Elsevier

Neurobiology of Disease

Volume 23, Issue 2, August 2006, Pages 329-341
Neurobiology of Disease

Kinase activity is required for the toxic effects of mutant LRRK2/dardarin

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2006.04.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Mutations in the LRRK2 gene, coding for dardarin, cause dominantly inherited Parkinson's disease (PD). Dardarin is a large protein, and mutations are found throughout the gene including the kinase domain. However, it is not clear if kinase activity is important for the damaging effects of pathogenic mutations. In this study, we noted two cellular phenotypes associated with mutant dardarin. First, pathogenic mutations increase the tendency of dardarin to form inclusion bodies. Secondly, neurons and neuronal cell lines undergo cell death after expression of mutant protein. Manipulating activity by replacing the kinase domain with a ‘kinase-dead’ version blocks inclusion body formation and strongly delays cell death. This predicts that kinase inhibitors will be useful therapeutic agents in patients with LRRK2 mutations and, perhaps, in sporadic PD. We also show that dardarin protein is expressed within human midbrain neurons and that C-terminal epitopes are also found in some Lewy bodies.

Introduction

Dominant mutations in the LRRK2 gene, coding for the protein dardarin (Paisan-Ruiz et al., 2004, Zimprich et al., 2004), are a common cause of inherited Parkinson disease (PD), accounting for 1–6% of cases including many apparently sporadic cases (Cookson et al., 2005). Patients with LRRK2/dardarin mutations show a loss of striatal 18F-DOPA PET signal, consistent with a loss of presynaptic neurons projecting from the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) to the striatum (Hernandez et al., 2005). These findings correlate well with post-mortem examination of PARK8 cases (Funayama et al., 2002, Zimprich et al., 2004), which revealed loss of nigral neurons, usually with the presence of α-synuclein positive Lewy bodies (Zimprich et al., 2004). However, the phenotype of cases with LRRK2 mutations also includes deposits of the microtubule-associated protein tau and several cases have intracellular protein inclusions that are tau and α-synuclein-negative (Zimprich et al., 2004). Some cases have apparently ‘pure’ nigral degeneration in the absence of Lewy bodies, and others may have symptoms such as dementia and amyotrophy that indicate damage to regions of the brain outside of the nigra (Funayama et al., 2002, Zimprich et al., 2004). These observations demonstrate that dominant mutations are associated with cell loss in the SNpc, presumably the anatomical substrate of the parkinsonism in these patients, and other brain regions together with a variable protein inclusion.

The dardarin protein is a large, 2527 amino acid protein with multiple discrete domains. The N-terminal region is followed by several leucine-rich repeats. In the central region, there is a GTPase domain (also known as Roc for Ras of complex proteins) that is separated from a kinase domain by a region referred to as the COR (C-terminal of Roc) domain (Bosgraaf and Van Haastert, 2003). Finally, the carboxy terminal region has a WD40-like domain that may form a β-propeller structure (Fig. 1A). This complex domain structure is notable for two reasons. Firstly, dardarin is likely to have kinase and GTPase activities, which may be linked. One hypothesis is that the GTPase activity might control kinase activity (Shen, 2004), which has recently been demonstrated to be true for the paralagous kinase LRRK1 (Korr et al., 2006). A common mutation in LRRK2/dardarin (G2019S) is found in the Mg2+ binding motif at the beginning of the activation loop of the kinase domain, while a second mutation at the adjacent isoleucine (I2020T) is found in the original family reported to have autosomal dominant PD linked to this locus (Funayama et al., 2005). Secondly, regions such as the leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), Roc, COR or WD40 domains may be capable of mediating protein–protein interactions. Mutations are found in all of these regions, including I1122V in the LRRs, R1441C in the Roc domain and Y1699C in the COR region.

It is not clear how mutations in dardarin lead to dominantly inherited disease that include both cell loss and variable protein inclusion pathology. For example, it has been proposed that kinase domain mutations might increase (Toft et al., 2005) or decrease (Albrecht, 2005) kinase activity. By analogy with mutations in presenilin, which increase processing of the amyloid precursor protein to the toxic Aβ peptides (Brunkan and Goate, 2005), a hyperactive kinase might increase phosphorylation of its target(s) leading to increased cellular damage. Indeed, recent data support the hypothesis that dardarin mutations in the kinase domain, G2019S and I2020T, increase kinase activity (Gloeckner et al., 2006, West et al., 2005), although the analogous mutations in LRRK1 actually decrease activity (Korr et al., 2006). The one mutation in dardarin (R1441C) outside of the kinase domain that has been assayed exerts only modest effects on activity (West et al., 2005). Whether there is a consistent effect of mutations on kinase activity is therefore currently unclear.

However, observations of increased activity would not be proof that kinase activity is required for pathogenesis as other properties of the mutant protein than kinase activity may also be altered. An analogy would be mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1), associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. These mutations have variable effects on dismutase activity but consistent effects on the tendency of the mutant protein to aggregate (Valentine and Hart, 2003), and therefore although some mutations do alter enzyme activity, pathogenesis correlates with another, novel, gain of function.

One way to distinguish between these possibilities is to measure a dominant phenotype and establish if this is prevented when kinase activity is decreased. To do this, one would need an indirect assay of the dominant mutations other than kinase activity itself. In this study, we show that mutations in dardarin lead to two phenotypes in cells, inclusion body formation and cell death, as recently suggested elsewhere (Smith et al., 2005). We support the idea that these two phenotypes are relevant to the human disease by showing that the protein is expressed in dopaminergic neurons in midbrain melanized neurons from human post-mortem material. Furthermore, we show that the cellular phenotypes are ameliorated by genetically inactivating the kinase using mutagenesis of key residues, suggesting that kinase activity is required for the full dominant effects of mutant dardarin.

Section snippets

Constructs and cell culture

Full-length dardarin cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR in several fragments containing unique restriction sites and ligated together into pGEMTeasy (Promega). After sequencing, the coding region was reamplified and cloned into pCR8GW/TOPO (Invitrogen). Mutagenesis to generate dominant mutations or the triple ‘kinase-dead’ variants was performed using the Quikchange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Transfer into expression vectors was performed using Gateway recombination cloning

Constructing ‘kinase-dead’ versions of dardarin

To test the concept that kinase activity may contribute to cellular phenotypes of dardarin mutations, we generated kinase-dead versions using a strategy similar to that used for PINK1 (Beilina et al., 2005). As outlined in Fig. 1A, a triple mutant was made with alanine replacements of the lysine that orients the gamma-phosphate of ATP, the active site aspartate and the aspartate that chelates divalent metal cations. The kinase mutant was introduced onto backgrounds that were otherwise wild type

Discussion

In the current study, we have described the cellular phenotype that results from the expression of dominant pathogenic forms of dardarin, which is associated with neuronal degeneration and Lewy body formation in human patients. We have shown that inclusion formation and cellular toxicity result from mutations in several dardarin domains as described elsewhere (Smith et al., 2005), but more importantly show that this is dependent on kinase activity.

Several dominant mutations in different genes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Aging. This work was also supported by grants from the Royal Society and the British Medical Association Dawkins and Lawson award (K.H.) and the Medical Research Council (R.J.H.), Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, University College London and the PDS Society of UK (AK and RB). Human tissue was obtained from the Queen Square Brain Bank, Institute of Neurology, University

References (28)

  • M. Albrecht

    LRRK2 mutations and Parkinsonism

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • M. Arrasate et al.

    Inclusion body formation reduces levels of mutant huntingtin and the risk of neuronal death

    Nature

    (2004)
  • A. Beilina et al.

    Mutations in PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 associated with recessive parkinsonism have differential effects on protein stability

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2005)
  • L. Bosgraaf et al.

    Roc, a Ras/GTPase domain in complex proteins

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2003)
  • A.L. Brunkan et al.

    Presenilin function and gamma-secretase activity

    J. Neurochem.

    (2005)
  • M.R. Cookson

    The biochemistry of Parkinson's disease

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (2005)
  • M.R. Cookson et al.

    How genetics research in Parkinson's disease is enhancing understanding of the common idiopathic forms of the disease

    Curr. Opin. Neurol.

    (2005)
  • L. Debure et al.

    Intracellular clusterin causes juxtanuclear aggregate formation and mitochondrial alteration

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2003)
  • M. Funayama et al.

    A new locus for Parkinson's disease (PARK8) maps to chromosome 12p11.2–q13.1

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2002)
  • M. Funayama et al.

    An LRRK2 mutation as a cause for the parkinsonism in the original PARK8 family

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2005)
  • B.I. Giasson et al.

    Biochemical and pathological characterization of Lrrk2

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2006)
  • C.J. Gloeckner et al.

    The Parkinson disease causing LRRK2 mutation I2020T is associated with increased kinase activity

    Hum. Mol. Genet.

    (2006)
  • D.G. Hernandez et al.

    Clinical and positron emission tomography of Parkinson's disease caused by LRRK2

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2005)
  • D. Korr et al.

    LRRK1 protein kinase activity is stimulated upon binding of GTP to its Roc domain

    Cell Signalling

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These two authors contributed equally.

    View full text