Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention
Introduction
Visually guided behavior depends first and foremost on the ability to construct an accurate representation of the many objects within the visual environment. In turn, because of the precipitous drop in acuity that occurs with increasing retinal eccentricity, visual perception in foveate animals relies upon the sequential scanning of the items within a scene by way of saccadic eye movements. Thus, the construction of an accurate visual representation depends crucially on the optimal and precise selection of successive fixation locations [1].
Recent evidence suggests that the visuo-oculomotor system of primates has evolved to select the visual parameters of objects concurrently with the specification of oculomotor commands needed to fixate those objects. Further evidence suggests that this system has evolved the capacity to amplify target visual signals covertly in the absence of the overt deployment of eye movements. Although the neural mechanisms involved in the triggering of visually guided saccades and those involved in covert attention must diverge at the point where eye movements are either made or withheld, results to date suggest considerable overlap of the circuits mediating both functions (e.g. [2]).
Here we review recent studies of the relationship between visual selection and oculomotor programming. These experiments reveal a causal relationship between the neural circuits controlling saccadic eye movements and shifts of covert spatial attention. Although some studies have identified separable neural populations that contribute uniquely to visual selection or oculomotor programming, recent work suggests how these processes might be integrated during visually guided behavior.
Section snippets
Links between selective attention and saccadic programming
Psychophysical evidence linking selective attention and oculomotor programming is abundant. A classic demonstration of the influence of directed attention on saccades was provided by Rizzolatti and colleagues [3]. This study examined the influence of covert attention on saccade trajectories in subjects instructed to initiate saccades to a location in one-half of the visual field (e.g. the lower half) according to cues presented in the other half. The cues themselves could be presented in one of
Causal mechanisms of spatial selective attention
If you are instructed to continue reading this text while preparing to detect the occurrence of some visual event in one corner of the page (e.g. a change in page number), your ability to detect the event would be heightened in comparison to a situation in which you had not been given those instructions. This is despite the fact that in neither case should your gaze shift to the corner of the page. In the macaque brain, the visual and oculomotor systems are highly interconnected, with cortical
Heterogeneous neural populations and implications for neurophysiological models of spatial attention
Despite evidence of a causal role of oculomotor circuits in the deployment of visual spatial attention, it remains to be seen to what extent particular neurons within those circuits contribute directly to both oculomotor behavior and visual selection. As stated earlier, by definition, covert attention requires at some level the divergence of neural mechanisms controlling visual filtering and the triggering of orienting behaviors. But where in the visuo-oculomotor axis does neural activity have
Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention
Although these electrophysiological studies provide evidence of functional heterogeneity at the single neuron level within the FEF and SC, one common characteristic deserves further comment. In each of the studies, covert shifts of spatial attention were elicited towards locations that had a high bottom-up salience. That is, spatial attention was shifted towards an object that had a unique color or shape 41, 42, 43 or towards the abrupt onset of a peripheral cue [44]. Past research has
Concluding remarks
Does the recent neurophysiological evidence confirm or weaken motor-based theories of attention, such as the premotor theory [3]? It can be said that the evidence appears to do both. Increasing the probability that a visual target will be foveated by electrically stimulating oculomotor structures, such as the FEF or the SC, concomitantly increases the probability that visual events at the target location will be detected. Furthermore, the perceptual improvements seen with electrical
References (65)
A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements
Neuron
(1998)Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention
Neuropsychologia
(1987)The role of attention in the programming of saccades
Vision Res.
(1995)- et al.
Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism
Vision Res.
(1996) Signal transformations from cerebral cortex to superior colliculus for the generation of saccades
Vision Res.
(2001)- et al.
Look and see: how the brain moves your eyes about
Prog. Brain Res.
(2001) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues
Neuropsychologia
(2005)- et al.
Neurodisruption of selective attention: insights and implications
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2005) - et al.
Manipulating intent: evidence for a causal role of the superior colliculus in target selection
Neuron
(2004) Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex
Trends Neurosci.
(2001)
Goal-related activity in V4 during free viewing visual search. Evidence for a ventral stream visual salience map
Neuron
Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses
J. Neurosci. Methods
Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field
Neuron
Search efficiency but not response interference affects visual selection in frontal eye field
Neuron
Visuomotor origins of covert spatial attention
Neuron
Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex
Curr. Biol.
Eye Movements and Vision
The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements
Percept. Psychophys.
Functions of the Brain
The Psychology of Attention
Topography of projections to posterior cortical areas from the macaque frontal eye fields
J. Comp. Neurol.
Visuomotor areas of the frontal lobe
Control of eye movements and spatial attention
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention
J. Neurophysiol.
Primate frontal eye fields: II. Physiological and anatomical correlates of electrically evoked eye movements
J. Neurophysiol.
Saccade target selection in frontal eye field of macaque: I. Visual and premovement activation
J. Neurosci.
The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
Human frontal eye fields and visual search
J. Neurophysiol.
Deficits in saccade target selection after inactivation of superior colliculus
Nat. Neurosci.
Change detection
Annu. Rev. Psychol.
Subcortical modulation of attention counters change blindness
J. Neurosci.
Cited by (274)
Fixation offset decreases pupillary inhibition of return
2023, Brain and CognitionMedication adversely impacts visually-guided eye movements in Parkinson's disease
2022, Clinical Neurophysiology