Key Points
-
Classification of neurons into types enables their reproducible identification across times, laboratories and conditions.
-
Classification also facilitates genetic access for functional studies, as well as analyses of development, evolution and disease.
-
Neuronal cell types must be defined by multiple criteria related to their morphological, physiological, molecular and connectional properties.
-
Past efforts at neuronal classification were hindered by severe biases and under-sampling, but newly developed high-throughput techniques allow this limitation to be circumvented.
-
For some regions of the central nervous system, particularly the retina and cerebral cortex, a complete cell census appears within reach.
-
Principles derived from the well-developed field of species taxonomy (systematics) provide common-sense guidelines for cell-type classification.
Abstract
Neurons have diverse molecular, morphological, connectional and functional properties. We believe that the only realistic way to manage this complexity — and thereby pave the way for understanding the structure, function and development of brain circuits — is to group neurons into types, which can then be analysed systematically and reproducibly. However, neuronal classification has been challenging both technically and conceptually. New high-throughput methods have created opportunities to address the technical challenges associated with neuronal classification by collecting comprehensive information about individual cells. Nonetheless, conceptual difficulties persist. Borrowing from the field of species taxonomy, we propose principles to be followed in the cell-type classification effort, including the incorporation of multiple, quantitative features as criteria, the use of discontinuous variation to define types and the creation of a hierarchical system to represent relationships between cells. We review the progress of classifying cell types in the retina and cerebral cortex and propose a staged approach for moving forward with a systematic cell-type classification in the nervous system.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ramón y Cajal, S. Histologie Du Système Nerveux de L'homme & Des Vertébrés (ed. Maloine, A.) (Paris: Maloine, 1909). Translated by Swanson, N. & Swanson, L. W. (Oxford University Press, 1995). The founding document of neurobiology, which was in large part an attempt to classify neuronal types with the best method available at the time, Golgi staining.
Ascoli, G. A. et al. Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 557–568 (2008).
Bota, M. & Swanson, L. W. The neuron classification problem. Brain Res. Rev. 56, 79–88 (2007).
Brenner, S. Sequences and consequences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 207–212 (2010).
Fishell, G. & Heintz, N. The neuron identity problem: form meets function. Neuron 80, 602–612 (2013).
Markram, H. et al. Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 793–807 (2004).
Masland, R. H. Neuronal cell types. Curr. Biol. 14, R497–R500 (2004).
Migliore, M. & Shepherd, G. M. An integrated approach to classifying neuronal phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 810–818 (2005).
Nelson, S. B., Sugino, K. & Hempel, C. M. The problem of neuronal cell types: a physiological genomics approach. Trends Neurosci. 29, 339–345 (2006).
Seung, H. S. & Sumbul, U. Neuronal cell types and connectivity: lessons from the retina. Neuron 83, 1262–1272 (2014).
Somogyi, P. & Klausberger, T. Defined types of cortical interneurone structure space and spike timing in the hippocampus. J. Physiol. 562, 9–26 (2005).
Stevens, C. F. Neuronal diversity: too many cell types for comfort? Curr. Biol. 8, R708–R710 (1998).
Korn, H. & Faber, D. S. The Mauthner cell half a century later: a neurobiological model for decision-making? Neuron 47, 13–28 (2005).
Crick, F. The impact of molecular biology on neuroscience. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 354, 2021–2025 (1999).
Huang, Z. J. & Zeng, H. Genetic approaches to neural circuits in the mouse. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 183–215 (2013). This article summarizes the progress enabled by obtaining genetic access to specific cell types, which relied on molecular classification.
Arendt, D. et al. The origin and evolution of cell types. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 744–757 (2016).
Taylor, J. P., Brown, R. H. Jr & Cleveland, D. W. Decoding ALS: from genes to mechanism. Nature 539, 197–206 (2016).
Yonehara, K. et al. Congenital nystagmus gene FRMD7 is necessary for establishing a neuronal circuit asymmetry for direction selectivity. Neuron 89, 177–193 (2016).
Sanes, J. R. & Masland, R. H. The types of retinal ganglion cells: current status and implications for neuronal classification. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 38, 221–246 (2015). This article reviews the progress in classifying RGC types in mice. Remarkably, the estimated number has grown from ∼30 to >50 in the two years since its publication.
Anderson, D. J. The neural crest cell lineage problem: neuropoiesis? Neuron 3, 1–12 (1989).
Boije, H., Rulands, S., Dudczig, S., Simons, B. D. & Harris, W. A. The independent probabilistic firing of transcription factors: a paradigm for clonal variability in the zebrafish retina. Dev. Cell 34, 532–543 (2015).
McLaughlin, T. & O'Leary, D. D. Molecular gradients and development of retinotopic maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 327–355 (2005).
Zipursky, S. L. & Sanes, J. R. Chemoaffinity revisited: dscams, protocadherins, and neural circuit assembly. Cell 143, 343–353 (2010).
Rowe, M. H. & Stone, J. The interpretation of variation in the classification of nerve cells. Brain Behav. Evol. 17, 123–151 (1980).
Wagner, A., Regev, A. & Yosef, N. Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1145–1160 (2016).
Deneris, E. S. & Hobert, O. Maintenance of postmitotic neuronal cell identity. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 899–907 (2014).
Waddington, C. H. The strategy of the genes: a discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology (Allen & Unwin, 1957).
Rodieck, R. W. & Brening, R. K. Retinal ganglion cells: properties, types, genera, pathways and trans-species comparisons. Brain Behav. Evol. 23, 121–164 (1983).
Rowe, M. H. & Stone, J. Naming of neurones. Classification and naming of cat retinal ganglion cells. Brain Behav. Evol. 14, 185–216 (1977).
Tyner, C. F. The naming of neurons: applications of taxonomic theory to the study of cellular populations. Brain Behav. Evol. 12, 75–96 (1975). A prescient discussion of how taxonomic principles could be used to improve cell-type classification. Cast in terms of physiological properties (see also Refs 24, 28 and 29 ), it is even more applicable to modern molecular schemes.
Sulston, J. E., Schierenberg, E., White, J. G. & Thomson, J. N. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 100, 64–119 (1983).
Leber, S. M., Breedlove, S. M. & Sanes, J. R. Lineage, arrangement, and death of clonally related motoneurons in chick spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 10, 2451–2462 (1990).
Agathocleous, M. & Harris, W. A. From progenitors to differentiated cells in the vertebrate retina. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 45–69 (2009).
Ma, Y., Hu, H., Berrebi, A. S., Mathers, P. H. & Agmon, A. Distinct subtypes of somatostatin-containing neocortical interneurons revealed in transgenic mice. J. Neurosci. 26, 5069–5082 (2006).
Dietzl, G. et al. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448, 151–156 (2007).
Gong, S. et al. Targeting Cre recombinase to specific neuron populations with bacterial artificial chromosome constructs. J. Neurosci. 27, 9817–9823 (2007).
Kim, I. J., Zhang, Y., Yamagata, M., Meister, M. & Sanes, J. R. Molecular identification of a retinal cell type that responds to upward motion. Nature 452, 478–482 (2008).
Siegert, S. et al. Genetic address book for retinal cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1197–1204 (2009).
Taniguchi, H. et al. A resource of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in cerebral cortex. Neuron 71, 995–1013 (2011).
Jenett, A. et al. A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell Rep. 2, 991–1001 (2012).
Manning, L. et al. A resource for manipulating gene expression and analyzing cis-regulatory modules in the Drosophila CNS. Cell Rep. 2, 1002–1013 (2012).
Gerfen, C. R., Paletzki, R. & Heintz, N. GENSAT BAC cre-recombinase driver lines to study the functional organization of cerebral cortical and basal ganglia circuits. Neuron 80, 1368–1383 (2013).
Harris, J. A. et al. Anatomical characterization of Cre driver mice for neural circuit mapping and manipulation. Front. Neural Circuits 8, 76 (2014).
Chiang, A. S. et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of brain-wide wiring networks in Drosophila at single-cell resolution. Curr. Biol. 21, 1–11 (2011).
Shih, C. T. et al. Connectomics-based analysis of information flow in the Drosophila brain. Curr. Biol. 25, 1249–1258 (2015).
Economo, M. N. et al. A platform for brain-wide imaging and reconstruction of individual neurons. eLife 5, e10566 (2016).
Gong, H. et al. High-throughput dual-colour precision imaging for brain-wide connectome with cytoarchitectonic landmarks at the cellular level. Nat. Commun. 7, 12142 (2016).
Gong, H. et al. Continuously tracing brain-wide long-distance axonal projections in mice at a one-micron voxel resolution. Neuroimage 74, 87–98 (2013).
Markram, H. et al. Reconstruction and simulation of neocortical microcircuitry. Cell 163, 456–492 (2015). This paper reports a large-scale electrophysiological and morphological characterization and classification of neocortical neurons.
Costa, M., Manton, J. D., Ostrovsky, A. D., Prohaska, S. & Jefferis, G. S. NBLAST: rapid, sensitive comparison of neuronal structure and construction of neuron family databases. Neuron 91, 293–311 (2016).
Peng, H. et al. BigNeuron: large-scale 3D neuron reconstruction from optical microscopy images. Neuron 87, 252–256 (2015).
Sumbul, U. et al. A genetic and computational approach to structurally classify neuronal types. Nat. Commun. 5, 3512 (2014).
Ascoli, G. A., Maraver, P., Nanda, S., Polavaram, S. & Armananzas, R. Win-win data sharing in neuroscience. Nat. Methods 14, 112–116 (2017).
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N. & Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 1–340 (1986).
Denk, W. & Horstmann, H. Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy to reconstruct three-dimensional tissue nanostructure. PLoS Biol. 2, e329 (2004). A seminal paper of the modern age of ultrastructural connectomics, this study introduced the high-throughput serial scanning electron microscopy method that remains the most used in research (see Refs 56 and 57 for other methods).
Knott, G., Marchman, H., Wall, D. & Lich, B. Serial section scanning electron microscopy of adult brain tissue using focused ion beam milling. J. Neurosci. 28, 2959–2964 (2008).
Hayworth, K. J. et al. Imaging ATUM ultrathin section libraries with WaferMapper: a multi-scale approach to EM reconstruction of neural circuits. Front. Neural Circuits 8, 68 (2014).
Kasthuri, N. et al. Saturated reconstruction of a volume of neocortex. Cell 162, 648–661 (2015).
Bock, D. D. et al. Network anatomy and in vivo physiology of visual cortical neurons. Nature 471, 177–182 (2011).
Eberle, A. L. et al. High-resolution, high-throughput imaging with a multibeam scanning electron microscope. J. Microsc. 259, 114–120 (2015).
Beier, T. et al. Multicut brings automated neurite segmentation closer to human performance. Nat. Methods 14, 101–102 (2017).
Greene, M. J., Kim, J. S., Seung, H. S. & The EyeWirers. Analogous convergence of sustained and transient inputs parallel on off pathways retinal motion computation. Cell Rep. 14, 1892–1900 (2016).
Kim, J. S. et al. Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina. Nature 509, 331–336 (2014). References 62 and 63 used serial block-face imaging (described in Ref 55) and crowd-sourced reconstruction to provide an ultrastructural classification of retinal BCs.
Berck, M. E. et al. The wiring diagram of a glomerular olfactory system. eLife 5, e14859 (2016).
Takemura, S. Y. et al. A visual motion detection circuit suggested by Drosophila connectomics. Nature 500, 175–181 (2013).
Briggman, K. L., Helmstaedter, M. & Denk, W. Wiring specificity in the direction-selectivity circuit of the retina. Nature 471, 183–188 (2011).
Helmstaedter, M. et al. Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina. Nature 500, 168–174 (2013).
Lee, W. C. et al. Anatomy and function of an excitatory network in the visual cortex. Nature 532, 370–374 (2016).
Morgan, J. L., Berger, D. R., Wetzel, A. W. & Lichtman, J. W. The fuzzy logic of network connectivity in mouse visual thalamus. Cell 165, 192–206 (2016).
Obien, M. E., Deligkaris, K., Bullmann, T., Bakkum, D. J. & Frey, U. Revealing neuronal function through microelectrode array recordings. Front. Neurosci. 8, 423 (2014).
Antic, S. D., Empson, R. M. & Knopfel, T. Voltage imaging to understand connections and functions of neuronal circuits. J. Neurophysiol. 116, 135–152 (2016).
Chen, T. W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).
Peron, S., Chen, T. W. & Svoboda, K. Comprehensive imaging of cortical networks. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 32, 115–123 (2015).
Yang, W. & Yuste, R. In vivo imaging of neural activity. Nat. Methods 14, 349–359 (2017).
Kim, T. H. et al. Long-term optical access to an estimated one million neurons in the live mouse cortex. Cell Rep. 17, 3385–3394 (2016).
Sofroniew, N. J., Flickinger, D., King, J. & Svoboda, K. A large field of view two-photon mesoscope with subcellular resolution for in vivo imaging. eLife 5, e14472 (2016).
Andermann, M. L. et al. Chronic cellular imaging of entire cortical columns in awake mice using microprisms. Neuron 80, 900–913 (2013).
Ghosh, K. K. et al. Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope. Nat. Methods 8, 871–878 (2011).
Lu, R. et al. Video-rate volumetric functional imaging of the brain at synaptic resolution. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 620–628 (2017).
Ouzounov, D. G. et al. In vivo three-photon imaging of activity of GCaMP6-labeled neurons deep in intact mouse brain. Nat. Methods 14, 388–390 (2017).
Ziv, Y. et al. Long-term dynamics of CA1 hippocampal place codes. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 264–266 (2013).
Ahrens, M. B., Orger, M. B., Robson, D. N., Li, J. M. & Keller, P. J. Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Methods 10, 413–420 (2013).
Naumann, E. A. et al. From whole-brain data to functional circuit models: the zebrafish optomotor response. Cell 167, 947–960e20 (2016).
Cox, J., Pinto, L. & Dan, Y. Calcium imaging of sleep-wake related neuronal activity in the dorsal pons. Nat. Commun. 7, 10763 (2016).
Resendez, S. L. et al. Visualization of cortical, subcortical and deep brain neural circuit dynamics during naturalistic mammalian behavior with head-mounted microscopes and chronically implanted lenses. Nat. Protoc. 11, 566–597 (2016).
Shapiro, E., Biezuner, T. & Linnarsson, S. Single-cell sequencing-based technologies will revolutionize whole-organism science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 618–630 (2013).
Trapnell, C. Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res. 25, 1491–1498 (2015).
Poulin, J. F., Tasic, B., Hjerling-Leffler, J., Trimarchi, J. M. & Awatramani, R. Disentangling neural cell diversity using single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1131–1141 (2016).
Svensson, V. et al. Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 14, 381–387 (2017).
Picelli, S. et al. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods 10, 1096–1098 (2013).
Ramskold, D. et al. Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 777–782 (2012).
Islam, S. et al. Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. Genome Res. 21, 1160–1167 (2011).
Islam, S. et al. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat. Methods 11, 163–166 (2014).
Hashimshony, T. et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-Seq. Genome Biol. 17, 77 (2016).
Hashimshony, T., Wagner, F., Sher, N. & Yanai, I. CEL-Seq: single-cell RNA-Seq by multiplexed linear amplification. Cell Rep. 2, 666–673 (2012).
Pollen, A. A. et al. Low-coverage single-cell mRNA sequencing reveals cellular heterogeneity and activated signaling pathways in developing cerebral cortex. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1053–1058 (2014).
Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015). This paper introduces Drop-seq, one of three similar methods used for microfluidic-based high-throughput scRNA-seq (see also Refs 98 and 99).
Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).
Zheng, G. X. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).
Sheng, K., Cao, W., Niu, Y., Deng, Q. & Zong, C. Effective detection of variation in single-cell transcriptomes using MATQ-seq. Nat. Methods 14, 267–270 (2017).
Habib, N. et al. Div-Seq: Single-nucleus RNA-Seq reveals dynamics of rare adult newborn neurons. Science 353, 925–928 (2016).
Krishnaswami, S. R. et al. Using single nuclei for RNA-seq to capture the transcriptome of postmortem neurons. Nat. Protoc. 11, 499–524 (2016).
Lacar, B. et al. Nuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11022 (2016).
Lake, B. B. et al. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science 352, 1586–1590 (2016).
Shekhar, K. et al. Comprehensive classification of retinal bipolar neurons by single-cell transcriptomics. Cell 166, 1308–1323e30 (2016). This paper uses high-throughput scRNA-seq (Drop-seq, Ref. 97 ) to provide a molecular classification of retinal BCs; it also shows a 1:1 relationship of molecularly and morphologically defined types.
Ziegenhain, C. et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. Mol. Cell 65, 631–643e4 (2017).
Cadwell, C. R. et al. Electrophysiological, transcriptomic and morphologic profiling of single neurons using Patch-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 199–203 (2016).
Fuzik, J. et al. Integration of electrophysiological recordings with single-cell RNA-seq data identifies neuronal subtypes. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 175–183 (2016).
Baden, T. et al. The functional diversity of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse. Nature 529, 345–350 (2016).
Lubeck, E. & Cai, L. Single-cell systems biology by super-resolution imaging and combinatorial labeling. Nat. Methods 9, 743–748 (2012).
Shah, S., Lubeck, E., Zhou, W. & Cai, L. In situ transcription profiling of single cells reveals spatial organization of cells in the mouse hippocampus. Neuron 92, 342–357 (2016).
Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015). This paper describes MERFISH, one of several highly multiplexed methods used for in situ hybridization.
Moffitt, J. R. et al. High-throughput single-cell gene-expression profiling with multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11046–11051 (2016).
Moffitt, J. R. et al. High-performance multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization in culture and tissue with matrix imprinting and clearing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14456–14461 (2016).
Chen, F. et al. Nanoscale imaging of RNA with expansion microscopy. Nat. Methods 13, 679–684 (2016).
Lee, J. H. et al. Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science 343, 1360–1363 (2014).
Ke, R. et al. In situ sequencing for RNA analysis in preserved tissue and cells. Nat. Methods 10, 857–860 (2013).
Larsson, C., Grundberg, I., Soderberg, O. & Nilsson, M. In situ detection and genotyping of individual mRNA molecules. Nat. Methods 7, 395–397 (2010).
Masland, R. H. The neuronal organization of the retina. Neuron 76, 266–280 (2012).
Sanes, J. R. & Zipursky, S. L. Design principles of insect and vertebrate visual systems. Neuron 66, 15–36 (2010).
Kay, J. N., Chu, M. W. & Sanes, J. R. MEGF10 and MEGF11 mediate homotypic interactions required for mosaic spacing of retinal neurons. Nature 483, 465–469 (2012).
Reese, B. E. & Keeley, P. W. Design principles and developmental mechanisms underlying retinal mosaics. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 90, 854–876 (2015).
Euler, T., Haverkamp, S., Schubert, T. & Baden, T. Retinal bipolar cells: elementary building blocks of vision. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 507–519 (2014).
Franke, K. et al. Inhibition decorrelates visual feature representations in the inner retina. Nature 542, 439–444 (2017). This paper uses high-throughput calcium imaging to provide a physiological classification of retinal BCs; the types defined here correspond 1:1 with those defined molecularly (Ref. 105 ) and morphologically (Refs 62 and 63).
Wassle, H., Puller, C., Muller, F. & Haverkamp, S. Cone contacts, mosaics, and territories of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 29, 106–117 (2009).
Della Santina, L. et al. Glutamatergic monopolar interneurons provide a novel pathway of excitation in the mouse retina. Curr. Biol. 26, 2070–2077 (2016).
Glasser, M. F. et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 536, 171–178 (2016).
Douglas, R. J. & Martin, K. A. Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 419–451 (2004).
Greig, L. C., Woodworth, M. B., Galazo, M. J., Padmanabhan, H. & Macklis, J. D. Molecular logic of neocortical projection neuron specification, development and diversity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 755–769 (2013).
Harris, K. D. & Shepherd, G. M. The neocortical circuit: themes and variations. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 170–181 (2015). An updated review of neocortical neuronal types and their patterns of input-output connections, which are repeated across cortical areas.
Molyneaux, B. J., Arlotta, P., Menezes, J. R. & Macklis, J. D. Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 427–437 (2007).
Kim, E. J., Juavinett, A. L., Kyubwa, E. M., Jacobs, M. W. & Callaway, E. M. Three types of cortical layer 5 neurons that differ in brain-wide connectivity and function. Neuron 88, 1253–1267 (2015).
Kita, T. & Kita, H. The subthalamic nucleus is one of multiple innervation sites for long-range corticofugal axons: a single-axon tracing study in the rat. J. Neurosci. 32, 5990–5999 (2012).
Velez-Fort, M. et al. The stimulus selectivity and connectivity of layer six principal cells reveals cortical microcircuits underlying visual processing. Neuron 83, 1431–1443 (2014).
Yamashita, T. et al. Membrane potential dynamics of neocortical projection neurons driving target-specific signals. Neuron 80, 1477–1490 (2013).
Tasic, B. et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 335–346 (2016). This article reports a comprehensive scRNA-seq characterization and classification of adult neocortical neurons using the Smart-seq method, which resulted in a transcriptomic cell type taxonomy that is supported by genetic (Cre recombinase driver lines), physiological, morphological and projectional evidence.
Fishell, G. & Rudy, B. Mechanisms of inhibition within the telencephalon: “where the wild things are”. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 535–567 (2011).
Kepecs, A. & Fishell, G. Interneuron cell types are fit to function. Nature 505, 318–326 (2014).
Rudy, B., Fishell, G., Lee, S. & Hjerling-Leffler, J. Three groups of interneurons account for nearly 100% of neocortical GABAergic neurons. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 45–61 (2011).
Tremblay, R., Lee, S. & Rudy, B. GABAergic interneurons in the neocortex: from cellular properties to circuits. Neuron 91, 260–292 (2016). An updated review of neocortical interneuron types, their cellular properties and their potential functions in circuit motifs and network operations.
Klausberger, T. & Somogyi, P. Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science 321, 53–57 (2008).
Jiang, X. et al. Principles of connectivity among morphologically defined cell types in adult neocortex. Science 350, aac9462 (2015). Reports a large-scale electrophysiological and morphological characterization of adult neocortical neurons, revealing connectivity patterns among morphologically defined neuronal types.
Ohki, K. & Reid, R. C. Specificity and randomness in the visual cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 401–407 (2007).
Morrie, R. D. & Feller, M. B. Development of synaptic connectivity in the retinal direction selective circuit. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 40, 45–52 (2016).
Oyster, C. W. & Barlow, H. B. Direction-selective units in rabbit retina: distribution of preferred directions. Science 155, 841–842 (1967).
Reid, R. C. From functional architecture to functional connectomics. Neuron 75, 209–217 (2012).
Dehorter, N. et al. Tuning of fast-spiking interneuron properties by an activity-dependent transcriptional switch. Science 349, 1216–1220 (2015).
Spitzer, N. C. Neurotransmitter switching? No surprise. Neuron 86, 1131–1144 (2015).
Gray, K. A., Seal, R. L., Tweedie, S., Wright, M. W. & Bruford, E. A. A review of the new HGNC gene family resource. Hum. Genom. 10, 6 (2016).
McDonald, A. G., Boyce, S. & Tipton, K. F. ExplorEnz: the primary source of the IUBMB enzyme list. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D593–D597 (2009).
Hamann, J. et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCIV. Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 67, 338–367 (2015).
Usoskin, D. et al. Unbiased classification of sensory neuron types by large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 145–153 (2015).
Zeisel, A. et al. Brain structure. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 347, 1138–1142 (2015).
Darmanis, S. et al. A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7285–7290 (2015).
Pollen, A. A. et al. Molecular identity of human outer radial glia during cortical development. Cell 163, 55–67 (2015).
Romanov, R. A. et al. Molecular interrogation of hypothalamic organization reveals distinct dopamine neuronal subtypes. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 176–188 (2017).
Li, C. L. et al. Somatosensory neuron types identified by high-coverage single-cell RNA-sequencing and functional heterogeneity. Cell Res. 26, 83–102 (2016).
Kee, N. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals a close relationship between differentiating dopamine and subthalamic nucleus neuronal lineages. Cell Stem Cell 20, 29–40 (2017).
Campbell, J. N. et al. A molecular census of arcuate hypothalamus and median eminence cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 484–496 (2017).
Wallace, M. L. et al. Genetically distinct parallel pathways in the entopeduncular nucleus for limbic and sensorimotor output of the basal ganglia. Neuron 94, 138–152e5 (2017).
Quadrato, G. et al. Cell diversity and network dynamics in photosensitive human brain organoids. Nature 545, 48–53 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank our colleagues K. Shekhar, L. Zipursky, E. Lein, C. Reid, M. Hawrylycz, B. Tasic, S. Sorensen, J. Berg and C. Koch for their valuable comments. This work was funded by National Institutes of Health grants R37NS029169 and U01MH105960 to J.R.S. and U01MH105982 to H.Z. H.Z. would like to thank the Allen Institute founder, Paul G. Allen, for his vision, encouragement and support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, H., Sanes, J. Neuronal cell-type classification: challenges, opportunities and the path forward. Nat Rev Neurosci 18, 530–546 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.85
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.85
This article is cited by
-
Gene panel selection for targeted spatial transcriptomics
Genome Biology (2024)
-
Heterogeneity of synaptic connectivity in the fly visual system
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Optimizing SH-SY5Y cell culture: exploring the beneficial effects of an alternative media supplement on cell proliferation and viability
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Multimodal cortical neuronal cell type classification
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology (2024)
-
A Novel Retrograde AAV Variant for Functional Manipulation of Cortical Projection Neurons in Mice and Monkeys
Neuroscience Bulletin (2024)
