Total activation: fMRI deconvolution through spatio-temporal regularization
Graphical abstract
Highlights
► Total activation reveals activity-inducing signal without paradigm information. ► Temporal prior favors block-like activity driven by sparse innovation signal. ► Spatial prior incorporates anatomical atlas to cope with high spatial variability. ► Presence of visual stimuli is recovered without prior knowledge of timing. ► Hierarchical clustering of activity signals reveals resting state networks.
Introduction
Conventional analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data heavily relies on approaches based on general linear models (GLMs) where prior knowledge about the experimental paradigm; i.e., onsets and durations of stimuli, is used to construct temporal regressors, which are then fitted to the time course of every voxel. The subsequent statistical hypothesis testing, for a given contrast of fitted weights, is a mass univariate approach leading to an “activation map” that highlights brain regions for which sufficient evidence is present to be related to the experimental paradigm. The relationship between the measured blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) and the experimental paradigm can be modeled as a linear shift-invariant system with the hemodynamic response function (HRF) as an impulse response. In standard GLM approached (Friston et al., 1998), the HRF is predefined using gamma functions; more flexible techniques estimate HRF components in a subject- or time-dependent way in order to deal with inter- and intra-subject variability (Aguirre et al., 1998). More notably, parcel-based HRF estimation methods through joint detection estimation (JDE) framework are studied based on Bayesian approaches (Chaari et al., 2013, Makni et al., 2008, Vincent et al., 2010). Recently, an adaptive parcel identification driven by the hemodynamics is proposed using JDE (Chaari et al., 2012, Thirion et al., 2006). These HRF identification methods are mainly combined with GLM analysis to explore the parcel/subject/group/task specific hemodynamic models.
Not all brain activity can be modeled beforehand using stimulus functions; e.g., interictal epileptic discharges occur spontaneously. In addition, mere resting-state, which was neglected before as background noise, is known (Raichle, 2006) to produce characteristic patterns of brain activity referred to as resting-state networks. Such unpredictable activity cannot be inferred from traditional GLM analysis approaches (Gusnard and Raichle, 2001). Therefore, there is an increasing need for methodologies that enable the exploration of hemodynamic brain activity without predefined responses (Cole et al., 2010). Data-driven methods have been proposed for that purpose such as fuzzy clustering (Baumgartner et al., 2000), temporal clustering analysis (TCA) (Liu et al., 2000, Morgan et al., 2008), seed correlation analysis (Biswal et al., 1995), or subspace decomposition methods such as independent component analysis (ICA) (Beckmann and Smith, 2004, Calhoun and Adali, 2006), canonical correlation analysis (CCA) (Afshin-Pour et al., 2012) and agnostic canonical variates analysis (agnostic-CVA) (Evans et al., 2010). ICA is probably the most commonly used data-driven method. It provides a bilinear decomposition of the data into components that consist out of a spatial map with an associated time course. Its application to fMRI typically relies on (a surrogate for) spatial statistical independence between the components. However, such criterion is not directed specifically to identify “activation like” components since no knowledge is taken into account about the hemodynamics or about the type of activity-driven signal (e.g., spikes versus sustained activity).
fMRI deconvolution methods have been proposed to uncover the underlying activity-inducing signal at the fMRI timescale of seconds. Initially, Glover (1999) introduced Wiener deconvolution filtering that is optimal for Gaussian sources and thus results in very smooth activity-inducing signals. This work was generalized by Gitelman et al. (2003) to study the psychophysiologic interactions at the neuronal level. Following recent advances in convex optimization theory, these methods can be made more sophisticated by adding sparse priors on the underlying signal and solve maximum a posteriori estimation rather than naive maximum likelihood estimation. They have been exploited as an extension to standard GLM analysis by defining spatial priors on spatial activation maps (Flandin and Penny, 2007, Harrison et al., 2008, Smith and Fahrmeir, 2007, Vincent et al., 2010). Within a temporal fMRI deconvolution framework, while the linear system assumption on the hemodynamic model is retained, regularization terms use ℓ1-norm to favor sparse solutions in time; i.e., a limited number of spike-like activations. For example, Hernandez-Garcia and Ulfarsson (2011) use the majorization–minimization scheme, Gaudes et al., 2011, Gaudes et al., 2013 rely on ridge-regression and sparsity-promoting estimators, and (Khalidov et al., 2007, Khalidov et al., 2011) impose sparsity in the activelet-domain, a wavelet basis that is tailored to the hemodynamic properties. These methods do not require any knowledge on the timing and exploit temporal properties of the HRF. Promising results have been demonstrated for local event detection (Gaudes et al., 2011), especially in epilepsy (Lopes et al., 2012), but also for resting-state analysis (Petridou et al., 2012). Recently, non-linear models have also attracted a lot of attention for blind deconvolution to explore the network dynamics. These methods solve non-linear state-space model in continuous time, which bring along high resolution solutions, and access both hidden states and (non)dynamic parameters related to the neuronal activity via Bayesian filtering, Cubature Kalman filtering and Local Linearization filters (Friston et al., 2008, Friston et al., 2010, Havlicek et al., 2011, Riera et al., 2004). These methods, however, have high computational cost compared with linear models and are mostly applied for uncovering the hemodynamics of a priori regions of interest.
Here we propose a novel deconvolution method for fMRI data analysis, for which we coin the term “total activation” (TA). TA includes some unique features to go beyond the limitations mentioned above:
- 1.
Express temporal properties of the activity-inducing signal. The deconvolution identifies the “innovation” signal (which is spike-type) as the sparse driver of the BOLD signal. However, the activity-inducing signal can be more flexible such as block-type signals (Karahanoglu et al., 2011).
- 2.
Structured sparsity for combined temporal and spatial regularization. Spatial regularization is incorporated using mixed-norms based on anatomical priors of brain regions (Baritaux et al., 2011); i.e., time courses of voxels in the same brain regions are favored to be coherent.
- 3.
Take advantage of efficient optimization schemes. We employ the efficient generalized forward–backward splitting algorithm (Raguet et al., 2012), which is a fast iterative shrinkage algorithm that alternates between temporal and spatial domain solutions until convergence to the final estimate of the underlying activity-inducing signal.
The paper is organized as follows. We first introduce the TA theoretical framework. Next, the feasibility of TA is demonstrated on both synthetic and experimental data. The simulation study allows validating the performance for block-type activity-inducing signals with different block durations. The experimental study is based on fMRI data acquired in three healthy subjects while being at rest but with several (unexpected) visual stimuli. The TA deconvolved signals indicate strong and short periods of activity in the primary visual regions that match with the experimental timing. The dynamic “activation maps” show coordinated activation (and “de-activation”) in large-scale networks, mostly with much larger average block lengths. We also show that resting-state networks can be retrieved using hierarchical clustering of the region-averaged activity-inducing signals.
Section snippets
fMRI signal model
We represent the BOLD response following neuronal activation as the convolution of the activity-inducing signal u(t) with the HRF h(t). In model-based approaches, the activity-inducing signal corresponds to the stimulus function according to the experimental paradigm. Hence, for every voxel i it can be modeled by a weighted sum of shifted and dilated box functions b(t) aswhere b(t) = 1, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 and 0 otherwise; ck(i) is the amplitude of the k-th block; ak is the block length; aktk
Synthetic data
In order to validate the TA approach, we used a software phantom with 10 × 10 × 10 voxels divided into four regions. The activity-inducing signal was fixed within a region, but different between regions. Two regions had spike-like activity-inducing signals: region 1 has spike trains with gradually increasing inter stimulus interval (ISI) from 1 to 12 s, region 2 has short events with duration uniformly distributed between [1,2] s. The other two regions have longer block-like activity (duration
Synthetic data
In Figs. 4(a) and (b), we show, for randomly selected voxels in the four different regions, the activity-related and activity-induced signals, respectively. The recovered activity-inducing signals match very closely with the ground-truth underlying activity with no prior information on the timing or duration of the simulated events. In Fig. 4 (first row), we observe for region 1 that TA can resolve for events with ISI down to 2 TRs. The signal model is able to successfully recover different
Methodological implications
We have proposed TA to deconvolve fMRI data based on hemodynamic and anatomical properties of the brain. The objective is formulated as a minimization problem where the convex cost function contains sparsity-inducing regularization terms in both the temporal and spatial dimensions. The optimization is performed using a state-of-the-art generalized forward–backward scheme. The variational cost function is formulated assuming uncorrelated noise structure, nevertheless, an autoregressive noise
Conclusion
We have introduced TA, a new analysis tool that essentially aims at revealing the activity-inducing driver of BOLD fMRI. Using synthetic and experimental data, we evaluated TA's ability to recover the underlying activity without timing information of cognitive tasks or stimuli, as well as the intrinsic brain activity. The method is formulated within the variational framework and solved using a convex optimization scheme where temporal and spatial priors are handled iteratively. This study
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant PP00P2-123438 and in part by the Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM) of the Geneva-Lausanne Universities & Hospitals and the EPFL.
References (62)
- et al.
Enhancing reproducibility of fMRI statistical maps using generalized canonical correlation analysis in NPAIRS framework
Neuroimage
(2012) - et al.
The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses
Neuroimage
(1998) - et al.
Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis
Magn. Reson. Imaging
(2000) - et al.
Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fMRI
Neuroimage
(2010) - et al.
Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI
Neuroimage
(2010) - et al.
Group specific optimisation of fMRI processing steps for child and adult data
Neuroimage
(2010) - et al.
Bayesian fMRI data analysis with sparse spatial basis function priors
Neuroimage
(2007) - et al.
Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses
Neuroimage
(1998) - et al.
Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the balloon model, Volterra kernels, and other hemodynamics
Neuroimage
(2000) - et al.
DEM: a variational treatment of dynamic systems
Neuroimage
(2008)
Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution
Neuroimage
Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI
Neuroimage
Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses
Neuroimage
Graph-partitioned spatial priors for functional magnetic resonance images
Neuroimage
Dynamic modeling of neuronal responses in fMRI using cubature Kalman filtering
Neuroimage
Neuronal event detection in fMRI time series using iterative deconvolution techniques
Magn. Reson. Imaging
Activelets: Wavelets for sparse representation of hemodynamic responses
Signal Process.
Detection of epileptic activity in fmri without recording the EEG
Neuroimage
Non-white noise in fMRI: does modelling have an impact?
Neuroimage
A fully Bayesian approach to the parcel-based detection-estimation of brain activity in fMRI
Neuroimage
A state-space model of the hemodynamic approach: nonlinear filtering of BOLD signals
Neuroimage
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Modelling the role of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity in the generation of the BOLD signal
Neuroimage
Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain
Neuroimage
IBASPM: toolbox for automatic parcellation of brain structures
Sparsity-driven reconstruction for FDOT with anatomical priors
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems
IEEE Trans. Image Process.
Probabilistic independent component analysis for fMRI
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI
Magn. Reson. Med.
Unmixing fMRI with independent component analysis
IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.
Cited by (98)
Whole-brain multivariate hemodynamic deconvolution for functional MRI with stability selection
2024, Medical Image AnalysisComplex of global functional network as the core of consciousness
2023, Neuroscience ResearchMixture Components Inference for Sparse Regression: Introduction and Application for Estimation of Neuronal Signal from fMRI BOLD
2023, Applied Mathematical ModellingFuzzy deconvolution of neuronal events in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2023, Procedia Computer Science