ArticleExtracellular dopamine levels are lower in the medial prefrontal cortex of alcohol-preferring rats compared to Wistar rats
Introduction
The medial prefrontal cortex (MPF) integrates a variety of sensory, limbic, and autonomic information from many brain areas (Groenewegen & Uylings, 2000) and is thought to subserve executive functions that are important for the optimal performance of certain goal-directed tasks (Koechlin et al., 2003, Robbins, 2000). The MPF receives dopamine (DA) projections as part of the mesocorticolimbic DA system and may play a role in mediating ethanol-drinking behavior. Recent studies have provided evidence of parallel systems in the dorsal and ventral MPF that are involved in mediating drug seeking and self-administration, respectively (McFarland et al., 2004).
Systemic administration of 2.0 g/kg ethanol reliably increases extracellular DA levels in the nucleus accumbens (NAC) (Yoshimoto et al., 1991) and ventral pallidum (Melendez et al., 2003) of Wistar rats. However, systemic administration of 0.5 g/kg ethanol significantly increased extracellular levels of DA in the NAC, but had no effect in the MPF (Bassareo et al., 1996). Similarly, Hegarty and Vogel (1993) observed that neither a 0.5 nor a 2.0 g/kg i.p. injection of ethanol had a significant effect on extracellular DA levels in the MPF. Together, these studies suggest that systemic administration of ethanol may not alter DA levels in the MPF and suggest that DA neurotransmission in this brain area may not be associated with the effects of ethanol. However, studies of DA mediation of ethanol self-administration indicate that DA D2/D3 receptors in the MPF are involved in ethanol self-administration behavior, as microinjections of the D2 antagonist Raclopride (0.05 and 1.0 μg/μl; bilateral) reduced the response rate and total responses for ethanol but had no effect on sucrose responding up to 20 μg/μl (Hodge et al., 1996). Moreover, recent work suggests that DA in the MPF is involved in mediating the onset and offset of ethanol drinking, whereas the NAC is more involved in the maintenance of ethanol self-administration (Samson & Chappell, 2003).
Some alcohol-preferring (P) lines of rats tend to have decreased tissue levels of DA in mesolimbic and cortical brain regions (Gongwer et al., 1989, Murphy et al., 1987). Moreover, immunohistological studies found a reduction in DA neuronal projections to mesolimbic areas, including the shell of the NAC and the cingulate cortex, in P rats as compared to alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) rats (Zhou et al., 1995). One study using quantitative microdialysis found that 5 days of ethanol administration (1.0 g/kg, i.p.) increased extracellular levels of DA in the NAC in both P and Wistar rats. However, no differences in basal DA levels were found between P, NP, and Wistar rats, suggesting that in this brain area, differences in DA content did not translate to differences in extracellular DA levels. Reduced DA neurotransmission in the MPF may result in an imbalance in the complex circuitry of the MPF, which integrates and processes autonomic, limbic, and sensory information important for the execution of goal-directed behavior (Groenewegen and Uylings, 2000, Robbins, 2000) and may contribute to the behavioral phenotypic profile of P rats, including alcohol preference (Murphy et al., 2002). Although several studies suggest that P rats may have a deficiency in the neurotransmitter DA in mesolimbic brain areas, no studies have directly examined extracellular levels in the MPF using a quantitative microdialysis approach, nor has the effect of systemic ethanol administration on extracellular MPF levels been assessed in P rats.
The differences in the alcohol-drinking phenotype of the P rat are thought to represent changes in the functional neurobiological makeup when compared with the outbred Wistar rat, which is the foundation stock for the P line of rats. Given the evidence implicating the MPF in executive function, goal-directed behavior, and the MPF DA system in ethanol self-administration behavior, coupled with low tissue levels of DA in the MPF, the hypothesis for this study was that DA neurotransmission would be reduced in the P rat as compared to the Wistar rat but would be more responsive to systemic alcohol administration. To test this hypothesis, quantitative no-net-flux (NNF) microdialysis was used to compare basal extracellular DA concentrations and conventional microdialysis was used to examine the effect of systemic administration of ethanol on the extracellular DA levels in the MPF of male Wistar and P rats.
Section snippets
Subjects
Alcohol-naive, adult male P rats from generations 49–51 and adult male Wistar rats weighing 250–350 g at the start of the experiment were used. Outbred Wistar rats (the foundation strain for the selected P rat line) were used as a comparator line because the selected NP rats have a clotting deficiency that results in excessive attrition when used in microdialysis experiments. In addition, Wistar rats have also been compared with P rats (Smith & Weiss, 1999) and other selected P rat lines (De
Probe placements
The microdialysis probe placements (Fig. 1) ranged from AP +3.7 to AP +2.2 and were located mainly in the cingulate, prelimbic, and/or infralimbic cortex of the MPF as illustrated in Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Paxinos & Watson, 1986). Only animals with at least 80% of the probe within the MPF were used in the study.
Experiment 1—quantitative microdialysis in the MPF
Extracellular DA levels determined from the x-intercept of the linear regression lines (Fig. 2A) generated from the quantitative (NNF) microdialysis of DA in the MPF were
Discussion
Quantitative NNF microdialysis conducted in experiment 1 indicated that the extracellular DA levels in the MPF of P rats are less than one half the levels found in Wistar rats. The DA extraction fraction, an indirect measure of DA uptake (Parsons & Justice, 1992), was not different in the MPF of P and Wistar rats, suggesting that the differences in extracellular DA levels observed were not the result of differences in DA clearance between the lines. A previous quantitative microdialysis study
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by NIAAA grants AA10717 and AA07611.
References (39)
- et al.
Serotonin-3 receptor and ethanol-stimulated dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(1995) - et al.
Reduced TH-immunoreactive fibers in the limbic system of Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats
Brain Res
(2002) - et al.
Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats show low 5-HT extraneuronal levels in the mPFC and no habituation in monoaminergic response to repeated ethanol consumption in the NacS
Brain Res
(2004) - et al.
Effect of housing conditions on sulpiride-induced increases in extracellular dopamine (DA) levels in the nucleus accumbens of alcohol-preferring (P) rats
Brain Res
(2004) - et al.
Regional brain contents of serotonin, dopamine and their metabolites in the selectively bred high- and low-alcohol drinking lines of rats
Alcohol
(1989) - et al.
The prefrontal cortex and the integration of sensory, limbic and autonomic information
Prog Brain Res
(2000) - et al.
Modulation of the stress response by ethanol in the rat frontal cortex
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(1993) - et al.
Sardinian alcohol-preferring and non-preferring rats show different reactivity to aversive stimuli and a similar response to a natural reward
Brain Res
(2003) - et al.
Influence of fluoxetine on the ability of buproprion to modulate extracellular dopamine and norepinephrine concentrations in three mesocorticolimbic areas of rats
Neuropharmacology
(2002) - et al.
Regional brain levels of monoamines in alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(1982)
Contents of monoamines in forebrain regions of alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
Effect of fluoxetine on serotonin and dopamine concentration in microdialysis fluid from rat striatum
Life Sci
Effect of sympathomimetic amines on the synaptosomal transport of noradrenaline, dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine
Eur J Pharmacol
From arousal to cognition: the integrative position of the prefrontal cortex
Prog Brain Res
Dopaminergic involvement in medial prefrontal cortex and core of the nucleus accumbens in the regulation of ethanol self-administration: a dual-site microinjection study in the rat
Physiol Behav
Regional concentrations of noradrenaline and dopamine in the frontal cortex of the rat: dopaminergic innervation of the prefrontal subareas and lateralization of prefrontal dopamine
Brain Res
Mesolimbic dopamine system in alcohol-preferring rats
Alcohol
Phencyclidine-induced dysregulation of dopamine response to amphetamine in prefrontal cortex and striatum
Neurochem Res
Non-psychostimulant drugs of abuse and anxiogenic drugs activate with differential selectivity dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat
Psychopharmacology (Berl)
Cited by (41)
Mesolimbic Neural Response Dynamics Predict Future Individual Alcohol Drinking in Mice
2024, Biological PsychiatryThe influence of dopamine autoreceptors on temperament and addiction risk
2023, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCNO Administration Increases Dopamine and Glutamate in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex of Wistar Rats: Further Concerns for the Validity of the CNO-activated DREADD Procedure
2022, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Rats were injected with 0, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg CNO (ip) after the baseline collection period (collection of samples were timed to incorporate sample flow through the collection assemble). Dopamine content was determined as described previously with a reversed-phase HPLC system and electrochemical detection (Ding et al., 2009; Engleman et al., 2000, 2006). Dialysate samples were loaded into a 10 µL loop and injected onto an analytical column (Hypersil BDS C18, 150 mm 9 2.1 mm, 3 µm, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The reinforcing effects of ethanol within the prelimbic cortex and ethanol drinking: Involvement of local dopamine D<inf>2</inf> receptor-mediated neurotransmission
2020, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :After a two-hour equilibration period, three baseline samples were collected every 20 min in microfuge tubes containing 5 μl of 0.1 N perchloric acid. Then, probes were perfused with one of three DA concentrations (5, 10, 20 nM in aCSF), as described previously (Engleman et al., 2006). After 20 min of perfusion with the new concentration of DA, four 20 min samples were collected at each concentration of DA.