Research reportDifferential activation of accumbens shell and core dopamine by sucrose reinforcement with nose poking and with lever pressing
Introduction
The notion that links dopamine (DA) to reward stands as one of the most popular, yet most debated issues in neuroscience. Evidence for a role of DA in reward was initially provided, starting almost 40 years ago, by studies on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) and on the effect of lesions of DA neurons and pharmacological impairment of DA transmission [1], [2], [3]. This role of DA in ICSS was later extended to all rewards, conventional and pharmacological [4], [5], [6]. In vivo monitoring of the activity of DA neurons and of DA transmission by a variety of techniques (extracellular recording, microdialysis, voltammetry and Positron Emission Tomography) also showed that rewards and reward-conditioned stimuli activate mesolimbic DA transmission [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. As a result of those studies, further hypotheses on the role of DA in behaviour were proposed (learning, incentive-motivational, activational/sensory-motor) [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].
Recently, new evidence for a role of DA in reward has been provided by optogenetic studies. Thus, selective light driven stimulation of mesolimbic DA neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is capable of inducing place preference [19] and of maintaining instrumental responding with characteristics superimposable to those of classical ICSS [20], [21], [22] in a DA D1 and D2 receptor dependent manner [23]. These observations provide compelling evidence that DA is linked to reward not only post hoc, as a consequence, but also propter hoc, as a cause [24]. Therefore, even in those conditions in which activation of NAc DA transmission is the consequence rather than the cause of reward, mesolimbic DA is likely to add a positive valence to the reward experience, over and above other functions (incentive, learning, value computation etc. etc.).
The NAc, however, is an heterogeneous structure, being made of two subdivisions, the shell and the core, with different and eventually opposite functions [9], [11], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Microdialysis studies show that amphetamine- and cocaine-like psychostimulants increase extracellular DA preferentially or, depending on the dose, selectively in the NAc shell as compared to the core when administered response non-contingently [29], [30], [31], [32] as well as contingently by i.v. self-administration [31], [33]. Recently, we have shown that lentiviral-siRNA-induced silencing of D1 receptor expression in the NAc shell but not core prevents acquisition of cocaine self-administration [34]. Therefore NAc shell DA is necessary for cocaine reward.
On the other hand, in vivo microdialysis and voltammetric studies suggest that NAc shell DA encodes the hedonic valence of food taste. Thus, in naive rats, a salient sweet taste (chocolate) increases, while a bitter taste (quinine) decreases DA transmission in the NAc shell. This contrasts with the ability of both sweet and bitter tastes to increase dialysate DA in the NAc core and medial prefrontal cortex, in turn consistent with encoding of generic salience, rather than hedonic valence, by DA in these areas [35].
We have recently reported that in rats responding for sucrose pellets by nose poking, extracellular DA increases selectively in the NAc shell [36], [37]. Our observations, however, contrast with those of the literature showing that in rats responding for food, extracellular DA increases both in the NAc shell and core [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. As we have already noted [36], the most consistent difference between our studies and those of the literature is that they utilized lever-pressing instead of nose-poking as operant response. However, the existence of other experimental differences in the rewarding value of the reinforcer, degree of food deprivation, training procedure, operant schedule, etc., makes impossible to establish if indeed the differences in modus operandi were critical for the differences in the profile of the DA responses among shell and core [36], [37].
In order to clarify this issue we compared the changes in extracellular DA in the NAc shell and core in two groups of rats differing only in the response modality utilized for responding, lever-pressing and, respectively, nose-poking for sucrose pellets on a FR1 schedule. In order to control for a role of effort and/or schedule ratio in performing the response we also ran in parallel a group of rats nose poking for sucrose pellets on a FR5 schedule.
Section snippets
Animals
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Italy, Udine, Italy) weighing 250–275 g were housed in group of six per cage with standard food (MIL topi e ratti, GLP diets, Stefano Morini, S. Polo D’Enza, RE, Italy) and water ad libitum, for at least one week in the central animal room, under constant temperature (23 °C), humidity (60%) and a 12 h light/dark cycle (light from 8.00 a.m. to 8.00 p.m.).
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines for care and use of experimental animals of
Training on FR1 responding for sucrose by lever pressing and nose poking
Fig. 2 shows the number of active and inactive lever presses and nose pokes performed by rats during training. With training, active lever presses and active nose pokes increased progressively up to a plateau while inactive lever presses and nose pokes remained at low levels. Four-way ANOVA of active and inactive responses, modus operandi (lever pressing and nose poking), area (shell and core), and sessions as repeated measure showed an effect of active versus inactive responding (F1,30 = 390.82;
Discussion
The main finding of the present study is that in rats trained to respond for sucrose pellets on a continuous reinforcement schedule (FR1), the pattern of changes of dialysate DA in the shell and in the core was dependent on the modus operandi. Thus, while responding by nose-poking was associated to a selective increase of DA in the shell, consistently with previous observations from our laboratory [36], [37], lever pressing was associated to an increase of DA both in the shell and in the core.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from Fondazione Banco di Sardegna (2011.1047. Prot n. U1140.2013/AI.1059.MGB) and (Regione Autonoma della Sardegna), 2007 (CRP-59764-F71J12000990002). Flavia Cucca gratefully acknowledges the financial support of her PhD scholarship (P.O.R. Sardegna F.S.E. Operational Programme of the Autonomous Region of Sardinia, European Social Fund 2007–2013 – Axis IV Human Resources, Objective l.3, Line of Activity l.3.1.).
References (57)
- et al.
A Intracranial self-stimulation in relation to the ascending dopaminergic systems of the midbrain: a moveable electrode mapping study
Brain Res.
(1980) - et al.
Amphetamine induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria
Biol. Psychiatry
(2001) Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction
Behav. Brain Res.
(2002)- et al.
Imaging dopamine's role in drug abuse and addiction
Neuropharmacology
(2009) Updating dopamine reward signals
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2013)- et al.
From motivation to action: functional interface between the limbic system and the motor system
Prog. Neurobiol.
(1980) - et al.
Neurobehavioural mechanisms of reward and motivation
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(1996) - et al.
Behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine: empirical and conceptual problems with the anhedonia hypothesis
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
(1997) - et al.
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Brain Res. Rev.
(1998) - et al.
Recombinase-driver rat lines: tools, techniques, and optogenetic application to dopamine-mediated reinforcement
Neuron
(2011)
Establishing causality for dopamine in neural function and behavior with optogenetics
Brain Res.
New perspectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: the striatopallidal, amygdaloid and corticopetal components of substantia innominata
Neuroscience
Impairment of acquisition of intravenous cocaine self-administration by RNA-interference of dopamine D1-receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell
Neuropharmacology
Monitoring dopamine transmission in the rat nucleus accumbens shell and core during acquisition of nose-poking for sucrose
Behav. Brain Res.
A microdialysis study of nucleus accumbens core and shell dopamine during operant responding in the rat
Neuroscience
Slow phasic changes in nucleus accumbens dopamine release during fixed ratio acquisition: a microdialysis study
Neuroscience
The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in responding on a continuous reinforcement operant schedule: a neurochemical and behavioral study
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
The effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions on continuously reinforced operant responding: contrasts with the effects of extinction
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Psychostimulant sensitization: differential changes in accumbal shell and core dopamine
Eur. J P. Pharmacol.
Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex
Brain Res. Rev.
Pavlovian valuation systems in learning and decision making
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine
Neuron
Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions make rats more sensitive to high ratio requirements but do not impair primary food reinforcement
Neuroscience
Accumbens dopamine and the regulation of effort in food-seeking behavior: modulation of work output by different ratio or force requirements
Behav. Brain Res.
Intracranial self-stimulation and wakefulness: effect of manipulating ambient brain catecholamines
Science
Catecholamine-containing neurones and electrical self-stimulation. 1. A review of some data
Psychol. Med.
Neuroleptic-induced “anhedonia” in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food
Science
Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis
Behav. Brain Sci.
Cited by (14)
Dopaminergic cellular and circuit contributions to kappa opioid receptor mediated aversion
2019, Neurochemistry InternationalCitation Excerpt :These sub-regions are distinguished in part by inputs, including being innervated by different dopamine neurons (Kelley, 2004; Lammel et al., 2014; Saunders et al., 2018). There is clear evidence these regions are functionally distinct (Bassareo et al., 2017, 2015; Biesdorf et al., 2015; de Jong et al., 2018; Di Chiara et al., 2004; Saddoris et al., 2015; Saunders et al., 2018) however there is no synthesizing consensus regarding the observed differences. For instance, evidence indicates the NAc shell mediates reinforcing effects of psychostimulants and the relevant associative learning, while the NAc core is involved in the motor expression of motivated and goal-directed behaviors and incentive bias (Di Chiara et al., 1999; Ito et al., 2004; Larson et al., 2011).
Dopamine Encodes Retrospective Temporal Information in a Context-Independent Manner
2017, Cell ReportsCitation Excerpt :Wait time dopamine levels decayed according to an exponential function for the first 15 s (prior to the first possible CS presentation) and by a linear function thereafter in long wait trials (Figure 1C; Figure S1). This reduction in wait time dopamine levels is consistent with the time-dependent decrease in dopamine neuron firing prior to the presentation of a CS (Bromberg-Martin et al., 2010; Pasquereau and Turner, 2015) as well as with the cumulative decrease in NAc dopamine levels observed across trials and throughout behavioral sessions (Bassareo et al., 2015; Oleson et al., 2014). Inhibiting dopamine neuron activity accelerates the subjective estimate of elapsed time (Soares et al., 2016), which suggests the decrease in wait time dopamine levels could signal the passage of time.
Behavioral sensitization of the reinforcing value of food: What food and drugs have in common
2016, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :The neural system responsible for sensitization is dopamine (Kai et al., 2015; Leyton and Vezina, 2014; Narendran and Martinez, 2008). The dopaminergic system is responsive to a broad range of reinforcing stimuli, including drugs, food, alcohol, access to a sexual partner, gambling, etc. (Bassareo et al., 2015; C.M. Cameron et al., 2014; Ostroumov et al., 2015; Pitchers et al., 2013; Zack and Poulos, 2009). Thus, it is possible for other stimuli that activate the dopaminergic system to result in sensitization.
TRH injected into the nucleus accumbens shell releases dopamine and reduces feeding motivation in rats
2016, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Nevertheless, TRH administration into the nucleus accumbens shell of rats in the experimental group (TRH-PR) induced a further increase in dopamine metabolism in the whole region. The dopamine system in the nucleus accumbens shell is involved in the incentive value of the reward, whereas that in the core participates in the learning process that leads the animal to invest energy and be active to obtain the reward [35,36]. Since we measured dopamine content in the whole nucleus accumbens of TRH-injected rats subjected to the PR, we could not determine the role that TRH plays in specific aspects of feeding when administered into the shell.