Elsevier

Cortex

Volume 43, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 38-52
Cortex

Special Issue: Original Article
Relationship Between Prefrontal Task-Related Activity And Information Flow During Spatial Working Memory Performance

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70444-1Get rights and content

Abstract

While monkeys performed spatial working memory tasks, cue- (C), delay- (D), and response-period (R) activities or their combinations (CD, CR, DR, CDR) were observed in prefrontal neurons. In the present study, we tried to understand information flow during spatial working memory performances and how each task-related neuron contributed to this process. We first characterized each neuron based on which task-related activity was exhibited and which information (cue location or saccade direction) each task-related activity represented, then classified these neurons into 9 groups (C, Dcue, Dsac, CDcue, Dcue Rcue, Dsac Rsac, Dcue Rsac, CDcue Rcue and CDcue Rsac). Preferred directions were similar between cue- and delay-period activities in CDcue, CDcue Rcue, and CDcue Rsac, indicating that the directional selectivity of delay- period activity is affected by the directional selectivity of cue-period activity, all of which represented visual information. Preferred directions were also similar between delay- and response-period activities in Dcue Rcue, CDcue Rcue, and Dsac Rsac, indicating that the directional selectivity of delay-period activity affects the directional selectivity of response- period activity in these neurons. By the comparison of temporal profiles of delay-period activity among these groups, we found (1) cue-period activity could affect directional selectivity of delay-period activity of CDcue and CDcue Rcue, (2) cue-period activity of C, CDcue, and CDcue Rcue might contribute to the initiation and the maintenance of delay-period activity of CDcue, CDcue Rcue, Dcue, and Dcue Rcue, and (3) saccade-related activity of Dsac Rsac could be affected by delay-period activity of Dsac and Dsac Rsac. These results suggest that the combination of task-related activities, the information represented by each activity, and the temporal profile of delay-period activity are important factors to consider information flow and processing and integration of the information in the prefrontal cortex during spatial working memory processes.

References (41)

  • C Constantinidis et al.

    Coding specificity in cortical microcircuits: A multiple-electrode analysis of primate prefrontal cortex

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • C Constantinidis et al.

    A role for inhibition in shaping the temporal flow of information in prefrontal cortex

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2002)
  • CE Curtis et al.

    Maintenance of spatial and motor codes during oculomotor delayed response tasks

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2004)
  • JF DeSouza et al.

    Preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in humans investigated with event-related fMRI

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2003)
  • S Funahashi et al.

    Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkeys dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1989)
  • S Funahashi et al.

    Visuospatial coding in primate prefrontal neurons revealed by oculomotor paradigms

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1990)
  • S Funahashi et al.

    Neuronal activity related to saccadic eye movements in the monkeys dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1991)
  • S Funahashi et al.

    Prefrontal neuronal activity in rhesus monkeys performing a delayed anti-saccade task

    Nature

    (1993)
  • S Funahashi et al.

    Neuronal interactions related to working memory processes in the primate prefrontal cortex revealed by cross-correlation analysis

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2000)
  • S Funahashi et al.

    Information processes in the primate prefrontal cortex in relation to working memory processes

    Reviews in the Neurosciences

    (2002)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Task-specific subnetworks extend from prefrontal cortex to striatum

      2022, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cellular recordings in non-human animals unveil the fine-grained cortical organization. They show that functional specialization exists also at the sub-area level, and that cortical areas are at a finer spatial scale characterized by functional heterogeneity (Funahashi, 2013; Goldman-Rakic, 1995; Takeda & Funahashi, 2007). This fine-scale specialization is also evident in functional imaging studies in humans, where multivariate pattern classification supports distributed representation of task-relevant information (Stiers et al., 2010; Waskom et al., 2014; Woolgar et al. 2011, 2015) and voxel-wise functional connectivity shows sub-areal heterogeneity in connectivity profiles (Stiers & Goulas, 2018).

    • Neural Bases of the Short-term Retention of Visual Information

      2015, Mechanisms of Sensory Working Memory: Attention and Perfomance XXV
    • Space representation in the prefrontal cortex

      2013, Progress in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For the neurophysiological examination of spatial representation in the prefrontal cortex, Fuster and Alexander (1971), Fuster (1973), Kubota et al. (1974), Niki (1974a), Niki and Watanabe (1976), and Kojima and Goldman-Rakic (1982, 1984) have used manual versions of the delayed-response task, and Kubota and Niki (1971) and Niki (1974b, 1974c) have used manual versions of the delayed alternation task. Recently, an oculomotor version of the delayed-response task (oculomotor delayed-response task or ODR task) has been used to examine the processing of spatial information in the prefrontal cortex (Constantinidis et al., 2001a,b; Funahashi and Inoue, 2000; Funahashi et al., 1989, 1990, 1991, 1993a,b; Inoue and Funahashi, 2002; Joseph and Barone, 1987; Meyer et al., 2011; Rainer et al., 1998b; Rao et al., 1997; Sawaguchi, 1998; Sawaguchi and Iba, 2001; Takeda and Funahashi, 2002, 2004, 2007; Watanabe et al., 2006; Watanabe and Funahashi, 2007; Wilson et al., 1993). The ODR task consists of a memory-guided saccade task, which was developed and extensively used for oculomotor studies (Bruce and Goldberg, 1985; Hikosaka and Wurtz, 1983; Izawa et al., 2004; Kastner et al., 2007; Kojima et al., 2010; Pertzov et al., 2011).

    • Thalamic mediodorsal nucleus and working memory

      2012, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, we hypothesized that dynamic and flexible interactions among processes and modulatory signals play an essential role in information processing. To understand information flow during spatial working memory performance in the DLPFC and how each task-related DLPFC neuron contributes to this process, Takeda and Funahashi (2007) first determined which task-related activity each DLPFC neuron exhibited and what information (cue direction or saccade direction) each task-related activity represented, and then compared preferred directions of task-related activities for each neuron. In DLPFC neurons with both cue- and delay-period activities, the preferred directions of both activities were always similar.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text