Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 149, 1 October 2015, Pages 119-130
Physiology & Behavior

Microstructural analysis of rat ethanol and water drinking patterns using a modified operant self-administration model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.034Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We evaluate drinking microstructure within a model of operant self-administration.

  • Initial patterns of EtOH vs. water intake differ in operant self-administration.

  • CIE vapor alters total consummatory/appetitive behavior and drinking microstructure.

  • CB1 antagonist SR141716a reverses many of these CIE effects.

Abstract

Background

Ethanol drinking pattern has emerged as an important factor in the development, maintenance, and health consequences of alcohol use disorders in humans. The goal of these studies was to further our understanding of this important factor through refinement of an operant rodent model of ethanol consumption capable of drinking pattern microstructural analysis. We evaluated measures of total consumption, appetitive behavior, and drinking microstructure for ethanol and water at baseline and assessed alterations induced by two treatments previously shown to significantly alter gross ethanol appetitive and consummatory behaviors in opposing directions.

Methods

Male Long–Evans rats were trained on an FR1 operant paradigm which allowed for continuous liquid access until an 8 second pause in consumption resulted in termination of liquid access. Total appetitive and consummatory behaviors were assessed in addition to microstructural drinking pattern for both ethanol and water during a five day baseline drinking period, after chronic intermittent ethanol vapor exposure, and following administration of a cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716a.

Results

As in previous operant studies, ethanol vapor exposure resulted in increases in ethanol-directed responding, total consumption, and rate of intake. Further, striking differential alterations to ethanol and water bout size, duration, and lick pattern occurred consistent with alterations in hedonic evaluation. Vapor additionally specifically reduced the number of ethanol-directed lever presses which did not result in subsequent consumption. SR141716a administration reversed many of these effects.

Conclusions

The addition of microstructural analysis to operant self-administration by rodents provides a powerful and translational tool for the detection of specific alterations in ethanol drinking pattern which may enable insights into neural mechanisms underlying specific components of drug consumption.

Introduction

Operant self-administration has served for decades as a valuable tool in evaluating mechanisms underlying the drive to seek out and consume ethanol. Many operant studies examine components of ethanol directed behaviors through a focus on the total amount of ethanol consumed [1], [2] and appetitive responses performed, such as lever presses or nose-pokes [3], [4], [5]. Though such measures remain critical components in alcohol research, the specific patterns of ethanol intake have also emerged as important factors. For example, individual drinking patterns are potent indicators for the development and maintenance of alcohol abuse-like behaviors in both humans [6], [7], [8] and non-human primate models [9]. In the most general terms, patterns of consumption across the short term, such as individual days or hours, consist of frequency of drinking events (“wanting” of ethanol) and amount consumed per each event (“liking” of ethanol) [10]. These patterns can be evaluated over weeks to months or years as in human studies; but, potential pharmacotherapies typically act to reduce long-term ethanol intake through alteration of one or both of these short-term components. The short-term consumption patterns during these individual drinking sessions thus underlie the long-term intake patterns which emerge during periods of abuse and relapse. That consumption pattern within individual drinking sessions can impact therapeutic efficacy of treatments for alcohol use disorders in humans [11] adds further importance to understanding the neural mechanisms which underlie this pattern. Thus, evaluation of short-term ethanol drinking patterns within rodent self-administration has reemerged as an area of active interest in basic research [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21].

In rodents, total liquid intake is broken into temporally distinct clusters of licks, termed licking ‘bouts.’ Individual rats may consume identical volumes of liquid but differ significantly with respect to moment-by-moment patterns (microstructure) that are related to the “wanting” (bout number and time between individual bouts (interbout-interval)) and “liking” (bout size, bout duration, intrabout licking rate) of the substance [22]. This drinking microstructure can reflect the relative hedonic value of the liquid, its caloric value, prior experiences (either positive or negative) with the substance, post-ingestive feedback from the gut, and the physiological state of the animal [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. For highly palatable, hedonically valuable solutions like sucrose, a monotonic relationship exists between concentration and bout size [29], which contrasts with the typical inverted U-shaped relationship found between increasing concentrations and total intake volume [30]. An inverse relationship in bout size occurs in consumption of aversive substances like quinine (bitter taste) [27]. Additionally, even the rate and pattern of individual licks within a bout of consumption reflect this complex hedonic evaluation or relative “liking” of the substance. For example, the induction of conditioned taste aversion results in increasing amounts of a slower, ‘hesitant’ licking behavior characterized by long pauses between licks [26]. Drinking microstructure has most frequently been assessed during limited access (10–120 min), but importantly these relationships have been demonstrated over periods of up to 23 h access [31]. Thus, the analysis of drinking microstructure provides unique insights into specific components of consumption related to both “wanting” and the shifting hedonic values or “liking” for a substance. Further, as sucrose-directed licking microstructure has been shown to undergo distinct alterations following administration of a D2 or D1 antagonist [32], analysis of this pattern may also eventually contribute to understanding the relative contribution of distinct neurobiological mechanisms to specific components of ethanol intake.

Previous work has demonstrated treatment specific effects on ethanol bout frequency and structure using non-operant models of self-administration and operant models that procedurally separate appetitive (lever press) and consummatory behaviors [17], [18], [19], [21], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]. However, concurrent evaluation of ethanol and water drinking microstructure at the millisecond level paired with an ongoing seeking component has not been performed. The concurrent analysis of total intake, appetitive behavior, and consummatory microstructure is of value in the full examination of neural mechanisms regulating interactions between ethanol seeking, evaluation, and consumption. A fixed ratio operant self-administration session is composed of a series of distinct periods of consumption, each unambiguously initiated by an appetitive response. As these consummatory periods are typically restricted by experimental design to a limited access period/amount of liquid following a response, the precise pattern of consumption as it relates to each seeking action cannot be evaluated within a typical operant session. We sought to address this limitation through modification of a classic FR1 operant procedure to allow for uninterrupted liquid access until a pause in licking behavior (selected based upon previous microstructural work within rats [25]) terminated the consummatory bout. The intake pattern was assessed for both ethanol and water during initial introduction to ethanol self-administration and following pharmacological manipulations previously demonstrated to significantly alter total ethanol consumption in opposing directions. As ethanol and water drinking patterns have been previously reported as most obviously distinct in the first 4–6 h of self-administration [12], we further sought to evaluate if the pattern of appetitive and consummatory behaviors changed over time through use of a prolonged 6 h session. Our microstructural analysis of ethanol drinking reveals unique outcomes associated with both chronic ethanol exposure and endocannabinoid receptor modulation.

Section snippets

Animals

Adult male Long–Evans rats weighing 200 g at arrival (7–8 weeks old) were purchased from a commercial supplier (Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN). A total of 16 animals were used. Animals were housed in groups of 4 on a reverse light/dark cycle (lights off at 9 am) under standard conditions. Animals were habituated to housing environment for one week before initiation of behavioral testing and were handled and weighed daily throughout the study. Rodent chow and tap water remained available ad

Baseline relationships between total intake and bout number/size

The relationship between total intake and bout number and size at baseline were assessed for both ethanol and water. Total ethanol licks did not correlate with the number of bouts (r2 = 0.14; p > .05) (Fig. 1a), but rather with mean bout size (r2 = 0.83; p < .001) (Fig. 1b). Notably, there was no relationship between ethanol bout number and size (r2 = 0.001; p > .05) (Fig. 1c). Water consumption exhibited a pattern of relationships that contrasted with ethanol. Total water licks significantly correlated

Discussion

The main aim of these studies was to evaluate the drinking microstructure associated with ethanol consumption on the level of individual licks using an extended-duration, operant ‘choice’ paradigm. At baseline, total intake of ethanol and water correlated with distinct aspects of behavior. These results are consistent with several previous studies showing that changes in total ethanol consumption do not necessarily occur alongside changes in bout number [18], [33], [34], [35] and may indicate

References (70)

  • D.T. Christian et al.

    Thalamic glutamatergic afferents into the rat basolateral amygdala exhibit increased presynaptic glutamate function following withdrawal from chronic intermittent ethanol

    Neuropharmacology

    (2013)
  • J.B. Travers et al.

    Motor and premotor mechanisms of licking

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (Sep, 1997)
  • K. Chu et al.

    Dependence-induced increases in ethanol self-administration in mice are blocked by the CRF1 receptor antagonist antalarmin and by CRF1 receptor knockout

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (Apr, 2007)
  • M.F. Lopez et al.

    Repeated episodes of chronic intermittent ethanol promote insensitivity to devaluation of the reinforcing effect of ethanol

    Alcohol

    (Nov, 2014)
  • D.A. Finn et al.

    Manipulation of GABAergic steroids: sex differences in the effects on alcohol drinking- and withdrawal-related behaviors

    Horm. Behav.

    (Jan, 2010)
  • M.J. Lewis

    Alcohol and nutrient intake: mechanisms of reinforcement and dependence

    Physiol. Behav.

    (Jul, 2011)
  • R. Dhaher et al.

    Lesions of the extended amygdala in C57BL/6J mice do not block the intermittent ethanol vapor-induced increase in ethanol consumption

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (Feb, 2008)
  • L.E. O'Dell et al.

    Enhanced alcohol self-administration after intermittent versus continuous alcohol vapor exposure

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (Nov, 2004)
  • F. Rodriguez de Fonseca et al.

    Cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A decreases operant ethanol self administration in rats exposed to ethanol-vapor chambers

    Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao

    (1999)
  • G.R. Valdez et al.

    Increased ethanol self-administration and anxiety-like behavior during acute ethanol withdrawal and protracted abstinence: regulation by corticotrophin-releasing factor

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (Oct, 2002)
  • G. Gmel et al.

    Revising the preventive paradox: the Swiss case

    Addiction

    (Feb, 2001)
  • M. Bobak et al.

    Contribution of drinking patterns to differences in rates of alcohol related problems between three urban populations

    J. Epidemiol. Community Health

    (Mar, 2004)
  • P. Miller, and M. Plant, “Spreading out or concentrating weekly consumption: alcohol problems and other consequences...
  • K.A. Grant et al.

    Drinking typography established by scheduled induction predicts chronic heavy drinking in a monkey model of ethanol self-administration

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (Oct, 2008)
  • T.E. Robinson et al.

    Addiction

    Annu. Rev. Psychol.

    (2003)
  • R.F. Anton et al.

    Naltrexone effects on alcohol consumption in a clinical laboratory paradigm: temporal effects of drinking

    Psychopharmacology

    (Apr, 2004)
  • A.M. Barkley-Levenson et al.

    Ethanol drinking microstructure of a high drinking in the dark selected mouse line

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (Aug, 2012)
  • M.M. Ford et al.

    Microanalysis of ethanol self-administration: estrous cycle phase-related changes in consumption patterns

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (May, 2002)
  • M.V. Wilcox et al.

    Repeated binge-like ethanol drinking alters ethanol drinking patterns and depresses striatal GABAergic transmission

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (Feb, 2014)
  • H.H. Samson et al.

    A new assessment of the ability of oral ethanol to function as a reinforcing stimulus

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (Jun, 2000)
  • C.S. Freedland et al.

    Effects of SR141716A on ethanol and sucrose self-administration

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (Feb, 2001)
  • W.C. Griffin et al.

    Repeated cycles of chronic intermittent ethanol exposure in mice increases voluntary ethanol drinking and ethanol concentrations in the nucleus accumbens

    Psychopharmacology

    (Jan, 2009)
  • D.M. Dwyer

    EPS prize lecture. Licking and liking: the assessment of hedonic responses in rodents

    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)

    (2012)
  • D.M. Dwyer et al.

    Simultaneous contrast: evidence from licking microstructure and cross-solution comparisons

    J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process.

    (Apr, 2011)
  • A. Galistu et al.

    Dopamine on D2-like receptors “reboosts” dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for a isotonic NaCl solution

    Psychopharmacology

    (Sep, 2013)
  • Cited by (17)

    • An operant ethanol self-administration paradigm that discriminates between appetitive and consummatory behaviors reveals distinct behavioral phenotypes in commonly used rat strains

      2021, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In fact, operant responding for visual stimuli mirrors aspects of operant responding for food and drug reinforcers; it is sensitive to treatment with a dopamine receptor antagonist (Olsen and Winder, 2009) as well as loss of mGluR5 signaling (Olsen et al., 2010) – two mechanisms also involved in the reinforcement of drugs of abuse. Interestingly, our data are not the first to report a similar absence of consumption following completion of the response requirement in an operant ethanol self-administration paradigm (Robinson and McCool, 2015). These data, in combination with findings from the present study, are particularly important to consider in light of previous work suggesting that rats can acquire robust operant responding for ethanol with the addition of a visual cue accompanying reinforcer delivery (Augier et al., 2014).

    • Reinforcing properties of alcohol in rats: Progressive ratio licking performance reinforced with 66% alcohol

      2021, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Enhanced activity after alcohol consumption has been reported in other labs [34,35]. Based on an estimate of 4.89 μl/lick in a 10% alcohol solution [36], and computing the mean number of licks for 66% alcohol in each experiment, we estimated that rats consumed 0.17, 0.22, 0.25, and 0.31 ml/kg of 66% alcohol in Experiments 1 to 4, respectively (or 0.09, 0.11, 0.13, and 0.16 g/kg/session). These numbers are not precise and should be taken with caution, only to provide a general idea.

    • Microstructure analysis of the effects of the cannabinoid agents HU-210 and rimonabant in rats licking for sucrose

      2020, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, the dose of 1 mg/kg resulted in a reduction of this measure which was apparent at the beginning of the session (Fig. 2B), suggesting the possibility of reduced “wanting” (D'Aquila and Galistu, 2017). Thus, the present results show consistency with previous studies suggesting the involvement of CB1 receptors both in “liking” (Higgs et al., 2003; Robinson and McCool, 2015; Sanchis-Segura et al., 2004) and in “wanting” (Grey et al., 2012; Higgs et al., 2005; Thornton-Jones et al., 2007). Further support to the interpretation of the effect of rimonabant (also) in terms of anhedonia comes from the analysis of the within-session time-course of burst number with HU-210 in the background of rimonabant treatment (1 mg/kg).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text