Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior
Introduction
Since its introduction, TMS of the human brain has been a useful tool to assess motor cortex excitability non-invasively (Barker et al., 1985). A single magnetic stimulus applied over the cerebral hemisphere evokes responses in contralateral limb muscles and in muscles supplied by cranial nerves. Pairs of stimuli can be used to investigate the excitability of interneuronal circuits in the primary motor cortex (M1) (Kujirai et al., 1993, Ziemann et al., 1996b) Depending on the frequency, duration and stimulus intensity, trains of stimuli have differential effects on motor cortex excitability (Pascual-Leone et al., 1994b). For instance, a short train of 5 Hz stimuli given at suprathreshold intensity evokes progressively larger MEPs with each shock, while stimulation at 10 Hz produces an alternating pattern of facilitated and depressed MEPs (Jennum et al., 1995).
In recent years, repetitive TMS (rTMS) of M1 has been shown to exert effects lasting beyond the time of the stimulus application, making it attractive for use in disorders with abnormal cortical excitability (Wassermann et al., 1996). For instance, lasting effects of high-frequency rTMS (more than 1Hz) on clinical symptoms have been discussed in Parkinson's disease (Pascual-Leone et al., 1994a, Ghabra et al., 1999, Siebner et al., 1999a), and in depressed patients (George et al., 1995, Pascual-Leone et al., 1996). On the other hand, low-frequency rTMS (at or below 1 Hz) can transiently improve symptoms in patients with task-specific focal dystonia (Siebner et al., 1999b). The potential for 1 Hz-rTMS to treat focal epilepsy and cortical myoclonus is currently being studied.
Although these reports demonstrate that rTMS can induce changes in the human motor system that outlast the stimulation period, little is known if the resulting suppression influences basic motor behavior. To address this issue, we studied the effects of low-frequency rTMS over M1 on peak force and peak acceleration. These basic movement parameters were studied because M1 is most closely related to these simple kinetic and kinematic aspects of movement (Georgopoulos et al., 1992, Ashe, 1997), and because previous work indicated some relationship between changes in basic motor behavior and M1 excitability in humans (Muellbacher et al., 1999).
Section snippets
Subjects
Seven healthy right-handed subjects (3 men, 4 women) with a mean age of 40 years (range, 22–57 years) participated in the experiments. The study protocol was approved by the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Review Board. All subjects underwent full clinical examination before the experiments and gave their written informed consent to participate in the study.
Experimental procedure
The subjects were seated comfortably in a reclined chair with both hands resting semipronated on a pillow. After
Results
No subject experienced any noticeable adverse effects of the rTMS procedure other than mild local discomfort on the site of the stimulus application. The effect of rTMS on resting motor threshold was statistically significant (ANOVA; P<0.002). Post-hoc analysis showed significantly higher thresholds for the FPB, FDI and ADM (P<0.001; Fig. 1), but not for the Bic muscle (P>0.05). The average increase at post 1 was 8.2% of the resting motor threshold (range, 1.9–15.3%; SD, 4.79) for the FPB; 6.9%
Discussion
Our results support the findings from two previous studies which demonstrated suppression of motor excitability after low-frequency rTMS that last beyond the time of the stimulus duration (Wassermann et al., 1996, Chen et al., 1997). We have extended these findings by showing: (i) that rTMS over hand M1 transiently suppresses motor excitability of hand motor representations but not the Bic representation, suggesting a relative focussed and limited effect of rTMS; (ii) an effect of rTMS on both
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank D.G. Schoenberg, M.S., for skillful editing. Dr. W. Muellbacher was supported by the Max-Kade-Foundation.
References (30)
Force and the motor cortex
Behav Brain Res
(1997)- et al.
Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex
Lancet
(1985) - et al.
Repetitive magnetic stimulation and motor evoked potentials
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1995) - et al.
The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brain
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1996) - et al.
Rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in drug-resistant depression
Lancet
(1996) Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. June 5–7, 1996
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1998)- et al.
Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1992) - et al.
Use and safety of a new repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1996) - et al.
Synaptic depression and cortical gain control
Science
(1997) - et al.
Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
Neurology
(1997)