Elsevier

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Volume 67, September 2019, Pages 178-184
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Clinical study
Multisite transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) modulates the distress network activity and oscillatory powers in subjects with chronic tinnitus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2019.06.033Get rights and content

Highlights

  • DLPFC and auditory cortex tRNS was used in sequence for treating chronic tinnitus.

  • Multisite-tRNS induced important oscillatory power changes.

  • tRNS increased alpha power in the auditory and prefrontal cortex.

  • tRNS could modulate the activity and connectivity of the distress network.

  • tRNS decreased beta2 activity in the DLPFC, OFC, ACC and the parahippocampus.

Abstract

Tinnitus is a common disorder in which auditory and non-auditory areas are involved as a network. Therefore, the multisite protocol of brain stimulation (tRNS) seems effective in relieving tinnitus symptoms. This study aimed to verify the modulatory effects of multisite tRNS on the tinnitus network. Thirty-two tinnitus-suffering patients received two consecutive sessions of tRNS (SHAM+ REAL) applied over the T3, T4 (the auditory cortex group) and F4, FP1 followed by T3, T4 (the multisite group). A 3-min resting-state EEG was recorded before and immediately after each session. After the multisite-tRNS real session, there was a significantly increased power in the alpha-1 band at the auditory and prefrontal cortex accompanied by decreased power in the delta and beta-2 bands in the prefrontal cortex. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) showed a significant decrease in beta-2 activity in the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and the parahippocampus and decreased alpha connectivity between the right prefrontal cortex and the left auditory cortex. No significant effects were noticed for the sham session. This study showed that tRNS has modulatory effects on the electrical activity of the brain and that targeting prefrontal and auditory areas in sequence could modulate the distress network and multiple hubs in the tinnitus network.

Introduction

Tinnitus is a common medical condition that has a significant impact on daily life, function, and emotions [1], [2]. In USA, there are at least 12 million tinnitus sufferers, >2 million of whom suffer debilitating symptoms [3]. Thus, epidemiologic situation has urged researchers to exert more efforts in determining the underlying mechanisms and the neural substrates of tinnitus. The development of neuroimaging studies has helped in this concern [4]. Neuromodulation using electrical stimulation is one such approach which has been well developed and frequently used recently, particularly for its capability to be combined with neuroimaging techniques.

Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a form of electrical stimulation, was used in tinnitus studies for the first time in comparison with other types of auditory cortex stimulation showing superiority in relieving tinnitus symptoms [5]. tRNS was also used in a multisite protocol in which both auditory and prefrontal areas were targeted in sequence, using tDCS1 for the prefrontal area [6], and recently tRNS [7] yielding much relief in tinnitus symptoms. The rationale for targeting non-auditory areas depended on reports demonstrated the role of these areas alongside the auditory cortex in generating tinnitus and its related distress [8].

Neuroimaging studies have reported the involvement of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) [9], [10], orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) [11], anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) [8], [12], insula [13], amygdala [14], and parahippocampus [14], [15], [16] in tinnitus perception and its related distress. There are functional interactions between these areas and the auditory cortex which is referred to as the “tinnitus network” [17], [18], [19]. EEG studies on tinnitus patients reported some alterations in the power of oscillatory brain activity. The decreased alpha power in the auditory cortex was substituted for by increased theta power; likewise, an increase in gamma power in the contralateral cortex was also reported [20], [21]. A recent EEG study demonstrated the relationship between tinnitus distress and increased beta band activity in the ACC [22]. Moreover, the amount of distress was correlated to the alpha band activity in several brain areas, forming the distress network [11]. The tRNS-EEG combined approach can provide an additional opportunity to study these functional interactions and how they can be modulated in order to reach the therapeutic effects of the intervention [4]. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has used such approach for tRNS in tinnitus patients; and that was the purpose of the current study.

Section snippets

Participants

A total of 32 right-handed subjects (9 females) with chronic tinnitus (duration >6 months), whose mean age was 42 ± 10.96 years, were included in this study. Participants with neurological and psychological disorders, a pacemaker, pregnant subjects, and treatable cases of tinnitus were excluded. All participants filled in the items of the Persian version of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI-P) [23], the validated Persian version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-P) [24]; scores

Results

Both tRNS protocols were well tolerated by the subjects, they were not able to distinguish between the sham and real stimulation sessions. The multisite protocol was more effective in reducing the loudness and annoyance of tinnitus in comparison with the auditory cortex tRNS, while the sham stimulation session had no effects. The amount of tinnitus loudness suppression measured by the visual analog scale was (23.29%, 18.68%) for the multisite and AC-tRNS groups, respectively, and the amount of

Discussion

The main findings of this research revealed that applying tRNS over the auditory cortex or in the multisite protocol resulted in important changes in oscillatory powers in both auditory and frontal cortices; albeit, these effects were more substantial for the multisite protocol. Moreover, there were remarkable alterations in the brain activity and functional connectivity of the tinnitus network after the DLPFC-tRNS stimulation.

The multisite-tRNS real session caused a significant increase in

Conclusions

This sham-controlled experiment highlighted the efficacy of multisite-tRNS in treating chronic tinnitus with distress. The increased alpha activity in the auditory cortex as well as the decreased beta-2 activity in the DLPFC, OFC, ACC, and the parahippocampus were the most salient findings that express the modulation of the distress network. However, such findings should be linked to the clinical results seen on the subjective scales in order to determine the therapeutic effects of the

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

This study was a part of a randomized clinical trial registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Identifier: 20586 30/6/2017) and it was part of a Ph.D. dissertation project in audiology approved and funded by Iran University of Medical Sciences, The International Campus.

References (57)

  • A. Delorme et al.

    EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis

    J Neurosci Methods

    (2004)
  • T. Ergenoglu et al.

    Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans

    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res

    (2004)
  • D. De Ridder et al.

    Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrode implant for intractable tinnitus

    World Neurosurg

    (2012)
  • D. De Ridder et al.

    Frontal cortex TMS for tinnitus

    Brain Stimul

    (2013)
  • B. Plakke et al.

    Neural correlates of auditory recognition memory in primate lateral prefrontal cortex

    Neuroscience

    (2013)
  • M. Faber et al.

    Top down prefrontal affective modulation of tinnitus with multiple sessions of tDCS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Brain Stimul

    (2012)
  • J.-P. Lefaucheur et al.

    Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2017)
  • P.S. Boggio et al.

    Modulation of emotions associated with images of human pain using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Neuropsychologia

    (2009)
  • A. Anand et al.

    Activity and connectivity of brain mood regulating circuit in depression: a functional magnetic resonance study

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • M. Meyer et al.

    EEG oscillatory power dissociates between distress- and depression-related psychopathology in subjective tinnitus

    Brain Res

    (2017)
  • S. Vanneste et al.

    The neural correlates of cognitive dysfunction in phantom sounds

    Brain Res

    (2016)
  • H. Maeoka et al.

    Influence of transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on pain related emotions: a study using electroencephalographic power spectrum analysis

    Neurosci Lett

    (2012)
  • D.M. Baguley

    Mechanisms of tinnitus

    Br Med Bull

    (2002)
  • C. Miniussi et al.

    Combining transcranial electrical stimulation with electroencephalography: a multimodal approach

    Clin EEG Neurosci

    (2012)
  • S. Vanneste et al.

    Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation, and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus

    Front Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • W.T. To et al.

    The added value of auditory cortex transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) after bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for tinnitus

    J Neural Transm Vienna Austria

    (1996)
  • S. Mohsen et al.

    The efficacy and safety of multiple sessions of multisite transcranial random noise stimulation in treating chronic tinnitus

    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol

    (2018)
  • S. Vanneste et al.

    The auditory and non-auditory brain areas involved in tinnitus. An emergent property of multiple parallel overlapping subnetworks

    Front Syst Neurosci

    (2012)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Feasibility and Safety of High-Definition Infraslow Pink Noise Stimulation for Treating Chronic Tinnitus—A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

      2023, Neuromodulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      More complex stimulation designs such as tRNS yield larger transient decreases in tinnitus loudness and distress than does traditional alternating and direct current transcranial stimulation.51 Multiple sessions of multisite tRNS compared with a single session also yield significant decreases in tinnitus loudness with no added side effects; however, other types of noise have yet to be explored as potential NIBS strategies for treating chronic tinnitus.47,50,52 From a theoretical perspective, it may be superior to use pink noise (1/f)53–55 because it reflects an innate behavior seen in biosystems,56 in which these self-organizing systems use a specific noise pattern with power inversely proportional to frequency (1/f).56

    • Using noise for the better: The effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on the brain and behavior

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      In that study, the authors found a steeper learning rate than a sham stimulation control condition. tRNS has also been successfully used in the treatment of tinnitus targeting the auditory and prefrontal cortex, with effectiveness depending on the stimulation frequency (Joos et al., 2015; Kreuzer et al., 2019, 2017; Mohsen et al., 2019, 2018; To et al., 2017; Vanneste et al., 2013), chronic pain (Alm and Dreimanis, 2013; Curatolo et al., 2017; Palm et al., 2016), fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS) (Salemi et al., 2019), improvement in visual perception in migraine (O’Hare et al., 2021) and in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (Berger et al., 2021). The studies reviewed above show promise for the use of tRNS in treating a range of clinical conditions.

    • Effect of tinnitus distress on auditory steady-state response amplitudes in chronic tinnitus sufferers

      2022, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Four regions of interest (ROI) that most closely correspond to the ASSR network were chosen for analysis and comparison of the ASSR amplitudes. These were the anterio-frontal (F3, Fz, F4), centro-frontal (FC3, FCz, FC4), left auditory (T3, C5, C3), and right auditory (C4, T4, C6) regions [30]. The SPSS version 19.0 (SPSS; USA) was used for statistical analysis.

    • Non-invasive neuromodulation for tinnitus: A meta-analysis and modeling studies

      2021, Brain Stimulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are limitations to address from this work. First, we included only sham-controlled studies that assessed tinnitus with standardized questionnaires which excluded current tRNS and tACS studies [84–87]. Therefore, our conclusions cannot be generalized to these techniques which may be beneficial to target tinnitus, especially tRNS [84–87].

    • Electrophysiological evaluation of high and low-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation over the auditory cortex

      2021, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, tinnitus patients' resting state EEG activity was recorded before and after lf tRNS over the auditory cortex, the prefrontal cortex as well as both in combination. Multisite tRNS caused significant increases in the alpha1 frequency band (8–12 Hz) as well as significant decreases in delta (2–3.5 Hz) and beta1 (13–18 Hz) frequency bands, emphasizing its possibility to modulate oscillatory brain activity (Mohsen et al., 2019a). In a previous study from our work group the consequences of hf and placebo (sham) tRNS over the auditory cortex on 20 and 40 Hz auditory steady state responses (ASSR) as well as spontaneous brain activity were investigated by means of electroencephalography (EEG) in healthy subjects.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text