfully block a wide range of THC-induced behavioral abnormalities into adulthood, including anhedonia, anxiety and impairments in memory and sensorimotor gating [96]. These preventative effects of L-theanine might result from its ability to normalize DAergic hyperactivity in the VTA, which in turn could ameliorate the cortical hyper-bursting state, restoring the inhibitory/excitatory balance and the oscillation patterns within PFC. In support of this, we found that L-theanine was able to fully prevent the overactivation of both sub-cortical VTA DAergic neuronal activity and cortical PFC activity states and gamma-oscillatory dysregulation induced by adolescent THC exposure. Furthermore, we found that down-regulation of cortical GSK-3α/β and Akt-Thr308, two critical molecular biomarkers for THC-related neuropsychiatric side effects, was similarly reversed by L-theanine [96] (Table 1). Such decreases in GSK-3α/β and Akt-Thr308 expression levels have been previously associated with hyper-DAergic states, as demonstrated following sustained activation of DA D2 receptors [97]. In addition, an in vitro study has demonstrated that L-theanine protects against excess DA-related neurotoxicity through modulation of glutathione levels in astrocytes [98]. This suggests a potential role of astrocytic-glutathione mechanisms underlying mesocorticolimbic PFC/VTA dysregulation induced by hyperactive DAergic drive following adolescent THC exposure.
Beyond the role of DA, adolescent THC exposure has been found to induce long-term dysregulation in serotonin transmission [60,68], highlighting this system as a potential target for novel therapeutic approaches. In particular, Berthoux and colleagues [99] have shown that co-administration during adolescence of THC and the 5HT6 receptor antagonist SB258585, was able to prevent long-lasting cognitive impairments and aberrations in cortical networks, such as sustained activation of mTOR, excitatory/inhibitory transmission imbalances as well as changes in the intrinsic properties of cortical pyramidal neurons and LTD (Table 1). These THC-induced abnormalities were abolished also following concomitant treatment with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin and were not detected in 5HT6 receptor deficiency mice, supporting the crucial role of these receptors in THC-related pathology. Consistently, antagonism of 5HT6 receptor has been previously observed to be effective in developmental models of schizophrenia [100]. In addition, these findings underscore the important role of mTOR dysregulation as a molecular mechanism underlying THC-induced neurodevelopmental pathophysiology [54,81].
Many studies have also investigated the potential protective properties of CBD, due to its antipsychotic profile and apparent lack of deleterious side-effects. Indeed, CBD has been found to induce opposite effects on various neurophysiological measures when compared with THC [101], resulting in a promising therapeutic treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders. For example, previous evidence has demonstrated that intra-NASh CBD administration ameliorated amphetamine-induced deficits in PPI, hyperlocomotion, and increased VTA DA activity [102]. A potential mechanism underlying these CBD effects has been suggested by Norris and colleagues [103], which have reported that CBD decreases spontaneous DAergic firing and bursting rates via functional interaction with the 5HT1A receptor system. In addition, adolescent CBD in spontaneous hypertensive rats prevented the emergence of hyper-motility as well as impairments in sensorimotor gating and contextual fear memory, through modulation of the serotonin system [104]. Notably, therapeutic properties of CBD have been reported in chronic cannabis users, in which prolonged treatment significantly improved memory and cognition as well as decreased depressive-like symptoms, without inducing any side effects [105]. Moreover, CBD was found to normalize the anatomical and neurochemical hippocampal aberrations associated with chronic cannabis consumption [106,107]. Similar preventive effects of CBD on long-term schizophrenia-like symptoms have been also reported in pre-clinical investigations. For example, Murphy and colleagues found that CBD and THC co-administration in adolescent mice prevented deficits in working memory, anxiety, and compulsive-like behaviors [108] (Table 1). Although the mechanisms are not yet fully elucidated, CBD may either antagonize THC effects via negatively modulating an allosteric site of CBRs [109] or interacting with other molecular substrates [101,110,111,112]. For instance, CBD has been found to exert its therapeutic properties by increasing serum levels of endogenous AEA, potentially through inhibition of the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) [113]. In support of this finding, administration of the FAAH inhibitor URB597 in adult female rats was able to rescue cognitive and depressive-like symptoms induced by adolescent THC exposure. Such effects, mediated by CB1R signaling, were associated with a higher density of cortical CB1Rs and restoration of THC-related functional aberrations occurring in PFC and DG [70,87] (Table 1). Moreover, increased levels of AEA may activate nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha (PPARα), an isoform of the nuclear ligand-activated transcription factors family, which has been previously demonstrated to provide neuroprotective effects when measured in several neurodevelopmental models [114,115].
As previously mentioned, several genetic polymorphisms may be associated with increased susceptibility for cannabis-related neurodevelopmental pathology. For example, transgenic mice with dominant-negative disrupted in schizophrenia 1 (DN-DISC1) mutations exposed to THC during late adolescence, exhibited anxiolytic behaviors and memory impairments at adulthood, correlated with reduced synaptic plasticity in HC. Notably, wild-type (WT) but not DN-DISC1 THC-treated mice, showed a robust increase of BDNF levels, suggesting that the BDNF response may be a protective mechanism against environmental insults, which fail when other vulnerability factors co-exist. Indeed, BDNF over-expression selectively in DN-DISC1-THC mice was found to prevent the cognitive deficits [116] (Table 1). In addition, a more recent study suggested that such THC-induced memory impairments are mediated by astrocytic mechanisms. For example, adolescent THC treatment in mice expressing DN-DISC1 selectively in astrocytes, activates the proinflammatory pathway NF-kB-COX-2, leading to increased glutamate levels and decreased parvalbumin-positive boutons in HC. Remarkably, selective inhibition of COX-2 signaling, aimed to counteract this neuroinflammatory state, prevented the emergence of these cognitive and glutamatergic abnormalities following adolescent THC exposure [117] (Table 1).
Further investigations have suggested potential protective properties though the modulation of Neuregulin 1 (Nrg1), another gene related to schizophrenia and cannabis-induced neuropsychiatric effects. For example, Long and colleagues [118] reported that a transgenic model of mice heterozygous in the Nrg1 transmembrane domain (Nrg1 HET) exhibited less susceptibility to anxiety following adolescent acute THC exposure, while chronic THC did not reduce exploratory sniffing behavior during social interaction, as observed in WT control groups. Extending these behavioral effects, THC induced different consequences in the binding density of CB1 and 5-HT2A receptors between Nrg1 HET and WT groups in brain areas related to schizophrenia. In addition, Nrg1 HET THC-exposed mice showed differential expression of hippocampal proteins associated with NMDA receptor trafficking, excessive glutamatergic transmission, excitotoxity and apoptosis when compared with WT mice [119] (Table 1). These observations suggested that the Nrg1 mutation may exert some protective effects toward THC-induced neurodevelopmental pathology.
Lastly, interventions targeting the epigenetic mechanisms involved in THC-related neurodevelopmental abnormalities have been proposed as a potential therapeutic target. In particular, THC exposure in adolescent female rats was found to significantly enhance a marker of the cortical repressive histone H3, through upregulation of the histone-modifying enzyme Suv39H. Co-administration during adolescence of a selective blocker of this enzyme was able to prevent the THC-induced cognitive impairments by normalization of these selective histone modifications [69] (Table 1). Notably, H3 methylation plays a crucial role in normal brain development and GABAergic neurotransmission [120], which raise the possibility that modulation of the histone H3 may restore the cortical inhibitory/excitatory imbalance induced by adolescent THC exposure. Future studies are required to further clarify these possibilities.

6. Conclusions

As presented in this review, a large and growing body of evidence has demonstrated that chronic cannabis exposure during adolescence is associated with an increased vulnerability for various neuropsychiatric disorders and cognitive abnormalities. Such disturbances can include impairments in memory and learning as well as schizophrenia-related psychosis, depressive phenotypes, and anxiety disorders. Investigations into the neurodevelopmental exposure to THC in translational animal models have been remarkably consistent with clinical findings and have provided an insight into various neural pathways and biomarkers involved in THC-related pathological outcomes, pinpointing several molecular targets for novel pharmacotherapeutic approaches. In particular, recent findings from our laboratory demonstrated that normalization of the hyper-DAergic state and restoration of the excitatory/inhibitory balance in the mesocorticolimbic system have been successful strategies for preventing and/or reversing the long-lasting behavioral, neural, and molecular consequences induced by adolescent THC [59,96].
Given the exponential increase of cannabis use among youth, it is becoming increasingly important to develop safer THC formulations for minimizing potential side effects as well as implementing tiered early interventions. The long-term outcomes related to cannabis exposure during adolescence are complex and can be the result of multiple factors. Specifically, not only THC exposure itself during brain development increases vulnerability for psychiatric disorders, but co-occurrence with other multivariate factors may heighten these risks (see [121] for an extensive review). For instance, while some genetic polymorphisms have been reported in this review as protective factors, others have been found to induce adverse and synergistic effects and increase the vulnerability to cannabis-related developmental insults. In addition, the emerging findings on early-life interferences, such as maternal deprivation or immune system activation, and adolescent THC exposure [122,123], highlight the complexity of such interactions and the need for further investigations.
This complementary evidence underscores the importance of continuing to identify the mechanisms associated with comorbid cannabis use and mental health disorders, in order to develop targeted therapeutic strategies. Moreover, preventive measures and effective health policy will continue to be crucial adjuncts in order to improve public awareness concerning potential neurodevelopmental consequences of cannabis exposure.

Author Contributions

M.D.F. and S.R.L. wrote the paper. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (PJT-159586), the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, MITACs Canada and CanaQuest Inc.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dhein, S. Different Effects of Cannabis Abuse on Adolescent and Adult Brain. Pharmacology 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hammond, C.J.; Chaney, A.; Hendrickson, B.; Sharma, P. Cannabis use among U.S. adolescents in the era of marijuana legalization: A review of changing use patterns, comorbidity, and health correlates. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2020, 32, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Canadian Cannabis Survey 2020: Summary. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-medication/cannabis/research-data/canadian-cannabis-survey-2020-summary.html (accessed on 21 December 2020).
  4. Maccarrone, M. Missing Pieces to the Endocannabinoid Puzzle. Trends Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tirado-Muñoz, J.; Lopez-Rodriguez, A.B.; Fonseca, F.; Farré, M.; Torrens, M.; Viveros, M.P. Effects of cannabis exposure in the prenatal and adolescent periods: Preclinical and clinical studies in both sexes. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2020, 57, 100841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Thorpe, H.H.A.; Hamidullah, S.; Jenkins, B.W.; Khokhar, J.Y. Adolescent neurodevelopment and substance use: Receptor expression and behavioral consequences. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 206, 107431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fischer, A.S.; Tapert, S.F.; Louie, D.L.; Schatzberg, A.F.; Singh, M.K. Cannabis and the Developing Adolescent Brain. Curr. Treat. Options Psychiatry 2020, 7, 144–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Stuyt, E. The Problem with the Current High Potency THC Marijuana from the Perspective of an Addiction Psychiatrist. Mo. Med. 2018, 115, 482–486. [Google Scholar]
  9. Freeman, T.P.; Craft, S.; Wilson, J.; Stylianou, S.; ElSohly, M.; Di Forti, M.; Lynskey, M.T. Changes in delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations in cannabis over time: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2020, 1000–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Freeman, A.M.; Petrilli, K.; Lees, R.; Hindocha, C.; Mokrysz, C.; Curran, H.V.; Saunders, R.; Freeman, T.P. How does cannabidiol (CBD) influence the acute effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in humans? A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019, 107, 586–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lorenzetti, V.; Solowij, N.; Yücel, M. The role of cannabinoids in neuroanatomic alterations in cannabis users. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 79, e17–e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Solowij, N.; Broyd, S.; Greenwood, L.M.; van Hell, H.; Martelozzo, D.; Rueb, K.; Todd, J.; Liu, Z.; Galettis, P.; Martin, J.; et al. A randomised controlled trial of vaporised Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol alone and in combination in frequent and infrequent cannabis users: Acute intoxication effects. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2019, 269, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hines, L.A.; Freeman, T.P.; Gage, S.H.; Zammit, S.; Hickman, M.; Cannon, M.; Munafo, M.; MacLeod, J.; Heron, J. Association of High-Potency Cannabis Use with Mental Health and Substance Use in Adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry 2020, 77, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Di Forti, M.; Marconi, A.; Carra, E.; Fraietta, S.; Trotta, A.; Bonomo, M.; Bianconi, F.; Gardner-Sood, P.; O’Connor, J.; Russo, M.; et al. Proportion of patients in south London with first-episode psychosis attributable to use of high potency cannabis: A case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry 2015, 2, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Di Forti, M.; Quattrone, D.; Freeman, T.P.; Tripoli, G.; Gayer-Anderson, C.; Quigley, H.; Rodriguez, V.; Jongsma, H.E.; Ferraro, L.; La Cascia, C.; et al. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): A multicentre case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry 2019, 6, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Schoeler, T.; Petros, N.; Di Forti, M.; Klamerus, E.; Foglia, E.; Ajnakina, O.; Gayer-Anderson, C.; Colizzi, M.; Quattrone, D.; Behlke, I.; et al. Effects of continuation, frequency, and type of cannabis use on relapse in the first 2 years after onset of psychosis: An observational study. Lancet Psychiatry 2016, 3, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Andréasson, S.; Allebeck, P.; Engström, A.; Rydberg, U. Cannabis and schizophrenia. A longitudinal study of Swedish conscripts. Lancet 1987, 2, 1483–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stefanis, N.C.; Delespaul, P.; Henquet, C.; Bakoula, C.; Stefanis, C.N.; Van Os, J. Early adolescent cannabis exposure and positive and negative dimensions of psychosis. Addiction 2004, 99, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gobbi, G.; Atkin, T.; Zytynski, T.; Wang, S.; Askari, S.; Boruff, J.; Ware, M.; Marmorstein, N.; Cipriani, A.; Dendukuri, N.; et al. Association of Cannabis Use in Adolescence and Risk of Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidality in Young Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2019, 76, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Leadbeater, B.J.; Ames, M.E.; Linden-Carmichael, A.N. Age-varying effects of cannabis use frequency and disorder on symptoms of psychosis, depression and anxiety in adolescents and adults. Addiction 2019, 114, 278–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Harvey, P.D. Smoking cannabis and acquired impairments in cognition: Starting early seems like a really bad idea. Am. J. Psychiatry 2019, 176, 90–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Renard, J.; Krebs, M.; Pen, G.L.; Jay, T.M. Long-term consequences of adolescent cannabinoid exposure in adult psychopathology. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Meier, M.H.; Caspi, A.; Ambler, A.; Harrington, H.L.; Houts, R.; Keefe, R.S.E.; McDonald, K.; Ward, A.; Poulton, R.; Moffitt, T.E. Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2657–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Morin, J.F.G.; Afzali, M.H.; Bourque, J.; Stewart, S.H.; Séguin, J.R.; O’Leary-Barrett, M.; Conrod, P.J. A population-based analysis of the relationship between substance use and adolescent cognitive development. Am. J. Psychiatry 2019, 176, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jacobus, J.; Courtney, K.E.; Hodgdon, E.A.; Baca, R. Cannabis and the developing brain: What does the evidence say? Birth Defects Res. 2019, 111, 1302–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gruber, S.A.; Sagar, K.A. Marijuana on the Mind? The Impact of Marijuana on Cognition, Brain Structure, and Brain Function, and Related Public Policy Implications. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 2017, 4, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Filbey, F.M.; McQueeny, T.; DeWitt, S.J.; Mishra, V. Preliminary findings demonstrating latent effects of early adolescent marijuana use onset on cortical architecture. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2015, 16, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lopez-Larson, M.P.; Bogorodzki, P.; Rogowska, J.; McGlade, E.; King, J.B.; Terry, J.; Todd, D.Y.; Yurgelun-Todd, D. Altered Prefrontal and Insular Cortical Thickness. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 220, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Wilson, W.; Mathew, R.; Turkington, T.; Hawk, T.; Coleman, R.E.; Provenzale, J. Brain morphological changes and early marijuana use: A magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography study. J. Addict. Dis. 2000, 19, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schoeler, T.; Bhattacharyya, S. The effect of cannabis use on memory function: An update. Subst. Abuse Rehabil. 2013, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sachs, J.; McGlade, E.; Yurgelun-Todd, D. Safety and Toxicology of Cannabinoids. Neurotherapeutics 2015, 12, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. McCormick, M.A.; Shekhar, A. Review of Marijuana Use in the Adolescent Population and Implications of its Legalization in the United States. J. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2014, 5, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Yücel, M.; Solowij, N.; Respondek, C.; Whittle, S.; Fornito, A.; Pantelis, C.; Lubman, D.I. Regional brain abnormalities associated with long-term heavy cannabis use. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2008, 65, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zalesky, A.; Solowij, N.; Yücel, M.; Lubman, D.I.; Takagi, M.; Harding, I.H.; Lorenzetti, V.; Wang, R.; Searle, K.; Pantelis, C.; et al. Effect of long-term cannabis use on axonal fibre connectivity. Brain 2012, 135, 2245–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mato, S.; Del Olmo, E.; Pazos, A. Ontogenetic development of cannabinoid receptor expression and signal transduction functionality in the human brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 17, 1747–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Prescot, A.P.; Renshaw, P.F.; Yurgelun-Todd, D.A. γ-Amino butyric acid and glutamate abnormalities in adolescent chronic marijuana smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 129, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Rigucci, S.; Xin, L.; Klauser, P.; Baumann, P.S.; Alameda, L.; Cleusix, M.; Jenni, R.; Ferrari, C.; Pompili, M.; Gruetter, R.; et al. Cannabis use in early psychosis is associated with reduced glutamate levels in the prefrontal cortex. Psychopharmacology 2018, 235, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Hashimoto, T.; Volk, D.W.; Eggan, S.M.; Mirnics, K.; Pierri, J.N.; Sun, Z.; Sampson, A.R.; Lewis, D.A. Gene expression deficits in a subclass of GABA neurons in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 6315–6326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Volk, D.W.; Austin, M.C.; Pierri, J.N.; Sampson, A.R.; Lewis, D.A. GABA transporter-1 mRNA in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia: Decreased expression in a subset of neurons. Am. J. Psychiatry 2001, 158, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maldonado-Aviles, J.G.; Curley, A.A.; Hashimoto, T.; Morrow, L.; Ramsey, A.J.; O’Donnell, P.; Volk, D.W.; Lewis, D.A. Altered Markers of Tonic Inhibition in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex of Subjects with Schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 2009, 166, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. de Jonge, J.C.; Vinkers, C.H.; Hulshoff Pol, H.E.; Marsman, A. GABAergic mechanisms in schizophrenia: Linking postmortem and In vivo studies. Front. Psychiatry 2017, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Karolewicz, B.; Maciag, D.; O’Dwyer, G.; Stockmeier, C.A.; Feyissa, A.M.; Rajkowka, G. Reduced Level of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase-67 kDa in the Prefrontal Cortex in Major Depression. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010, 13, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Luscher, B.; Shen, Q.; Sahir, N. The GABAergic deficit hypothesis of major depressive disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 2011, 16, 383–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Fogaça, M.V.; Duman, R.S. Cortical GABAergic dysfunction in stress and depression: New insights for therapeutic interventions. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Bloomfield, M.A.P.; Morgan, C.J.A.; Egerton, A.; Kapur, S.; Curran, H.V.; Howes, O.D. Dopaminergic function in cannabis users and its relationship to cannabis-induced psychotic symptoms. Biol. Psychiatry 2014, 75, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Urban, N.B.; Slifstein, M.; Thompson, J.L.; Xu, X.; Girgis, R.R.; Raheja, S.; Haney, M.; Abi-dargham, A. Dopamine release in chronic cannabis users: A [11C]raclopride Positron Emission Tomography study. Biol. Psychiatry 2012, 71, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Caspi, A.; Moffitt, T.E.; Cannon, M.; McClay, J.; Murray, R.; Harrington, H.L.; Taylor, A.; Arseneault, L.; Williams, B.; Braithwaite, A.; et al. Moderation of the effect of adolescent-onset cannabis use on adult psychosis by a functional polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene: Longitudinal evidence of a gene X environment interaction. Biol. Psychiatry 2005, 57, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Morgan, C.J.A.; Freeman, T.P.; Powell, J.; Curran, H.V. AKT1 genotype moderates the acute psychotomimetic effects of naturalistically smoked cannabis in young cannabis smokers. Transl. Psychiatry 2016, 6, e738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Di Forti, M.; Iyegbe, C.; Sallis, H.; Kolliakou, A.; Falcone, M.A.; Paparelli, A.; Sirianni, M.; La Cascia, C.; Stilo, S.A.; Marques, T.R.; et al. Confirmation that the AKT1 (rs2494732) genotype influences the risk of psychosis in cannabis users. Biol. Psychiatry 2012, 72, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Miguez, M.J.; Chan, W.; Espinoza, L.; Tarter, R.; Perez, C. Marijuana use among adolescents is associated with deleterious alterations in mature BDNF. AIMS Public Health 2019, 6, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mané, A.; Bergé, D.; Penzol, M.J.; Parellada, M.; Bioque, M.; Lobo, A.; González-Pinto, A.; Corripio, I.; Cabrera, B.; Sánchez-Torres, A.M.; et al. Cannabis use, COMT, BDNF and age at first-episode psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 2017, 250, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tirelli, E.; Laviola, G.; Adriani, W. Ontogenesis of behavioral sensitization and conditioned place preference induced by psychostimulants in laboratory rodents. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2003, 27, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Braff, D.L.; Geyer, M.A. Sensorimotor Gating and Schizophrenia. Human and animal model studies. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1990, 47, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Renard, J.; Rosen, L.G.; Loureiro, M.; De Oliveira, C.; Schmid, S.; Rushlow, W.J.; Laviolette, S.R. Adolescent Cannabinoid Exposure Induces a Persistent Sub-Cortical Hyper-Dopaminergic State and Associated Molecular Adaptations in the Prefrontal Cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2017, 27, 1297–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Abela, A.R.; Rahbarnia, A.; Wood, S.; Lê, A.D.; Fletcher, P.J. Adolescent exposure to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol delays acquisition of paired-associates learning in adulthood. Psychopharmacology 2019, 236, 1875–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lee, J.; Nuechterlein, K.H.; Knowlton, B.J.; Bearden, C.E.; Cannon, T.D.; Fiske, A.P.; Ghermezi, L.; Hayata, J.N.; Hellemann, G.S.; Horan, W.P.; et al. Episodic Memory for Dynamic Social Interaction Across Phase of Illness in Schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 2018, 44, 620–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rubino, T.; Parolaro, D. The impact of exposure to cannabinoids in adolescence: Insights from animal models. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 79, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Renard, J.; Rushlow, W.J.; Laviolette, S.R. What can rats tell us about adolescent cannabis exposure? Insights from. Can. J. Psychiatry 2016, 61, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Renard, J.; Szkudlarek, H.J.; Kramar, C.P.; Jobson, C.E.L.; Moura, K.; Rushlow, W.J.; Laviolette, S.R. Adolescent THC Exposure Causes Enduring Prefrontal Cortical Disruption of GABAergic Inhibition and Dysregulation of Sub-Cortical Dopamine Function. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Poulia, N.; Delis, F.; Brakatselos, C.; Lekkas, P.; Kokras, N.; Dalla, C.; Antoniou, K. Escalating low-dose Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol exposure during adolescence induces differential behavioral and neurochemical effects in male and female adult rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2020, 52, 2681–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rubino, T.; Parolaro, D. Sex-dependent vulnerability to Cannabis abuse in adolescence. Front. Psychiatry 2015, 6, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Poulia, N.; Delis, F.; Brakatselos, C.; Polissidis, A.; Koutmani, Y.; Kokras, N.; Dalla, C.; Politis, P.K.; Antoniou, K. Detrimental effects of adolescent escalating low-dose Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol leads to a specific bio-behavioural profile in adult male rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 178, 1722–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, H.T.; Mackie, K. Adolescent Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure Selectively Impairs Working Memory but Not Several Other mPFC-Mediated Behaviors. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 576214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kasten, C.R.; Zhang, Y.; Boehm, S.L. Acute cannabinoids produce robust anxiety-like and locomotor effects in mice, but long-term consequences are age- and sex-dependent. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Kasten, C.R.; Zhang, Y.; Boehm, S.L. Acute and Long-Term Effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on Object Recognition and Anxiety-Like Activity are Age- and Strain-Dependent in Mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2018, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Nelson, N.G.; Law, W.X.; Weingarten, M.J.; Carnevale, L.N.; Das, A.; Liang, N.C. Combined ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol and moderate alcohol administration: Effects on ingestive behaviors in adolescent male rats. Psychopharmacology 2019, 236, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gibula-Tarlowska, E.; Wydra, K.; Kotlinska, J.H. Deleterious effects of ethanol, ∆(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (thc), and their combination on the spatial memory and cognitive flexibility in adolescent and adult male rats in the barnes maze task. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. De Gregorio, D.; Dean Conway, J.; Canul, M.-L.; Posa, L.; Bambico, F.R.; Gobbi, G. Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low-Dose delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Adolescence and Adulthood on Serotonin/Norepinephrine Neurotransmission and Emotional Behavior. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Prini, P.; Rusconi, F.; Zamberletti, E.; Gabaglio, M.; Penna, F.; Fasano, M.; Battaglioli, E.; Parolaro, D.; Rubino, T. Adolescent THC exposure in female rats leads to cognitive deficits through a mechanism involving chromatin modifications in the prefrontal cortex. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2017, 43, 170082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Realini, N.; Vigano’, D.; Guidali, C.; Zamberletti, E.; Rubino, T.; Parolaro, D. Chronic URB597 treatment at adulthood reverted most depressive-like symptoms induced by adolescent exposure to THC in female rats. Neuropharmacology 2011, 60, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rubino, T.; Vigano, D.; Realini, N.; Guidali, C.; Braida, D.; Capurro, V.; Castiglioni, C.; Cherubino, F.; Romualdi, P.; Candeletti, S.; et al. Chronic delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol During Adolescence Provokes Sex-Dependent Changes in the Emotional Profile in Adult Rats: Behavioral and Biochemical Correlates. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008, 33, 2760–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Saravia, R.; Ten-Blanco, M.; Julià-Hernández, M.; Gagliano, H.; Andero, R.; Armario, A.; Maldonado, R.; Berrendero, F. Concomitant THC and stress adolescent exposure induces impaired fear extinction and related neurobiological changes in adulthood. Neuropharmacology 2019, 144, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Cadoni, C.; Simola, N.; Espa, E.; Fenu, S.; Di Chiara, G. Strain dependence of adolescent Cannabis influence on heroin reward and mesolimbic dopamine transmission in adult Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Addict. Biol. 2015, 20, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bruijnzeel, A.W.; Knight, P.; Panunzio, S.; Xue, S.; Bruner, M.M.; Wall, S.C.; Pompilus, M.; Febo, M.; Setlow, B. Effects in rats of adolescent exposure to cannabis smoke or THC on emotional behavior and cognitive function in adulthood. Psychopharmacology 2019, 236, 2773–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Llorente-berzal, A.; Puighermanal, E.; Burokas, A. Sex-Dependent Psychoneuroendocrine Effects of THC and MDMA in an Animal Model of Adolescent Drug Consumption. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stringfield, S.J.; Torregrossa, M.M. Intravenous self-administration of delta-9-THC in adolescent rats produces long-lasting alterations in behavior and receptor protein expression. Psychopharmacology 2021, 238, 305–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hirvonen, J.; Goodwind, R.; Li, C.-T.; Terry, G.; Zoghbi, S.; Morse, C.; Pike, V.; Volkow, N.; Huestis, M.; Innis, R. Reversible and regionally selective downregulation of brain cannabinoid CB1 receptors in chronic daily cannabis smokers. Mol. Psychiatry 2012, 17, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Burston, J.J.; Wiley, J.L.; Craig, A.A.; Selley, D.E.; Sim-Selley, L.J. Regional enhancement of cannabinoid CB 1 receptor desensitization in female adolescent rats following repeated Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol exposure. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 161, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Miller, M.L.; Chadwick, B.; Dickstein, D.L.; Purushothaman, I.; Egervari, G.; Rahman, T.; Tessereau, C.; Hof, P.R.; Roussos, P.; Shen, L.; et al. Adolescent exposure to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol alters the transcriptional trajectory and dendritic architecture of prefrontal pyramidal neurons. Mol. Psychiatry 2019, 24, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Zamberletti, E.; Beggiato, S.; Steardo, L.; Prini, P.; Antonelli, T.; Ferraro, L.; Rubino, T.; Parolaro, D. Neurobiology of Disease Alterations of prefrontal cortex GABAergic transmission in the complex psychotic-like phenotype induced by adolescent delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol exposure in rats. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014, 63, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Renard, J.; Rushlow, W.J.; Laviolette, S.R. Effects of adolescent THC exposure on the prefrontal GABAergic system: Implications for schizophrenia-related psychopathology. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Swerdlow, N.R.; Geyer, M.A.; Braff, D.L. Neural circuit regulation of prepulse inhibition of startle in the rat: Current knowledge and future challenges. Psychopharmacology 2001, 156, 194–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Cheng, C.H.; Chan, P.Y.S.; Niddam, D.M.; Tsai, S.Y.; Hsu, S.C.; Liu, C.Y. Sensory gating, inhibition control and gamma oscillations in the human somatosensory cortex. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Draycott, B.; Loureiro, M.; Ahmad, T.; Tan, H.; Zunder, J.; Laviolette, S.R. Cannabinoid transmission in the prefrontal cortex Bi-phasically controls emotional memory formation via functional interactions with the ventral tegmental area. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 13096–13109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Calakos, K.C.; Bhatt, S.; Foster, D.W.; Cosgrove, K.P. Author Correction: Underlying Sex Differences in Cannabis Use. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2017, 4, 439–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zamberletti, E.; Gabaglio, M.; Grilli, M.; Prini, P.; Catanese, A.; Pittaluga, A.; Marchi, M.; Rubino, T.; Parolaro, D. Long-term hippocampal glutamate synapse and astrocyte dysfunctions underlying the altered phenotype induced by adolescent THC treatment in male rats. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 111, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cuccurazzu, B.; Zamberletti, E.; Nazzaro, C.; Prini, P.; Trusel, M.; Grilli, M.; Parolaro, D.; Tonini, R.; Rubino, T. Adult Cellular Neuroadaptations Induced by Adolescent THC Exposure in Female Rats Are Rescued by Enhancing Anandamide Signaling. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018, 21, 1014–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bagot, R.C.; Parise, E.M.; Peña, C.J.; Zhang, H.X.; Maze, I.; Chaudhury, D.; Persaud, B.; Cachope, R.; Bolaños-Guzmán, C.A.; Cheer, J.; et al. Ventral hippocampal afferents to the nucleus accumbens regulate susceptibility to depression. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Loureiro, M.; Kramar, C.; Renard, J.; Rosen, L.G.; Laviolette, S.R. Cannabinoid Transmission in the Hippocampus Activates Nucleus Accumbens Neurons and Modulates Reward and Aversion-Related Emotional Salience. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 80, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hudson, R.; Renard, J.; Norris, C.; Rushlow, W.J.; Laviolette, S.R. Cannabidiol Counteracts the Psychotropic Side-Effects of Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in the Ventral Hippocampus through Bidirectional Control of ERK1-2 Phosphorylation. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 8762–8777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Lewis, D.A.; Cho, R.Y.; Carter, C.S.; Eklund, K.R.; Forster, S.; Kelly, M.A.; Montrose, D. Subunit-Selective Modulation of GABA Type A Receptor Neurotransmission and Cognition in Schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 2008, 165, 1585–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Lopes Sakamoto, F.; Metzker Pereira Ribeiro, R.; Amador Bueno, A.; Oliveira Santos, H. Psychotropic effects of L-theanine and its clinical properties: From the management of anxiety and stress to a potential use in schizophrenia. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 147, 104395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hidese, S.; Ota, M.; Wakabayashi, C.; Noda, T.; Ozawa, H.; Okubo, T.; Kunugi, H. Effects of chronic l-theanine administration in patients with major depressive disorder: An open-label study. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2017, 29, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Shen, M.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, L.; Tang, H.; Chen, J. L-theanine ameliorate depressive-like behavior in a chronic unpredictable mild stress rat model via modulating the monoamine levels in limbic–cortical–striatal–pallidal–thalamic-circuit related brain regions. Phyther. Res. 2019, 33, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ota, M.; Wakabayashi, C.; Sato, N.; Hori, H.; Hattori, K.; Teraishi, T.; Ozawa, H.; Okubo, T.; Kunugi, H. Effect of L-theanine on glutamatergic function in patients with schizophrenia. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2015, 27, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. De Felice, M.; Renard, J.; Hudson, R.; Szkudlarek, H.J.; Pereira, B.J.; Schmid, S.; Rushlow, W.J.; Laviolette, S.R. L-Theanine Prevents Long-Term Affective and Cognitive Side Effects of Adolescent Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure and Blocks Associated Molecular and Neuronal Abnormalities in the Mesocorticolimbic Circuitry. J. Neurosci. 2021, 41, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Sutton, L.P.; Rushlow, W.J. The dopamine D2 receptor regulates Akt and GSK-3 via Dvl-3. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 3, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Takeshima, M.; Miyazaki, I.; Murakami, S.; Kita, T.; Asanuma, M. L-Theanine protects against excess dopamine-induced neurotoxicity in the precence of astrocytes. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2016, 59, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Berthoux, C.; Hamieh, A.M.; Rogliardo, A.; Doucet, E.L.; Coudert, C.; Ango, F.; Grychowska, K.; Chaumont-Dubel, S.; Zajdel, P.; Maldonado, R.; et al. Early 5-HT6 receptor blockade prevents symptom onset in a model of adolescent cannabis abuse. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Meffre, J.; Chaumont-Dubel, S.; Mannoury la Cour, C.; Loiseau, F.; Watson, D.J.G.; Dekeyne, A.; Séveno, M.; Rivet, J.M.; Gaven, F.; Déléris, P.; et al. 5-HT6 receptor recruitment of mTOR as a mechanism for perturbed cognition in schizophrenia. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012, 4, 1043–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Renard, J.; Norris, C.; Rushlow, W.; Laviolette, S.R. Neuronal and molecular effects of cannabidiol on the mesolimbic dopamine system: Implications for novel schizophrenia treatments. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 75, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Renard, J.; Loureiro, M.; Rosen, L.G.; Zunder, J.; De Oliveira, C.; Schmid, S.; Rushlow, W.J.; Laviolette, S.R. Cannabidiol counteracts amphetamine-induced neuronal and behavioral sensitization of the mesolimbic dopamine pathway through a novel mTOR/p70S6 kinase signaling pathway. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 5160–5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Norris, C.; Loureiro, M.; Kramar, C.; Zunder, J.; Renard, J.; Rushlow, W.; Laviolette, S.R. Cannabidiol modulates fear memory formation through interactions with serotonergic transmission in the mesolimbic system. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016, 41, 2839–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Peres, F.F.; Diana, M.C.; Levin, R.; Suiama, M.A.; Almeida, V.; Vendramini, A.M.; Santos, C.M.; Zuardi, A.W.; Hallak, J.E.C.; Crippa, J.A.; et al. Cannabidiol administered during peri-adolescence prevents behavioral abnormalities in an animal model of schizophrenia. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Solowij, N.; Broyd, S.J.; Beale, C.; Prick, J.A.; Greenwood, L.M.; Van Hell, H.; Suo, C.; Galettis, P.; Pai, N.; Fu, S.; et al. Therapeutic Effects of Prolonged Cannabidiol Treatment on Psychological Symptoms and Cognitive Function in Regular Cannabis Users: A Pragmatic Open-Label Clinical Trial. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018, 3, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Yücel, M.; Lorenzetti, V.; Suo, C.; Zalesky, A.; Fornito, A.; Takagi, M.J.; Lubman, D.I.; Solowij, N. Hippocampal harms, protection and recovery following regular cannabis use. Transl. Psychiatry 2016, 6, e710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Beale, C.; Broyd, S.J.; Chye, Y.; Suo, C.; Schira, M.; Galettis, P.; Martin, J.H.; Yücel, M.; Solowij, N. Prolonged cannabidiol treatment effects on hippocampal subfield volumes in current cannabis users. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018, 3, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Murphy, M.; Mills, S.; Winstone, J.; Leishman, E.; Wager-Miller, J.; Bradshaw, H.; Mackie, K. Chronic Adolescent Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Treatment of Male Mice Leads to Long-Term Cognitive and Behavioral Dysfunction, Which Are Prevented by Concurrent Cannabidiol Treatment. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2017, 2, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Chung, H.; Fierro, A.; David Pessoa-Mahana, C. Cannabidiol binding and negative allosteric modulation at the cannabinoid type 1 receptor in the presence of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: An In Silico study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Hudson, R.; Rushlow, W.; Laviolette, S.R. Phytocannabinoids modulate emotional memory processing through interactions with the ventral hippocampus and mesolimbic dopamine system: Implications for neuropsychiatric pathology. Psychopharmacology 2018, 235, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Jung, T.; Hudson, R.; Rushlow, W.; Laviolette, S.R. Functional interactions between cannabinoids, omega-3 fatty acids and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: Implications for mental health pharmacotherapies. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Campos, A.C.; Fogaça, M.V.; Sonego, A.B.; Guimarães, F.S. Cannabidiol, neuroprotection and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 112, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Leweke, F.M.; Piomelli, D.; Pahlisch, F.; Muhl, D.; Gerth, C.W.; Hoyer, C.; Klosterkötter, J.; Hellmich, M.; Koethe, D. Cannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia. Transl. Psychiatry 2012, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. De Felice, M.; Melis, M.; Aroni, S.; Muntoni, A.L.; Fanni, S.; Frau, R.; Devoto, P.; Pistis, M. The PPARα agonist fenofibrate attenuates disruption of dopamine function in a maternal immune activation rat model of schizophrenia. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2019, 25, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Rolland, B.; Marche, K.; Cottencin, O.; Bordet, R. The PPARα Agonist Fenofibrate Reduces Prepulse Inhibition Disruption in a Neurodevelopmental Model of Schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. Treat. 2012, 2012, 839853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Segal-Gavish, H.; Gazit, N.; Barhum, Y.; Ben-Zur, T.; Taler, M.; Hornfeld, S.H.; Gil-Ad, I.; Weizman, A.; Slutsky, I.; Niwa, M.; et al. BDNF overexpression prevents cognitive deficit elicited by adolescent cannabis exposure and host susceptibility interaction. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 2462–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Jouroukhin, Y.; Zhu, X.; Shevelkin, A.V.; Hasegawa, Y.; Abazyan, B.; Saito, A.; Pevsner, J.; Kamiya, A.; Pletnikov, M.V. Adolescent Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure and Astrocyte-Specific Genetic Vulnerability Converge on Nuclear Factor-κB–Cyclooxygenase-2 Signaling to Impair Memory in Adulthood. Biol. Psychiatry 2019, 85, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Long, L.E.; Chesworth, R.; Huang, X.F.; McGregor, I.S.; Arnold, J.C.; Karl, T. Transmembrane domain Nrg1 mutant mice show altered susceptibility to the neurobehavioural actions of repeated THC exposure in adolescence. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 16, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Spencer, J.R.; Darbyshire, K.M.E.; Boucher, A.A.; Kashem, M.A.; Long, L.E.; McGregor, I.S.; Karl, T.; Arnold, J.C. Novel molecular changes induced by Nrg1 hypomorphism and Nrg1-cannabinoid interaction in adolescence: A hippocampal proteomic study in mice. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Shrestha, S.; Offer, S.M. Epigenetic Regulations of GABAergic Neurotransmission: Relevance for Neurological Disorders and Epigenetic Therapy. Med. Epigenet. 2016, 4, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Dunn, A.L.; Michie, P.T.; Hodgson, D.M.; Harms, L. Adolescent cannabinoid exposure interacts with other risk factors in schizophrenia: A review of the evidence from animal models. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2020, 116, 202–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zamberletti, E.; Prini, P.; Speziali, S.; Gabaglio, M.; Solinas, M.; Parolaro, D.; Rubino, T. Gender-dependent behavioral and biochemical effects of adolescent delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in adult maternally deprived rats. Neuroscience 2012, 204, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Lecca, S.; Luchicchi, A.; Scherma, M.; Fadda, P.; Muntoni, A.L.; Pistis, M. Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol during Adolescence Attenuates Disruption of Dopamine Function Induced in Rats by Maternal Immune Activation. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 07861 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic circuit diagram illustrating the long-lasting alterations in brain regions affected by adolescent THC exposure.
Figure 1. Schematic circuit diagram illustrating the long-lasting alterations in brain regions affected by adolescent THC exposure.
Ijms 22 07861 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of pre-clinical findings on therapeutic approaches for abnormalities induced by chronic THC during adolescence.
Table 1. Summary of pre-clinical findings on therapeutic approaches for abnormalities induced by chronic THC during adolescence.
Therapeutic Intervention THC Adolescent TreatmentOutcomes 1
Muscimol 500 ng/0.5 μL
intra-PFC infusions
(male SD rats, >PND 75)		THC 2.5–10 mg/kg i.p.
twice daily
(male SD rats, PND 35–45)		↑ novel object recognition index
↑ social motivation and
recognition scores
↑ locomotor activity
↓ anxiety
↓ VTA DA firing activity
↓ VTA DA bursting activity		[59]
L-theanine 10 mg/kg i.p.
twice daily
(male SD rats, PND 35–45)		THC 2.5–10 mg/kg i.p.
twice daily
(male SD rats, PND 35–45)		↑ sensory motor gating
↑ social memory
↑ novel object recognition index
↑ sucrose preference
↓ anxiety
↓ VTA DA firing activity
↓ PFC pyramidal bursting rate
↑ PFC gamma oscillations
↑ p-GSK3α-β
↑ p-GSK3α-β/t-GSK3α/β		[96]
SB258585 2.5 mg/kg or rapamycin 1.5 mg/kg i.p. daily
(male C57BL/6J mice,
PND 30–45)		THC 5 mg/kg i.p. daily
(male C57BL/6J mice,
PND 30–45)		↓ PFC mTOR
↓ PFC p-p70s6K
↑ object discrimination index
↑ sociability and social
discrimination index
↑ PFC mIPSC frequency
↓ PFC mEPSC frequency
↓ PFC resting membrane potential
↑ action potential threshold
↑ rheobase
↓ LTD		[99]
CBD 3 mg/kg i.p. daily
(male CD1 mice, PND 28–48)		THC 3 mg/kg i.p. daily
(male CD1 mice, PND 28–48) 		↑ object discrimination index
↓ compulsive behaviors
↓ anxiety		[108]
URB597 0.3 mg/kg i.p. daily
(female SD rats, >PND 75)		THC 2.5–10 mg/kg i.p.
twice daily
(female SD rats, PND 35–45)		↓ immobility, ↑ swimming in FST
↑ sucrose consumption
↑ social interaction
= recognition memory		[70]
URB597 0.3 mg/kg i.p. daily
(female SD rats, >PND 75)		THC 2.5–10 mg/kg i.p.
twice daily
(female SD rats, PND 35–45)		↑ PFC CB1Rs
↑ PFC LTD
↑ DG dendritic arborization
↑ DG DCX+ cells
↓ immobility, ↑ swimming in FST		[87]
BDNF over-expression
in dorsal HC		THC 10 mg/kg i.p. daily
(male DN-DISC1 C57BL/6J mice, PND 42–51)		↑ object recognition memory
= locomotor activity
= anxiety		[116]
NS398 10 mg/kg s.c. daily
(male and female astrocytic DN-DISC1 mice, PND 30–51)
or NS398 20 μM
in culture medium		THC 8 mg/kg s.c. daily
(male and female astrocytic DN-DISC1 mice, PND 30–51)
or THC 5 mM
in culture medium		↑ spatial memory
↑ novel object recognition index
↑ novel place recognition index
↑ glutamate secretion		[117]
Genetic modification
in Nrg1 gene		THC 10 mg/kg i.p. daily
(male Nrg1 HET mice,
PND 30–51)		= locomotor activity
= anxiety
= PPI and startle reflex
↑ sniffing behavior
↑ Substantia nigra CB1Rs binding
↑ Anterior insula 5HT2A binding		[118]
Genetic modification
in Nrg1 gene		THC 10 mg/kg i.p. daily
(male Nrg1 HET mice,
PND 30–51)		↑ APOA1
↓ GPSM2
↓ FLOT1		[119]
Chaetocin 0.05 mg/kg i.p daily
(female SD rats, PND 35–45)		THC 2.5–10 mg/kg i.p.
twice daily
(female SD rats, PND 35–45)		↑ novel object recognition index
= social behavior
= immobility, = swimming in FST		[69]
1 Outcomes of therapeutic interventions when compared with THC adolescent treated groups.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Felice, M.; Laviolette, S.R. Reversing the Psychiatric Effects of Neurodevelopmental Cannabinoid Exposure: Exploring Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions for Symptom Improvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157861

AMA Style

De Felice M, Laviolette SR. Reversing the Psychiatric Effects of Neurodevelopmental Cannabinoid Exposure: Exploring Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions for Symptom Improvement. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(15):7861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157861

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Felice, Marta, and Steven R. Laviolette. 2021. "Reversing the Psychiatric Effects of Neurodevelopmental Cannabinoid Exposure: Exploring Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions for Symptom Improvement" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 15: 7861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157861

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop