Efficient computation via sparse coding in electrosensory neural networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.016Get rights and content

The electric sense combines spatial aspects of vision and touch with temporal features of audition. Its accessible neural architecture shares similarities with mammalian sensory systems and allows for recordings from successive brain areas to test hypotheses about neural coding. Further, electrosensory stimuli encountered during prey capture, navigation, and communication, can be readily synthesized in the laboratory. These features enable analyses of the neural circuitry that reveal general principles of encoding and decoding, such as segregation of information into separate streams and neural response sparsification. A systems level understanding arises via linkage between cellular differentiation and network architecture, revealed by in vitro and in vivo analyses, while computational modeling reveals how single cell dynamics and connectivity shape the sparsification process.

Highlights

► The electric sense encodes a wide range of stimuli including navigational cues, communication signals and prey signals. ► Electroreceptors on the body respond linearly to this range, except at high frequencies where population synchrony occurs. ► The electrosensory hindbrain structure (ELL), with limited cell types, has been studied to reveal how a sparse code emerges. ► This code relies on linked cellular and architectural properties including segregated maps and cell types. ► Computational studies ground this code in neural dynamics, and support studies of deeper sparsification in the midbrain.

Introduction

Peripheral sensory neurons typically encode a wide range of environmental stimuli. Moving more centrally, this dense coding is progressively replaced by a narrowing of neural responses to a subset of features of the whole stimulus ensemble [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Such sparse coding makes for easier read-out by downstream neurons, and is more energy efficient [6]. The mechanisms underlying sparsification are still elusive, and their elucidation is a fundamental goal of systems neuroscience. In particular, there is a quest for links between cellular/molecular properties – revealed through in vitro recordings – and network architecture and responses – revealed through in vivo and anatomical studies. Ideally the process would be understood for a behaving animal. Computational modeling has revealed that sparse coding requires nonlinear mechanisms in both the biophysical and network properties of sensory circuitry.

This review looks at the successive transformations of sensory input in the electrosensory system of weakly electric fish. This system has enabled major advances in understanding how differences in anatomy and cellular physiology underlie sparse coding. This is because links between in vitro and in vivo subthreshold and spiking dynamics are possible in the awake animal responding to a wide range of behaviorally relevant sensory input. The review is organized as follows. We first introduce the electrosensory system and its natural stimuli. We then review how electroreceptors can respond differentially to all these stimuli. Next, we describe the first order electrosensory target (hindbrain) emphasizing how linked cellular and architectural differentiation initiates the routing of these inputs into separate output streams. Finally, we summarize recent work on how an even sparser and more efficient representation of the stimulus ensemble is generated in the midbrain. Throughout, we highlight the dynamical and computational features of neural function that provide the substrate for the sparse code.

Section snippets

The electrosensory system

Gymnotiform wave-type weakly electric fish produce an electric field by repetitively discharging a specialized electric organ located in their tail (Figure 1a). This electric field is commonly referred to as the electric organ discharge (EOD). The EOD is sensed everywhere on the body as a transdermal potential difference. Perturbations of the EOD, caused by nearby objects with conductivity different than that of the surrounding water (e.g. prey, conspecifics), modify the transdermal potential

Electrosensory stimuli

EOD AM's can arise in multiple behaviorally relevant situations. Prey objects give rise to spatially localized AMs that contain low temporal frequencies (Figure 1a) [11]. Self-generated AMs through body movements can induce spatially diffuse low frequency AMs that interfere with prey detection, but covering the entire body surface [10, 12]. Weakly electric fish are often found in groups of 2–4 individuals [13]; the interference between the EODs of two neighboring fish causes a sinusoidal AM

Electroreceptors and coding of natural sensory input

Electroreceptors in A. leptorhynchus (∼15,000 total) are phase locked to the EOD and discharge at rates of 100–500 spikes/s in a highly variable but patterned manner when the EOD is unperturbed [15]. The baseline discharges of individual electroreceptors are uncorrelated, allowing them to act as independent coding channels [16]. Patterning in the spontaneous discharge is characterized by a long interspike interval (ISI) following on average by a short ISI and vice versa [16, 17, 18] and is

The electrosensory lateral line lobe: efficient circuits for feature extraction and sparse coding

Electroreceptors project to the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL). Each afferent trifurcates and synapses onto pyramidal cells within three structurally similar parallel segments: centromedial (CMS), centrolateral (CLS) and lateral (LS) [29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. Ampullary electroreceptors project to the medial segment (MS) and are not considered here (Figure 2). All three segments thus receive identical input and each forms an entire topographic map of the animal's body surface. The output

Feature selectivity in the electrosensory midbrain (TS)

The separation of electrocommunication and electrolocation channels has been nearly completed in TS. Indeed, TS neurons generally respond to a much narrower range of spatiotemporal frequencies than ELL pyramidal cells [65, 66, 67]. Some are tuned to low frequencies, others to mid-range or even high frequencies (Figure 3a). In addition, some TS neurons respond selectively to communication stimuli [68] (Figure 3a).

Moreover, TS neurons also respond selectively to objects (Figure 3b). Indeed,

Summary

Through a combination of intrinsic and network properties, electrosensory circuitry progressively segregates inputs of varying temporal and spatial scales encountered in different behavioral contexts. This results in the creation of separate neural streams for electrolocation and electrocommunication. Experimental and computational work have revealed general principles of sparse coding that can be summarized as follows:

  • 1-

    Electroreceptors use different strategies to encode different temporal

Funding

This research was supported by CIHR (M.J.C., A.L., L.M.), NSERC (M.J.C., A.L.), CFI (M.J.C.), and CRC (M.J.C.). The funders had no role in either study design, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We would like to dedicate this review to Joseph Bastian, a friend, colleague, mentor, and pioneer in research on the electrosensory system.

References (72)

  • J. Perez-Orive et al.

    Oscillations and sparsening of odor representations in the mushroom body

    Science

    (2002)
  • D. Attwell et al.

    An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain

    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab

    (2001)
  • L. Chen et al.

    Modeling signal and background components of electrosensory scenes

    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol

    (2005)
  • M. Kelly et al.

    Electric field interactions in pairs of electric fish: modeling and mimicking naturalistic input

    Biol Cybern

    (2008)
  • D. Babineau et al.

    Spatial acuity and prey detection in weakly electric fish

    PLoS Comput Biol

    (2007)
  • J. Bastian

    Plasticity in an electrosensory system. I. General features of a dynamic sensory filter

    J Neurophysiol

    (1996)
  • M.E. Nelson et al.

    Prey capture in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus albifrons: sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory consequences

    J Exp Biol

    (1999)
  • J. Bastian

    Plasticity of feedback inputs in the apteronotid electrosensory system

    J Exp Biol

    (1999)
  • G.J. Hupe et al.

    Electrocommunication signals in free swimming brown ghost knifefish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus

    J Exp Biol

    (2008)
  • D. Gussin et al.

    Limits of linear rate coding of dynamic stimuli by electroreceptor afferents

    J Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • M.J. Chacron et al.

    Electroreceptor neuron dynamics shape information transmission

    Nat Neurosci

    (2005)
  • R. Ratnam et al.

    Non-renewal statistics of electrosensory afferent spike trains: implications for the detection of weak sensory signals

    J Neurosci

    (2000)
  • M.J. Chacron et al.

    Suprathreshold stochastic firing dynamics with memory in P-type electroreceptors

    Phys Rev Lett

    (2000)
  • M.J. Chacron et al.

    Interspike interval correlations, memory, adaptation, and refractoriness in a leaky integrate-and-fire model with threshold fatigue

    Neural Comput

    (2003)
  • J. Benda et al.

    Linear versus nonlinear signal transmission in neuron models with adaptation currents or dynamic thresholds

    J Neurophysiol

    (2010)
  • M.J. Chacron et al.

    Negative interspike interval correlations increase the neuronal capacity for encoding time-varying stimuli

    J Neurosci

    (2001)
  • M.J. Chacron et al.

    Experimental and Theoretical demonstration of noise shaping by interspike interval correlations

    Proc SPIE

    (2005)
  • O. Avila Akerberg et al.

    Nonrenewal spike train statistics: causes and consequences on neural coding

    Exp Brain Res

    (2011)
  • A. Longtin et al.

    Correlations and memory in neurodynamical systems

  • W. Nesse et al.

    Biophysical information representation in temporally correlated spike trains

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2010)
  • J. Benda et al.

    Spike-frequency adaptation separates transient communication signals from background oscillations

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • J. Benda et al.

    A synchronization-desynchronization code for natural communication signals

    Neuron

    (2006)
  • N.J. Berman et al.

    a Inhibition evoked from primary afferents in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of the weakly electric fish (Apteronotus leptorhynchus)

    J Neurophysiol

    (1998)
  • N.J. Berman et al.

    b Interaction of GABAB-mediated inhibition with voltage-gated currents of pyramidal cells: computational mechanism of a sensory searchlight

    J Neurophysiol

    (1998)
  • N.J. Berman et al.

    c Distal versus proximal inhibitory shaping of feedback excitation in the electrosensory lateral line lobe: implications for sensory filtering

    J Neurophysiol

    (1998)
  • N.J. Berman et al.

    Neural architecture of the electrosensory lateral line lobe: adaptations for coincidence detection, a sensory searchlight and frequency-dependent adaptive filtering

    J Exp Biol

    (1999)
  • Cited by (86)

    • Stochastic resonance: The response to envelope modulation signal for neural networks with different topologies

      2022, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Green treefrog can use two frequency bands in long-distance vocal communication [29]. It experimentally showed that the electric fish would generate sinusoidal amplitude modulations beat pattern if the electric generating organs of the two electric fishes were disturbed [30]. Moreover, Chialvo et al. first found that moderate noise enables individual neuron to optimally response to mixed periodic signals with harmonic frequencies [31,32].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text