Ramping activity is a cortical mechanism of temporal control of action

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Timing involves frontal areas of the cerebral cortex.

  • Neurons in the frontal cortex ramp, or increase or decrease activity during temporal intervals.

  • These neurons are necessary and may be sufficient for temporal control of action.

  • These insights may be relevant for diseases with impaired timing.

A fundamental feature of the mammalian cortex is to guide movements in time. One common pattern of neural activity observed across cortical regions during temporal control of action is ramping activity. Ramping activity can be defined as consistent increases or decreases in neuronal firing rate across behaviorally relevant epochs of time. Prefrontal brain regions, including medial frontal and lateral prefrontal cortex, are critical for temporal control of action. Ramping is among the most common pattern of neural activity in these prefrontal areas during behavioral tasks. Finally, stimulating prefrontal neurons in medial frontal cortex can influence the timing of movement. These data can be helpful in approaching human diseases with impaired temporal of action, such as Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia. Cortical ramping activity might contribute to new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for these and other debilitating human diseases.

Introduction

Finding food and evading threats is critical for mammalian behavior and requires the ability to guide movements in time. For humans, the temporal control of action is central to complex activities such as cooking and driving. In this review, I argue that ramping activity in the prefrontal cortex critically regulates how movements are guided in time to achieve behavioral goals. I focus on epochs of several seconds, as temporal processing at shorter or longer scales can involve distinct neural systems [1, 2].

Timing has been extensively addressed by theoreticians for decades [3]. Much of this work concerns the perception of time by the brain. Perceptual timing consistently recruits subcortical networks in the cerebellum, striatum, and brainstem [4]. In the last decade, evidence has accumulated that frontal and visual cortical areas are also required for temporal control of action. Posterior cortical areas are discussed in a companion review by Shuler et al., in this issue. Here, I focus on the frontal cortex, which is chiefly concerned with motor control.

Neurophysiology facilitates investigation into how neural networks instantiate timing processes that allow movements to be coordinated in time. Most neurophysiological tasks involve some amount of temporal expectation, or the anticipation of when events or movements will occur in time. Temporal expectation can be captured mathematically via a ‘hazard’ function [5]. For instance, when an event is likely to occur within a given amount of time, if the event fails to occur at time x, then the probability that it will occur at time x + 1 will increase. Organisms capitalize upon temporal information when preparing movements, as certainty regarding when events will occur will progressively increase as time unfolds. For instance, sprinters might respond to the starting gun fastest after waiting a long time, because after a long delay they are fully prepared to respond [6]. Temporal preparation can be ‘embodied’ in movements [7]. In this sense, temporal control of action is a subset of motor control. Furthermore, temporal control demands executive resources such as working memory and attention [8, 9] albeit at an elementary level [10, 11]. That is, loading executive functions such as working memory or attention can interfere with guiding movements in time [8]. These data indicate that timing shares resources with classical executive processes such as working memory, attention, and reasoning [8, 10].

Section snippets

Ramping activity

One pattern of cortical neuronal activity that robustly encodes temporal information is ramping, which can be defined as consistent increases or decreases in firing rate over time (Figure 1). Ramping is the most common pattern of activity in frontal cortex during timing tasks [12, 13•, 14•], and typically starts at the beginning of the interval and consistently changes until the end of the interval. This pattern of activity could readily encode the accumulation of temporal evidence; i.e., as

Prefrontal cortex ramps while animals wait to respond

Prefrontal regions include medial frontal cortex (MFC; cingulate/prelimbic cortex, BA 24/32; lead Cz from EEG) and lateral prefrontal areas in the middle frontal gyrus (BA 9/46) [30]. Several studies have shown that these areas are required for temporal processing. For example, humans with lesions of superior medial or right lateral frontal cortex have increased variability in tasks requiring temporal control [31, 32]. Reversible lesions with rTMS of human right lateral frontal cortex shortened

Clinical implications

Timing tasks are ideal to study cortical function and dysfunction. Patients with many human diseases have reliably impaired timing (Table 1). Timing tasks can be readily adapted to patient populations with profoundly impaired cortical function. They can be deployed in the operating room or the intensive care unit, when consciousness may be impaired and experiments may be limited. Thus, timing tasks can provide a unique window on cortical function [11].

For example, patients with schizophrenia

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

Funding: K08 NS078100 and R01 NS089470 from NINDS. Thank you to Krystal Parker, Eric Emmons, Ryan Kelley, Mark Laubach, and Marshall Shuler for feedback.

References (55)

  • N.S. Narayanan et al.

    Top-down control of motor cortex ensembles by dorsomedial prefrontal cortex

    Neuron

    (2006)
  • H. Niki et al.

    Cingulate unit activity and delayed response

    Brain Res

    (1976)
  • A. Genovesio et al.

    Neuronal activity related to elapsed time in prefrontal cortex

    J Neurophysiol

    (2006)
  • R.D. Ward et al.

    Timing as a window on cognition in schizophrenia

    Neuropharmacology

    (2012)
  • C. Malapani et al.

    Coupled temporal memories in Parkinson's disease: a dopamine-related dysfunction

    J Cogn Neurosci

    (1998)
  • R.A. Barkley et al.

    Sense of time in children with ADHD: effects of duration, distraction, and stimulant medication

    J Int Neuropsychol Soc

    (1997)
  • C.V. Buhusi et al.

    What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2005)
  • J. Gibbon et al.

    Scalar timing in memory

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1984)
  • S.L. Cowen et al.

    Selective delay activity in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat: contribution of sensorimotor information and contingency

    J Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • S.W. Brown

    Timing and executive function: bidirectional interference between concurrent temporal production and randomization tasks

    Mem Cognit

    (2006)
  • J.T. Coull et al.

    Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2011)
  • K.L. Parker et al.

    Executive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease and timing deficits

    Front Integr Neurosci

    (2013)
  • N.S. Narayanan et al.

    Delay activity in rodent frontal cortex during a simple reaction time task

    J Neurophysiol

    (2009)
  • T. Bekolay et al.

    A spiking neural integrator model of the adaptive control of action by the medial prefrontal cortex

    J Neurosci

    (2014)
  • K.L. Parker et al.

    D1-Dependent 4 Hz oscillations and ramping activity in rodent medial frontal cortex during interval timing

    J Neurosci

    (2014)
  • D. Durstewitz

    Self-organizing neural integrator predicts interval times through climbing activity

    J Neurosci

    (2003)
  • P. Simen et al.

    A model of interval timing by neural integration

    J Neurosci

    (2011)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Anxiety-related activity of ventral hippocampal interneurons

      2022, Progress in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This pattern of ramping activity was more frequently observed among vH interneurons than pyramidal neurons and was most abundant in low anxiety rats. Ramping in neuronal activity has been described in prefrontal areas where it is thought to allow for the precise timing of behaviour observed during delay and waiting periods, and ends with the initiation of motor actions (Narayanan, 2016). With respect to the hippocampus, ramping in activity has been proposed to play a role in timing as well, and has been reported in the lateral entorhinal cortex, a predominant monosynaptic input region of the vH (Banquet et al., 2021; Burwell, 2000; Tsao et al., 2018; van Groen et al., 2003).

    • Medial prefrontal cortex and the temporal control of action

      2021, International Review of Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although these patterns can be diverse, and representation of impending movements can be ubiquitous in frontal cortex, recordings from our group and others have identified a common theme in temporal control of action. This pattern is characterized by “ramping”—or monotonic changes in firing rate over a temporal interval—and is a key form of temporal processing (Narayanan, 2016). In seminal recording studies by Niki and Watanabe, anticipatory patterns of neuronal activity (i.e., ramping activity) were the most common pattern (~ 25%) during timing and delayed-response tasks (Niki & Watanabe, 1976, 1979).

    • Prefrontal Cortical Projection Neurons Targeting Dorsomedial Striatum Control Behavioral Inhibition

      2020, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Possibly, persistently activated neurons are PT neurons, whereas persistently silenced neurons are IT neurons, but this is unclear and warrants further investigation. Persistent changes in neuronal activity have also been linked to estimation of time intervals [13, 19], by which the amplitude and ramping angle of firing rate positively correlates with estimated time interval [59]. Moreover, earlier onset of the stimulus orientation moment during premature responses has been reported in the 5-CSRTT without a shorter stimulus orientation to response time, suggesting that animals use a time estimation strategy only, with an advanced onset of trial engagement accounting for premature responses [34].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text