Top-down control of visual attention

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.003Get rights and content

Top-down visual attention improves perception of selected stimuli and that improvement is reflected in the neural activity at many stages throughout the visual system. Recent studies of top-down attention have elaborated on the signatures of its effects within visual cortex and have begun identifying its causal basis. Evidence from these studies suggests that the correlates of spatial attention exhibited by neurons within the visual system originate from a distributed network of structures involved in the programming of saccadic eye movements. We summarize this evidence and discuss its relationship to the neural mechanisms of spatial working memory.

Introduction

Selective attention is the basic cognitive faculty that allows us to filter out irrelevant sensory information in favor of the relevant. Disorders of attention are frequently occurring among the symptoms of many neuropsychiatric disorders [33], most notably attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which afflicts more than 4% of the population [34]. To date, the neural circuits and neural computations underlying normal and abnormal attention are only poorly understood. However, recent experimental work suggests that an understanding of how networks of neurons control the selection of relevant sensory input might be at hand. Much of what is known so far about the neural basis of attention comes from studies of the primate visual system, particularly that of the macaque monkey, which has proven to be a highly valuable model system. In recent years, neurophysiological studies have not only provided a more rigorous description of the correlates and signatures of attention in neural activity, but they have begun identifying the sources of attentional influences on neural activity and perception.The deployment of attention to a particular location in space (spatial attention) or to a particular feature or object (feature-based or object-based attention) can occur either by virtue of a stimulus’ physical salience (exogenous, involuntary or bottom-up attention) or according to internal, behavioral goals (endogenous, voluntary or top-down attention). Most of the studies over the past few years that we discuss, particularly those aimed at identifying neural circuits controlling attention, have focused primarily on top-down, spatial attention. Although it is clear that feature-based attention (e.g. [23, 35]) and bottom-up attention (e.g. [12•, 36]) both modulate neuronal activity within the visual system, the neurophysiological effects of these forms of attention are less well understood.

Section snippets

Signatures of attention

Attention provides a means of dynamically selecting specific neural representations for further processing, and this filtering involves amplifying behaviorally relevant information at the expense of other information. The objective of attention can be viewed as increasing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the readout from subpopulations of neurons encoding the selected representation. In theory, this can be accomplished in a number of ways, including strengthening selected signals, improving

Sources of attention

Experimental evidence of a role of prefrontal and parietal cortex in the control of attention, and particularly of brain structures involved in oculomotor or gaze functions, dates back to at least the late 19th century [45]. Only in recent years, however, has the relationship between the neural control of gaze and attention been tested directly. Several studies have employed electrical microstimulation to probe the role of saccade-related structures in the deployment of spatial attention. Moore

Circuits of attention

Although recent evidence has begun to identify sources of top-down effects of attention, the particular circuits involved in generating its signatures within visual cortex remain to be identified. The set of known connections between possible sources of attentional control (i.e. the FEF, LIP, and the SC) and visual cortical areas are obvious candidates. Direct corticocortical projections exist from both the FEF and LIP to most extrastriate areas in which signatures of attention have been

The role of neuromodulators

Although the involvement of neuromodulators such as acetylcholine (Ach), noradrenaline (NA), and dopamine (DA) in arousal and attention is widely accepted, it remains to be established how that involvement intersects with known signatures of attention in visual cortex. A recent study however found evidence of a cholinergic contribution to attentional modulation within macaque V1 through muscarinic receptors [5]. The role of Ach in attention may either be achieved via gating of information

Spatial attention and spatial working memory

Top-down attention is often directed according to information held in working memory [68, 69, 70]. Many psychophysical studies have demonstrated a reciprocal relationship between spatial attention, spatial working memory, and oculomotor control, suggesting that the maintenance of visual spatial information may be achieved via some combination of attention-based rehearsal and motor preparation [71, 72, 73, 74]. Other studies in humans show enhanced processing of visual targets at locations held

Conclusions

Neurophysiological studies have made significant progress both in describing how top-down visual attention alters signals within the visual system as well as in beginning to identifying their causal basis. Nevertheless, our understanding of the neural circuitry of attention remains fairly rudimentary. Evidence to date falls far short of allowing one to identify the specific neurons, synaptic operations, or local and distributed neural computations that are both necessary and sufficient to

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (93)

  • R.J. Schafer et al.

    Attention governs action in the primate frontal eye field

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • G.B. Stanton et al.

    Topography of projections to posterior cortical areas from the macaque frontal eye fields

    Journal of Computational Neurology

    (1995)
  • N.K. Logothetis et al.

    Interpreting the BOLD signal

    Annual Review of Physiology

    (2004)
  • S. Vijayraghavan et al.

    Inverted-U dopamine D1 receptor actions on prefrontal neurons engaged in working memory

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • E. Awh et al.

    Rehearsal in spatial working memory: Evidence from neuroimaging

    Psychological Science

    (1999)
  • B.R. Postle et al.

    The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory

    Cognitive Brain Research

    (2004)
  • M. Corbetta et al.

    Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience

    (2002)
  • S. Funahashi et al.

    Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1989)
  • J.Q. Trojanowski et al.

    Areal and laminar distribution of some pulvinar cortical efferents in rhesus monkey

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology

    (1976)
  • I. Stepniewska et al.

    Projections of the superior colliculus to subdivisions of the inferior pulvinar in New World and Old World monkeys

    Visual Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • K. McAlonan et al.

    Guarding the gateway to cortex with attention in visual thalamus

    Nature

    (2008)
  • S.E. Petersen et al.

    Contributions of the pulvinar to visual spatial attention

    Neuropsychologia

    (1987)
  • C.J. McAdams et al.

    Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • J.L. Herrero et al.

    Acetylcholine contributes through muscarinic receptors to attentional modulation in V1

    Nature

    (2008)
  • E.A. Buffalo et al.

    A backwards progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    (2009)
  • J. Moran et al.

    Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex

    Science

    (1985)
  • S. Treue et al.

    Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex

    Nature

    (1999)
  • L. Chelazzi et al.

    Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1998)
  • L. Chelazzi et al.

    A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex

    Nature

    (1993)
  • J.W. Bisley et al.

    Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention

    Science

    (2003)
  • T.J. Buschman et al.

    Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices

    Science

    (2007)
  • K.G. Thompson et al.

    Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2005)
  • K.M. Armstrong et al.

    Selection and maintenance of spatial information by frontal eye field neurons

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • I.E. Monosov et al.

    Measurements of simultaneously recorded spiking activity and local field potentials suggest that spatial selection emerges in the frontal eye field

    Neuron

    (2008)
  • G.G. Gregoriou et al.

    High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention

    Science

    (2009)
  • M.A. Lebedev et al.

    Representation of attended versus remembered locations in prefrontal cortex

    PLoS Biology

    (2004)
  • S. Everling et al.

    Filtering of neural signals by focused attention in the monkey prefrontal cortex

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2002)
  • K. Taylor et al.

    Coherent oscillatory activity in monkey area V4 predicts successful allocation of attention

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2005)
  • T. Womelsdorf et al.

    Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection

    Nature

    (2006)
  • P. Fries et al.

    Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention

    Science

    (2001)
  • N.P. Bichot et al.

    Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4

    Science

    (2005)
  • Y.B. Saalmann et al.

    Neural mechanisms of visual attention: how top-down feedback highlights relevant locations

    Science

    (2007)
  • J.F. Mitchell et al.

    Differential attention-dependent response modulation across cell classes in macaque visual area V4

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • M.R. Cohen et al.

    Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • J.F. Mitchell et al.

    Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4

    Neuron

    (2009)
  • T. Womelsdorf et al.

    Receptive field shift and shrinkage in macaque middle temporal area through attentional gain modulation

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2008)
  • Cited by (253)

    • Common and distinct neural mechanisms of attention

      2024, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
    • Emerging biometric methodologies for human behaviour measurement in applied sensory and consumer science

      2023, Digital Sensory Science: Applications in New Product Development
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text