Chapter 30 - Central auditory processing disorders in children and adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00030-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Central auditory processing disorders (CAPD) can affect children and adults of all ages due to a wide variety of causes. CAPD is a neurobiologic deficit in the central auditory nervous system (CANS) that affects those mechanisms that underlie fundamental auditory perception, including localization and lateralization; discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds; auditory pattern recognition; temporal aspects of audition, including integration, resolution, ordering, and masking; and auditory performance with competing and/or degraded acoustic signals (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2005a, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2005b). Although it is recognized that central auditory dysfunction may coexist with other disorders, CAPD is conceptualized as a sensory-based auditory disorder. Administration of behavioral and/or electrophysiologic audiologic tests that have been shown to be sensitive and specific to dysfunction of the CANS is critical for a proper diagnosis of CAPD, in addition to assessments and collaboration with a multidisciplinary team. Intervention recommendations for CAPD diagnosis are based on the demonstrated auditory processing deficits and related listening and related complaints. This chapter provides an overview of current definitions and conceptualizations, methods of diagnosis of, and intervention for, CAPD. The chapter culminates with a case study illustrating pre- and posttreatment behavioral and electrophysiologic diagnostic findings.

Introduction

Central auditory processing disorders (CAPD) can affect children and adults of all ages. Etiologies ranging from trauma to neurotoxic substances and neurologic disease or insult may cause dysfunction in the central auditory nervous system (CANS), resulting in a CAPD (American Academy of Audiology, 2010). In addition, CAPD may coexist with and/or mimic other disorders that affect listening, learning, and communication, particularly in children. Musiek et al. (1985; Musiek and Gollegly, 1988) postulated three primary underlying etiologies of CAPD in children: (1) neuromorphologic disorders, including atypical left/right anatomic asymmetries in planum temporale, ectopic areas, and polymicrogyri (65–70%); (2) neuromaturational delay (25–30%); and (3) neurologic disorder, disease, or insult (< 5%). Although frank neuropathology may be relatively rare in children, the effects of acquired neurologic disorders on central auditory function in this population have nonetheless garnered recent attention (Chermak and Musiek, 2011). Similarly, in recent years, evidence of atypical neuromorphology in children with CAPD has been presented (e.g., Boscariol et al., 2009, Boscariol et al., 2010, Boscariol et al., 2011; Fig. 30.1). It has been estimated that CAPD affects 2–5% of the school-aged population, or approximately half of all children with learning disorders, and up to 76% of elderly adults, depending on the criteria used for diagnosis (Cooper and Gates, 1991, Chermak and Musiek, 1997, Bamiou et al., 2001, Golding et al., 2004).

More recently, increasing attention has been focused on the prevalence of CAPD in adults with acquired traumatic injuries, including returning war veterans and individuals involved in contact sports (e.g., Okie, 2005, Martin et al., 2008, Malloy and Bellis, 2013). In a recent study by Gallun et al. (2012), behavioral and electrophysiologic tests were administered to 36 blast-exposed veterans and 29 controls. Results indicated that the blast-exposed veterans exhibited a threefold increase in abnormalities on tests of central auditory function and speech in noise, despite normal peripheral hearing sensitivity. Similarly, Malloy and Bellis (2013) studied eight Division 1 football players with no history of diagnosed concussion. When compared to age- and education-matched controls with no history of participation in contact sports at the high-school level or above, the football players exhibited significantly smaller amplitudes and longer response latencies on several auditory evoked potential measures. These results indicated that the types of recurrent impulses and impacts experienced by those involved in contact sports such as football may result in central auditory deficits.

In short, CAPD is a distinct clinical disorder that has gained increasing attention in the literature over the past two decades. This chapter will provide an overview of current definitions and conceptualizations, methods of diagnosis of, and intervention for, CAPD. The chapter will culminate with a case study illustrating pre- and posttreatment behavioral and electrophysiologic diagnostic findings.

Section snippets

Current definitions and conceptualizations of CAPD

Since Myklebust (1954) emphasized the need to address auditory perceptual disorders not attributable to peripheral hearing loss, various definitions of CAPD have been offered which range from the very simple (e.g., “What we do with what we hear,” Katz et al., 1992, p. 5) to the very complex (e.g., American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2005a, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2005b, American Academy of Audiology, 2010).

The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Working

Diagnosis of CAPD

The purpose of a central auditory diagnostic test battery is to evaluate the integrity of the CANS, determine if a CAPD exists, and describe its parameters so that deficit-specific intervention can be programmed. This involves the administration of behavioral and/or electrophysiologic audiologic tests that have been shown to be sensitive and specific to dysfunction of the CANS.

Intervention for CAPD

Intervention recommendations for CAPD are based on the demonstrated auditory processing deficits and related listening and related complaints (Bellis, 2003, American Academy of Audiology, 2010). Further, just as auditory processing involves both bottom-up and top-down factors, intervention for CAPD should include both bottom-up and top-down activities. The individual's diagnostic test findings, case history, and information from other multidisciplinary professionals such as speech-language and

Case study

The patient, KA, was a 17-year-old healthy female who presented at our clinic with primary complaints of significant difficulty hearing in noise, “mishearing” auditory input leading to misunderstanding of auditory-verbal communications, and reading and spelling difficulties. She had been an accomplished musician (piano, violin) from a very early age.

At the age of 10, KA underwent a stereotactic volumetric resection of a right posterior temporal-lobe glioma. Prior to the surgery, KA complained

Conclusions

In conclusion, CAPD can affect anyone of any age. Various etiologies for CAPD may include neurologic disorders, genetic diseases, neurotoxins, and trauma; however, in many cases, no identifiable neuropathology may be evident, particularly in children. Nonetheless, the most widely accepted definitions of CAPD emphasize that the disorder is neurobiologic in origin and affects perceptual processing (and neural transmission) of auditory information in the CANS.

Diagnosis of CAPD requires the

References (99)

  • F. Musiek et al.

    Perspective on dichotic listening and the corpus callosum

    Brain Cogn

    (2011)
  • C. Pantev et al.

    Plasticity of the human auditory cortex related to muscical training

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2011)
  • N. Russo et al.

    Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem

    Behav Brain Res

    (2005)
  • M. Sams et al.

    Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex

    Neurosci Lett

    (1991)
  • M. Sharma et al.

    Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of auditory processing deficits in children with reading disorder

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2006)
  • B. Wright et al.

    Nonlinguistic deficits associated with reading and language disorders

    Curr Opin Neurobiol

    (2000)
  • American Academy of Audiology

    Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder

    (2010)
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

    (Central) auditory processing disorders [technical report]

    (2005)
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

    (Central) auditory processing disorders – The role of the audiologist [position statement]

    (2005)
  • D.E. Bamiou et al.

    Aetiology and clinical presentation of auditory processing disorders – a review

    Arch Dis Child

    (2001)
  • K. Banai et al.

    Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • K. Banai et al.

    Sensory-based learning disability: insights from brainstem processing of speech sounds

    Int J Audiol

    (2007)
  • S. Bao et al.

    Temporal plasticity in the primary auditory cortex induced by operant perceptual learning

    Nat Neurosci

    (2004)
  • T. Bellis

    When the brain can’t hear

    (2002)
  • T. Bellis

    Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting

    (2003)
  • T. Bellis et al.

    Multidimensional approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children

    J Am Acad Audiol

    (1999)
  • T. Bellis et al.

    Performance of normal adults and children on central auditory diagnostic tests and their corresponding visual analogs

    J Am Acad Audiol

    (2011)
  • T. Bellis et al.

    Effects of aging and gender on interhemispheric function

    J Speech Lang Hear Res

    (2001)
  • T. Bellis et al.

    Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry in the neural representation of speech sounds

    J Neurosci

    (2000)
  • T. Bellis et al.

    The utility of visual analogs of central auditory tests in the differential diagnosis of (central) auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    J Am Acad Audiol

    (2011)
  • T. Bellis et al.

    Efficacy of auditory interventions for central auditory processing disorder: a response to Fey et al. (2011)

    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch

    (2012)
  • C. Billiet et al.

    The relationship between brainstem temporal processing and performance on tests of central auditory function in children with reading disorders

    J Speech Lang Hear Res

    (2011)
  • M. Boscariol et al.

    Auditory processing disorders in twins with perisylvian polymicrogyria

    Arq Neuropsiquiatr

    (2009)
  • M. Boscariol et al.

    Auditory processing disorder in patients with language-learning impairment and correlation with malformation of cortical development

    Brain Dev

    (2011)
  • British Society of Audiology

    Auditory processing disorder [position statement]

    (2011)
  • A. Cacace et al.

    The importance of modality specificity in diagnosing central auditory processing disorder

    Am J Audiol

    (2005)
  • G.A. Calvert et al.

    Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading

    Science

    (1997)
  • S. Cameron et al.

    The listening in spatialized noise-sentences tests (LISN-S): comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder

    J Am Acad Audiol

    (2008)
  • L. Cestnick et al.

    Auditory temporal processing and lexical/nonlexical reading in developmental dyslexia

    J Am Acad Audiol

    (2000)
  • G.D. Chermak

    Managing central auditory processing disorders: metalinguistic and metacognitive approaches

    Semin Hear

    (1998)
  • G.D. Chermak et al.

    Central auditory processing disorders. New perspectives

    (1997)
  • G.D. Chermak et al.

    Neurological substrate of central auditory processing deficits in children

    Curr Pediatr Rev

    (2011)
  • Chermak GD, Musiek FE (Eds.) (in press). Handbook of central auditory processing disorder: Vol. 2. Comprehensive...
  • G.D. Chermak et al.

    Neurobiology, cognitive science, and intervention (2nd edn)

  • CISGSLPA

    Canadian guidelines on auditory processing disorder in children and adults: Assessment and intervention

    (2013)
  • J.C. Cooper et al.

    Hearing in the elderly – the Framingham cohort, 1983–1985. Part II. Prevalence of central auditory processing disorders

    Ear Hear

    (1991)
  • E. deVillers-Sidani et al.

    Recovery of functional and structural age-related changes in the rat primary auditory cortex with operant training

    Proc Natl Acad Sci

    (2010)
  • H. Dillon et al.

    An opinion on the assessment of people who may have an auditory processing disorder

    J Am Acad Audiol

    (2012)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Ear Abnormalities Among Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      2022, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, they may have difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments, following directions, and differentiating similar-sounding speech sounds. The assessment of auditory processing involves the administration of behavioral tests evaluating the functional capabilities of the auditory system, and electrophysiological tests evaluating neural processes in the central auditory pathway.67,68 There are no established population-level data for abnormal auditory filtering to enable comparison with the estimated prevalence found in this review.

    • Cortical auditory evoked potentials with different acoustic stimuli: Evidence of differences and similarities in coding in auditory processing disorders

      2021, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The components N2 and P3 are also considered potentials related to events, as they are easily identified when using the odd-ball paradigm [20,21], point to the influence of supra-modal factors on audition [20–22]. This information is important since APD may be diagnoses alongside other conditions that affect development, such as attention deficit and/or hyperactivity, and deficits in reading, language and memory [4,5,8,12,23–26]. In light of this, caution is needed in the application and analysis of event-related potentials in populations with and without APDs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text