Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 367, September 2018, Pages 97-105
Hearing Research

Research Paper
Cholinergic responses of acoustically-characterized cochlear nucleus neurons: An in vivo iontophoretic study in Guinea pig

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cochlear nucleus neurons' responses to iontophoretic injection of cholinergic drugs were studied.

  • Pauser-buildup neurons in dorsal cochlear nucleus were excited by cholinergic drugs.

  • Transient choppers in ventral cochlear nucleus were excited by cholinergic drugs.

  • Onset choppers in ventral cochlear nucleus were unaffected by cholinergic drugs.

  • Findings are consistent with descending inputs directly to transient choppers.

Abstract

The responses of guinea pig cochlear nucleus neurons to in vivo iontophoretic application of various neurotransmitter agonists were recorded with extracellular multi-barrelled electrodes. Where possible, neurons were physiologically identified using strict criteria. Emphasis was placed on the action of cholinergic agonists in relation to the possible action of olivocochlear collateral innervation. Excitatory responses (increase in action potential firing) to glutamate were confirmed in a number of neuronal response types. Application of acetylcholine (ACh) or the broad spectrum cholinergic agonist carbachol produced reliable excitatory responses in about 47% of neurons (n = 29 out of 61 neurons). The remaining neurons were unresponsive to cholinergic agonists and no inhibitory responses were observed. Cholinergic responses were more common in dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) (73% of 30 neurons tested) than in ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) (23% of 31 neurons). Of the total neuron sample in which cholinergic responses were investigated, 41 neurons were able to be categorized according to established acoustic response features. Excitatory responses to cholinergic agonists were seen in “Pauser-buildup” (Pb) and “Transient chopper” (Ct) response types. Primary-like neurons (PL and Pn) as well as “Onset chopper” (Oc) neurons (n = 6) were unresponsive to either ACh or carbachol. Oc neurons also did not show any effect on their acoustic responses. Robust cholinergic responses were also seen in several VCN and DCN neurons that were either unresponsive to sound, or had acoustic response properties that did not fit standard classification. The results suggest a relatively more robust cholinergic innervation of DCN compared to VCN. The excitatory cholinergic responses of some Ct neurons and the lack of effect on Oc neurons are consistent with previous results in mouse brain slice studies, but are in conflict with reports of medial olivocochlear collateral excitatory responses in onset-type neurons in vivo. The results also indicate that a number of neurons of unknown identity may also receive cholinergic input.

Introduction

The mammalian cochlear nuclear complex receives descending cholinergic innervation from several sources. Superior olivary complex inputs comprise the collateral projection of medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent neurons (Benson and Brown, 1990; Brown and Benson, 1992; Brown et al., 1988, 1991), and a separate direct projection from the ventral nuclei of the trapezoid body (Sherriff and Henderson, 1994). Tegmental areas also are known to supply cholinergic input to both the dorsal (DCN) and ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) (Mellott et al., 2011). The importance of these descending systems in the modulation of ascending auditory information is still a matter of conjecture and the specific neuronal targets that receive cholinergic input within the diverse populations of cell types in the cochlear nuclear complex, is not firmly established. Anatomical studies show that MOC collaterals make excitatory synaptic contacts with dendrites of multipolar neurons in VCN (Benson and Brown, 1990; Benson et al., 1996). Two major populations of multipolar cells in VCN are the d-stellate, thought to correspond to Onset Chopper (Oc) neurons and the T-stellate, thought to correspond to the transient chopper (Ct) and sustained chopper (Cs) neurons (Oertel and Fujino, 2001; Oertel et al., 1990; Smith and Rhode, 1989; Smith et al., 2005). In vivo electrophysiological studies using both intra and extracellular recordings, indicate that onset type and Oc neurons are excited by activation of olivocochlear collaterals (Mulders et al., 2002, 2003, 2007, 2009).

However, in mouse brain slices, excitatory responses to application of cholinergic agonists have only been reported in T-stellate cells and bushy cells (Fujino and Oertel, 2001; Oertel and Fujino, 2001). The latter authors specifically report a lack of cholinergic responses in d-stellate neurons, which evidence suggests correspond to Oc neurons (Oertel et al., 1990; Smith and Rhode, 1989). The present study attempts to resolve some of these conflicts by combining in vivo recording of cholinergic responses of cochlear nucleus (CN) neurons with detailed classification of their acoustic response types.

Section snippets

Animals

Eighteen pigmented guinea pigs were used in this study. All anaesthetic and surgical methods conformed to the Code of Practice of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Western Australia. All procedures, anaesthetic and surgical methods have been reported in detail previously (Vogler et al., 2011, 2014). Briefly, animals received a subcutaneous injection of 0.1 ml atropine followed by an intraperitoneal

Results

Table 1 summarizes the results of iontophoretic application of glutamate, glycine, carbachol and acetylcholine. The responses to iontophoretic applications which satisfied the criteria described above (see Methods), were recorded in 82 neurons. Of these, glutamate and glycine responses were tested in 19 and 2 neurons respectively. In the remaining 61 neurons, carbachol responses were tested in 17 and ACh responses in 44 neurons.

With respect to cholinergic responses, no inhibitory effects were

Discussion

The present study has a number of limitations. The strict criteria we chose to apply before accepting drug-related responses as genuine, and the need to fully characterize acoustic response properties of each neuron, means that the final sample size is rather small. In addition, single cell iontophoresis combined with extracellular recording of spike activity suffers from problems of interpretation. For example, a lack of response in terms of spike rate changes does not exclude the possibility

Acknowledgements

Supported by grants from the NHMRC (APP1042623), MHRIF and The University of Western Australia.

References (37)

  • D.P. Vogler et al.

    Hyperactivity following unilateral hearing loss in characterized cells in the inferior colliculus

    Neuroscience

    (2014)
  • T.E. Benson et al.

    Synapses formed by olivocochlear axon branches in the mouse cochlear nucleus

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1990)
  • T.E. Benson et al.

    Synaptic input to cochlear nucleus dendrites that receive medial olivocochlear synapses

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1996)
  • M.C. Brown

    Recording and labeling at a site along the cochlea shows alignment of medial olivocochlear and auditory nerve tonotopic mappings

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2016)
  • M.C. Brown et al.

    Transneuronal labeling of cochlear nucleus neurons by HRP-labeled auditory nerve fibers and olivocochlear branches in mice

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1992)
  • M.C. Brown et al.

    Cochlear-nucleus branches of thick (medial) olivocochlear fibers in the mouse: a cochleotopic projection

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1991)
  • M.C. Brown et al.

    Brainstem branches from olivocochlear axons in cats and rodents

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1988)
  • K. Fujino et al.

    Cholinergic modulation of stellate cells in the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus

    J. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (3)

    View full text