Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement

Abstract

When we reach towards an object that suddenly appears in our peripheral visual field, not only does our arm extend towards the object, but our eyes, head and body also move in such a way that the image of the object falls on the fovea. Popular models of how reaching movements are programmed1,2 have argued that while the first part of the limb movement is ballistic, subsequent corrections to the trajectory are made on the basis of dynamic feedback about the relative positions of the hand and the target provided by central vision. These models have assumed that the adjustments are dependent on seeing the hand moving with respect to the target. Here we present evidence that a change in the position of a visual target during a reaching movement can modify the trajectory even when vision of the hand is prevented. Moreover, these dynamic corrections to the trajectory of the moving limb occur without the subject perceiving the change in target location. These findings demonstrate that (1) visual feedback about the relative position of the hand and target is not necessary for visually driven corrections in reaching to occur, and (2) the mechanisms that maintain the apparent stability of a target in space are dissociable from those that mediate the visuomotor outputdirected at that target.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keele, S. W. in Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Vol. 2 (ed. Brooks, V.) 1391–1414 (American Physiological Society, Baltimore, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paillard, J. in Analysis of Visual Behavior (eds Ingle, D., Goodale, M. A. & Mansfield, R. M.) 367–385 (MIT Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, J. A. Jr, Woods, G. D. & Held, R. A device for rapid recording of positioning responses in two dimensions, Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentaion 1, 157–159 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G. & Nagle, M. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Percept. Perform. 5, 692–700 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perenin, M. T. & Jeannerod, M. Neuropsychology 16, 1–13 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiskrantz, L., Warrington, E., Sanders, M. D. & Marshall, J. Brain 97, 709–728 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Henson, D. B. Vision Res. 18, 63–67 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodale, M., Pelisson, D. & Prablanc, C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320, 748–750 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/320748a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/320748a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing