Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 184, 1 January 2019, Pages 943-953
NeuroImage

Ventral striatum links motivational and motor networks during operant-conditioned movement in rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We established a procedure for measuring cerebral metabolic changes in rats at the whole brain during forelimb movement.

  • Striatal activities propagate to the medial prefrontal cortex and motor systems in parallel through the thalamus during operant action.

  • Reward-related and motor-related circuits have interacted each other through the ventral striatum-thalamic pathway.

Abstract

Voluntary actions require motives. It is already known that the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) assess the motivational values. However, it remains unclear how the motivational process gains access to the motor execution system in the brain. Here we present evidence that the ventral striatum (VS) plays a hub-like role in mediating motivational and motor processing in operant behavior. We used positron emission tomography (PET) to detect the neural activation areas associated with motivational action. Using obtained regions, partial correlation analysis was performed to examine how the motivational signals propagate to the motor system. The results revealed that VS activity propagated to both MPFC and primary motor cortex through the thalamus. Moreover, muscimol injection into the VS suppressed the motivational behavior, supporting the idea of representations of motivational signals in VS that trigger motivational behavior. These results suggest that the VS-thalamic pathway plays a pivotal role for both motivational processing through interactions with the MPFC and for motor processing through interactions with the motor BG circuits.

Introduction

Voluntary actions are often initiated to obtain eventual rewards or to avoid punishment. Animals can learn to execute specific voluntary actions, depending on the contingencies across cues, actions, and consequences. This is called operant conditioning, which is a fundamental form of learning goal-directed actions that allows animals to adapt to unfamiliar environments. However, it remains unclear how the motivational processes gain access to the motor execution system in the brain during operant behavior.

The limbic system plays a central role in motivational processes (Ikemoto et al., 2015; Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1996; Jennings et al., 2013; Koob, 1992; Wise, 1978; Wise and Bozarth, 1987). The nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is the core of the ventral striatum (VS), receiving direct afferents from limbic structures. The NAcc in turn projects to limbic areas and the ventral pallidum of the basal ganglia (Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1999). Based on this anatomy, the NAcc is considered a link between the limbic system and the basal ganglia (BG) (Graybiel, 1976; Mogenson et al., 1980; Ikemoto et al., 2015). The ventral pallidum projects to mediodorsal thalamic nuclei (Baleydier and Mauguiere, 1980; Jürgens, 1983), which connect with the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) in rats (Morici et al., 2015). In particular, the prelimbic cortex, a part of MPFC in rats, topographically connects with the VS (Berendse et al., 1992) and might encode action-outcome contingencies (Corbit and Balleine, 2003).

The limbic-BG circuit is functionally segregated from the motor-BG circuit (Alexander, 1986). This anatomical model has led to an influential serial processing theory in which motivational information is processed first in the limbic circuit and then transferred to the motor BG circuits. However, recent evidence indicates that fibers from various prefrontal cortical areas overlap substantially within the striatum (Averbeck et al., 2014; Haber et al., 2006; Haber and Knutson, 2010). This anatomical convergence may allow links between reward-related processing and motor-related processing in an integrative rather than serial manner (Kupferschmidt et al., 2017). Collectively, it seems reasonable to assume that the VS plays a pivotal role in operant behavior for motivational processing through interactions with the MPFC and for motor processing through interactions with the motor BG circuits.

However, direct evidence for the hypothesized network organization is scarce. The paucity of evidence partially results from technical difficulty in measuring neural activation at the whole-brain level in animals performing an operant conditioning task. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is an established imaging technique, which can measure cerebral glucose metabolism as a surrogate marker of overall synaptic and neural activity (Phelps et al., 1981). Once 18F-FDG reaches the brain, 18F-FDG is taken up by astrocytes close to the sites of neural activation (Bélanger et al., 2011). Then, 18F-FDG is phosphorylated by hexokinase as is glucose but cannot be metabolized further because of the lack of hydroxyl group, yielding trapped 18F-FDG within the brain tissue after neural activity for an extended period. This slow kinetics of FDG makes it possible to insert a delay period between tasks and PET scanning (Endepols et al., 2010; Marx et al., 2012; Xi et al., 2013). Thus, 18F-FDG-PET enables us to reveal changes in glucose metabolism during operant behavior via a delayed scanning technique.

Here we combined an operant training system and 18F-FDG PET to reveal changes of glucose metabolism at the whole-brain level during operant behavior in rats. Using this method, we tested a hypothesis that VS might play a pivotal role connecting between motivational and motor systems during operant behavior. We further tested a causal relationship between neural activities in VS and motivational actions, using a pharmacological blocking method.

Section snippets

Experimental design

Sixty-four male Long-Evans rats (8-week-old at the beginning of the training; 228 ± 29 g body weight [mean ± standard deviation (s.d.)]) were used in this study (Institute for Animal Reproduction, Kasumigaura, Japan). The rats were kept under inversed light schedule (lights off at 9:00 a.m. and lights on at 9:00 p.m.) in their home cages and were handled by an experimenter for habituation (10–15 min). All animal experiments were performed under approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of

Behavioral data

One rat was excluded from the PET analysis according to the exclusion criteria (maximum OCRR was only 37.9% across the 3 learning days). Averaged across the remaining ten rats, maximum OCRRs were 44.6% ± 33.1% (mean ± s.d.) on the 1st training day, 89.8% ± 17.7% on the 2nd training day, and 97.9% ± 4.3% before the FDG injection on the 3rd training day (before the FDG injection) (Fig. 3A). An RM-ANOVA showed significant differences in OCRRs across the training days (F[2,18] = 21.9, p < 0.001).

Discussion

In the present study, we tested a hypothesis that VS plays a pivotal role connecting between motivational processing and motor processing during operant action. For this purpose, we developed a method using 18F-FDG PET combined with an operant training system to evaluate neural activities at the whole-brain level during operant behavior. Using this approach, we revealed that the VS activities likely propagated to MPFC and motor systems through the thalamus. Moreover, muscimol injection into the

Conclusion

In the present study, we have established a procedure for measuring cerebral metabolic changes in rats at the whole brain level during operant-conditioned skilled forelimb movement. we revealed that VS signal reflects the internal motivational state during motivational action, and limbic activities evoked by rewarding stimuli propagated to the primary motor cortex and MPFC through the VS. These results suggest that VS plays a pivotal role as a hub for both motivational processing through

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contribution statement

Conceived and designed the experiments.

YH, NI, TH.

Data acquisition and analysis.

YH, NI, JO, CS.

Interpretation of data.

YH, NI, MH, KK, YI, TH.

Drafting the article.

YH, TH.

Final approval of the version to be published.

YH, NI, JO, CS, MH, KK, YI, TH.

Acknowledgements

The present work was supported in part by the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Intramural Research Grant (24-10, 26-9), Grants for Young Scientists (B) (15K21652), and Development of translatable biomarkers for neural circuit disturbance and recovery in cerebrovascular diseases and Parkinson's disease (16dm0207022h0003) carried out under the Brain Mapping by Integrated Neurotechnologies for Disease Studies by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan

References (69)

  • S. Ikemoto et al.

    The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking

    Brain Res. Rev.

    (1999)
  • S. Ikemoto et al.

    Basal ganglia circuit loops, dopamine and motivation: a review and enquiry

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2015)
  • D.L. Jones et al.

    Injections of dopaminergic, cholinergic, serotonergic and GABAergic drugs into the nucleus accumbens: effects on locomotor activity in the rat

    Neuropharmacology

    (1981)
  • U. Jürgens

    Afferent fibers to the cingular vocalization region in the squirrel monkey

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1983)
  • G.F. Koob

    Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (1992)
  • A.R. Laird et al.

    Modeling motor connectivity using TMS/PET and structural equation modeling

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • K. Mizuno et al.

    The neural basis of academic achievement motivation

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • G.J. Mogenson et al.

    From motivation to action: functional interface between the limbic system and the motor system

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1980)
  • J.F. Morici et al.

    Medial prefrontal cortex role in recognition memory in rodents

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2015)
  • F.S. Salinas et al.

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation educes frequency-specific causal relationships in the motor network

    Brain Stimul

    (2016)
  • F.S. Salinas et al.

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation elicits rate-dependent brain network responses in non-human primates

    Brain Stimul

    (2013)
  • K. Takeda et al.

    Impaired prefrontal activity to regulate the intrinsic motivation-action link in schizophrenia

    NeuroImage Clin

    (2017)
  • Y. Tachibana et al.

    The primate ventral pallidum encodes expected reward value and regulates motor action

    Neuron

    (2012)
  • S. Tsujimoto et al.

    Frontal pole cortex: encoding ends at the end of the endbrain

    Trends Cognit. Sci.

    (2011)
  • H.B.M. Uylings et al.

    Do rats have a prefrontal cortex?

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2003)
  • R.A. Wise

    Catecholamine theories of reward: a critical review

    Brain Res.

    (1978)
  • B.C. Wittmann et al.

    Reward-related fMRI activation of dopaminergic midbrain is associated with enhanced Hippocampus- dependent long-term memory formation

    Neuron

    (2005)
  • H. Yamada et al.

    Controlled water intake: a method for objectively evaluating thirst and hydration state in monkeys by the measurement of blood osmolality

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (2010)
  • G. Alexander

    Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1986)
  • G.I. Allen et al.

    Cerebrocerebellar communication systems

    Physiol. Rev.

    (1974)
  • B.B. Averbeck et al.

    Estimates of projection overlap and zones of convergence within frontal-striatal circuits

    J. Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • C. Baleydier et al.

    The duality of the cingulate gyrus in monkey. Neuroanatomical study and functional hypothesis

    Brain

    (1980)
  • H.W. Berendse et al.

    Topographical organization and relationship with ventral striatal compartments of prefrontal corticostriatal projections in the rat

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1992)
  • N.A. Bock et al.

    Fractionated manganese-enhanced MRI

    NMR Biomed.

    (2008)
  • 1

    YH and NI have contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors. YH is on the leave to RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. NI is on the leave to University of Tokyo Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

    View full text