Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their anaesthesia sensitivity in the European Starling and the chicken
References (40)
- et al.
Suppressibility of the 2f1−fs stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man
Hear. Res.
(1984) Quantitative analysis of the innervation of the chicken basilar papilla
Hear. Res.
(1992)Quantitative TEM analysis of the barn owl basilar papilla
Hear. Res.
(1994)- et al.
Quantitative morphological analysis of the sensory epithelium of the starling and pigeon basilar papilla
Hear. Res.
(1988) - et al.
Performance of the avian inner ear
- et al.
Frequency discrimination by the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): A comparison of different measures
Hear. Res.
(1992) - et al.
Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability
Hear. Res.
(1987) - et al.
A quantitative comparison of peripheral tuning measures: primary afferent tuning curves versus suppression tuning curves of spontaneous and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions
- et al.
Otoacoustic emissions in a song bird
Hear. Res.
(1987) - et al.
Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposure
Hear. Res.
(1987)
Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans
Hear. Res.
Slow variation of the amplitude of acoustic distortion at f2−f1 in awake rabbits
Hear. Res.
Nonmonotonic behaviour (2f1−f2) explained by a saturation feedback model
Hear. Res.
Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils
Hear. Res.
Morphological gradients in the Starling basilar papilla
J. Morphol.
The behavior of the acoustic distortion products, 2f1−f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Auditory primary afferents in the starling: Correlation of function and morphology
Hear. Res.
Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of ratio
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing-impaired mutant mice
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Auditory illusions and the single hair cell
Nature
Cited by (43)
A Prestin Motor in Chicken Auditory Hair Cells: Active Force Generation in a Nonmammalian Species
2013, NeuronCitation Excerpt :We suggest that the two “active” processes could sum to function as a negative feedback control on hair bundle position and with fast kinetics might amplify extrinsic mechanical stimuli. They might also underlie the otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous or evoked sound production at the tympanum, which have been recorded in birds (Kettembeil et al., 1995; Burkard et al., 1996; Chen et al., 2001). Electrically evoked hair bundle movements were previously reported in chicken hair cells but neither the underlying mechanism nor the link to mechanotransduction was examined (Brix and Manley, 1994).
Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries)
2009, Hormones and BehaviorMultifrequency forcing of a Hopf oscillator model of the inner ear
2008, Biophysical JournalCitation Excerpt :Then the effect of the suppressor tone on the response at each of the primary frequencies and the distortion product frequencies can be recorded. In nonmammals, multifrequency forcing experiments, including two primary frequencies ω1 and ω2 (ω1 <ω2) and a suppressor frequency, indicate that maximum suppression of the 2ω1 −ω2 distortion product frequency occurs when the suppressor tone is near the ω1 frequency (36–38). Oddly, in mammals, the reverse trend is observed and maximum suppression of 2ω1 −ω2 occurs when the suppressor frequency is near the ω2 frequency (39,40).