Elsevier

Neuroscience

Volume 291, 16 April 2015, Pages 203-215
Neuroscience

The basolateral nucleus of the amygdala mediates caloric sugar preference over a non-caloric sweetener in mice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.02.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Fasted and fed mice alternately received caloric sucrose and non-caloric saccharin.

  • All mice showed equal preference for sucrose and saccharin before alternate training.

  • Fasted mice shifted the preference for sucrose over saccharin after the training.

  • The basolateral (BLA) and central (CeA) amygdala were selectively lesioned.

  • Lesions of the BLA, but not of the CeA, affected the shift in sweetener preference.

Abstract

Neurobiological and genetic mechanisms underlying increased intake of and preference for nutritive sugars over non-nutritive sweeteners are not fully understood. We examined the roles of subnuclei of the amygdala in the shift in preference for a nutritive sugar. Food-deprived mice alternately received caloric sucrose (1.0 M) on odd-numbered training days and a non-caloric artificial sweetener (2.5 mM saccharin) on even-numbered training days. During training, mice with sham lesions of the basolateral (BLA) or central (CeA) nucleus of the amygdala increased their intake of 1.0 M sucrose, but not saccharin. Trained mice with sham lesions showed a significant shift in preference toward less concentrated sucrose (0.075 M) over the saccharin in a two-bottle choice test, although the mice showed an equivalent preference for these sweeteners before training. No increased intake of or preference for sucrose before and after the alternating training was observed in non-food-deprived mice. Excitotoxic lesions centered in the BLA impaired the increase in 1.0 M sucrose intake and shift in preference toward 0.075 M sucrose over saccharin. Microlesions with iontophoretic excitotoxin injections into the CeA did not block the training-dependent changes. These results suggest that food-deprived animals selectively shift their preference for a caloric sugar over a non-caloric sweetener through the alternate consumption of caloric and non-caloric sweet substances. The present data also suggest that the BLA, but not CeA, plays a role in the selective shift in sweetener preference.

Introduction

Caloric intake from sugar-sweetened foods and liquids in humans has increased for several decades (Saris, 2003, Bellisle and Drewnowski, 2007) despite the development and wide use of non-caloric artificial sweeteners. Increased intake of sweetened foods/fluids can disturb appetite control (Erlanson-Albertsson, 2005, Malik et al., 2006, Malik and Hu, 2012). Consumption of caloric sugar-sweetened beverages has been suggested to be a key factor for increased body weight (Ludwig et al., 2001, Hu, 2013). Moreover, an increased preference for caloric sugars over non-caloric sweeteners may contribute to increased caloric intake derived from caloric sugars in humans. Increased preference for caloric sucrose has been reported in rat studies with experimental manipulations such as stress loading, adrenalectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and taste–nutrient learning (Dess, 1992, Sclafani, 1995, Sclafani, 2004, Laugero et al., 2001, Mathes and Spector, 2012, Mathes et al., 2012). However, the neural and behavioral mechanisms underlying shifts in preference for caloric sugars over non-caloric sweeteners remain unclear.

Although many brain areas that regulate taste-processing and feeding behavior may be involved in the sweetener preference shift, we assumed that the amygdala would be critical because of the following reasons: (1) The amygdala plays a role in the association between sensory cues and reinforcers (Balleine and Killcross, 2006, Dwyer and Iordanova, 2010, Mahler and Berridge, 2012) and (2) in the encoding of the reward value of food (Kenny, 2011); (3) the amygdala response to caloric sucrose is altered by habitual consumption of non-caloric sweeteners (Green and Murphy, 2012, Rudenga and Small, 2012). However, in rats, lesions of the whole amygdala fail to disrupt nutrient-conditioned preferences for taste mixture stimuli that are clearly different from each other (‘bitter-sweet’ versus ‘salty-sweet’) (Touzani and Sclafani, 2005). In this previous study, the salience of the taste mixtures may be strong enough to be associated with postingestive influences in the absence of amygdala function. It remains unclear whether the amygdala plays a role in the preference shift for a ‘simple’ oral caloric sucrose cue over that of an equally sweet-tasting non-caloric saccharin cue. The amygdala consists of subnuclei that have different roles. Thus, the question of which subnucleus was dominantly involved in the sweetener preference shift arose. We explored the role of the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA), because the BLA plays roles in learned preference changes for flavor through flavor–nutrient (Touzani and Sclafani, 2005, Dwyer and Iordanova, 2010) or flavor–taste (Gilbert et al., 2003, Dwyer, 2011) associations. The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) plays a role in feeding behavior including unconditioned feeding control (Hajnal et al., 1992, Bovetto and Richard, 1995) and an unconditioned preference–aversion shift toward a highly concentrated sodium solution in sodium-depleted animals (Galaverna et al., 1993). The CeA also has a relatively weaker contribution to flavor–nutrient learning (Touzani et al., 2009). To evaluate the roles of these subnuclei, we compared the effects of selective lesions of the BLA and CeA on the sweetener preference shift. For selective lesions of the CeA, we used a well-controlled microlesioning technique (Hernadi et al., 2000) to minimize and localize the lesioned area while preserving the BLA.

To examine the roles of the BLA and CeA, we used a novel behavioral model of the sweetener preference shift in mice. To develop the sweetener preference shift in the model, we selected an oral-simultaneous training method, i.e., alternating oral delivery of caloric sucrose and non-caloric saccharin (cf. Sclafani, 1995, Dwyer and Iordanova, 2010). During training, mice received both oral (e.g., sweet taste) and post-oral (postingestive consequences) cues that normally occur after the intake of each sweetener. To evaluate the effect of energetic state on the intake of and preference for the sweeteners (Sclafani, 1991, Sclafani and Ackroff, 1993), we first compared sweetener preferences between the two groups of mice in the presence or absence of food access prior to sweetener access.

We used the well-studied sweet-sensitive C57BL/6J (B6) mouse strain (Bachmanov et al., 2001, Sclafani and Glendinning, 2003, Glendinning et al., 2005, Pinhas et al., 2012). Since B6 mice are widely used as a control strain in transgenic mouse studies (e.g., de Araujo et al., 2008, Stratford and Finger, 2011), the behavioral model used herein is applicable to transgenic strains for the investigation of neurobiological and genetic mechanisms.

Section snippets

Animals

C57BL/6J male mice (10–12 weeks-old, weighing 18–20 g at the start of the study; n = 50) were obtained from CREA Japan (Osaka, Japan). Mice were divided into two groups: those receiving chow for only 4 h per day (Chow4h) (n = 41) or 20 h per day (Chow20h) (n = 9). A pellet diet (MF; Oriental Yeast, Japan) was delivered as normal chow. Seven days after arrival at our laboratory, mice were subjected to the experimental procedures described below. All behavioral procedures were conducted in their home

Sweetener preference shift for caloric sucrose after alternate training under food-deprived conditions

Before comparing the effects of lesions on the shift in sweetener preference, we examined the effects of food deprivation on changes in sweetener intake during the training blocks and on the two-bottle choice preference between sucrose and saccharin. Fig. 2A, C show the intake of 1.0 M sucrose and saccharin for six blocks in the Chow4h trained group (n = 10) and Chow20h group (n = 9), respectively. As shown in Fig. 2A, C, basal water intake during the pretraining period was significantly different

Discussion

The main findings of the present study were as follows: (1) the intake of and preference for caloric sucrose over non-caloric saccharin increased after alternating oral delivery training under food restricted conditions; (2) the BLA, but not the CeA, was involved in the shift in sweetener preference. Our data clearly suggest that development of preference shifts for sugar-sweetened substances is mediated by BLA function.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that a remarkable shift in preference for caloric sucrose over non-caloric saccharin can be induced via an alternating oral delivery training method in food-restricted mice. Our procedure provides a simple mouse model of increased intake of calorie-dense sweetened foods/beverages caused by an increased preference for caloric sugars as observed in humans. The present results, using well-controlled excitotoxic microlesions, also suggest that the BLA, but not the

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Takashi Yamamoto for his thoughtful comments on this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Bio-Imaging Center, Japan Women’s University (T.M.), and from the Mishima Kaiun Memorial Foundation, Asahi Group Foundation, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24614006) (Y.Y.). We thank Ohkubo Lisa and Erina Yamaguchi for their technical assistance.

References (81)

  • O.G. Galaverna et al.

    Lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala. I: effects on taste reactivity, taste aversion learning and sodium appetite

    Behav Brain Res

    (1993)
  • P.E. Gilbert et al.

    The role of the amygdala in conditioned flavor preference

    Neurobiol Learn Mem

    (2003)
  • E. Green et al.

    Altered processing of sweet taste in the brain of diet soda drinkers

    Physiol Behav

    (2012)
  • A. Hajnal et al.

    Feeding disturbances and EEG activity changes after amygdaloid kainate lesions in the rat

    Brain Res Bull

    (1992)
  • I. Hernadi et al.

    Alterations of conditioned taste aversion after microiontophoretically applied neurotoxins in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat

    Brain Res Bull

    (2000)
  • E.W. Holman

    Immediate and delayed reinforcers for flavor preferences in rats

    Learn Motiv

    (1975)
  • H. Karimnamazi et al.

    Differential projections from gustatory responsive regions of the parabrachial nucleus to the medulla and forebrain

    Brain Res

    (1998)
  • P.J. Kenny

    Reward mechanisms in obesity: new insights and future directions

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • R.M. Liao et al.

    Differential effects of diazepam infused into the amygdala and hippocampus on negative contrast

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (2003)
  • D.S. Ludwig et al.

    Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • V.S. Malik et al.

    Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2006)
  • C.M. Mathes et al.

    Food selection and taste changes in humans after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a direct-measures approach

    Physiol Behav

    (2012)
  • G. Nelson et al.

    Mammalian sweet taste receptors

    Cell

    (2001)
  • A. Pinhas et al.

    Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice

    Physiol Behav

    (2012)
  • H.A. Raynor et al.

    The relative-reinforcing value of food under differing levels of food deprivation and restriction

    Appetite

    (2003)
  • K.J. Rudenga et al.

    Amygdala response to sucrose consumption is inversely related to artificial sweetener use

    Appetite

    (2012)
  • W.H. Saris

    Sugars, energy metabolism, and body weight control

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2003)
  • S.S. Schiffman et al.

    Sensory evaluation of soft drinks with various sweeteners

    Physiol Behav

    (1985)
  • A. Sclafani

    Oral and postoral determinants of food reward

    Physiol Behav

    (2004)
  • A. Sclafani et al.

    Deprivation alters rats’ flavor preferences for carbohydrates and fats

    Physiol Behav

    (1993)
  • A. Sclafani et al.

    Glucose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats: taste versus postingestive conditioning

    Physiol Behav

    (1994)
  • A. Sclafani et al.

    Flavor preferences conditioned in C57BL/6 mice by intragastric carbohydrate self-infusion

    Physiol Behav

    (2003)
  • A. Sclafani et al.

    Abdominal vagotomy does not block carbohydrate-conditioned flavor preferences in rats

    Physiol Behav

    (1996)
  • A. Sclafani et al.

    On the role of the mouth and gut in the control of saccharin and sugar intake: a reexamination of the sham-feeding preparation

    Brain Res Bull

    (1985)
  • A. Sclafani et al.

    Selective effects of vagal deafferentation and celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy on the reinforcing and satiating action of intestinal nutrients

    Physiol Behav

    (2003)
  • P.A. Smeets et al.

    Consumption of caloric and non-caloric versions of a soft drink differentially affects brain activation during tasting

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • J.C. Smith et al.

    Saccharin as a sugar surrogate revisited

    Appetite

    (2002)
  • K. Tokita et al.

    Subnuclear organization of parabrachial efferents to the thalamus, amygdala and lateral hypothalamus in C57BL/6J mice: a quantitative retrograde double labeling study

    Neuroscience

    (2010)
  • T. Yamamoto et al.

    Gustatory reaction time to various sweeteners in human adults

    Physiol Behav

    (1985)
  • T. Yamamoto et al.

    Neural substrates for conditioned taste aversion in the rat

    Behav Brain Res

    (1994)
  • Cited by (5)

    View full text