Elsevier

Biosystems

Volume 150, December 2016, Pages 138-148
Biosystems

A neural mechanism of dynamic gating of task-relevant information by top-down influence in primary visual cortex

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.09.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Visual recognition involves bidirectional information flow, which consists of bottom-up information coding from retina and top-down information coding from higher visual areas. Recent studies have demonstrated the involvement of early visual areas such as primary visual area (V1) in recognition and memory formation. V1 neurons are not passive transformers of sensory inputs but work as adaptive processor, changing their function according to behavioral context. Top-down signals affect tuning property of V1 neurons and contribute to the gating of sensory information relevant to behavior. However, little is known about the neuronal mechanism underlying the gating of task-relevant information in V1. To address this issue, we focus on task-dependent tuning modulations of V1 neurons in two tasks of perceptual learning. We develop a model of the V1, which receives feedforward input from lateral geniculate nucleus and top-down input from a higher visual area. We show here that the change in a balance between excitation and inhibition in V1 connectivity is necessary for gating task-relevant information in V1. The balance change well accounts for the modulations of tuning characteristic and temporal properties of V1 neuronal responses. We also show that the balance change of V1 connectivity is shaped by top-down signals with temporal correlations reflecting the perceptual strategies of the two tasks. We propose a learning mechanism by which synaptic balance is modulated. To conclude, top-down signal changes the synaptic balance between excitation and inhibition in V1 connectivity, enabling early visual area such as V1 to gate context-dependent information under multiple task performances.

Introduction

The dominant view of cortical sensory processing is that as one proceeds along the visual pathway from primary visual cortex (V1) to higher-ordered visual areas, neurons become sensitive to progressively more complex stimuli-‘complexification’. Early areas are thought to analyze simple attributes, such as orientation, direction of movement, and color. But visual processing also involves countercurrent streams of information flow, and the operation between bottom-up information coding from retina and feedback information coding from higher-ordered visual areas (Engel et al., 2001, Gilbert and Li, 2013, Lamme and Roelfsema, 2000). Visual recognition involved in memory, prediction, and attention is processed in distributed cortical and subcortical networks which include the subcortical structures and V1. However, the involvement of early visual areas in cognition has been often underestimated (Gilbert and Sigman, 2007). V1 neurons are not passive transformers of sensory inputs but rather their activity is influenced by attention, task, training, and expectation (Muckli, 2010, Muckli and Petro, 2013, Tong, 2003). V1 receives considerably more feedback than feedforward thalamic afferents and 10 times more axons from V2 than from the lateral geniculate body (LGN) (Budd, 1998). Consequently, information processing in V1 includes top-down influence. However, it is poorly understood how V1 and higher-ordered visual areas concurrently form visual recognition leading to behavior.

Several studies on perceptual learning have demonstrated that V1 neurons can function as adaptive processor, changing their function according to behavioral context, and their responses reflect the demands of the perceptual task being performed (Gilbert and Li, 2013, Gilbert and Sigman, 2007, Li et al., 2004, Li et al., 2006). In the study on two discrimination tasks with five-bar arrays (Li et al., 2004), it was demonstrated that V1 neurons exhibited the changes of tuning curves depending on these tasks. Further study by Ramalingam et al. (2013) showed the differences in the temporal correlations of spikes and local-field potential (LFP) coherence, caused by the two tasks. Their study pointed out the importance of dynamic control in top-down influence, suggesting that the intracortical connections of V1 network could be dynamically organized so as to gate information critical for the relevant tasks. However, it remains unclear how task-relevant information is gated by the dynamic interplay of the connection change of V1 network and the top-down signals reflecting task behavior.

To address this issue, we developed a neural model of the V1, which receives feedforward inputs from LGN and top-down signals from a higher-ordered area such as V2. V1 neurons interact with each other via a balanced connection of excitation and inhibition. We made two assumptions. One is that a synaptic balance between excitation and inhibition in the V1 network is modulated in a different way, depending on which task is relevant. This assumption is based on the evidence that the circuitry in the V1 has long-range horizontal connections linking columns of similar orientation specificity (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1989, Stettler et al., 2002). Another is that top-down signal has a temporal correlation reflecting behavior relevant to each task. The temporal correlation is supported from the experimental results by Ramalingam et al. (2013). We show that a balance between excitation and inhibition in the V1 connectivity is modulated to gate task-relevant information. The balance change well accounts for the modulations of tuning curves and dynamic properties of V1 responses. We also show that the balance change is caused by top-down signals with temporal correlations reflecting the perceptual strategies of the two tasks. We propose a learning mechanism of the balance change. The results provide a neural mechanism of how V1 is associated with visual recognition and behavior.

Section snippets

Five-bar discrimination task

In the five-bar discrimination tasks (Li et al., 2004), the visual stimuli consisted of five bar segments, a central bar fixed in receptive field (RF) center and four additional flanking bars surrounding the RF, paralleled side-by-side and end-to-end, as shown in Fig. 1a and b. The left and right bars have always the same offset and the top and bottom flanking bars are shifted in the similar way. Two referenced arrays were defined to represent the offsets of side and end flanks: the offsets of

Modulations of tuning property of V1 neurons by perceptual learning

The V1 network, with the modulated weight pairs described in Section 2.4, yielded the modulations of tuning property to side- and end-flank offsets. Fig. 4a shows the tuning curves of V1 neurons in which bisection task is relevant. The task behavior modulated the tuning property of V1 neurons, depending on different positions of the side flanks. To characterize the tuning property in the relevant task, or bisection task, we calculated the tuning property of V1 neurons in the case where the

Discussion

In the present study, we sought to reveal the neural mechanism underlying the gating of task-relevant information in the early visual areas such as V1. We focused on the experimental studies on perceptual learning with the bisection and vernier tasks (Li et al., 2004, Ramalingam et al., 2013). We have shown that a balance between excitation and inhibition in the V1 connectivity is modulated to gate information relevant to the two tasks. The balance change produces the change in the tuning

References (50)

  • D.D. Stettler et al.

    Lateral connectivity and contextual interactions in macaque primary visual cortex

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • M. Ursino et al.

    A model of contextual interactions and contour detection in primary visual cortex

    Neural Netw.

    (2004)
  • H. Yao et al.

    Stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in cortical processing of orientation

    Neuron

    (2001)
  • J.M. Budd

    Extrastriate feedback to primary visual cortex in primates: a quantitative analysis of connectivity

    Proc. Biol. Sci.

    (1998)
  • M. Castelo-Branco et al.

    Neural synchrony correlates with surface segregation rules

    Nature

    (2000)
  • A.K. Engel et al.

    Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • A.K. Engel et al.

    Synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses between striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas of the cat

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1991)
  • J. Fell et al.

    The role of phase synchronization in memory processes

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • P. Fries et al.

    Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention

    Science

    (2001)
  • Y.-X. Fu et al.

    Temporal specificity in the cortical plasticity of visual space representation

    Science (New York, NY)

    (2002)
  • A. Gail et al.

    Contour decouples gamma activity across texture representation in monkey striate cortex

    Cereb. Cortex (New York, NY: 1991)

    (2000)
  • W. Gerstner

    Population dynamics of spiking neurons: fast transients, asynchronous states, and locking

    Neural Comput.

    (2000)
  • C.D. Gilbert et al.

    Top-down influences on visual processing

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • C.D. Gilbert et al.

    Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex

    J. Neurosci.

    (1989)
  • C.M. Gray et al.

    Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties

    Nature

    (1989)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Modulation of top-down influence affects trafficking of glutamatergic receptors in the primary visual cortex

      2022, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the current study observes changes in the trafficking of AMPA and NMDA receptors in the V1 cortex after modulation of top-down influence of A7, we cannot exclude the possibility that inhibitory neurotransmitter systems in the V1 cortex may also be affected by modulation of top-down influence because the V1 polysynaptic circuits receiving feedback projections are complicated [43]. Recent network modeling predicts that top-down signals may affect inhibitory neurons and change synaptic balance between excitation and inhibition in V1 cortex [1,44]. In addition, neuronal tracing study report that feedback influence on pyramidal neurons in the lower-level visual areas may also depend on the output of GABAergic neurons that receive feedback influence [43].

    • Effects of top-down influence suppression on behavioral and V1 neuronal contrast sensitivity functions in cats

      2022, iScience
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the relative contributions of top-down feedback and V1 remain elusive. Some studies have emphasized the role of top-down influence (Al-Aidroos et al., 2012; Chalk et al., 2010; Eger et al., 2007; Fenske et al., 2006; Gazzaley et al., 2005; Gilbert and Li, 2013; Huang and Dobkins, 2005; Kamiyama et al., 2016; Keller et al., 2020; Lee and Maunsell, 2010; Li et al., 2008; Manita et al., 2015; Nassi et al., 2013; Nurminen et al., 2018; Pak et al., 2020; Roland et al., 2006; Rolls, 2008; Wang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014). Other studies have showed that V1, including back projections to V1, is crucial for visual detection (Chirimuuta and Tolhurst, 2005; Gerard-Mercier et al., 2016; Glickfeld et al., 2013; Hurme et al., 2017, 2019; Koivisto et al., 2010; Roebuck et al., 2014; Seidemann and Geisler, 2018; Silvanto et al., 2005a, 2005b).

    • Coordination of top-down influence on V1 responses by interneurons and brain rhythms

      2021, BioSystems
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further study by Ramalingam et al. (2013) revealed that in addition to the modulated tuning curves, top-down influence altered dynamic property of V1 neurons depending on the contexts of both tasks. Although V1 models for explaining the top-down mechanism of either bisection or vernier task have been proposed (Schäfer et al. (2007, 2009); Piëch et al. (2013)), we developed a V1 network model to elucidate the mechanisms by which the top-down influences in the two tasks coexist (Kamiyama et al., 2016). In this model, top-down signal modulated the synaptic weights of long-range connection, depending on task context.

    • Effects of sensory deprivation on cognitive degeneration: Evidence from ageing individuals with blindness

      2018, Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In a bottom-up approach, cognitive functions are rooted in the sensory information and the lack of sensory experience may leads to an impairment in subsequent cognitive functioning (Valentijn et al., 2005). In a top- down approach, cognitive functioning modulates the sensory processing (Kamiyama, Fujita, & Kashimori − Biosystems, 2016; Näätänen, Tervaniemi, Sussman, Paavilainen, & Winkler, 2001) and the brain can compensate the lack of sensory information and interpolate the information loss based on the remained parts (Baltes & Lindenberger, 1997). Furthermore, there are two variations for the interaction between these approaches that may be considered as two alternative perspectives.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text