Background: Across culture, healthy infants show a high interest in infant-directed (ID) talking and singing. Despite ID talking and ID singing being very similar in physical properties, infants differentially respond to each of them. The mechanisms underpinning these different responses are still under discussion. Methods: This study explored the behavioral (n = 26) and brain (n = 14) responses from 6- to 8-month-old infants to ID talking and ID singing during a face-to-face mother-infant interaction with their own mother. Behavioral response was analyzed from offline video coding, and brain response was estimated from the analysis of electrophysiological recordings. Results: We found that during ID talking, infants displayed a significantly higher number of visual contacts, vocalizations, and body movements than during ID singing. Moreover, only during ID talking were the number of visual contacts and vocalizations positively correlated with the number of questions and pauses in the mother's speech. Conclusions: Our results suggest that ID talking provides infants with specific cues that allow them not only to react to mother stimulation, but also to act toward them, displaying a rudimentary version of turn-taking behavior. Brain activity partially supported that interpretation. The relevance of our results for bonding is discussed.

Keywords:
Face-to-face interaction, Mother-infant interaction, Infant-directed speech, Singing
1.
Richter L: The Importance of Caregiver-Child Interactions for the Survival and Healthy Development of Young Children: A Review. Geneva, Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development, World Health Organization, 2004.
2.
Fernald A: Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behav Dev 1985;8:181-195.
3.
Stern DN, Spieker S, Mackain K: Intonation contours as signals in maternal speech to pre-linguistic infants. Dev Psychol 1982;18:727-735.
4.
Golinkoff RM, Alioto A: Infant-directed speech facilitates lexical learning in adults hearing Chinese: implications for language acquisition. J Child Lang 1995;22:703-726.
5.
Kitamura C, Burnham D: Pitch and communicative intent in mother's speech: adjustments for age and sex in the first year. Infancy 2003;4:85-110.
6.
Trainor LJ, Austin CM, Desjardins RN: Is infant-directed speech prosody a result of the vocal expression of emotion? Psychol Sci 2000;11:188-195.
7.
Fernald A: Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message? Child Dev 1989;60:1497-1510.
8.
Trehub S, Trainor L: Singing to infants: lullabies and play songs. Adv Inf Res 1998;12:43-78.
9.
Trehub SE, Gudmundsdottir HR: Mothers as singing mentors for infants; in Welch GF, Howard DM, Nix J (eds): Oxford Handbook of Singing. Oxford, Oxford University Press (advance online publication), 2015.
10.
Nakata T, Trehub SE: Infants' responsiveness to maternal speech and singing. Infant Behav Dev 2004;27:455-464.
11.
Shenfield T, Trehub SE, Nakata T: Maternal singing modulates infant arousal. Psychol Music 2003;31:365-375.
12.
Corbeil M, Trehub SE, Peretz I: Speech versus singing: Infants choose happier sounds. Front Psychol 2013;4:372.
13.
Cruttenden A: Phonetic and prosodic aspects of baby talk; in Gallaway C, Richards BJ (eds): Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp 135-152.
14.
Gianino A, Tronick EZ: The mutual regulation model: the infant's self and interactive regulation and coping defense capacities; in Field T, McCabe P, Schneiderman N (eds): Stress and Coping across Development. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1988, pp 47-68.
15.
Minde K: Prematurity and serious medical conditions in infancy: implications for development, behavior, and intervention; in Zeanah CH (ed): Handbook of Infant Mental Health, ed 2. New York, Guilford Press, 2000, pp 176-194.
16.
Muscara F, Burke K, McCarthy MC, Anderson VA, Hearps SJ, Hearps SJ, Dimovski A, Nicholson JM: Parent distress reactions following a serious illness or injury in their child: a protocol paper for the Take a Breath Cohort Study. BMC Psychiatry 2015;15:153.
17.
Tester-Jones M, O'Mahen H, Watkins E, Karl A: The impact of maternal characteristics, infant temperament and contextual factors on maternal responsiveness to infant. Infant Behav Dev 2015;40:1-11.
18.
Wan MW, Green J: The impact of maternal psychopathology on child-mother attachment. Arch Womens Ment Health 2009;12:123-134.
19.
Seow WK: Environmental, maternal, and child factors which contribute to early childhood caries: a unifying conceptual model. Int J Paediatr Den 2012;22:157-168.
20.
Bradley RH, Corwyn RF: Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu Rev Psychol 2002;53:371-399.
21.
Evans GW, Gonnella C, Marcynyszyn LA, Gentile L, Salpekar N: The role of chaos in poverty and children's socioemotional adjustment. Psychol Sci 2005;16:560-565.
22.
Saby J, Marshall P: The utility of EEG band power analysis in the study of infancy and early childhood. Dev Neuropsychol 2012;37:253-273.
23.
Lindsley DB: A longitudinal study of the occipital alpha rhythm in normal children: frequency and amplitude standards. J Genet Psychol 1939;55:197-213.
24.
Stroganova TA, Orekhova EV, Posikera IN: Alpha rhythm in infants. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:997-1012.
25.
Hagne I: Development of the EEG in normal infants during the first year of life. A longitudinal study. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 1972;232:1-53.
26.
Marshall PJ, Bar-Haim Y, Fox NA: Development of the EEG from 5 months to 4 years of age. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:1199-1208.
27.
Klimesch W: α-Band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends Cogn Sci 2012;16:606-617.
28.
Orekhova EV, Stroganova TA, Posikera IN: Alpha activity as an index of cortical inhibition during sustained internally controlled attention in infants. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:740-749.
29.
Saby JN, Marshall PJ, Meltzoff AN: Neural correlates of being imitated: an EEG study in preverbal infants. Soc Neurosci 2012;7:650-661.
30.
Peña M, Pittaluga E, Mehler J: Language acquisition in premature and full-term infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:3823-3828.
31.
DeBoer T, Scott LS, Nelson CA: Methods of acquiring and analyzing infant event-related potentials; in de Haan M (ed): Infant EEG and Event-Related Potentials. London, Psychology Press, 2006, pp 5-38.
32.
Putnam SP, Helbig AL, Gartstein MA, Rothbart MK, Leerkes E: Development and assessment of short and very short forms of the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised. J Pers Assess 2014;96:445-458.
33.
Delorme A, Makeig S: EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. J Neurosci Methods 2004;134:9-21.
34.
Mognon A, Bruzzone L, Jovicich J, Buiatti M; ADJUST: An automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. Psychophysiology 2011;48:229-240.
35.
Corbeil M, Trehub SE, Peretz I: Singing delays the onset of infant distress. Infancy 2015, DOI: 10.1111/infa.12114.
36.
Kivy P: The Fine Art of Repetition: Essays in the Philosophy of Music. Cambridge, University Press, 1993.
37.
Trainor LJ, Zatorre RJ: The neurobiological basis of musical expectations: from probabilities to emotional meaning; in Hallam S, Cross I, Thaut M (eds): Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology. New York, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp 171-183.
38.
Gratier M, Devouche E, Guellai B, Infanti R, Yilmaz E, Parlato-Oliveira E: Early development of turn-taking in vocal interaction between mothers and infants. Front Psychol 2015;6:1167.
39.
Hilbrink EE, Gattis M, Levinson SC: Early developmental changes in the timing of turn-taking: a longitudinal study of mother-infant interaction. Front Psychol 2015;6:1492.
40.
Kaye K, Wells A: Mothers' jiggling and the burst-pause pattern in neonatal sucking. Infant Behav Dev 1980;3:29-46.
41.
Meltzoff AN, Moore MK: Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 1977;198:74-78.
42.
Cirelli LK, Einarson KM, Trainor LJ: Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Dev Sci 2014;17:1003-1011.
43.
Kugler J, Laub M: ‘Puppet show' theta rhythm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1971;31:532-533.
44.
Futagi Y, Ishihara T, Tsuda K, Suzuki Y, Goto M: Theta rhythms associated with sucking, crying, gazing and handling in infants. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;106:392-399.
45.
Bazhenova OV, Stroganova TA, Doussard-Roosevelt JA, Posikera IA, Porges SW: Physiological responses of 5-month-old infants to smiling and blank faces. Int J Psychophysiol 2007;63:64-76.
46.
Kaufman J, Csibra G, Johnson MH: Oscillatory activity in the infant brain reflects object maintenance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:15271-15274.
47.
Southgate V, Csibra G, Kaufman J, Johnson MH: Distinct processing of objects and faces in the infant brain. J Cogn Neurosci 2008;20:741-749.
48.
Grossmann T, Johnson M, Farroni T, Csibra G: Social perception in the infant brain: gamma oscillatory activity in response to eye gaze. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2007;2:284-291.
49.
Reid VM, Csibra G, Belsky J, Johnson MH: Neural correlates of the perception of goal-directed action in infants. Acta Psychol 2007;124:129-138.
50.
Thiessen ED, Hill EA, Saffran JR: Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy 2005;7:53-71.
51.
Levinson SC: Turn-taking in human communication - origins and implications for language processing. Trends Cogn Sci 2016;20:6-14.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.