Research report
A new test paradigm for social recognition evidenced by urinary scent marking behavior in C57BL/6J mice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Olfaction is a major sensory element in intraspecies recognition and communication in mice. The present study investigated scent marking behaviors of males of the highly inbred C57BL/6J (C57) strain in order to evaluate the ability of these behaviors to provide clear and consistent measures of social familiarity and response to social signals. C57 males engage in scent marking when placed in a chamber with a wire mesh partition separating them from a conspecific. Male mice (C57 or outbred CD-1 mice) showed rapid habituation of scent marking (decreased marking over trials) with repeated exposure at 24-h intervals, to a stimulus animal of the C57 or CD-1 strains, or to an empty chamber. Subsequent exposure to a genetically different novel mouse (CD-1 after CD-1 exposure, or CD-1 after C57 exposure) or to a novel context (different shaped chamber) produced recovery of marking, while responses to a novel but genetically identical mouse (C57 after C57 exposure) or to the empty chamber did not. This finding demonstrated that male mice differentiate familiar and novel conspecifics as expressed by habituation and recovery of scent marking, but neither C57 or CD-1 mice can differentiate new vs. familiar C57 males; likely due to similarities in their odor patterns. The data also indicate that scent marking can differentiate novel from familiar contexts.

Introduction

The ability to differentiate and respond to individuals has advantages in many social contexts, enabling animals to adjust their behavior in accord with this information [8], [31], [33], [42]. Among mammals, including mice, urinary scent plays a significant role in olfactory social signaling [2], [12], [34]. Urinary odors are used both to discriminate between individual conspecifics [7], [24], [32], and to communicate information such as dominance and health [27], [29], [35], [61]. Scent marking is also used by males to advertise their male quality to potential mates [26], [46], and to advertise territory ownership [18], [25], [30]. When territory owners encounter scent from other males within their territory, they increase their own rate of scent marking to countermark the alien scent [27], [45], but show no such response to their own scent marks or to these from males genetically identical to themselves [28], [41], [42].

The tendency for rodents to investigate conspecifics has long been used as a paradigm to evaluate social attraction and social memory [17], [56], [57]. This social investigation paradigm has been used for a variety of mouse models associated with neurocognitive disorders including autism [44], [58], Fragile X syndrome [38], [55] and Rett syndrome [50], as well as studies of the effects of neuropeptides including oxytocin [21], [22] and vasopressin [49]. A habituation–dishabituation paradigm for social investigation to conspecifics can provide a measure of social memory [56], [57]. In this task, an adult male is allowed to investigate a juvenile or ovariectomized female that is introduced to its cage. When the stimulus animal is removed and later re-introduced, subjects display reduced investigation compared to the first encounter [6]. A three-chamber test modeled on place preference paradigms has been shown to provide quantitative, replicable, data on investigation of social and nonsocial stimuli, demonstrating preference for social stimuli, and habituation to individual social stimuli over repeated exposures [9], [10], [39], [40].

The present experiments aim to assess a complementary approach to analysis of social behaviors and memory, through scent marking. Conspecific communication in mice involves both the emission of olfactory social signals (scent marking) and response to such social signals through additional scent marking, often overmarking the initial scent [2], [12], [25], [34]. The present experiments of scent marking utilized C57BL/6J (C57) mice, an inbred strain often used as a background for transgenic mice [15], [16], [51], in order to facilitate the potential use of this technique for genetic studies of animal models of neurocognitive disorders. Experiments 1, 2 and 3 investigated scent marking response of adult male mice to inbred (C57) or outbred (CD-1) mice, and the habituation of this response over repeated exposures. Experiment 4 examined a potential confound in these studies; scent marking and habituation of marking to an initially novel context, and recovery of marking to a novel context. Experiment 5 attempted to separate habituation to a context from habituation to a stimulus mouse, utilizing a paradigm that evaluated these changes independently.

Section snippets

Subjects and rearing condition

All protocols and animal handling and treatment were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Hawaii. Male C57BL/6J mice bred from stock obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), were used as the subjects. They were weaned at 4 weeks of age and then housed in same-sex groups (N = 3–4), in polypropylene cages, 26.5 cm × 17 cm × 11.5 cm (H), under 12L:12D cycle (lights on 06:00) in a temperature-(22 ± 2 °C) and humidity-(60%) controlled room at the

Experiment 1 C57 males exposed to CD-1 males

Fig. 1a depicts the mean number of squares with scent marks for C57 males toward an initially unfamiliar CD-1 male for first 4 trials and then toward a novel CD-1 male on trial 5. ANOVA found a significant main effect of trials, F(4,52) = 11.859, p < 0.001. C57 males deposited substantial marking on the first trial which decreased during 4 exposures to the same CD-1 male, as shown by reduced marking on both trials 3 and 4 compared to trial 1 (Bonferroni test, p < 0.05). Following these 4 habituation

Discussion

Major urinary proteins (MUPs), one source of odor complexity in rodents, are a class of non-volatile polymorphic proteins [31], [32], [33], which produce genetically individual scents [33], [41], [42]. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) encodes highly polymorphic glycoproteins [62], [63]. This is another source of variation in the urinary scents produced by a range of animals including mice [43], [63], rats [13], [53] and humans [59]. They act through a complex mixture of volatile and

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by SNRP grant 5U54NS039406 to R.J.B. and JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research No. 16.1415 to H.A.

References (64)

  • G. Gheusi et al.

    Individually distinctive odours represent individual conspecifics in rats

    Anim Behav

    (1997)
  • L.M. Gosling et al.

    The response of subordinate male mice to scent marks varies in relation to their own competitive ability

    Anim Behav

    (1996)
  • R.E. Humphries et al.

    Unravelling the chemical basis of competitive scent marking in house mice

    Anim Behav

    (1999)
  • J.L. Hurst

    Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty 1: communication between males

    Anim Behav

    (1990)
  • J.L. Hurst

    The priming effects of urine substrate marks on interactions between male house mice, Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz and Schwarz

    Anim Behav

    (1993)
  • M. Kavaliers et al.

    Recognition and avoidance of the odors of parasitized conspecifics and predators: differential genomic correlates

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2005)
  • J.A. Maruniak et al.

    Urinary marking in male house mice: responses to novel environmental and social stimuli

    Physiol Behav

    (1974)
  • Y.S. Mineur et al.

    Social behavior deficits in the Fmr1 mutant mouse

    Behav Brain Res

    (2006)
  • S.S. Moy et al.

    Mouse behavioral tasks relevant to autism: phenotypes of 10 inbred strains

    Behav Brain Res

    (2007)
  • D. Penn et al.

    Untrained mice discriminate MHC-determined odors

    Physiol Behav

    (1998)
  • S. Qiu et al.

    Cognitive disruption and altered hippocampus synaptic function in Reelin haploinsufficient mice

    Neurobiol Learn Mem

    (2006)
  • T.J. Rich et al.

    The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates

    Anim Behav

    (1999)
  • G.M.V. Sankoorikal et al.

    A mouse model system for genetic analysis of sociability: C57BL/6J versus BALB/cJ inbred mouse strains

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • R. Sekiguchi et al.

    Analysis of the influence of vasopressin neuropeptides on social recognition of rats

    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol

    (1991)
  • M.D. Shahbazian et al.

    Mice with truncated MeCP2 recapitulate many Rett syndrome features and display hyperacetylation of histone H3

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • P. Tueting et al.

    Reelin down-regulation in mice and psychosis endophenotypes

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2006)
  • Blanchard DC, Arakawa H, Crawley JN, Blanchard RJ. Social behaviors in wild and laboratory mice with a special emphasis...
  • R.J. Blanchard et al.

    Attack and defensive behaviors in the albino mouse (Mus musculus)

    Agg Behav

    (1979)
  • J.M. Bowers et al.

    Mice: individual recognition by olfactory cues

    Science

    (1967)
  • P.A. Brennan et al.

    Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition

    Phil Trans R Soc B

    (2006)
  • R.E. Brown et al.
    (1985)
  • J.N. Crawley et al.

    Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies

    Psychopharmacology

    (1997)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Animal models of autism

      2022, The Neuroscience of Autism
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text