Raphe serotonin neurons are not homogenous: Electrophysiological, morphological and neurochemical evidence
Highlights
► Raphe neurons in different subfields are often treated as a homogenous population. ► We show that properties of 5-HT and non-5-HT neurons differ across subfields. ► Distribution of input to 5-HT and non-5-HT neurons also varies by subfield. ► Topographical organization of the raphe reveals subfield specific mechanisms. ► Different raphe subfields have been proposed to control a variety of behaviors.
Introduction
The median raphe (MR) and dorsal raphe (DR) nuclei contain the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin) cell bodies that provide the majority of 5-HT innervation of the forebrain. These 5-HT neurons have been implicated in mediating numerous homeostatic functions, i.e., stress responses, sleep–wake cycles, arousal, pain, learning and memory, and temperature regulation (Abrams et al., 2004, Buhot, 1997, Herman and Cullinan, 1997, Lopez et al., 1999, Lowry, 2002, Meneses, 1998, Wang and Nakai, 1994). Additionally, MR and DR are also implicated in the etiology and treatment of pathophysiological processes, in particular mood disorders and psychoses (Kroeze and Roth, 1998, Meltzer, 1999, Mourilhe and Stokes, 1998). Understanding how specific raphe circuits and neuron populations control particular behaviors requires a mechanistic description at the cellular and circuit level. Many investigators have proposed that the different subfields of DR and MR have differential roles in terms of mediating stress, anxiety and depression (Adell et al., 1997, Andrade and Graeff, 2001, Andrade et al., 1999, Andrews et al., 1997, Andrews et al., 1994, File and Gonzalez, 1996, Gonzalez and File, 1997, Gonzalez et al., 1998, Graeff et al., 1996, Lowry, 2002). Raphe circuits involve direct modulation of the HPA axis as well as indirectly mediated influences orchestrated by raphe projections to other limbic structures (e.g., the hippocampus, amygdala, and medial prefrontal cortex) and brainstem areas that regulate the autonomic nervous system.
MR and DR project to many of the same forebrain regions but also have distinct projections; additionally DR subfields project to different brain regions (Azmitia and Segal, 1978, Datiche et al., 1995, Imai et al., 1986a, Imai et al., 1986b, Johnson et al., 2008, Lowry, 2002, Vertes, 1991, Vertes et al., 1999, Vertes and Martin, 1988). For example, the rostral DR projects to the caudate–putamen and substantia nigra, the middle DR to the amygdala, whereas the caudal DR projects to the lateral and medial septum, ventral hippocampus, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, locus coeruleus and hypothalamus. The MR projects to limbic regions such as the habenula, medial and lateral septum, medial prefrontal cortex, and dorsal and ventral hippocampus. Subfield projections (i.e, dmDR, vmDR and lwDR) of the middle and caudal DR project to the amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex and parts of the autonomic nervous system, all regions that are involved in uncontrollable stress and anxiety (Abrams et al., 2005, Abrams et al., 2004, Hale and Lowry, 2011, Johnson et al., 2008, Petrov et al., 1992, Sawchenko et al., 1983).
Non-5-HT-containing neurons are present and occur in equal or greater number to 5-HT neurons in DR and MR (Descarries et al., 1982, Kiss et al., 2002, Kohler and Steinbusch, 1982, Li et al., 2001, Van Bockstaele et al., 1993). For any given neurotransmitter, however, the number of neurons is lower, i.e., one third to one tenth less, than the number of 5-HT neurons. Most of non-5-HT neurons are differentially distributed within DR, e.g., GABA in lwDR and CRF cell bodies in dmDR (Allers and Sharp, 2003, Commons et al., 2003, Day et al., 2004). The evidence is less clear for non-5-HT neurons in MR. Many report that non-5-HT neurotransmitters are co-localized with 5-HT (Amilhon et al., 2010, Fremeau et al., 2002, Fu et al., 2010, Ma and Bleasdale, 2002). Thus both 5-HT and the non-5-HT neurotransmitters may be co-released within the raphe as well as in projection areas (Cardin et al., 2010, Varga et al., 2009).
Previous studies characterizing the active and passive membrane characteristics of 5-HT neurons in DR have been tentative since most did not use neurochemical identification. Of the three studies primarily cited as a basis for identifying putative 5-HT neurons (Aghajanian and Lakoski, 1984, Aghajanian and Vandermaelen, 1982, Vandermaelen and Aghajanian, 1983) only one used neurochemical identification. The hallmark characteristics include a firing rate of 1–5 Hz, an action potential with a long duration and large afterhyperpolarization (AHP) and a hyperpolarizing response to 5-HT1A receptor activation. Additionally, several laboratories have proposed different subtypes of 5-HT neurons (Gartside et al., 2000, Hajos and Sharp, 1996, Kocsis et al., 2006). We have recently used whole-cell recording techniques in concert with immunohistochemistry to identify the cellular characteristics of both 5-HT and non-5-HT neurons in rat vmDR and MR (Beck et al., 2004). Findings in these two regions have emphasized the necessity to examine these characteristics in all raphe subfields. Results from these studies indicate that differences between 5-HT and non-5-HT neurons are not great enough to identify the neurons electrophysiologically; immunohistochemical identification is required since the electrophysiological properties overlap.
The present report completes our investigation of 5-HT and non-5-HT cell characteristics within the rat raphe subfields. Additionally we report the regional mapping of GABA and glutamate cell bodies and synaptic boutons within the raphe as well as differences in dendritic arborization of 5-HT cells across subfields. Understanding the unique characteristics of 5-HT and non-5-HT neurons within the different raphe subfields in concert with their anatomy and topography leads to a greater understanding of the mechanisms which govern raphe signaling, through which raphe neurons regulate homeostatic processes and that may be altered in pathological states.
Section snippets
Animals
Male Sprague–Dawley rats (100–150 g) were used (Taconic, Germantown, NY) in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals and approved by the institutional IACUC committee. At this size and age (P35–P42), animals were juveniles and had not yet reached adulthood. However, the males are sexually mature, i.e, gonads have dropped. Recordings made in animals this size produce healthier slices in which the majority of the neural circuits have
Electrophysiology
To determine whether recorded cells were 5-HT or non-5-HT, slices were stained for biocytin and TPH after recording. Although standard practice in the field is to use electrophysiological measures to identify 5-HT neurons, we have previously demonstrated that confirmation using immunocytochemical staining is necessary since there is an overlap in the electrophysiological characteristics of 5-HT and non-5-HT neurons in the DR (Beck et al., 2004, Kirby et al., 2003). Similarly, applying
Discussion
Despite similarities, the MR and subfields of the DR are clearly not uniform in terms of the active and passive characteristics of 5-HT and non-5-HT neurons, localization of GABA neurons, synaptic innervation by GABA and glutamate, and dendritic structure. Although 5-HT neurons possess some similar physiological properties, important differences exist between subfields. In most cases, non-5-HT neurons that are interspersed among 5-HT neurons greatly resemble 5-HT neurons, although significant
Conclusion
The electrophysiological properties, distribution of excitatory and inhibitory inputs, and dendritic architecture of 5-HT neurons differ across subfield. Additionally 5-HT neurons are distinct from non-5-HT cells although the magnitude of this difference is greater in some raphe subfields. Previous studies have often treated 5-HT neurons as a homogenous population. However, comparison of the projection patterns from various raphe subfields in conjunction with behavioral evidence suggests that
Disclosure statement
The authors have nothing to disclose. No conflicts of interest are declared by the authors.
Role of the funding source
The funding source for this work, the National Institute of Mental Health, did not play any role in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Acknowledgments
This work is funded by the National Institute of Mental Health under grant number MH0754047.
References (118)
- et al.
Serotonergic systems associated with arousal and vigilance behaviors following administration of anxiogenic drugs
Neuroscience
(2005) - et al.
Comparative study in the rat of the actions of different types of stress on the release of 5-HT in raphe nuclei and forebrain areas
Neuropharmacology
(1997) - et al.
Hyperpolarization of serotonergic neurons by serotonin and LSD: studies in brain slices showing increased K+ conductance
Brain Research
(1984) - et al.
Neurochemical and anatomical identification of fast- and slow-firing neurones in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus using juxtacellular labelling methods in vivo
Neuroscience
(2003) - et al.
Effect of electrolytic and neurotoxic lesions of the median raphe nucleus on anxiety and stress
Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
(2001) - et al.
5-HT1A receptors in the median raphe nucleus and dorsal hippocampus may mediate anxiolytic and anxiogenic behaviours respectively
European Journal of Pharmacology
(1994) - et al.
GABA-accumulating neurons in the nucleus raphe dorsalis and periaqueductal gray in the rat: a biochemical and radioautographic study
Brain Research
(1979) - et al.
Immunohistochemical evidence for the presence of gamma-aminobutyric acid and serotonin in one nerve cell. A study on the raphe nuclei of the rat using antibodies to glutamate decarboxylase and serotonin
Brain Research
(1983) - et al.
Is there a role for 5-HT1A agonists in the treatment of depression?
Biological Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
Differential effects of exposure to low-light or high-light open-field on anxiety-related behaviors: relationship to c-Fos expression in serotonergic and non-serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus
Brain Research Bulletin
(2007)