Elsevier

Cortex

Volume 49, Issue 5, May 2013, Pages 1206-1218
Cortex

Research report
Be concrete to be comprehended: Consistent imageability effects in semantic dementia for nouns, verbs, synonyms and associates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.007Get rights and content

Abstract

There are two contrasting views on the nature of comprehension impairment in semantic dementia: (a) that it stems from degradation of a pan-modal “hub” that represents core conceptual knowledge or (b) that it results from degradation of modality-specific visual feature knowledge. These theories make divergent predictions regarding comprehension of concrete versus abstract words in the disorder. The visual hypothesis predicts that concrete words should be particularly impaired because they depend heavily on visual information. In contrast, the pan-modal hub hypothesis holds that all types of knowledge are affected but predicts less severe impairment of concrete words because they have richer and more detailed semantic representations than abstract words. We investigated concreteness effects in the comprehension of six SD patients. Across nouns, verbs, synonymous and associative relationships, a clear and consistent pattern emerged: concrete words were always comprehended more successfully than abstract words. These findings extend those of previous studies and suggest that conceptual impairment in SD is not confined to concepts that rely on visual information. Instead, all types of knowledge are affected by the progressive deterioration of modality-invariant representations (required for coherent pan-modal concepts). Concrete words succumb less quickly by virtue of their richer and more detailed semantic representations.

Introduction

This study is concerned with the nature of the semantic impairment in semantic dementia (SD), a neurodegenerative condition in which atrophy centred on the inferolateral, anterior temporal lobe accompanies a progressive and eventually profound breakdown in semantic knowledge (Snowden et al., 1989; Hodges and Patterson, 2007). Because SD patients present with a central and highly selective semantic deficit, the disorder is an important source of evidence for theories of semantic knowledge (Rogers et al., 2004; Patterson et al., 2007; Jefferies and Lambon Ralph, 2006; Simmons and Martin, 2009). A key issue in interpreting the nature of the disorder is to determine whether any particular domains of knowledge are disproportionately impaired. Though SD patients have an indisputable deficit in understanding concrete concepts (e.g., manmade objects and living things; Luzzi et al., 2007; Bozeat et al., 2000, 2002; Garrard and Carroll, 2006), the status of abstract word knowledge (e.g., advantage or chance) is more contentious. Comprehension deficits following brain damage typically affect abstract words to a greater extent than concrete words (Coltheart, 1980; Hoffman et al., 2010, 2011; Katz and Goodglass, 1990; Franklin, 1989), in line with more efficient processing of concrete words in healthy subjects (Kroll and Merves, 1986; James, 1975; Degroot, 1989). However, there are a number of reports of SD patients who show a reversal of this standard effect, i.e., better comprehension of abstract relative to concrete words (Cipolotti and Warrington, 1995; Warrington, 1975; Macoir, 2009; Breedin et al., 1994; Papagno et al., 2009; Reilly et al., 2007). Throughout the paper, we refer to this as an A > C pattern of comprehension.

These unusual “reversals” of the typical concreteness effect have been interpreted in two ways. Some researchers take them to be an important signature of the underlying semantic impairment in SD. On this view, SD patients suffer from damage to the visual association cortex in the ventral temporal lobes, which is particularly important for the representation of concrete words (Yi et al., 2007; Breedin et al., 1994; Macoir, 2009; Bonner et al., 2009). Because the meanings of abstract words depend strongly on verbal associations and are less dependent on visual-perceptual information (Paivio, 1986), their semantic representations are thought to be relatively spared. The semantic representations of abstract words might depend more heavily on superior temporal regions specialised for verbal comprehension, which are less severely affected in SD (Galton et al., 2001).

Other researchers maintain that A > C effects are not informative about the nature of semantic impairment in SD because they only occur in a small subset of SD cases (Jefferies et al., 2009; Hoffman and Lambon Ralph, 2011). Most reports of A > C effects are from single-case studies and until recently there had been no attempt to determine whether these cases were representative of the typical pattern of impairment in the disorder. The inferolateral aspects of the anterior temporal lobes are the focus of atrophy and hypometabolism in SD patients (Galton et al., 2001; Nestor et al., 2006). However, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to this region in healthy subjects produces a greater (temporary) impairment for abstract over concrete words (i.e., a C > A pattern; Pobric et al., 2009). This runs counter to the idea that anterior temporal lobe atrophy gives rise to an A > C pattern of comprehension. Instead, these findings predict that SD patients should typically exhibit C > A effects, a view that is more in keeping with the “hub-and-spoke” semantic framework (Rogers et al., 2004; Pobric et al., 2010; Patterson et al., 2007). This theory states that semantic representations are underpinned by (a) a network of modality-specific regions of cortex distributed throughout the brain (“spokes”) and (b) a pan-modal “hub” that merges input from these regions to form modality-invariant, coherent conceptual representations (Lambon Ralph et al., 2010). Semantic impairment in SD is thought to arise from damage to the hub, affecting all types of semantic knowledge irrespective of whether they depend on visual or verbal information. On this view, abstract words are disproportionately impaired simply because they have intrinsically weaker semantic representations. Their weaker representation comes about because they are not associated with the rich perceptual experiences that characterise concrete words (Paivio, 1986; Plaut and Shallice, 1993; Jones, 1985). On this view, occasional reports of individual patients showing A > C effects represent a deviation from the typical pattern of semantic breakdown in SD.

A number of recent studies have attempted to adjudicate on this issue by assessing concrete and abstract knowledge in larger groups of SD patients. In support of the visual deficit hypothesis, Yi et al. (2007) tested 12 SD patients with a description-to-word matching task and found an A > C pattern for verbs, with nine patients showing an effect in this direction. However, there was no such effect for comprehension of nouns. In a follow-up study, Bonner et al. (2009) tested 11 patients with a synonym matching task with verbs and found a similar pattern at the group level. In contrast, Jefferies et al. (2009) gave a synonym judgement task consisting mostly of nouns to 11 SD patients and found a strong C > A effect, which was present at a statistically significant level in all 11 individuals. The differences between these studies could have arisen from differences in the patients themselves or variation in the experimental stimuli used to assess knowledge. We recently tested a single set of seven SD patients on all of the tasks from the above studies, along with some other concrete–abstract assessments (Hoffman and Lambon Ralph, 2011). Averaged across all tasks, there was a significant C > A effect, supporting the hub-and-spoke interpretation. There were also some informative differences between tasks. The Jefferies et al. task yielded a robust C > A effect, while no difference between concrete and abstract words emerged for the Yi et al. and Bonner et al. verb tasks. We attributed this variability to differences in the stimuli used in the various tasks. Tasks were more likely to reveal a C > A effect if they: (a) ensured that concrete and abstract words employed in the task were fully separated along the imageability scale and (b) ensured that stimuli were matched across conditions for word frequency. The two verb tasks did not meet these criteria. The selected concrete and abstract words were quite similar in imageability, resulting in lower sensitivity to concreteness effects than the Jefferies et al. task. Moreover, the abstract conditions featured higher frequency words than the concrete conditions. Lexical frequency has a powerful influence in SD, with patients invariably showing better comprehension of higher frequency/more familiar words (Hoffman et al., 2011; Jefferies et al., 2009; Lambon Ralph et al., 1998; Funnell, 1995). Consequently, these two methodological factors may have conspired to produce an apparent A > C effect for the Yi et al. and Bonner et al. stimuli.

We proposed that these differences in frequency and imageability (summarised in Table 1) can account for the inconsistent results across studies. However, another possibility is that the word class of the stimuli is a critical factor in determining the type of concreteness effects observed. Jefferies et al. (2009) employed mostly nouns in their test, while Bonner et al. (2009) used only verbs. In addition, Yi et al. (2007) found an A > C effect for verbs but no effect for nouns. Yi et al. claimed that concrete nouns are partially protected from semantic degradation because they belong to dense semantic neighbourhoods. Because concrete nouns tend to have many semantic neighbours with similar features, when a particular concept degrades it can be partially supported by remaining knowledge for its neighbours (Gonnerman et al., 1997). The same was not thought to be true of concrete verbs, which have fewer neighbours. Thus, while visual feature degradation predicts greater impairment for concrete words, this effect tends not be observed with nouns because concrete nouns are protected by virtue of their dense neighbourhoods. This is a critical point because it calls into question into the C > A effects reported by Jefferies et al. (2009) and Hoffman and Lambon Ralph (2011). These authors reported robust C > A effects in SD patients, but used nouns predominantly as stimuli. The visual feature hypothesis predicts that an A > C effect would emerge if the same patients were tested with verb stimuli.

In the present study, we directly compared concreteness effects for nouns and verbs in six SD patients, including five individuals who showed C > A effects for nouns in our previous study (Hoffman and Lambon Ralph, 2011). We paid particular attention to the key stimulus factors described above. We maximised the difference in imageability values between concrete and abstract words and we ensured that all of the words in each condition were carefully matched for lexical frequency. This allowed us to test whether A > C effects were present for verbs, as predicted by the visual deficit hypothesis, once the relevant stimulus factors were controlled for.

In a second experiment, we investigated another factor thought to influence concreteness effects. The Jefferies et al. test, in common with many other comprehension assessments, probed knowledge of synonymous relationships between words (e.g., frog and toad). This type of semantic relationship may not be well-suited to probing abstract word knowledge. While the semantic representations of concrete words are thought to be organised according to similarity in features, associative relationships (e.g., religion and prayer) are more important for abstract words (Crutch and Warrington, 2005; Crutch et al., 2009). Thus C > A effects may arise in synonym judgement tests because the format of the test is more compatible with the organisation of concrete concepts. This theory predicts that an A > C pattern could be observed in SD patients if their knowledge of associative relationships was probed. To test this prediction, we compared concrete and abstract words in an associative matching test. If the C > A effects in previous studies were due to the use of synonym judgements, one would expect a different pattern to emerge with this paradigm. We also included a second concrete condition in which probe and target shared perceptual similarity, to compare directly associative and similarity-based judgements for concrete words.

Section snippets

Patients

Six patients with a clinical diagnosis of SD took part in this and the subsequent experiment. They fulfilled all of the clinical criteria for SD (Hodges et al., 1992): they had word-finding and comprehension difficulties in the context of fluent and grammatically correct speech and they also showed non-verbal semantic deficits. Visuospatial skills, executive function and day-to-day memory were relatively preserved. Structural imaging [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography

Patients

The six SD patients from Experiment 1 took part in this experiment.

Control participants

Ten healthy individuals from the NARU volunteer panel acted as controls. They had a mean age of 69.8 and mean educational level of 17.0 (school-leaving age). These values did not differ from the patient group [t(14) < 2, p > .07]. None had any history of neurological illness and all scored at least 90/100 on the ACE-R.

Task

On each trial, participants were presented with a probe word and three choices and were asked to pick the word most

General discussion

The status of concrete versus abstract word knowledge in SD has proved a contentious issue, with some arguing that concrete words are disproportionately affected by the disorder, suggesting underlying damage to visual-perceptual feature information (Bonner et al., 2009; Yi et al., 2007; Breedin et al., 1994). Conversely, previous studies from our own group have shown that the typical pattern in SD is for concrete words to be more preserved than abstract words, provided that the test is

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the patients and their carers for their generous assistance with this study. We thank Gemma Evans for assistance in collecting control data. The research was supported by MRC programme grants (G0501632 & MR/J004146/1) and an NIHR senior investigator grant to MALR.

References (64)

  • C. Papagno et al.

    Reversed concreteness effect for nouns in a subject with semantic dementia

    Neuropsychologia

    (2009)
  • G. Pobric et al.

    The role of the anterior temporal lobes in the comprehension of concrete and abstract words: rTMS evidence

    Cortex

    (2009)
  • G. Pobric et al.

    Category-specific vs. category-general semantic impairment induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Current Biology

    (2010)
  • J. Reilly et al.

    A unitary semantics account of reverse concreteness effects in semantic dementia

    Brain and Language

    (2007)
  • D.S. Sabsevitz et al.

    Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • R.J.S. Wise et al.

    Noun imageability and the temporal lobes

    Neuropsychologia

    (2000)
  • R.H. Baayen et al.

    The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM)

    (1993)
  • J.R. Binder et al.

    Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2009)
  • H. Bird et al.

    Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words

    Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers

    (2001)
  • M.F. Bonner et al.

    Reversal of the concreteness effect in semantic dementia

    Cognitive Neuropsychology

    (2009)
  • S. Bozeat et al.

    When objects lose their meaning: What happens to their use?

    Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Neuroscience

    (2002)
  • S.D. Breedin et al.

    Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia

    Cognitive Neuropsychology

    (1994)
  • L.L. Chao et al.

    Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects

    Nature Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • L. Cipolotti et al.

    Semantic memory and reading abilities: A case report

    Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

    (1995)
  • M. Coltheart

    Deep dyslexia: A review of the syndrome

  • M. Coltheart

    The MRC psycholinguistic database

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

    (1981)
  • S.J. Crutch et al.

    The different representational frameworks underpinning abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from odd-one-out judgements

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (2009)
  • S.J. Crutch et al.

    Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks

    Brain

    (2005)
  • A.M.B. Degroot

    Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

    (1989)
  • S. Franklin

    Dissociations in auditory word comprehension; Evidence from nine fluent aphasic patients

    Aphasiology

    (1989)
  • E. Funnell

    Objects and properties: A study of the breakdown of semantic memory

    Memory

    (1995)
  • C.J. Galton et al.

    Differing patterns of temporal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia

    Neurology

    (2001)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Semantic control deficits impair understanding of thematic relationships more than object identity

      2017, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      By this view, the ATL is thought to form a central semantic hub encompassing multiple aspects of knowledge (Lambon Ralph et al., 2017; Patterson et al., 2007). Patients with semantic dementia (SD), who have relatively focal degeneration of the ATL bilaterally (Mummery et al., 2000), show highly consistent errors for the same concepts across different tasks – including across object matching and thematic matching paradigms (Bozeat et al., 2000; Hoffman et al., 2013; Jefferies and Lambon Ralph, 2006), consistent with degradation of core conceptual knowledge that encompasses both the physical and associative features of items. The semantic deficit in SD erodes the distinction between specific concepts first, such that patients can no longer distinguish a Dalmatian from other breeds of dog; but can identify that this item is an animal (Hodges and Patterson, 2007; Mummery et al., 2000; Rogers et al., 2006).

    • Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease: A behavioral and neuroimaging study

      2017, Brain and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to this view, RCE would result from a greater impairment in processing concrete words due to their imageability and crucial reliance on visual sensory knowledge (Bright, Moss, Longe, Stamatakis, & Tyler, 2007) while abstract words rely more on verbal associations. Other studies, however, did not find this reversal of concreteness in svPPA (Hoffman, Jones, & Lambon Ralph, 2013; Hoffman & Lambon Ralph, 2011; Jefferies, Patterson, Jones, & Lambon Ralph, 2009). Authors who have not found RCE in svPPA suggested that when studying abstract and concrete word processing, studies should strictly control for factors such as word frequency and imageability of stimuli used in the semantic tasks.

    • Cognitive and anatomic double dissociation in the representation of concrete and abstract words in semantic variant and behavioral variant frontotemporal degeneration

      2016, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      This reversal of the CE is an extension of Warrington (1975) initial observations of semantic dementia. Although this is not seen by all investigators (Jefferies et al., 2009; Hoffman et al., 2013a), such discrepancies may be due to differences in the svPPA populations that are sampled, specifically due to variance in the course, extent, and stage of disease (Bright et al., 2008; Rohrer et al., 2008). One possibility is that semantic impairment in svPPA is initially amodal, but as disease spreads posteriorly through the ventrolateral temporal lobe, words with rich visual features are progressively more impaired (Hoffman et al., 2012).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text