Skip to main content
Log in

Vocalization of sex partners in the house mouse (Mus Musculus)

  • Comparative and Ontogenic Physiology
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acoustic parameters of the house mouse male and female vocalizations accompanying the sexual behavior were studied. The spectral-temporal analysis of female defensive calls and male ultrasonic calls was conducted on adult house mice, CBA and C57BL/6 hybrid strains. The principal feature of the female defensive call was its harmonic structure formed by three–five fundamental harmonics with the fundamental frequency of about 3 kHz. The signal energy was concentrated in the frequency range below 25 kHz. The basic harmonic structure could be modified by frequency and amplitude modulations and/or noise. The call duration varied widely from 40 to 470 ms and averaged 180 ± 70 ms. The principal feature of the male ultrasonic vocalization was its low intensity and poorly defined noise components. Depending on the call’s semantic load, its fundamental frequency averaged 67.3 ± 8.5 or 45.6 ± 3.7 kHz. Male ultrasonic vocalizations were shorter than female defensive calls and their duration did not exceed 220 ms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dewsbury, D.A., Comparative Animal Behavior, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Hinde, R.A., Animal Behavior, New York: Mc-Graw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nikolskii, A.A., Zvukovye signaly mlekopitayushchikh v ontogeneze (Sound Signals of Mammals in Evolution), Nauka, Moscow, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehret, G., Development of sound communication in mammals, Advances in the Study of Behavior, Rosenblatt, J.S., Hinde, R.A., Beer, C., and Busnel, M.C., Eds., New York, Academic, 1980, vol. 11, pp. 179–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Branchi, I., Santucci, D., and Alleva, E., Ultrasonic vocalisation emitted by infant rodents: A tool for assessment of neurobehavioural development, Behavioural Brain Research, 2001, vol. 125, no. 1–2, pp. 49–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehret, G., Common rules of communication sound perception, Behavior and Neurodynamics for Auditory Communication, Cambridge, University, 2006, pp. 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haack, B., Markl, H., and Ehret, G., Sound communication between parents and offspring, The Auditory Psychobiology of the Mouse, Springfield, 1983, pp. 57–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wöhr, M., Dalhoff, M., Wolf, E., Holsboer, F., Schwarting, R.K.W., and Wotjak, C.T., Effects of genetic background, gender, and early environmental factors on isolation-induced ultrasonic calling in mouse pups: An embryo-transfer study, Behavior Genetics, 2008, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 579–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Egorova, M.A. and Akimov, A.G., Acoustic charac-teristics in the low-frequency nest call of the house mouse (Mus musculus) early ontogenesis, Acoustical Physics, 2010, vol. 56, no. 3. pp. 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, Z. and Holy, T.E., Sex selectivity of mouse ultrasonic songs, Chemical Senses, 2007, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 463–473, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjm015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Portfors, C.V., Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice, J. Americ. Assoc. for Labor. Anim. Sci., 2007, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 28–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whytney, G. and Nyby, J., Sound communication among adults, The Auditoty Psychobiology of the Mouse, Springfield, Charles C. Thomas, 1983, pp. 98–129.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nyby, J., Auditory communication in adults, Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology, Chapter 1, Willott, J.F., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001, pp. 3–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Musolf, K., Hoffmann, F., and Penn, D.J., Ultrasonic courtship vocalizations in wild house mice, Mus musculus, Animal Behaviour, 2010, vol. 79, pp. 757–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffmann, F., Musolf, K., and Penn, D.J., Spectrographic analyses reveal signals of individuality and kinship in the ultrasonic courtship vocalizations of wild house mice, Physiol. Behav., 2012, vol. 105, pp. 766–771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lahvis, G.P., Alleva, E., and Scattoni, M.L., Translating mouse vocalizations: prosody and frequency modulation, Genes Brain Behav., 2011, vol. 10, pp. 4–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammerschmidt, K., Radyushkin, K., Ehrenreich, H., and Fischer, J., Female mice respond to male ultrasonic ‘songs’ with approach behavior, Biol. Lett., 2009, vol. 5, pp. 589–592.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pomerantz, S.M., Nunez, A.A., and Jay, B.N., Female behavior is affected by male ultrasonic vocalizations in house mice, Physiol. Behav., 1983, vol. 31, pp. 91–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Volodin, I.A., Goltsman, M.E., and Kalashnikova, M.V., Dynamics of agonistic interaction between paired animals in three gerbil species, Doklady RAN, 1998, vol. 363, no. 4, pp. 583–586.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kotenkova, E.V., Osipova, O.V., and Lyalyukhina, S.I., Domovaya mysh’ (The House Mouse), Sokolov, V.E., Ed., Moscow, IEMEZh, 1989.

  21. Volodin, I.A., Ilchenko, O.G., and Popov, S.V., Peschanki:soderzhanie i demographiya populyatsii raznykh vidov v nevole (Gerbils: Management and Demography of Different Species in Captivity), Moscow, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Plekhanova, A.S. and Egorova, M.A., Acoustic parameters of male agonistic vocalizations in house mouse (Mus musculus), Sbornik trudov XXIV sessii Rossiiskogo akusticheskogo obshchestva (Proceedings of the XXIV Session of the Russian Acoustical Society), Saratov, 2011, pp. 596–599.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bee, M.A., Kozich, C.E., Blackwell, K.J., and Gerhardt, H.C., Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination, Ethology, 2001, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Semple, S. and McComb, K., Perception of female reproductive state from vocal cues in a mammal species, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 2000, vol. 267, pp. 707–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sales, G.D., Ultrasound and mating behaviour in rodents with some observations on other behavioural situations, J. Zool. Lond., 1972, vol. 168, pp. 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Plekhanova, A.S. and Egorova, M.A., The study of acoustic structure of house mouse (Mus musculus) pups vocalizations in ontogenesis, Sbornik trudov I Vserossiiskoi akusticheskoi konferentsii (Proceedings of the Ist All-Russian Acoustic Conference), Moscow, 2014, pp. 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Egorova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.S. Lupanova, M.A. Egorova, 2015, published in Zhurnal Evolyutsionnoi Biokhimii i Fiziologii, 2015, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 283—289.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lupanova, A.S., Egorova, M.A. Vocalization of sex partners in the house mouse (Mus Musculus). J Evol Biochem Phys 51, 324–331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093015040080

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093015040080

Key words

Navigation