ReviewA systematic review and meta-analysis of rTMS effects on cognitive enhancement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease
Introduction
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that is increasingly used for a growing number of research and clinical applications. To perform TMS, a magnetic field that reaches a strength of up to 2 Tesla is rapidly generated in <1 ms. Typically, this transient magnetic field is focally applied with a figure-of-eight coil that is carefully placed on the surface of the scalp over a targeted stimulation site. Leveraging Faraday's principle of electromagnetic induction, this magnetic field penetrates the skull and generates an electric current in the more conductive brain tissue in a direction that is perpendicular to the applied magnetic field (Barker et al., 1985, Hallett, 2007). If this orthogonal electrical current is strong enough to surpass a physiological threshold, it can depolarize neurons in the targeted cortical tissue. Due to the nature of the exponentially decaying electromagnetic field, the penetration depth is limited to 2–3 centimeters. Thus, only superficial brain tissue can be directly stimulated by TMS, but this excitation can be propagated to distal targets through circuits that are structurally and/or functionally connected to the stimulation site (Chou et al., 2015b, Liston et al., 2014, Wang et al., 2014). In the corticospinal system, for example, when the motor cortex is stimulated with a suprathreshold TMS pulse, this direct excitation evokes a series of descending corticospinal volleys in the form of direct (D-) and indirect (I-) waves, which ultimately elicits a motor response in the corresponding limb (Bestmann and Krakauer, 2015).
Contrary to single-pulse TMS, patterned repetitive TMS (rTMS) can produce long-lasting effects on neural activity and behavior beyond the stimulation period (Chou et al., 2015a, Fitzgerald et al., 2006). Careful manipulation of the parameters comprising these patterned rTMS pulse trains can induce neuroplastic changes that resemble either long-term potentiation (LTP) or depression (Chen et al., 1997, Pascual-Leone et al., 1994). Early studies targeting the motor cortex helped elucidate which rTMS parameters promote particular responses and their neurophysiological underpinnings (Klomjai et al., 2015). More recently, this ability to evoke distinct long-lasting changes in neural activity has been leveraged for therapeutic applications in neuropsychiatric disease. In 2008, for example, TMS devices were cleared for market by the Food and Drug Administration for the clinical treatment of medication-resistant Major Depression Disorder. The specific Food and Drug Administration-approved protocol comprises a high-frequency stimulation protocol, which is known to produce an excitatory LTP-like effect, over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (O'Reardon et al., 2007). However, as an extension of the prefrontal asymmetry phenomenon, it has also been reported that inhibitory long-term depression–like low-frequency rTMS over the right DLPFC is equally efficacious in producing antidepressive outcomes in this patient population (Fitzgerald et al., 2009, Sutton and Davidson, 1997). In other words, prefrontal activity in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) is abnormally imbalanced with right-sided hyperactivity and left-sided hypoactivity. Thus, distinct rTMS protocols that are known to produce opposite neurophysiological effects must be specifically applied depending on the targeted site of stimulation. This interaction between rTMS protocol and stimulation site has also been documented in the treatment of neurodegenerative disease (Chou et al., 2015a). Accordingly, it is necessary to carefully discern the rTMS parameters when evaluating its potential efficacy in all neurologic and psychiatric conditions.
In recent years, rTMS has been closely investigated to evaluate its potential to modulate cognitive functions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Here, we extend previous important reviews (Birba et al., 2017, Cheng et al., 2017, Dong et al., 2018, Hsu et al., 2015, Liao et al., 2015, Nardone et al., 2014) by including rTMS studies among both patients with AD or MCI to evaluate and update the efficacy of rTMS intervention compared to sham controls. In addition, we sought to give greater attention to the methodological components of these existing studies. Considerable heterogeneity exists among the various rTMS treatment protocols that have been reported for cognitive enhancement for AD and MCI in the literature (e.g., different combinations of stimulation site, pulse frequency, stimulation intensity, number of stimuli delivered, and number of treatment sessions). A systematic and quantitative review that delineates rTMS effects based on various rTMS treatment protocols is not available. It is important to integrate these findings in a manner that accounts for this methodological heterogeneity to more accurately estimate the effects of rTMS in AD and MCI. Furthermore, we systematically characterize the effectiveness of various combinations of rTMS parameters on different cognitive domains in patients with AD and MCI. The distilled findings presented herein can be used to improve the experimental design of future rTMS clinical trials.
Section snippets
Search strategy
Our meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement (Moher et al., 2009) (Fig. 1). To identify studies for inclusion in this meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Current Contents Connect, and SciELO Citation Index through March 2019. Databases were searched using combinations of the following terms: Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment and repetitive transcranial magnetic
Search results
Our initial search of all databases retrieved 124 studies, and 1 additional article was identified from previous reviews (Fig. 1). After rejecting articles based on the contents of the title and abstract, the full texts of 28 articles were obtained for further examination. Of these, 15 studies were excluded (see Supplementary Table 1). The remaining 13 studies (Ahmed et al., 2012, Anderkova et al., 2015, Cotelli et al., 2011, Cotelli et al., 2008, Drumond Marra et al., 2015, Eliasova et al.,
Discussion
Overall, our meta-analysis provides evidence supporting a beneficial effect of rTMS on cognitive functions in both patients with MCI and AD. Subgroup analyses indicate that (1) high-frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC and low-frequency rTMS at the right DLPFC significantly improved memory functions; (2) high-frequency rTMS targeting the right IFG significantly enhanced executive performance; and (3) the effects of 5–30 consecutive rTMS sessions could last for 4–12 weeks.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NIH, United States P30 AG019610 Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium Pilot Study Program (Pilot Project PI: Y-hC) and the BIO5 Team Scholars Award (PI: Y-hC). The authors thank William Mennie for assistance in literature review.
References (99)
- et al.
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in memory post-retrieval monitoring revealed in both item and associative recognition tests
Neuroimage
(2005) - et al.
A controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in medication-resistant major depression
Biol. Psychiatry
(2006) - et al.
Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex
Lancet
(1985) - et al.
Executive function deficits in early Alzheimer's disease and their relations with episodic memory
Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol.
(2006) Memory and executive function in aging and AD: multiple factors that cause decline and reserve factors that compensate
Neuron
(2004)- et al.
Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults
Neuroimage
(2002) - et al.
Left versus right repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating major depression: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Psychiatry Res.
(2013) - et al.
Peptide immunoreactivity in aged rat cortex and hippocampus as a function of memory and BDNF infusion
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1999) The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study
Aust. J. Physiother.
(2009)- et al.
Non-invasive brain stimulation of the right inferior frontal gyrus may improve attention in early Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study
J. Neurol. Sci.
(2014)
A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition
Clin. Neurophysiol.
Impaired use of organizational strategies in free recall following frontal lobe damage
Neuropsychologia
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer
Neuron
Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Neurobiol. Aging
Age-related repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on executive function in depression: a systematic review
Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry
Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS)
Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the precuneus enhances memory and neural activity in prodromal Alzheimer's disease
Neuroimage
Changes in 5-HT1A and NMDA binding sites by a single rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation procedure in rats
Brain Res.
Default mode network mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression
Biol. Psychiatry
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) influences spatial cognition and modulates hippocampal structural synaptic plasticity in aging mice
Exp. Gerontol.
The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in retrieval from long-term memory depends on strategies: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study
Neuroscience
Long-term repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and cholecystokinin mRNA, but not neuropeptide tyrosine mRNA in specific areas of rat brain
Neuropsychopharmacology
Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial
Biol. Psychiatry
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for apathy in mild cognitive impairment: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over pilot study
Psychiatry Res.
Neurobiology of emotion perception II: implications for major psychiatric disorders
Biol. Psychiatry
Cholecystokinin and Alzheimer's disease: a biomarker of metabolic function, neural integrity, and cognitive performance
Neurobiol. Aging
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effectively facilitates spatial cognition and synaptic plasticity associated with increasing the levels of BDNF and synaptic proteins in Wistar rats
Neurobiol. Learn Mem.
Cholecystokinin protects cholinergic neurons against basal forebrain lesion
Jpn. J. Pharmacol.
Low-frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) reverses Abeta(1-42)-mediated memory deficits in rats
Exp. Gerontol.
Improvement of spatial learning by facilitating large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel with transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease model mice
Neuropharmacology
Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on synaptic plasticity and apoptosis in vascular dementia rats
Behav. Brain Res.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances spatial learning and synaptic plasticity via the VEGF and BDNF-NMDAR pathways in a rat model of vascular dementia
Neuroscience
Gamma rhythm low field magnetic stimulation alleviates neuropathologic changes and rescues memory and cognitive impairments in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
Alzheimers Dement (N. Y.)
Effects of low versus high frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function and cortical excitability in Alzheimer's dementia
J. Neurol.
Distinct pattern of gray matter atrophy in mild Alzheimer's disease impacts on cognitive outcomes of noninvasive brain stimulation
J. Alzheimer's Dis.: JAD
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
BMJ
Emotional memory retrieval. rTMS stimulation on left DLPFC increases the positive memories
Brain Imaging Behav.
Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves performance in emotional memory retrieval as a function of level of anxiety and stimulus valence
Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci.
Compensatory brain activity during encoding among older adults with better recognition memory for face-name pairs: an integrative functional, structural, and perfusion imaging study
J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.
The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour
Exp. Brain Res.
Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy in mild cognitive impairment?
Front Aging Neurosci.
Putting the pieces together: the role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in relational memory encoding
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex promotes long-term memory formation through its role in working memory organization
J. Neurosci.
Prefrontal cortex and long-term memory encoding: an integrative review of findings from neuropsychology and neuroimaging
Neuroscientist
Publication Bias. Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Response and remission rates following high-frequency vs. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over right DLPFC for treating major depressive disorder (MDD): a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind trials
Front Psychiatry
Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
Neurology
Executive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: association with neuropsychiatric symptoms and functional impairment
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci.
Cited by (163)
Tackling cognitive decline in late adulthood: Cognitive interventions
2024, Current Opinion in PsychologyNon-invasive brain stimulation for patients and healthy subjects: Current challenges and future perspectives
2024, Journal of the Neurological Sciences