Elsevier

Behavioural Brain Research

Volume 301, 15 March 2016, Pages 19-26
Behavioural Brain Research

Research report
Aerobic exercise enhances neural correlates of motor skill learning

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.12.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A preceding bout of aerobic exercise augments the cortical response to motor training.

  • Excitability of trained muscles is enhanced although performance is unaffected.

  • Acute exercise may be a useful adjunct to motor learning tasks.

Abstract

Introduction

Repetitive, in-phase bimanual motor training tasks can expand the excitable cortical area of the trained muscles. Recent evidence suggests that an acute bout of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise can enhance the induction of rapid motor plasticity at the motor hotspot. However, these changes have not been investigated throughout the entire cortical representation. Furthermore, it is unclear how exercise-induced changes in excitability may relate to motor performance. We investigated whether aerobic exercise could enhance the neural correlates of motor learning. We hypothesized that the combination of exercise and training would increase the excitable cortical area to a greater extent than either exercise or training alone, and that the addition of exercise would enhance performance on a motor training task.

Methods

25 young, healthy, right-handed individuals were recruited and divided into two groups and three experimental conditions. The exercise group performed exercise alone (EX) and exercise followed by training (EXTR) while the training group performed training alone (TR).

Results

The combination of exercise and training increased excitability within the cortical map of the trained muscle to a greater extent than training alone. However, there was no difference in performance between the two groups. These results indicate that exercise may enhance the cortical adaptations to motor skill learning.

Introduction

There is growing interest in the potential ability of aerobic exercise to enhance cortical excitability. A single session of moderate-intensity exercise has been shown to transiently increase cortical activity and cognitive function in frontal and motor regions, changes that persist following exercise cessation. Given its role in movement execution, it is not surprising that excitability in the primary motor cortex (M1) may be enhanced following an acute exercise bout. Although little is known about the direct effects of aerobic exercise on motor cortical neurons, emerging evidence suggests that a single session of moderate-intensity cycling activity can suppress short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and enhance intracortical facilitation (ICF) for at least 30 min following exercise completion [1], [2], suggesting that the post-exercise environment may be ideal for inducing experience-dependent plasticity. Indeed, early markers of long-term potentiation (LTP) are enhanced when induction is preceded by acute exercise. Exercise has been shown to enhance the response to paired-associative stimulation (PAS), a technique thought to induce LTP-like plasticity in the motor cortex, and this effect is observed following both moderate and high-intensity exercise [3], [4].

One limitation of these studies is that excitability changes have only been examined at the motor hotspot. Motor learning often involves not only changes at the central site, but an outward expansion of the excitable area [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Whether and to what extent exercise affects the overall M1 representation is unclear. Additionally, it is not known whether this benefit extends beyond passive stimulation to tasks involving active motor learning. Although the retention of motor skills appears to be enhanced by subsequent aerobic activity [10], and neurorehabilitation outcomes are improved by the addition of aerobic exercise [11], [12], enhancements in motor performance following acute exercise in healthy individuals have not yet been investigated. Such investigations are critical for determining the potential mechanisms and clinical utility of aerobic exercise as an adjunct therapy to improve motor function and motor skill training in neurological patient populations. In-phase bimanual movements can increase both cortical excitability and the spatial representation of target muscles [5], [13]. Such movements can exploit interhemispheric connections between corresponding M1 representations in order to enhance learning effects. Specifically, in-phase bimanual movements promote disinhibition of M1 and facilitate interhemispheric communication between homologous regions [14], [15]. Bimanual training tasks have been shown to increase the size of the motor map of the target muscle following training [5], [6], [7], and the neural substrates underlying this expansion are also thought to mediate the functional reorganization of M1 [16], [17]. Short-term learning (<1 h) is associated with increased bilateral M1 activity [18] and increased functional connectivity between M1 and premotor regions [19]. While the consolidation of motor skills is related to a decrease in motor map size, early motor skill learning is associated with an increased cortical representation of the trained muscles [20].

Motor learning comprises skill acquisition and motor adaptation [21] and requires a cortical environment that is receptive to experience-dependent plasticity. Facilitatory interventions that target the motor cortex, such as intermittent theta-burst stimulation, or anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, have been shown to effectively prime the brain for subsequent motor learning [22], [23], [24]. In the current study, we investigate whether exercise may have a similar effect when performed prior to a bimanual visuomotor learning task. We used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to generate a cortical map of the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle representation before and after training. We hypothesized that (a) exercise would enhance the cortical response to training, both in terms of the spatial extent of the cortical map and the excitability changes within the map; and (b) that a single-session of visuomotor training would induce motor learning as measured by response time, accuracy and movement trajectory on the motor task.

Section snippets

Subjects and experimental setup

Twenty-five young, healthy, self-reported right-handed individuals were recruited (14 males; average age = 27 years). Participants were screened for any contraindications to TMS and informed consent was obtained prior to undergoing the experimental protocol. All experimental procedures received clearance from the University of Waterloo Office of Research Ethics. Participants were divided into an exercise group (n = 13) and a training only group (n = 12). The exercise group underwent two experimental

Baseline characteristics

One-way ANOVAs of baseline measures revealed significant differences between the number of active sites (F2,33 = 4.09, p < 0.026) and the MEP amplitudes in central sites (F2,33 = 2.98, p < 0.037), and a near-significant difference in global MEP amplitude (F2,33 = 2.98, p < 0.065) across groups (Table 1). Consequently, MEP amplitudes were expressed as a percent of baseline and subsequent between-group analyses were performed on normalized data.

Within- and between-session effects

Results of the TMS measures are displayed in Fig. 2. For the

Summary of main findings

The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition of exercise could enhance the cortical and behavioral responses to a motor training task. M1 is a highly plastic region and with repeated training, use-dependent reorganization in M1 is associated with skill acquisition [8], [26] and improvements in performance markers such as reaction time [26]. Single sessions of training have also been demonstrated to alter cortical representations [27], [28], [29], and bimanual motor

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the addition of aerobic exercise can enhance the cortical changes induced by a motor training task. Specifically, the combination of exercise and training increases the excitability of the target muscle representation to a greater extent than training alone. Thus, exercise may be a potentially beneficial adjunct to motor learning.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding to WRS from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). AMS was supported by graduate scholarship funds from the Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) program.

References (86)

  • M.S. Remple et al.

    Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2001)
  • J.A. Kleim et al.

    Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex

    Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.

    (2002)
  • K. Skriver et al.

    Acute exercise improves motor memory: exploring potential biomarkers

    Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.

    (2014)
  • C. Grefkes et al.

    Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • R.J. Ibey et al.

    Corticomotor excitability changes seen in the resting forearm during contralateral rhythmical movement and force manipulations: a TMS study

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2013)
  • A.L. Smith et al.

    Externally cued inphase bimanual training enhances preparatory premotor activity

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2012)
  • D. Gomez-Merino et al.

    Site-dependent effects of an acute intensive exercise on extracellular 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels in rat brain

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2001)
  • S.M. Gold et al.

    Basal serum levels and reactivity of nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor to standardized acute exercise in multiple sclerosis and controls

    J. Neuroimmunol.

    (2003)
  • G. Gustafsson et al.

    The acute response of plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a result of exercise in major depressive disorder

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2009)
  • S. Rojas Vega et al.

    Acute BDNF and cortisol response to low intensity exercise and following ramp incremental exercise to exhaustion in humans

    Brain Res.

    (2006)
  • S.W. Tang et al.

    Influence of exercise on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations in healthy human subjects

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2008)
  • B. Winter et al.

    High impact running improves learning

    Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.

    (2007)
  • J.C. Smith et al.

    Detecting changes in human cerebral blood flow after acute exercise using arterial spin labeling: implications for fMRI

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (2010)
  • C.J. Stagg et al.

    The role of GABA in human motor learning

    Curr. Biol.

    (2011)
  • A. Smith et al.

    The influence of a single bout of aerobic exercise on short-interval intracortical excitability

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2014)
  • A.M. Singh et al.

    Acute exercise enhances the response to paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity in the primary motor cortex

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2014)
  • C.S. Mang et al.

    A single bout of high-intensity aerobic exercise facilitates response to paired associative stimulation and promotes sequence-specific implicit motor learning

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (2014)
  • R.J. Nudo et al.

    Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys

    J. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • R.J. Nudo et al.

    Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1996)
  • M. Roig et al.

    A single bout of exercise improves motor memory

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • B.M. Quaney et al.

    Aerobic exercise improves cognition and motor function poststroke

    Neurorehabil. Neural Repair

    (2009)
  • A. Tang et al.

    Effects of an aerobic exercise program on aerobic capacity, spatiotemporal gait parameters, and functional capacity in subacute stroke

    Neurorehabil. Neural Repair

    (2009)
  • J.W. Stinear et al.

    Rhythmic bilateral movement training modulates corticomotor excitability and enhances upper limb motricity poststroke: a pilot study

    J. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2004)
  • J.W. Stinear et al.

    Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements

    J. Physiol.

    (2002)
  • F.G. Andres et al.

    Functional coupling of human cortical sensorimotor areas during bimanual skill acquisition

    Brain

    (1999)
  • J. Kleim et al.

    Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1998)
  • M.-S. Rioult-Pedotti et al.

    Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • K.R. Lohse et al.

    Motor skill acquisition across short and long time scales: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data

    Neuropsychologia

    (2014)
  • F.T. Sun et al.

    Functional connectivity of cortical networks involved in bimanual motor sequence learning

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2006)
  • J.W. Krakauer

    Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation

    Curr. Opin. Neurol.

    (2006)
  • M.E. Cabral et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training?

    Neuroreport

    (2015)
  • J.T.H. Teo et al.

    Human θ burst stimulation enhances subsequent motor learning and increases performance variability

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2011)
  • A. Pascual-Leone et al.

    Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge

    Science

    (1994)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Effects of acute cardiovascular exercise on motor memory encoding and consolidation: A systematic review with meta-analysis

      2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Briefly, 14 studies (Angulo-Barroso et al., 2019; Baird et al., 2018; Helm et al., 2017; Hübner et al., 2018; Mang et al., 2016b, 2014; Neva et al., 2019; Opie and Semmler, 2019; Perini et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2016; Snow et al., 2016; Statton et al., 2015; Stavrinos and Coxon, 2017; Wanner et al., 2020) investigated the effects of exercise applied immediately prior to motor skill practice (note: the exercise + rest group reported in Statton et al., 2015 includes a rest period of one hour between the exercise bout and practice and thus was not included in the meta-analysis), while five experiments (Dal Maso et al., 2018; Lundbye-Jensen et al., 2017; Ostadan et al., 2016; Thomas et al., 2016b, c) applied the exercise directly after skill practice (note: the strength training group reported in Thomas et al. (2016b) mainly includes resistance exercises and thus was not included in the meta-analysis), and three studies (Ferrer-Uris et al., 2018, 2017; Tomporowski and Pendleton, 2018) included both, a group performing the exercise before and after skill practice, respectively (note: the group performing pre-practice exercise reported in Ferrer-Uris et al., 2018 is already included in Angulo-Barroso et al., 2019 and thus was not included in the meta-analysis). Regarding exercise intensity, ten studies (Angulo-Barroso et al., 2019; Dal Maso et al., 2018; Ferrer-Uris et al., 2018, 2017; Lundbye-Jensen et al., 2017; Mang et al., 2016b, 2014; Ostadan et al., 2016; Stavrinos and Coxon, 2017; Thomas et al., 2016b) administered high-intensity interval protocols, nine articles (Helm et al., 2017; Hübner et al., 2018; Neva et al., 2019; Opie and Semmler, 2019; Perini et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2016; Snow et al., 2016; Statton et al., 2015; Tomporowski and Pendleton, 2018) reported moderate-intensity bouts, and three studies (Baird et al., 2018; Thomas et al., 2016c; Wanner et al., 2020) included groups doing high- and moderate-intensity exercise, respectively. While exercise parameters were very similar in the high-intensity studies, moderate-intensity protocols differed considerably in duration and type (interval or continuous) between studies.

    • Exercise Intensity Does not Modulate the Effect of Acute Exercise on Learning a Complex Whole-Body Task

      2020, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, the beneficial effects of an acute exercise bout seems to be distinguishable from a simple activation of the central nervous system due to repetitive movement of the extremities or a minimal stimulation of the cardiovascular system. Further, whilst high-intensity bouts applied prior to skill practice showed no effects on online learning gains (Roig et al., 2012; Mang et al., 2014, 2016; Ferrer-Uris et al., 2017; Helm et al., 2017; Stavrinos and Coxon, 2017; Ferrer-Uris et al., 2018), findings in moderate-intensity bouts suggest beneficial effects even though the results are inconsistent (Chartrand et al., 2015; Statton et al., 2015; Perini et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2016; Snow et al., 2016). In contrast, high-intensity bouts have been consistently shown to increase offline learning (Roig et al., 2012; Mang et al., 2014, 2016; Skriver et al., 2014; Ferrer-Uris et al., 2017; Stavrinos and Coxon, 2017; Ferrer-Uris et al., 2018), whereas moderate intensities failed to show similar effects (Chartrand et al., 2015; Statton et al., 2015; Snow et al., 2016).

    • Acute Exercise at Different Intensities Influences Corticomotor Excitability and Performance of a Ballistic Thumb Training Task

      2019, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      As interactions between high-intensity exercise and ballistic training have not been previously investigated, this represents a novel observation on how exercise impacts motor performance. However, the effects of exercise on the acquisition of more complex visuomotor tasks have been assessed, with results suggesting either no effect (Singh et al., 2016; Stavrinos and Coxon, 2017) or improved learning (Mang et al., 2014; Statton et al., 2015) following moderate–high intensity exercise. Interestingly, studies that have dichotomized performance improvement based on movement speed vs movement accuracy have shown that exercise seems to more specifically improve movement accuracy (Statton et al., 2015; Stavrinos and Coxon, 2017).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text