Abstract
Acoustic parameters of the house mouse male and female vocalizations accompanying the sexual behavior were studied. The spectral-temporal analysis of female defensive calls and male ultrasonic calls was conducted on adult house mice, CBA and C57BL/6 hybrid strains. The principal feature of the female defensive call was its harmonic structure formed by three–five fundamental harmonics with the fundamental frequency of about 3 kHz. The signal energy was concentrated in the frequency range below 25 kHz. The basic harmonic structure could be modified by frequency and amplitude modulations and/or noise. The call duration varied widely from 40 to 470 ms and averaged 180 ± 70 ms. The principal feature of the male ultrasonic vocalization was its low intensity and poorly defined noise components. Depending on the call’s semantic load, its fundamental frequency averaged 67.3 ± 8.5 or 45.6 ± 3.7 kHz. Male ultrasonic vocalizations were shorter than female defensive calls and their duration did not exceed 220 ms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dewsbury, D.A., Comparative Animal Behavior, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Hinde, R.A., Animal Behavior, New York: Mc-Graw-Hill, 1970.
Nikolskii, A.A., Zvukovye signaly mlekopitayushchikh v ontogeneze (Sound Signals of Mammals in Evolution), Nauka, Moscow, 1984.
Ehret, G., Development of sound communication in mammals, Advances in the Study of Behavior, Rosenblatt, J.S., Hinde, R.A., Beer, C., and Busnel, M.C., Eds., New York, Academic, 1980, vol. 11, pp. 179–225.
Branchi, I., Santucci, D., and Alleva, E., Ultrasonic vocalisation emitted by infant rodents: A tool for assessment of neurobehavioural development, Behavioural Brain Research, 2001, vol. 125, no. 1–2, pp. 49–56.
Ehret, G., Common rules of communication sound perception, Behavior and Neurodynamics for Auditory Communication, Cambridge, University, 2006, pp. 85–114.
Haack, B., Markl, H., and Ehret, G., Sound communication between parents and offspring, The Auditory Psychobiology of the Mouse, Springfield, 1983, pp. 57–97.
Wöhr, M., Dalhoff, M., Wolf, E., Holsboer, F., Schwarting, R.K.W., and Wotjak, C.T., Effects of genetic background, gender, and early environmental factors on isolation-induced ultrasonic calling in mouse pups: An embryo-transfer study, Behavior Genetics, 2008, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 579–595.
Egorova, M.A. and Akimov, A.G., Acoustic charac-teristics in the low-frequency nest call of the house mouse (Mus musculus) early ontogenesis, Acoustical Physics, 2010, vol. 56, no. 3. pp. 391–397.
Guo, Z. and Holy, T.E., Sex selectivity of mouse ultrasonic songs, Chemical Senses, 2007, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 463–473, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjm015.
Portfors, C.V., Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice, J. Americ. Assoc. for Labor. Anim. Sci., 2007, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 28–34.
Whytney, G. and Nyby, J., Sound communication among adults, The Auditoty Psychobiology of the Mouse, Springfield, Charles C. Thomas, 1983, pp. 98–129.
Nyby, J., Auditory communication in adults, Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology, Chapter 1, Willott, J.F., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001, pp. 3–18.
Musolf, K., Hoffmann, F., and Penn, D.J., Ultrasonic courtship vocalizations in wild house mice, Mus musculus, Animal Behaviour, 2010, vol. 79, pp. 757–764.
Hoffmann, F., Musolf, K., and Penn, D.J., Spectrographic analyses reveal signals of individuality and kinship in the ultrasonic courtship vocalizations of wild house mice, Physiol. Behav., 2012, vol. 105, pp. 766–771.
Lahvis, G.P., Alleva, E., and Scattoni, M.L., Translating mouse vocalizations: prosody and frequency modulation, Genes Brain Behav., 2011, vol. 10, pp. 4–16.
Hammerschmidt, K., Radyushkin, K., Ehrenreich, H., and Fischer, J., Female mice respond to male ultrasonic ‘songs’ with approach behavior, Biol. Lett., 2009, vol. 5, pp. 589–592.
Pomerantz, S.M., Nunez, A.A., and Jay, B.N., Female behavior is affected by male ultrasonic vocalizations in house mice, Physiol. Behav., 1983, vol. 31, pp. 91–96.
Volodin, I.A., Goltsman, M.E., and Kalashnikova, M.V., Dynamics of agonistic interaction between paired animals in three gerbil species, Doklady RAN, 1998, vol. 363, no. 4, pp. 583–586.
Kotenkova, E.V., Osipova, O.V., and Lyalyukhina, S.I., Domovaya mysh’ (The House Mouse), Sokolov, V.E., Ed., Moscow, IEMEZh, 1989.
Volodin, I.A., Ilchenko, O.G., and Popov, S.V., Peschanki:soderzhanie i demographiya populyatsii raznykh vidov v nevole (Gerbils: Management and Demography of Different Species in Captivity), Moscow, 1996.
Plekhanova, A.S. and Egorova, M.A., Acoustic parameters of male agonistic vocalizations in house mouse (Mus musculus), Sbornik trudov XXIV sessii Rossiiskogo akusticheskogo obshchestva (Proceedings of the XXIV Session of the Russian Acoustical Society), Saratov, 2011, pp. 596–599.
Bee, M.A., Kozich, C.E., Blackwell, K.J., and Gerhardt, H.C., Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination, Ethology, 2001, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 65–84.
Semple, S. and McComb, K., Perception of female reproductive state from vocal cues in a mammal species, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 2000, vol. 267, pp. 707–712.
Sales, G.D., Ultrasound and mating behaviour in rodents with some observations on other behavioural situations, J. Zool. Lond., 1972, vol. 168, pp. 149–164.
Plekhanova, A.S. and Egorova, M.A., The study of acoustic structure of house mouse (Mus musculus) pups vocalizations in ontogenesis, Sbornik trudov I Vserossiiskoi akusticheskoi konferentsii (Proceedings of the Ist All-Russian Acoustic Conference), Moscow, 2014, pp. 5–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.S. Lupanova, M.A. Egorova, 2015, published in Zhurnal Evolyutsionnoi Biokhimii i Fiziologii, 2015, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 283—289.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lupanova, A.S., Egorova, M.A. Vocalization of sex partners in the house mouse (Mus Musculus). J Evol Biochem Phys 51, 324–331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093015040080
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093015040080