Bottom-Up Influences on Working Memory: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Distraction Varies with Distractor Strength
Abstract
Abstract. The present study investigates bottom-up effects serving the optimal balance between focusing attention on relevant information and distractibility by potentially significant events outside the focus of attention. We tested whether distraction, indicated by behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures, varies with the strength of task-irrelevant deviances. Twenty subjects performed a tone-duration discrimination task (200 or 400 ms sinusoidal tones presented equiprobably). The stimuli were presented with frequent standard (p = 0.84; 1000 Hz) or infrequent deviant (p = 0.16) pitch. These task-irrelevant pitch changes consisted in a frequency increase/decrease of 1%, 3%, 5%, or 10%. Each of them resulted in prolonged reaction times (RT) in the duration discrimination task and elicited the MMN, P3a, and RON components of the ERP. Importantly, these measures did increase as a function of pitch deviance. Separating the individual trials on the 1% deviation level into trials with and without RT prolongation, i.e., behavioral distraction effect, revealed that both subgroups had similar MMN, but P3a and RON were confined to the trials with RT prolongation. Results are interpreted within a model relating preattentive deviance detection, distraction, and working memory.
References
(2000). Increased distractibility by task-irrelevant sound changes in abstinent alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 24, 1850– 1854
(1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5– 28
(2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119– 1122
(2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction: behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 265– 273
(1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (pp. 62-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803– 1806
(2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11, 467– 473
(1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and function of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (pp. 102-134). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 877– 883
(2003). Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2408– 2412
(2001). The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355– 373
(1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19, 369– 381
(1990). Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 89– 108
(2003). Behavioral stochastic resonance within the human brain. Physical Reviews Letters, 90, 218103– 218301
(1998). Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 15, 3– 13
(2002). Noise-induced entrainment and stochastic resonance in human brain waves. Physical Reviews Letters, 88, 218101– 218301
(1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 826– 859
(2002). Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results. NeuroImage, 15, 165– 174
(2000). Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiology and Neurootology, 5, 111– 139
(2003). Electrophysiological evidence of abnormal activation of the cerebral network of involuntary attention in alcoholism. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 134– 146
(2003a). Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: An event-related potential and behavioral study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 341– 349
(2003b). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 347– 357
(1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A preattentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245– 257
(1998a). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71– 87
(1998b). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355– 3358
(2003). Top-down processes control the involuntary orienting of attention to sound changes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 630– 637
(1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90– 92
(2003). Visual short-term memory load affects sensory processing of irrelevant sounds in human auditory cortex. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 358– 367
(2001). Activation of brain mechanisms of attention switching as a function of auditory frequency change. Neuroreport, 12, 4093– 4097