Hippocampus and context in classical conditioning

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80027-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that contextual learning encompasses a variety of changes in learning and performance processes. Only some of these changes depend on the hippocampus. Specialized functions proposed for the hippocampus in contextual learning include the construction and consolidation of contextual memory representations, incidental contextual learning, and inhibitory contextual learning.

Introduction

In a typical classical fear-conditioning experiment, a rat is placed in a conditioning chamber and given one or more tone–shock pairings. As a result, the tone comes to evoke behavioral manifestations of fear, such as freezing. This acquisition of a conditioned response (CR) is used to infer the formation of associations between the tone (conditioned stimulus [CS]) and the shock (unconditioned stimulus [US]). At the same time, there is considerable learning about the context in which those CS–US pairings occurred (e.g. the conditioning chamber.) Many researchers have suggested that this contextual learning may differ from conditioning to explicit CSs in important ways. Most important for the purposes of this review, early evidence suggests that contextual learning may depend on hippocampal activity in a way that conditioning of explicit CSs is not. For example, many investigators 1, 2 have found that hippocampal lesions made after tone–shock conditioning interfere with the display of fear to the context but not to the tone. Indeed, contextual learning has been increasingly used as a convenient assay of hippocampus-dependent behavioral function, and has been used to explore the effects of aging, drugs and genetic variations on hippocampal processing 3•, 4, 5•, 6.

The recent literature, however, suggests a more cautious view. We favor the emerging view that contextual learning encompasses a variety of changes in learning and performance, some of which involve hippocampal processing and others of which do not. The purpose of this review is to integrate recent investigations of hippocampal function in contextual learning with the empirical and theoretical perspectives of behavioral research. First, we describe the common view that hippocampal processing is especially important for the formation of contextual memory representations. Then, we describe various other roles suggested for contextual cues within traditional learning theory and consider the evidence for hippocampal involvement in those roles. These distinctions may be independent of the nature of contextual stimuli themselves, and may thus provide additional insight into hippocampal function in contextual learning. Finally, after briefly presenting some persistent theoretical and methodological issues, we suggest some directions for future research.

Section snippets

Contextual memory representations

Contexts are ill-defined stimuli, comprising many individual features from multiple modalities, each of which might be perceived from several vantage points. Many researchers believe that contextual learning requires the integration of these multiple cues into a unified, configural representation of the context 7, 8, 9. Hippocampal processing may be necessary for the formation of these configural representations, much as it was thought to underlie the formation of spatial memory representations

The role of context in behavior theory

Learning theorists have described several ways in which contextual cues may influence learned behavior: they may become directly associated with the US; they may enter into a more hierarchical relation with explicit cues (e.g. as occasion-setters or retrieval cues); and they may be integrated with explicit stimuli to form context-specific stimulus configurations. Notably, hippocampal processing has been implicated in occasion setting and configural learning 21••, 22, as well as in various

Learning, performance or consolidation?

The behavioral consequences of post-training hippocampal lesions are typically attributed to effects on performance or expression of learning, whereas those of pre-training lesions are attributed to either learning or performance effects. The story may be more complex. First, several studies suggest that the deleterious effects of post-training lesions on conditioned responding to the context are temporally graded (see 1, 15••). Lesions made months after training have little effect on

Conclusions and future directions

Contextual learning is likely to involve a variety of learning and memory processes, some of which depend on the hippocampus and some of which do not. The idea that the hippocampus is critical to the abstraction and consolidation of a configural representation of the context has proved useful for accounting for broad-ranging deficits after hippocampal damage. However, this idea needs to be developed more fully. Despite its success, there have been few systematic attempts to describe the nature

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this article was funded in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (IBN 9727992 to ME Bouton) and the National Institutes of Mental Health (MH53667 to PC Holland).

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (75)

  • R.R. Miller et al.

    The comparator hypothesis: a response rule for the expression of associations

  • M. Gallo et al.

    Reversible inactivation of dorsal hippocampus by tetrodotoxin impairs blocking of taste aversion selectively during the acquisition but not the retrieval in rats

    Neurosci Lett

    (1995)
  • N.A. Marlin

    Within-compound association between the context and the conditioned stimulus

    Learn Motiv

    (1982)
  • P.C. Holland

    Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning

  • T.W. Berger et al.

    Hippocampectomy selectively disrupts discrimination reversal conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response

    Behav Brain Res

    (1983)
  • S. Maren et al.

    The startled seahorse: is the hippocampus necessary for contextual fear conditioning?

    Trends Cogn Sci

    (1998)
  • C.R. Pugh et al.

    Type II glucocorticoid receptor antagonists impair contextual but not auditory-cue conditioning in juvenile rats

    Neurobiol Learn Mem

    (1997)
  • J.J. Kim et al.

    Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear

    Science

    (1992)
  • R.G. Phillips et al.

    Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning

    Behav Neurosci

    (1992)
  • J.A. Oler et al.

    Age-related deficits on the radial maze and in fear conditioning: hippocampal processing and consolidation

    Hippocampus

    (1998)
  • P.W. Frankland et al.

    The dorsal hippocampus is essential for context discrimination but not for contextual conditioning

    Behav Neurosci

    (1998)
  • E.H. Owen et al.

    Identification of quantitative trait loci involved in contextual and auditory-cued fear conditioning in BXD recombinant inbred strains

    Behav Neurosci

    (1997)
  • L. Nadel et al.

    Context and conditioning: a place for space

    Physiol Psychol

    (1980)
  • M.S. Fanselow

    Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning

    Anim Learn Behav

    (1990)
  • S.L. Young et al.

    NMDA processes mediate anterograde amnesia of contextual fear conditioning induced by hippocampal damage: immunization against amnesia by context preexposure

    Behav Neurosci

    (1994)
  • M. Good et al.

    Dissociable effects of selective lesions to hippocampal subsystems on exploratory behavior, contextual learning, and spatial learning

    Behav Neurosci

    (1997)
  • R.G. Phillips et al.

    Lesions of the fornix but not the entorhinal or perirhinal cortex interfere with contextual fear conditioning

    J Neurosci

    (1995)
  • C. Herzog et al.

    Odor-guided fear conditioning in rats: 2. Lesions of the anterior perirhinal cortex disrupt fear conditioned to the explicit conditioned stimulus but not to the training context

    Behav Neurosci

    (1997)
  • R.G.M. Morris et al.

    Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions

    Nature

    (1982)
  • M. Good et al.

    Contingent versus incidental context processing during conditioning: dissociation after excitotoxic hippocampal plus dentate gyrus lesions

    Hippocampus

    (1997)
  • N.A. Schmajuk et al.

    Stimulus configuration, occasion setting, and the hippocampus

    Behav Neurosci

    (1997)
  • J.W. Rudy et al.

    Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: an appraisal and reconfiguration

    Hippocampus

    (1995)
  • N.A. Schmajuk et al.

    A neural network approach to hippocampal function in classical conditioning

    Behav Neurosci

    (1991)
  • P.C. Holland

    Brain mechanisms for changes in processing of conditioned stimuli in Pavlovian conditioning: implications for behavior theory

    Anim Learn Behav

    (1997)
  • R.A. Rescorla et al.

    A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement

  • M.E. Bouton et al.

    Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: tests for the associative value of the context

    J Exp Psychol [Anim]

    (1983)
  • L. Aguado et al.

    Illness-induced context aversion learning in rats with lesions of the dorsal hippocampus

    Behav Neurosci

    (1998)
  • Cited by (316)

    • The neural substrates of higher-order conditioning: A review

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text