ReviewThe mixed block/event-related design
Highlights
► Mixed fMRI design allows for extraction of transient and sustained BOLD activity. ► Different BOLD timescales suggest different neural functions. ► Mixed design allows for modeling of putative task control signals. ► Use of mixed design requires power considerations prior to implementation.
Section snippets
Existing designs at time
With the advent of event-related designs, people's ambitions extended beyond just comparing different trial types using fMRI. Beginning in the late 1990s, researchers began using more complicated designs to look at multiple events within trials and to look at signals that transcended single trials. It is because of this latter ambition that the mixed block/event-related design (hereinafter, the mixed design) was developed. This design was a combination of the two major extant designs—the block
Identification of multiple temporal codings that suggest possibility/likelihood of ROIs performing separate/multiple processes that act over different timescales
At this point, in the early 2000s, the use of the mixed block/event-related fMRI design (Chawla et al., 1999, Donaldson et al., 2001) focused on the identification of separate trial-related activity and a sustained signal that persisted across an entire block. Fig. 1 demonstrates how the three fMRI design methods extract different signals from the BOLD activity. This distinction requires one to contemplate neural function associated with the modeled BOLD response differently than in both block
Results of interest
The mixed design has been used in a large number of studies over the intervening years since its inception. We make no pretense here to have an exhaustive review of these studies. Rather, we will focus on two areas that seem to have utilized these designs: the search for memory modes and the development of sustained versus transient activity. A third highlighted set of studies, one in which we have toiled significantly, is the use of these different signal types to define control systems. The
Conclusions
The mixed block/event-related design was developed to allow for simultaneous modeling of transient, trial-related and sustained, task-related BOLD signals. This advance from the block design and event-related design, respectively, resulted in researchers being able to look for BOLD signals related to task modes independent of the trials stimuli. While some areas of investigation (i.e. memory, development, and task control) have utilized the mixed design, its usage has not become widespread
Acknowledgements
Support for this research came from NIH grants NS37924 and NS06424, the McDonnell Foundation, and NIGMS grant T32 GM081739.
References (37)
- et al.
Developmental differences in sustained and transient activity underlying working memory
Brain Res.
(2010) - et al.
Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching
Neuron
(2003) - et al.
Sustained and transient activity during an object-naming task: a mixed blocked and event-related fMRI study
NeuroImage
(2003) - et al.
The development of sustained and transient neural activity
NeuroImage
(2006) - et al.
Effects of aging on transient and sustained successful memory encoding activity
Neurobiol. Aging
(2007) - et al.
Dissociating state and item components of recognition memory using fmri
NeuroImage
(2001) Parsing brain activity with fMRI and mixed designs: what kind of a state is neuroimaging in?
Trends Neurosci.
(2004)- et al.
A core system for the implementation of task sets
Neuron
(2006) - et al.
A dual-networks architecture of top-down control
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2008) - et al.
Transient BOLD responses at block transitions
NeuroImage
(2005)
Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI
NeuroImage
Transient activation during block transition
NeuroImage
Rapid self-paced event-related functional MRI: feasibility and implications of stimulus- versus response-locked timing
NeuroImage
Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing
NeuroImage
Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI II. Analysis
NeuroImage
Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI I. The method
NeuroImage
Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI
NeuroImage
Comparison of sustained and transient activity in children and adults using a mixed blocked/event-related fMRI design
NeuroImage
Cited by (139)
Embodiment of action-related language in the native and a late foreign language – An fMRI-study
2023, Brain and LanguageA two-stage framework for neural processing of biological motion
2022, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :To tease apart the contributions of these differing types of information, we presented the walker in its original form (GLOBAL motion) and only the right foot of the walker (LOCAL motion). The biological motion discrimination task was designed under a mixed block/event-related framework (Petersen and Dubis, 2012), coupled with a two-alternative forced choice decision (2AFC) task (“which of two consecutive stimuli is closest to true biological motion?”), which is depicted in Fig. 1.
How associative thinking influences scene perception
2022, Consciousness and CognitionCategory-specific fMRI correlates of picture naming: A study with Arabs and Filipinos
2022, Journal of Neurolinguistics