Elsevier

Methods

Volume 51, Issue 4, August 2010, Pages 444-451
Methods

The QPCR assay for analysis of mitochondrial DNA damage, repair, and relative copy number

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.01.033Get rights and content

Abstract

The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) assay allows measurement of DNA damage in the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes without isolation of mitochondria. It also permits measurement of relative mitochondrial genome copy number. Finally, it can be used for measurement of DNA repair in vivo when employed appropriately. In this manuscript we briefly review the methodology of the QPCR assay, discuss its strengths and limitations, address considerations for measurement of mitochondrial DNA repair, and describe methodological changes implemented in recent years. We present QPCR assay primers and reaction conditions for five species not previously described in a methods article: Caenorhabditis elegans, Fundulus heteroclitus, Danio rerio, Drosophila melanogaster, and adenovirus. Finally, we illustrate the use of the assay by measuring repair of ultraviolet C radiation-induced DNA damage in the nuclear but not mitochondrial genomes of a zebrafish cell culture.

Section snippets

Theory/rationale

QPCR1, also called long amplicon PCR (LA-PCR) and long extension PCR (LX-PCR), measures gene-specific damage by quantifying the decrease in amplification of DNA extracted from sample cells of organisms following genotoxin exposure. This assay is based on the principle that induced DNA damage impedes the progression of the DNA polymerase when analyzed by

Protocol

Protocols for this assay have been published previously [2], [14], [26]. Here, we focus on updates and changes made to the assay in recent years.

Example of derived data

As an example, we present data from an experiment in which the QPCR method was adapted to the zebrafish model. Here, we are able to determine the presence of DNA damage and repair in a zebrafish cell line. Zebrafish embryonic fibroblasts (ZF-4 cell line, ATCC # CRL-2050) were cultured at 28 °C (5% CO2) in Dulbecco’s MEM with 15% FBS and 0.1 mg/mL gentamicin as described [32] and exposed to various doses of ultraviolet C radiation (UVC). DNA was then isolated using the Qiagen Tissue Extraction

Summary

The QPCR assay is a well-validated and sensitive protocol that specifically measures DNA damage in various mitochondrial and nuclear DNA regions in a variety of species, thus permitting investigation of mtDNA and nucDNA damage and repair. This is a particularly useful method in investigating mtDNA damage since differential separation of the mitochondrial DNA is not required, and because very small amounts of DNA can be analyzed. Thus, this method lends itself to biomarker-type work in humans,

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NIH P42 ES10356 (to RTD) and NIH R21 NS065468 (to JNM); the funding sources played no role in the research related to this publication, nor in the writing. We thank Elwood Linney for providing the ZF-4 cell lines and for cell culture advice, Bennett Van Houten for support during the adaptation of the assay to D. melanogaster, and Amanda Smith for editing suggestions.

References (37)

  • S. Ayala-Torres et al.

    Methods

    (2000)
  • W.A. Boyd et al.

    Mutat. Res.

    (2010)
  • J.H. Santos et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • D.E. Sawyer et al.

    Mutat. Res.

    (2003)
  • J. Termini

    Mutat. Res.

    (2000)
  • D. Jung et al.

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2009)
  • D. Jung et al.

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (2009)
  • D. Chandrasekhar et al.

    Mutat. Res.

    (2000)
  • C.S. Lassiter et al.

    Gene

    (2002)
  • K.L. Willett et al.

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (2001)
  • W.M. David et al.

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (2004)
  • E.G. Notch et al.

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2009)
  • M. Ponti et al.

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (1991)
  • J.N. Meyer et al.

    Genome Biol.

    (2007)
  • E.C. Friedberg et al.

    DNA Repair and Mutagenesis

    (2006)
  • P.C. Hanawalt et al.

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2008)
  • A.C. Haugen et al.

    PLoS Genet.

    (2010)
  • F.M. Yakes et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1997)
  • Cited by (125)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text