Skip to main content
Log in

Curing characteristics of acrylic bone cement

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Commercial acrylic bone cements are supplied as two components, a polymer powder and a liquid monomer. Mixing of the two components is followed by a progressive polymerization of the liquid monomer to yield a solid mass, a high level of heat being generated during this exothermic reaction. The exposure of bone to high temperatures has led to incidences of bone necrosis and tissue damage, ultimately resulting in failure of the prosthetic fixation. The aim of this study was to determine the thermal properties of two acrylic bone cements as they progress through their polymerization cycles. It was also felt that there was a need to quantify the variations in the curing characteristics as a function of preparing bone cement by different techniques, hand mixing and vacuum mixing. A number of parameters were calculated using the data gathered from the investigation: peak temperature, cure temperature, cure time, and the cumulative thermal necrosis damage index. The results show the temperature profile recorded during polymerization was lowest when the cement was prepared using the Howmedica Mix-Kit I® system: 36 °C for Palacos R® and 41 °C for CMW3® respectively. When the acrylic cements were prepared in any vacuum mixing system there was evidence of an increase in the cure temperature. The main factor that contributed to this rise in temperature was an imbalance in the polymer powder : liquid monomer ratio, there was a high incidence of unmixed powder visible in the mixing barrel of some contemporary vacuum mixing devices. Observing the thermal characteristics of the polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cements assessed, it was found that particular formulations of bone cements are suited to certain mixing methodologies. It is vital that a full investigation is conducted on a cement mixing/delivery system prior to its introduction into the orthopaedic market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Feith, Acta. Orthop. Scand. Suppl. (1975) 161.

  2. J. R. Wijn De, F. C. M. Driessens and T. J. J. H. Sloff, J. Biomaterial Res. 6 (1975) 99-103.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. A. Dipisa, G. S. Sih and A. T. Berman, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. (1976) 121.

  4. S. C. Bayne, E. P. Lautenschlager, C. L. Compere and R. Wides, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 9(1) (1975) 27-34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. A. Berman, J. S. Reid, D. R. Yanicko, C. G. Sih and M. R. Zimmerman Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 186(1) (1984) 284-292.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. M. Brauer, D. R. Steinberger and J. W. Stansbury, J. of Biomed. Mater. Res. 20(1) (1986) 839-852.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. D. Jefferis, A. J. C. Lee and R. S. M. Ling, J. Bone Joint Surg. 57-B(4) (1975) 511-518.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Meyer, E. P. Lautenschlager and B. K. Moore, ibid. 55-A(1) (1973) 149-158.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. C. Revie, M. E. Wallace and J. F. Orr, J. Engi. Medi. 208 (1994) 45-51.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Huiskes and T. J. Sloof, Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 6 (1981) 134.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. C. Sih and G. M. Connelly, J. Biomech. 13(1) (1980) 347-352.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. R. Moritz and F. C. Henriques, Am. J. Pathol. 23 (1947) 695-720.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. R. Eriksson and T. Alberksson, J. Prosthet. Dent. 50(1) (1983) 101-107.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Lundskog, Scand. J. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. Suppl. (1972) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Mjoberg, H. Petterson, R. Roseqvist and A. Rydholm, Acta. Orthop. Scand. 55 (1984) 597-600.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. G. Nelson, E. G. Krishnan and J. R. Neff, Medical Phys. 13(4) (1986) 462-468.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. T. Larsen, S. Franzen and L. Ryd, Acta. Orthop. Scand. 62(2) (1991) 102-105.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Lidgren, B. Bodelind and J. MÖller, ibid. 58(1) (1987) 27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Seidel, A. Heggert and H. Pietsch, Arach. Orthop. Unfallchir. 90(3) (1977) 251-257.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. S. Haas, G. M. Brauer and M. A. Dickson, J. Bone Joint Surg. 57-A(3) (1975) 380-391.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunne, N.J., Orr, J.F. Curing characteristics of acrylic bone cement. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 13, 17–22 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013670132001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013670132001

Keywords

Navigation