Chapter 9 - The mammillary bodies and memory: more than a hippocampal relay

https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.03.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Although the mammillary bodies were one of the first neural structures to be implicated in memory, it has long been assumed that their main function was to act primarily as a hippocampal relay, passing information on to the anterior thalamic nuclei and from there to the cingulate cortex. This view not only afforded the mammillary bodies no independent role in memory, it also neglected the potential significance of other, nonhippocampal, inputs to the mammillary bodies. Recent advances have transformed the picture, revealing that projections from the tegmental nuclei of Gudden, and not the hippocampal formation, are critical for sustaining mammillary body function. By uncovering a role for the mammillary bodies that is independent of its subicular inputs, this work signals the need to consider a wider network of structures that form the neural bases of episodic memory.

Introduction

The hippocampal-mammillary body projections hold a noteworthy position in history; they were the arguably the first hippocampal projections to undergo experimental analysis and, until the mid-twentieth century, were the principal focus of attention in terms of hippocampal outputs (Gudden, 1881, MacLean, 1990). Both the medial temporal lobe and medial diencephalon, comprising the hippocampus and mammillary bodies, respectively, have been implicated in event memory for over a hundred years, but there remains much uncertainty about how these brain regions interact to support this function. Since Papez proposed his model of emotion in 1937, most accounts of mammillary body function have emphasized the importance of hippocampal inputs to this region, effectively relegating the mammillary bodies to the status of a relay within an “extended hippocampal system” (Aggleton and Brown, 1999, Papez, 1937). However, recent advances in our understanding challenge the prevalent hippocampal-centric view of mammillary body function. In contrast to traditional models, it appears that independent ascending projections from the mammillary bodies are key for some aspects of hippocampal function.

Section snippets

The Papez Circuit: Anatomy

In his proposed mechanism of emotion, Papez described a circuit that originated in the cortex, then “built up in the hippocampal formation and…transferred to the mammillary body and thence through the anterior thalamic nuclei to the cortex of the gyrus cinguli” (Papez, 1937, p. 728). In terms of hippocampal outputs, the projections to the mammillary bodies were seen as key. The mammillary bodies are remarkable for a number of reasons. They are clearly discernable as two spherical structures on

The Papez Circuit: Function

While we now know that structures within the Papez circuit are important for memory, it was not until the mid-twentieth century that this view became widely accepted. Up to this point, the hippocampus had been linked to a number of different functions including sensation, olfaction, and attention. Papez originally made the link with emotion as a result of his work on the rabies virus. The rabies virus principally affects the hippocampus, and Papez, therefore, attributed the emotive changes seen

Medial Diencephalic-Temporal Lobe Interactions

Traditional models emphasize the hippocampal inputs to the mammillary bodies within an extended memory system emanating from the hippocampus. If the mammillary bodies are more than a hippocampal relay and make a contribution to memory that is dependent on their inputs from the limbic midbrain rather than the hippocampus (Dillingham et al., 2014, Vann, 2013, Vann et al., 2011), then these models require revision. Evidence from cross-lesions studies would suggest that the hippocampus and anterior

Conclusions

Ever since Papez proposed his influential circuit, the mammillary bodies have been viewed principally in terms of their hippocampal inputs. However, for both the medial and lateral mammillary bodies, their ascending inputs from the tegmental nuclei appear to be, functionally, more important than those from the hippocampal formation (e.g., Dillingham et al., 2014, Goodridge and Taube, 1997, Stackman and Taube, 1997, Taube et al., 1996, Tonkiss and Rawlins, 1992, Vann, 2013). These findings are

Acknowledgments

S.D.V. is funded by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship in Basic Biomedical Science (Grant number WT090954AIA). Thanks to Lorraine Woods for help with illustrations and John Aggleton for helpful discussion.

References (154)

  • G. Dixon et al.

    Characterization of gabaergic neurons within the human medial mamillary nucleus

    Neuroscience

    (2004)
  • V.B. Domesick

    The fasciculus cinguli in the rat

    Brain Res.

    (1970)
  • J.R. Dumont et al.

    Anterior thalamic nuclei lesions in rats disrupt markers of neural plasticity in distal limbic brain regions

    Neuroscience

    (2012)
  • D.M. Freed et al.

    Forgetting in H.M.: a second look

    Neuropsychologia

    (1987)
  • N.M. Hunkin et al.

    Recency judgements in Wernicke-Korsakoff and post-encephalitic amnesia: influences of proactive interference and retention interval

    Cortex

    (1993)
  • N.M. Hunkin et al.

    Aetiological variation in the amnesic syndrome: comparisons using the list discrimination task

    Neuropsychologia

    (1994)
  • F.A. Huppert et al.

    Recognition memory in amnesic patients: a defect of acquisition?

    Neuropsychologia

    (1977)
  • D.K. Jones et al.

    Distinct subdivisions of the cingulum bundle revealed by diffusion MRI fibre tracking: implications for neuropsychological investigations

    Neuropsychologia

    (2013)
  • M.D. Kopelman et al.

    Temporal and spatial context memory in patients with focal frontal, temporal lobe, and diencephalic lesions

    Neuropsychologia

    (1997)
  • M. Loftus et al.

    An analysis of atrophy in the medial mammillary nucleus following hippocampal and fornix lesions in humans and nonhuman primates

    Exp. Neurol.

    (2000)
  • M. Mendez-Lopez et al.

    Reduced cytochrome oxidase activity in the retrosplenial cortex after lesions to the anterior thalamic nuclei

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2013)
  • J. Ozyurt et al.

    Remote effects of hypothalamic lesions in the prefrontal cortex of craniopharygioma patients

    Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.

    (2014)
  • A. Parker et al.

    The effect of anterior thalamic and cingulate cortex lesions on object-in-place memory in monkeys

    Neuropsychologia

    (1997)
  • A.J. Parkin

    Amnesic syndrome: a lesion-specific disorder?

    Cortex

    (1984)
  • A.J. Parkin et al.

    Impaired temporal context memory on anterograde but not retrograde tests in the absence of frontal pathology

    Cortex

    (1993)
  • L.J. Reed et al.

    FDG-PET findings in the Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome

    Cortex

    (2003)
  • J.P. Aggleton

    EPS Mid-Career Award 2006. Understanding anterograde amnesia: disconnections and hidden lesions

    Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove)

    (2008)
  • J.P. Aggleton et al.

    Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (1999)
  • J.P. Aggleton et al.

    A comparison of the effects of medial prefrontal, cingulate cortex, and cingulum bundle lesions on tests of spatial memory: evidence of a double dissociation between frontal and cingulum bundle contributions

    J. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • J.P. Aggleton et al.

    Differential cognitive effects of colloid cysts in the third ventricle that spare or compromise the fornix

    Brain

    (2000)
  • J.P. Aggleton et al.

    Projections from the hippocampal region to the mammillary bodies in macaque monkeys

    Eur. J. Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • G.V. Allen et al.

    Mamillary body in the rat: topography and synaptology of projections from the subicular complex, prefrontal cortex, and midbrain tegmentum

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1989)
  • J. Barbizet

    Defect of memorizing of hippocampal-mammillary origin: a review

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (1963)
  • J. Barbizet

    Human Memory and Its Pathology

    (1970)
  • J.P. Bassett et al.

    Neural correlates for angular head velocity in the rat dorsal tegmental nucleus

    J. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • J.P. Bassett et al.

    Lesions of the tegmentomammillary circuit in the head direction system disrupt the head direction signal in the anterior thalamus

    J. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • W. Bechterew

    Demonstration eines Gehirns mit Zerstörung der vorderen und inneren Teile der Hirnrinde beider Schläfenlappen

    Neurol. Zentralbl.

    (1900)
  • L. Benedek et al.

    Uber das anomische substrat des Korsakowschen Syndromes

    Schweizerisches Arch. Psychiatr. Nervenkr.

    (1941)
  • H.G. Bernstein et al.

    Strongly reduced number of parvalbumin-immunoreactive projection neurons in the mammillary bodies in schizophrenia: further evidence for limbic neuropathology

    Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2007)
  • H.T. Blair et al.

    The anterior thalamic head-direction signal is abolished by bilateral but not unilateral lesions of the lateral mammillary nucleus

    J. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • S. Brown et al.

    An investigation into the functions of the occipital and temporal lobes of the monkey's brain

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B

    (1888)
  • N. Butters et al.

    Alcoholic Korsakoff's Syndrome: An Information-Processing Approach to Amnesia

    (1980)
  • G. Byatt et al.

    Both anteromedial and anteroventral thalamic lesions impair radial-maze learning in rats

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • W.B. Cannon

    Again the James-Lange and the thalamic theories of emotion

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1931)
  • M. Caulo et al.

    Functional MRI study of diencephalic amnesia in Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome

    Brain

    (2005)
  • W.E.L.G. Clark

    The Hypothalamus: Morphological, Functional, Clinical and Surgical Aspects

    (1938)
  • S. Clarke et al.

    Pure amnesia after unilateral left polar thalamic infarct: topographic and sequential neuropsychological and metabolic (PET) correlations

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • J. Delay et al.

    Le Syndrome de Korsakoff

    (1969)
  • C.M. Dillingham et al.

    How do mammillary body inputs contribute to anterior thalamic function?

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2014)
  • C.M. Dillingham et al.

    Fornical and non-fornical projections from the rat hippocampal formation to the anterior thalamic nuclei

    Hippocampus

    (2015)
  • Cited by (89)

    • Construction of complex memories via parallel distributed cortical–subcortical iterative integration

      2022, Trends in Neurosciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      A key to goal-oriented engram processing lies in the motivation-biased base of the brain. The hypothalamus is a surprisingly important node in mnemonic loops [22]. At only 2% of brain volume in rodents (0.3% volume in humans) [23,24], it is nonetheless key to a vast range of functions.

    • Comparative Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Detecting Cerebral Microstructural Changes in Alzheimer Disease

      2022, Academic Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mammillary body and their projections to the anterior thalamus via the mammillothalamic tract are important for recollection memory. It plays an important role in spatial and episodic memory (22). Similarly, fornix is an important structure in limbic system forming the hippocampal-diencephalic-cingulate network.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text