The hierarchical organization of decision making in the primate prefrontal cortex
Introduction
Decision making can be regarded as a process in which an animal tries to maximize benefit by selecting a response that will lead to a positive result in given circumstances. Animals with higher cognitive abilities are able to change their response to the same physical stimulus depending on the context, and so are able to adapt to new stimulus/reward associations. Such higher cognitive function, or complex decision-making process seems to be closely related to the working of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Neuropsychological studies have implicated PFC in decision making, particularly in polysemous stimulus circumstances. For example, prefrontal patients are unable to shift their attention to the appropriate visual dimension in the Wisconsin card sorting test (Milner, 1964) and are unable to choose the strategy that maximizes their score in a gambling game (Bechara et al., 1997). Their deficits are primarily in response selection and strategy because prefrontal patients can perceive their surroundings normally and do not have difficulty in motor execution (Bechara et al., 1997, Fuster, 1997).
To understand the underlying neural mechanisms, single unit studies have been conducted with non-human primates using various discrimination tasks (Niki, 1974, Watanabe, 1986, Yamatani et al., 1990, Sakagami and Niki, 1994a, Bichot et al., 1996, Miller et al., 1996, Fuster, 1997). These studies have suggested that cells in primate PFC code the representation of the response which should be made to the cue stimulus to obtain reward, given that their activity during the cue period predicted the monkey’s impending action. The activity pattern correlates with the behavior to be executed later but does not have a direct causal relationship with it at the time of execution. The representation is characterized best as the behavioral meaning or significance of the cue stimulus (Watanabe, 1986, Yajeya et al., 1988, Sakagami and Niki, 1994a). For example, in Sakagami and Niki (1994a), monkeys were trained to make a go or no-go response depending on the physical features of the cue stimulus, e.g. a red or yellow color indicated that the monkey should make a go response to obtain reward, and a green or purple color indicated that the monkey should make a no-go response. Many cells in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) showed differential visual responses to the cue stimulus, not depending on the physical features, but on whether the feature of the cue stimulus indicated a go response or a no-go response. The differential activity of these cells was not simply related to the motor execution of a go or no-go response as there was a delay period between the cue presentation and the response.
Cells that code behavioral meaning can provide insights into how the PFC plays its important role in making and/or keeping an association between sensory information and a specific behavior. In a complex decision-making situation, however, the appropriate response to a given stimulus may be different depending on the context. How does the PFC make the appropriate association between the stimulus and its behavioral meaning in such a complex situation? Anatomical studies have suggested that the various interconnections of the PFC with sensory cortices and the close intrinsic connections within the PFC could underlie such a higher cognitive function. For example, the inferior convexity (ventral part of Walker’s area 46 and area 12) of the PFC receives color and shape information from the inferotemporal cortex (Barbas, 1988, Seltzer and Pandya, 1989, Ungerleider et al., 1989). On the other hand, the parietal cortex supplies spatial or movement information about a visual stimulus to the principalis (area 46) and arcuate (area 8) areas in the PFC (Cavada and Goldman-Rakic, 1989, Seltzer and Pandya, 1989, Andersen et al., 1990). The processed information in these PFC subareas flows to the periarcuate area (area 8 and sulcal area 6) (Barbas, 1988, Barbas and Pandya, 1989). Thus, we hypothesized that cells in each subarea of the PFC code different aspects of the behavioral meaning of the stimulus, depending on the anatomical connections, and furthermore we posited that the PFC is hierarchically organized to support decision making about which is the appropriate response in a given situation. Such a decision would then be a precursor to the motor command.
We recorded single-unit activity in three male Japanese monkeys while they performed a go/no-go selective attention task in which they had to discriminate compound visual stimuli (targets) consisting of moving colored dots. To test the hypothesis described above, we compared the activity patterns of cells in each PFC subarea in different attending conditions (color or motion), examining response latency and receptive field properties. If our hypothesis based on anatomical connections is true, we should find cells in the inferior PFC that show differential go/no-go activity to the cue stimulus only when the monkey attends to the color of the stimulus, while cells in the superior PFC should show go/no-go activity only when the monkey attends to the motion, and in the periarcuate area we should find cells that show go/no-go activity irrespective of the attending condition. This hypothesis also predicts that condition-independent go/no-go cells in the peri-arcuate area have longer latencies to the cue stimulus and larger receptive fields than condition-dependent go/no-go cells. This is because go/no-go cells that are free from constraints by the visual information processes, and so are closer to cells that generate motor commands, should have a position in the later stage of the hierarchical decision-making process.
Section snippets
Subject
We used three male Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). Their weights were 9, 10 and 10.5 kg, respectively. All surgical and experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Tokyo and Juntendo University in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of National Institutes of Health.
Stimuli and equipment
The target stimulus consisted of a dynamic random dot pattern presented through a virtual square-shape aperture (6.2°×6.2°). All dots were
Results
While the monkeys performed the go/no-go task, we recorded the neuronal activity in the DLPFC, mainly in the caudal half of the area principalis (area 46), the adjacent superior convexity (lower area 9) and the inferior convexity (upper area 12), and in the arcuate and periarcuate areas (areas 8, 45 and sulcal 6). An ANOVA was carried out on all the PFC cells for which sufficient trials could be obtained. Of the 523 PFC cells recorded, 389 showed a statistically reliable main effect (P<0.01) in
Discussion
Prefrontal patients are unable to make appropriate decisions in complex task situations (Milner, 1964, Damasio, 1985, Bechara et al., 1997). This deficit cannot be attributed to dysfunction of perception or motor execution, and instead, seems to be due to the inability to choose an appropriate behavior in response to a certain stimulus depending on the context in which it is presented (Fuster, 1997). To understand the underlying neural mechanisms, we investigated the characteristics of the PFC
Acknowledgements
We thank H. Niki, O. Hikosaka, D. Palomo, J. Lauwereyns, M. Watanabe, W. Schultz and K. Hikosaka for their comments and suggestions and H. Takenaka for assistance. This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.
References (28)
- et al.
Neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex during associative learning
Neuron
(1998) Prefrontal unit activity during delayed alternation in the monkey. II. Relation to absolute versus relative direction of response
Brain Res.
(1974)- et al.
The functional organization of the lateral frontal cortex: conjecture or conjuncture in the electrophysiology literature?
Trends Cognit. Sci.
(1998) - et al.
A glass-insulated 'Elgiloy' microelectrode for recording unit activity in chronic monkey experiments
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1976) Prefrontal unit activity during delayed conditional Go/No-Go discrimination in the monkey. I. Relation to the stimulus
Brain Res.
(1986)- et al.
Prefrontal representation of stimulus attributes during delay tasks. II. The role of behavioral significance
Brain Res.
(1988) - et al.
Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule
J. Comp. Neurol.
(1990) Anatomic organization of basoventral and mediodorsal visual recipient prefrontal regions in the rhesus monkey
J. Comp. Neurol.
(1988)- et al.
Architecture and intrinsic connections of the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey
J. Comp. Neurol.
(1989) - et al.
Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy
Science
(1997)
Visual feature selectivity in frontal eye fields induced by experience in mature macaques
Nature
Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque
J. Comp. Neurol.
Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe
J. Comp. Neurol.
The frontal lobes
Cited by (77)
The rodent medial prefrontal cortex and associated circuits in orchestrating adaptive behavior under variable demands
2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsAssociations between sounds and actions in primate prefrontal cortex
2020, Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :In conclusion, we provide electrophysiological evidence from one monkey that PFC represents audiomotor associations during goal-directed behavior. The findings in the current study, combined with those in the previous visual studies (Asaad et al., 1998; Komatsu, 1982; Sakagami and Tsutsui, 1999; Sakagami et al., 2001; Watanabe, 1986; Yamatani et al., 1990), suggest that PFC is involved in the selection of appropriate motor responses to stimuli from different modalities for individuals to achieve goals. Experimental procedures were the same as those described in detail in our previous studies (Huang and Brosch, 2016; Huang et al., 2016a, 2019).
Prefrontal Cortex Represents Long-Term Memory of Object Values for Months
2018, Current BiologySpace representation in the prefrontal cortex
2013, Progress in NeurobiologyCitation Excerpt :Only 2% responded differentially depending on the difference in the physical properties of the visual cues. Further, Sakagami and Tsutsui (1999) used a Go/No-Go selective attention task. In this task, monkeys were required to make either Go (lever-pressing) or No-Go (lever-holding) responses depending on either the color or direction of motion of visual target stimuli (moving colored dots).