Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00065-3Get rights and content

Abstract

After right posterior brain damage, patients may ignore events occurring on their left, a condition known as unilateral neglect. Although deficits at different levels of impairment may be at work in different patients, the frequency and severity of attentional problems in neglect patients have been repeatedly underlined. Recent advances in the knowledge of the mechanisms of spatial attention in normals may help characterizing these deficits. The present review focuses on studies exploring several aspect of attentional processing in unilateral neglect, with particular reference to the dichotomy between ‘exogenous’, or stimulus-related, and ‘endogenous’, or strategy-driven, orienting of attention. A large amount of neuropsychological evidence suggests that a basic mechanism leading to left neglect behavior is an impaired exogenous orienting toward left-sided targets. In contrast, endogenous processes seem to be relatively preserved, if slowed, in left unilateral neglect. Other component deficits, such as a general slowing of the operations of spatial attention, might contribute to neglect behavior. These results are presented and discussed, and their implications for hemispheric specialization in attentional orienting and for the mechanisms of visual consciousness are explored.

Introduction

Left unilateral neglect is a severe disabling condition resulting from right-hemisphere damage, usually centered on the inferior parietal lobule [1] or on the superior temporal lobe [2]. Neglect patients ignore events occurring on their left (Fig. 1), sometimes to the dramatic extent of ‘forgetting’ to eat from the left part of their dish or of bumping into obstacles situated on their left.

Unilateral neglect negatively affects patients’ motor recovery [3] and social rehabilitation. Deficits at different levels of impairment may be at work in different patients; however, the frequency and severity of attentional problems in neglect patients have been repeatedly underlined [4]. A precise characterization of these deficits can shed light on how brain mechanisms process spatial information, and is necessary in order to devise rational strategies of rehabilitation. Recent advances in the knowledge of the mechanisms of spatial attention in normals may help to characterize these deficits. The present review focuses on studies which explore several aspects of attentional processing in unilateral neglect, with particular reference to the dichotomy between ‘exogenous’, or stimulus-related, and ‘endogenous’, or strategy-driven, orienting of attention. With reference to this distinction, Gainotti suggested that a basic mechanism leading to left neglect behavior might be a relatively selective deficit of exogenous orienting towards left-sided targets [5], [6]. A large amount of neuropsychological evidence is now available which is consistent with this proposal. Moreover, a number of studies have shown that endogenous processes are relatively preserved, if slowed, in left unilateral neglect. The present review aims at discussing these results and at exploring the implications of such a model of left neglect for hemispheric specialization for attentional orienting and for the mechanisms of visual consciousness.

Section snippets

Varieties of attention

The concept of attention refers to a heterogeneous set of processes that aim to maintain coherent behavior in the face of irrelevant distractions. James [7] observed that “my experience is what I agree to attend to… Without selective interest, experience is an utter chaos” (p. 402). In a recent review, Parasuraman [8] identified at least three independent but interacting components of attention: (1) selection, that is, mechanisms determining more extensive processing of some input rather than

Accounts of left unilateral neglect

Even a superficial consideration of left neglect behavior immediately suggests that these patients have problems in orienting their attention toward the left side. However, a number of different hypotheses have been proposed to explain left neglect and there is no consensus about its causal mechanisms [50]. In a putative ‘sensation-to-action’ sequence [4], accounts of left neglect can be schematically summarized as a visual sensory deficit [51], an amputation [52] or distortion [53] of a mental

A rightward attentional bias in left neglect

A well-articulated account of neglect based on orienting of attention is the opponent processor model [57], [76], [77], [78]. This model draws upon the very general biological evidence that reciprocally inhibiting opponent systems are an evolutionary advantageous way of solving the problem of deciding whether to turn right or left. The dominant system would achieve its goal of turning the organism by progressively inhibiting its contralateral counterpart. A first assumption of the opponent

Impaired exogenous orienting in unilateral neglect: implications for the neural implementation of attentional mechanisms

The proposal that left unilateral neglect primarily results from an asymmetrical exogenous orienting has implications for both the interhemispheric and the intrahemispheric implementation of attentional mechanisms. The importance for attentional orienting of brain regions in the parietal [144], [145] and frontal [80], [146] lobes has long been known. Gottlieb et al. [147] have recently identified neurons in the macaque lateral intraparietal area which selectively respond to visual stimuli with

Impaired exogenous orienting in unilateral neglect: implications for phenomenal consciousness

As mentioned in Section 2.5, attention is thought to be crucial for binding together the different features (color, location, etc.) of an object [44]; in particular, exogenous orienting influences feature detection [49] and binding [35]. Failure to exogenously orient one's attention toward an object may thus result in incomplete feature processing, which in turn may cause either a complete lack of awareness of the object (whose perception is too inconsistent to be attributed to a specific

References (174)

  • M. Jeannerod et al.

    The directional coding of reaching movements. A visuomotor conception of visuospatial neglect

  • M. Gentilini et al.

    Space exploration with and without the aid of vision in hemisphere-damaged patients

    Cortex

    (1989)
  • T. Fujii et al.

    Unilateral spatial neglect in visual and tactile modalities

    Cortex

    (1991)
  • H. Hjaltason et al.

    Visual and tactile rod bisection in unilateral neglect

    Cortex

    (1993)
  • N. Soroker et al.

    Auditory inattention in right-hemisphere-damaged patients with and without visual neglect

    Neuropsychologia

    (1997)
  • H. Hjaltason et al.

    Darkness improves line bisection in unilateral spatial neglect

    Cortex

    (1992)
  • E. Bisiach et al.

    Unilateral neglect of representational space

    Cortex

    (1978)
  • E. Bisiach et al.

    Brain and conscious representation of outside reality

    Neuropsychologia

    (1981)
  • E. Bisiach et al.

    Dyschiria. An attempt at its systemic explanation

  • M. Kinsbourne

    Mechanisms of unilateral neglect

  • E. Kowler et al.

    The role of attention in the programming of saccades

    Vision Res

    (1995)
  • E. De Renzi et al.

    Attentional shifts toward the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect

    Cortex

    (1989)
  • E. Làdavas et al.

    The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients

    Cortex

    (1990)
  • P. D'Erme et al.

    Early rightwards orienting of attention on simple reaction time performance in patients with left-sided neglect

    Neuropsychologia

    (1992)
  • P. Bartolomeo et al.

    Perception and action in hemispatial neglect

    Neuropsychologia

    (1998)
  • G. Vallar

    The anatomical basis of spatial hemineglect in humans

  • H.O. Karnath et al.

    Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe

    Nature

    (2001)
  • G. Denes et al.

    Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study

    Brain

    (1982)
  • P. Bartolomeo et al.

    Levels of impairment in unilateral neglect

  • G. Gainotti et al.

    Early orientation of attention toward the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • W. James

    The principles of psychology

    (1890)
  • R. Parasuraman

    The attentive brain: issues and prospects

  • M.I. Posner

    Orienting of attention

    Q J Exp Psychol

    (1980)
  • C. Umiltà

    Visuospatial attention

  • P. Bartolomeo et al.

    Emergence of orienting behavior in ecological neural networks

    Neural Process Lett

    (2002)
  • P.S. Arvidson

    Transformations in consciousness: continuity, the self and marginal consciousness

    J Consciousness Stud

    (2000)
  • W.A. Johnston et al.

    Selective attention

    Annu Rev Psychol

    (1986)
  • R. Desimone et al.

    Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention

    Annu Rev Neurosci

    (1995)
  • D.A. Allport

    Visual attention

  • H. Egeth et al.

    Visual attention: control, representation, and time course

    Annu Rev Psychol

    (1997)
  • H.E. Pashler

    The psychology of attention

    (1998)
  • A.D. Macquistan

    Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues

    Psychon Bull Rev

    (1997)
  • S. Yantis et al.

    Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation

    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform

    (1990)
  • S. Yantis

    Attentional capture in vision

  • J. Jonides

    Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement

  • H.J. Müller et al.

    Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption

    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform

    (1989)
  • E.A. Maylor et al.

    Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space

    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform

    (1985)
  • M.I. Posner et al.

    Components of visual orienting

  • R. Rafal et al.

    The neurology of inhibition: integrating controlled and automatic processes

  • M.I. Posner et al.

    Inhibition of return: neural basis and function

    Cogn Neuropsychol

    (1985)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text