Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke
Introduction
Motor deficiency is the leading cause of disability following stroke (Duncan et al., 1992). The mechanisms underlying recovery are multifold including active relearning strategies and passive processes of lesion adaptation (Seitz et al., 2002). The traditional neurorehabilitative approach to treat motor deficits after stroke is mainly based on techniques aiming at stimulating the use of the paretic limb during supervised training sessions (Rossetti et al., 2005). The main tenet is that practice of repetitive, active movements by a paretic limb leads to effects induced by positive neuronal plasticity. The effects of repetitive training are empirically well proven (Shepherd, 2001, Aichner et al., 2002, Jang et al., 2003, Byl et al., 2003, Dombovy, 2004): this approach was demonstrated to be more effective than conventional physiotherapeutic approaches (Beer, 2000, Hesse et al., 2002), with a smaller learning time of manual arm movements (Beer, 2000), a faster recovery and smaller therapy lasts (Kwakkel et al., 1999). Examples include the “constraint-induced movement therapy” (Taub et al., 1993, Duncan, 1997, Elbert et al., 2003), the motor relearning program (Langhammer and Stanghelle, 2003), and repetitive arm training (Buetefisch et al., 1995). These neurorehabilitative trainings are supposed to have attained the best rehabilitative outcomes so far.
There is increasing experimental evidence that motor areas are recruited not only when actions are actually executed, but also when they are mentally rehearsed or simply observed (for a review see Jeannerod, 2001). The neurophysiological basis for this recruitment relies on the discovery of mirror neurons, first described in the monkey (Rizzolatti et al., 1996, Gallese et al., 1996). These neurons discharge when the animal performs an object-related action with the hand or the mouth and when it observes the same or a similar action done by another individual. It has been shown, also in humans, that the observation of actions recruits the same motor representations active during the actual execution of those same actions (Fadiga et al., 1995, Hari et al., 1998; for review see Rizzolatti and Craighero, 2004, Buccino et al., 2004a), and this in a somatotopic manner (Buccino et al., 2001). The mirror neuron system has been shown to be involved in imitation (Iacoboni et al., 1999) and imitation learning (Buccino et al., 2004a).
While motor imagery has been shown useful in sport practice and rehabilitation especially when combined with conventional rehabilitation treatment (Page et al., 2001), observation of actions has not yet been tested as a potential tool in neurorehabilitation.
The major aim of this study was to assess whether action observation therapy may lead to clinical improvement of motor impairment in chronic stroke patients, as measured by standard functional scales. Based on the findings of previous studies concerning the use of mental techniques in neurorehabilitation (Page et al., 2001), we combined action observation with the direct effects of action execution. Our hypothesis was that the activation of motor areas by action observation becomes reinforced by the concomitant active execution of the observed actions (Binkofski et al., 2004, Buccino et al., 2006). Additionally, by means of fMRI we studied the reorganization within the motor areas following this treatment, using an independent sensorimotor task consisting of object manipulation.
Section snippets
Patients
Patients were recruited from the local Rehabilitation Centre. We excluded patients older than 76 years, with hemorrhagic stroke or ischemic lesions in the territory of posterior or Anterior Cerebral Artery, impaired level of consciousness (confusion, stupor, coma), severe to moderate aphasia, anosognosia or neglect, amnesia or dementia, depression.
After giving their informed consent fifteen patients (4 females) with a confirmed diagnosis of a first ever ischemic stroke in the territory of the
Clinical results
Each of the analyses was performed using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Age and duration of former therapies as the two most important demographic details revealed no significant difference between the treatment and the control groups (Wilcoxon signed rank test; see Table 1). In all patients the neurological impairment was stable as demonstrated by the lack of any significant difference between the results of the standard functional scales (WMFT, FAT) and the subjective self-assessment (SIS)
Discussion
There are two important findings in the present study. First, we could demonstrate that the new rehabilitation program combining action observation with intensive repetitive practice of the observed actions provides a significant improvement of motor functions, and this in chronic stroke patients with a well-established motor impairment of the upper limb. This improvement could be quantified in standard functional motor scales (WMFT, FAT) as well as in the subjective self-assessment of the
Acknowledgments
Supported by VW-Grants (I/79006 and I/81085) and BMBF-Grants (01GO0207 and 01GW0571).
References (47)
- et al.
Rehabilitation approaches to stroke
J. Neural Transm., Suppl.
(2002) Rehabilitation nach Hirnschlag
Schweizerische Ärztezeitung
(2000)- et al.
Motor functions of the Broca's region
Brain Lang.
(2004) - et al.
The role of ventral premotor cortex in action execution and action understanding
J. Physiol. (Paris)
(2006) - et al.
Modulation of the BOLD-response in early recovery from sensorimotor stroke
Neurology
(2004) - et al.
A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man. Evidence from a fMRI-study
Eur. J. Neurosci.
(1999) - et al.
Das System für Bewegungsbeobachtung/Bewegungsausführung und seine Rolle in der neurologischen rehabilitation
Neurol. Rehabil.
(2004) - et al.
Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study
Eur. J. Neurosci.
(2001) - et al.
The mirror neuron system and action recognition
Brain Lang.
(2004) - et al.
Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an fMRI study
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
(2004)
Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: an event-related fMRI study
Neuron
Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation
Cogn. Behav. Neurol.
Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand
J. Neurol. Sci.
Effectiveness of sensory and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb following the principles of neuroplasticity: patients stable poststroke
Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair
Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers
Cereb. Cortex
Encoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation
NeuroImage
Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients: 2. Comparison of arm function tests and pursuit tracking in relation to clinical recovery
Int. Rehabil. Med.
Understanding stroke recovery and rehabilitation: current and emerging approaches
Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep.
Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke
Stroke Rehabil.
Measurement of motor recover after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements
Stroke
The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change
Stroke
New developments in stroke rehabilitation based on behavioral and neuroscientific principles: constraint-induced therapy
Nervenarzt
Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study
J. Neurophysiol.
Cited by (528)
Virtual reality rehabilitation in patients affected by multiple sclerosis: Impact on quality of life and sexual functions
2024, Multiple Sclerosis and Related DisordersEvidence of motor resonance in stroke patients with severe upper limb function impairments
2023, CortexCitation Excerpt :It consists of a treatment period, typically lasting four weeks (5 days a week), divided into sessions during which patients observe a daily action and afterwards execute it in context (Buccino, 2014) (for reviews see Borges et al., 2018; Buchignani et al., 2019; Rizzolatti et al., 2021). The first study was a randomized controlled study in patients with chronic ischemic stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery (Ertelt et al., 2007). Compared with the stable pre-treatment baseline, and compared with the control group, the scores of the AOT group at the stroke impact scale, the Wolf motor function test, and the Frenchay arm test showed a significant improvement of motor functions.
The value of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition in predicting motor skill improvement driven by action observation
2023, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :This applies also to the case of action observation, which has been proven able to induce lasting changes within primary-motor representations in both healthy individuals (Celnik et al., 2006; Stefan et al., 2008) and people with brain damage (Celnik et al., 2008), as well as to prevent the corticomotor depression following peripheral limb immobilization (Bassolino et al., 2014). Such long-term modulations likely explain why motor training approaches based on the alternation of action observation and execution (i.e., Action Observation Training, AOT) are capable of promoting the acquisition (Bazzini et al., 2022), recovery (Ertelt et al., 2007), and maintenance (De Marco et al., 2021) of motor abilities (see Rizzolatti et al., 2021 for a recent review. A still unsettled piece of knowledge, however, is whether the efficacy of AOT can be explained, or even predicted, by the reactivity of the motor system to action observation.
Cortical Reorganization after Limb Loss: Bridging the Gap between Basic Science and Clinical Recovery
2024, Journal of NeurosciencePerformance of the Action Observation-Based Brain-Computer Interface in Stroke Patients and Gaze Metrics Analysis
2024, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- 1
Both authors contributed equally to this work.