Research report
The nucleus accumbens core and shell are critical for the expression, but not the consolidation, of Pavlovian conditioned approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.024Get rights and content

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is important for the ability of motivationally significant stimuli to guide behavior. To further delineate its role in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning, we tested the hypothesis that the NAc contributes to memory consolidation and expression for a goal-tracking version of Pavlovian conditioned approach (PCA) in rats. We found that neither post-training reversible inactivation with the GABA receptor agonists muscimol and baclofen nor inhibition of protein synthesis with anisomycin (ANI) in either the core or shell regions of the NAc had an effect on approach to a reward port in response to a reward-predictive cue (conditioned stimulus, CS+). In contrast, pre-test reversible inactivation of both the core and shell decreased conditioned responding during the CS+. Unlike inactivation of the core, however, reversible inactivation of the shell also produced an increase in responding during the CS− and the inter-trial interval. This suggests that the NAc is not involved in the consolidation of goal-tracking PCA, but that once the memory is formed, the core is required for expression of the CS–unconditioned stimulus (US) association and the shell is required to inhibit conditioned approach behavior at times when the CS+ is not presented.

Introduction

Historically, the nucleus accumbens (NAc) has been considered a site of “limbic–motor integration” important for the ability of motivationally significant stimuli to guide goal-directed behavior [1], [2], [3]. The NAc and its subnuclei, the core and shell, are involved in a variety of appetitive behaviors [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. In a type of appetitive Pavlovian conditioning called Pavlovian conditioned approach (PCA), repeated pairing of a conditioned stimulus (CS) with the delivery of a reward can induce multiple conditioned responses during CS presentation, including approach to both the CS and the site of unconditioned stimulus (US) delivery [3], [11]. Conditioned approaches to the site of US delivery are known as goal-tracking [12].

Memory consolidation refers to the biological stabilization of long-term memories, and in rodents, this process is generally thought to occur during several hours immediately following memory acquisition [13], [14], [15]. Experimentally, memory consolidation can be differentiated from memory acquisition through the timing of experimental manipulations; pre-training manipulations are thought to affect memory acquisition while post-training manipulations are thought to affect memory consolidation [13], [14]. We demonstrated previously that inhibition of protein synthesis impairs consolidation of the goal-tracking form of PCA [16], but the location of this consolidation-related protein synthesis is unknown.

There is evidence that the NAc shell, but not the core, is involved in the consolidation, but not the acquisition, of goal-tracking PCA. Post-training infusions of the psychostimulant d-amphetamine in the full NAc as well as the NAc shell enhanced goal-tracking PCA, suggesting that the shell is involved in consolidation, but infusions of d-amphetamine in the core had no effect [17]. In addition, pre-training lesions of the NAc core and NAc shell had no effect on acquisition of goal-tracking PCA, and pre-training lesions that contralaterally disconnected the NAc and basolateral amygdala had no effect on the acquisition of first-order conditioning (although second-order conditioning was impaired), suggesting that the NAc is not necessary for PCA acquisition [18], [19]. However, there is evidence that the NAc is necessary for the expression of goal-tracking PCA, as pre-test lesions of the NAc core (but not the shell) have been shown to impair the expression of this behavioral task [20].

To further elucidate the role of the NAcc core and shell in goal-tracking PCA, we have examined the effect of reversible inactivation of these brain regions on the consolidation and expression of a goal-tracking PCA task. Additionally, we have used the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin (ANI) to investigate whether protein synthesis-dependent plasticity is necessary within these brain regions for the consolidation of the PCA memory.

Section snippets

Subjects

Male Long-Evans rats (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN, USA) weighing between 250 and 280 g were individually housed on ventilated racks in polycarbonate cages, and subjects were kept on a 12-h light:12-h dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.). The day before the start of behavioral training in the PCA task, rats were water restricted, such that they were allowed free access to water for 2 h/day, immediately after behavioral sessions. All rats received food ad libitum. All experimental procedures were

Reversible inactivation during the consolidation of PCA

To investigate whether the NAc is involved in the consolidation of the goal-tracking version of PCA, we used two approaches: post-training local reversible inactivation using GABA-receptor agonists and post-training local protein synthesis inhibition using ANI. Although the former approach identifies an involvement of a given region in consolidation, it could impair consolidation through two different mechanisms. First, GABA agonists could impair consolidation through GABA-receptor-mediated

Discussion

These studies revealed two main results. First, we found that the NAc is not critical for the consolidation of goal-tracking PCA, but once the memory is formed, the NAc is necessary for the normal expression of this behavior. Second, our results suggest that the NAc core is required for expression of the CS–US association while the NAc shell is also required for the ability to inhibit conditioned approach behavior at times when the reward is unavailable.

Conclusions

These studies indicate that the NAc is not involved in the consolidation of the goal-tracking version of PCA, but once the memory is formed, the NAc is necessary for the normal expression of PCA behavior. In addition, we demonstrated that the NAc core is needed for expression of the CS–US association while the NAc shell is also required for the ability to inhibit conditioned approach behavior during times when reward is unavailable. These data suggest that the NAc core and shell are involved in

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank L.L. Sahuque, R. Van Bautista, and Dr. N. Chaudhri for technical assistance and many helpful discussions. This work was supported by funds from the State of California for Medical Research on Alcohol and Substance Abuse through the University of California at San Francisco and NIDA grant #F31 DA016881 to C.A.B.

References (51)

  • I. Usuda et al.

    Efferent projections of the nucleus accumbens in the rat with special reference to subdivision of the nucleus: biotinylated dextran amine study

    Brain Res

    (1998)
  • P. Voorn et al.

    Putting a spin on the dorsal–ventral divide of the striatum

    Trends Neurosci

    (2004)
  • A.J. McDonald

    Cortical pathways to the mammalian amygdala

    Prog Neurobiol

    (1998)
  • G. Gal et al.

    Latent inhibition is disrupted by nucleus accumbens shell lesion but is abnormally persistent following entire nucleus accumbens lesion: the neural site controlling the expression and disruption of the stimulus preexposure effect

    Behav Brain Res

    (2005)
  • I. Weiner et al.

    Differential involvement of the shell and core subterritories of the nucleus accumbens in latent inhibition and amphetamine-induced activity

    Behav Brain Res

    (1996)
  • S.B. Floresco et al.

    Opposing roles for the nucleus accumbens core and shell in cue-induced reinstatement of food-seeking behavior

    Neuroscience

    (2008)
  • G.J. Mogenson

    Limbic–motor integration

  • B.J. Everitt et al.

    Associative processes in addiction and reward: the role of amygdala-ventral striatal subsystems

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1999)
  • P.J. Hernandez et al.

    Early consolidation of instrumental learning requires protein synthesis in the nucleus accumbens

    Nat Neurosci

    (2002)
  • R.N. Cardinal et al.

    Impulsive choice induced in rats by lesions of the nucleus accumbens core

    Science

    (2001)
  • J. Hall et al.

    Involvement of the central nucleus of the amygdala and nucleus accumbens core in mediating Pavlovian influences on instrumental behaviour

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2001)
  • L.H. Corbit et al.

    The role of the nucleus accumbens in instrumental conditioning: evidence of a functional dissociation between accumbens core and shell

    J Neurosci

    (2001)
  • P.C. Holland

    Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response

    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process

    (1977)
  • R.A. Boakes

    Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement

  • Y. Dudai

    The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram?

    Annu Rev Psychol

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text