Abstract
As bridges or brains become bigger or smaller, the changes pose problems of design thatneed to be solved. Larger brains could have larger or more neurons, or both. With largerneurons, it becomes difficult to maintain conduction times over longer axons andelectrical cable properties over longer dendrites. With more neurons, it becomes difficultfor each neuron to maintain its proportion of connections with other neurons. Theseproblems are addressed by making brains more modular, thereby reducing the lengths ofmany connections, and by altering functions. Smaller brains may not have enoughneurons for all circuits, and they may lose modules and functions. Mammals with moreneocortex tend to have more cortical areas and more columns and types of columnswithin the larger areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aboitiz, F., 1996: Does bigger mean better? Evolutionary determinants of brain size and structure, Brain, Behav. Evol. 47, 225–245.
Allman, J. M., 1999: Evolving Brains, W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.
Barlow, H. B., 1986: Why have multiple cortical areas? Vision Res. 26, 81–90.
Bekkers, J. M. and Stevens, C. F., 1970: Two different ways evolution makes neurons larger, Prog. Brain Res. 83, 37–45.
Blackstad, T. W., 1975: Electron microscopy of experimental axon degeneration in photochemically modified Golgi preparations: a procedure for precise mapping of nervous connections, Brain Res. 95, 191–210.
Brodmann, K., 1909: Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde, Barth, Leipzig.
Catania, K. C. and Kaas, J. H., 1996: The unusual nose and brain of the star-nosed mole, Bio Science 46, 578–586.
Catania, K. C., Lyon, D. C., Mock, O. B. and Kaas, J. H., 1999: Cortical organization in shrews: Evidence from five species, J. Comp. Neurol. 410, 55–72.
Cherniak, C., 1990: The bounded brain: Toward a quantitative neuroanatomy, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, 58–68.
Cooper, H. M., Herbin, M. and Nevo, E., 1993: Visual system of a naturally microphthalmic mammal: The blind mole rat Spalax ehvenbergi, J. Comp. Neurol. 328, 313–350.
Cowey, A., 1979: Cortical maps and visual perception, Q. J. Exp. Psych. U. 31, 1–17.
Cusick, C. G. and Kaas, J. H., 1988: Surface view patterns of intrinsic and extrinsic cortical connections of area 17 in a prosimian primate, Brain Res. 458, 386–388.
Deacon, T.W., 1990: Fallacies of progression in theories of brain-size, evolution, Int. J. Primatology 11, 193–236.
Elston, G. N. and Rosa, M. G. P., 1998: Morphological variation of layer III pyramidal neurons in the occipitotemporal pathway of the macaque monkey visual cortex, Cerebral Cortex 8, 278–294.
Elston, G. N., Rosa, M. G. P. and Calford, M. P., 1996: Comparison of dendritic fields of layer III pyramidal neurons in striate and extrastriate visual areas of the marmoset: A lucifer yellow intracellular injection study, Cerebral Cortex 6, 807–813.
Finlay, B. L. and Darlington, R. B., 1995: Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains, Science 268, 1578–1584.
Florence, S. L. and Kaas, J. H., 1992: Ocular dominance columns in area 17 of Old World macaque and talapoin monkeys: Complete reconstructions and quantitive analyses, Visual Neurosci. 8, 449–462.
Gazzaniga, M. S., 1995: Principles of human brain organization derived from split-brain studies, Neuron 14, 217–228.
Gilbert, C. D. and Wiesel, T. N., 1989: Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex, J. Neurosci. 9, 2432–2442.
Haug, H., 1987: Brain sizes, surfaces, and neuronal sizes of the cortex cerebri: A stereological investigation of man and his variability and a comparison with some mammals (primates, whales, marsupials, insectivores and one elephant), Am. J. Anat. 180, 126–142.
Hofman, M. A., 1985: Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. I. The cortical surface, Brain Behav. Evol. 27, 28–40.
Hofman, M. A., 1989: On the evolution and geometry of the brain in mammals, Prog. Neurobiol. 32, 137–158.
Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N., 1974: Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field sizes, scatter, and magnification factor, J. Comp. Neurol. 158, 295–306.
Iwaniuk, A. N., Pellis, S. M. and Whishaw, I. Q., 1999: Brain size is not correlated with forelimb dexterity in fissiped carnivores (Carnivora): A comparative test of the principle of proper mass, Brain Behav. Evol. 54, 167–180.
Jacob, F., 1977: Evolution and tinkering, Science 196, 1161–1166.
Jacobs, R. A. and Jordan, M. I., 1992: Computational consequences of a bias toward short connections, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 4, 323–336.
Jerison, H. J., 1973: Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence, Academic Press, New York.
Kaas, J. H., 1987: The organization and evolution of neocortex, in S. P. Wise (ed.), Higher Brain Functions, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 347–378.
Kaas, J. H., 1989: Why does the brain have so many visual areas? J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1, 121–135.
Kaas, J. H., 1993a: The evolution of multiple areas and modules within neocortex, in P. Levitt and D. O'Leary (eds), Perspectives on Developmental Neurobiology 1, 101–107.
Kaas, J. H., 1993b: The functional organization of somatosensory cortex in primates, Ann. Anat. 175, 509–518.
Kaas, J. H., 1995a: The evolution of isocortex, Brain Behav. Evol. 46, 187–196.
Kaas, J. H., 1995b: The organization of callosal connections in primates, in A. G. Reeves and D. W. Roberts (eds), Epilepsy and the Corpus Callosum. Advances in Behavioral Biology, Vol. 45, Plenum, New York, pp. 15–27.
Kaas, J. H., 1997: Topographic maps are fundamental to sensory processing, Brain Res. Bull. 44, 107–112.
Kaas, J. H. and Hackett, T. A., 1998: Subdivisions of auditory cortex and levels of processing in primates, Audiol. Neurootol. 3, 73–85.
Krubitzer, L., 1995: The organization of neocortex in mammals: Are species differences really so different? TINS 18, 408–417.
Kruska, D., 1988: Mammalian domestication and its effect on brain structure and behavior, in H. J. Jerison and I. Jerison (eds), Intelligence and Evolutionary Biology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 211–250.
Livingstone, M. S. and Hubel, D. H., 1988: Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception, Science 240, 740–749.
Lund, J. S., Yoshioka, T. and Levitt, J. B., 1993: Comparison of intrinsic connectivity in different areas of macaque cerebral cortex, Cerebral Cortex 3, 148–162.
Lyon, D., Jain, N. and Kaas, J. H., 1998: Cortical connections of striate and extrastriate visual areas in the tree shrew, J. Comp. Neurol. 401, 109–128.
Mitchison, G., 1991: Neuronal branching patterns and the economy of cortical wiring, Proc. R. Soc. London B 245, 151–158.
Mitchison, G., 1992: Axonal trees and cortical architecture, TINS 15, 122–126.
Northcutt, R. G. and Kaas, J. H., 1995: The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex, TINS 18, 373–379.
Prothero, J., 1997: Cortical scaling in mammals: A repeating units model, J. Brain Res. 38, 195–207.
Rakic, P., 1988: Specification of cerebral cortical areas, Science 241, 170–176.
Ringo, J. L., 1991: Neuronal interconnections as a function of brain size, Brain Behav. Evol. 38, 1–6.
Ringo, J. L., Doty, R. W., Demeter, S. and Simard, P. Y., 1994: Time is of the essence: A conjucture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay, Cerebral Cortex 4, 331–343.
Rockel, A. J., Hiorns, R. W. and Powell, T. P. S., 1980: The basic uniformity in structure of the neocortex, Brain 103, 221–224.
Rockland, K. S. and Lund, J. S., 1983, Intrinsic laminar lattice connections in primate visual cortex, J. Comp. Neurol. 216, 303–318.
Schmidt-Nielson, K., 1984: Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
Schüz. A. and Demianenko, G. P., 1995: Constancy and variability in cortical structure. A study in synapses and dendritic spines in hedgehog and monkey, J. Brain Res. 36, 113–122.
Skoglund, T. S., Pascher, R. and Berthold, C. H., 1996: Heterogeneity in the columnar number of neurons in different neocortical areas in the rat, Neurosci. Lett. 208, 97–100.
Stevens, C. F., 1989: How cortical interconnectedness varies with network size,Neural Computation 1, 473–479.
Suga, N., 1978: Specialization of the auditory system for reception and processing of species specific sounds, Fed. Proc. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 37, 2342–2354.
Tyler, C. J., Dunlop, S. A., Lund, R. D., Harman, A. M., Dann, J. F., Beazley, L. D. and Lund J. S., 1998: Anatomical comparison of the macaque and marsupial visual cortex: Common features that may reflect retention of essential cortical elements, J. Comp. Neurol. 400, 449–468.
Van Essen, D. C., 1997: A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system, Nature 385, 313–318.
Wu, C. W-H., Bichot, N. P. and Kaas, J. H., 2000: Converging evidence from microstimulation, architecture, and connections for multiple motor areas in the frontal and cingulate cortex of prosimian primtes, J. Comp. Neurol., in press.
Young, M. P., Scannell, J. W. and Burns, G., 1995: The Analysis of Cortical Connectivity, Springer, New York.