Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 45, Issue 3, May 1990, Pages 203-219
Hearing Research

Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(90)90121-5Get rights and content

Abstract

In a previous paper (Winter et al., 1990) we demonstrated the existence of a new type of auditory-nerve rate-intensity function, the straight type, as well as a correlation between rate-level type, threshold and spontaneous rate. In this paper we now show that the variation in rate-intensity functions has its origin in the basilar membrane nonlinearity. Comparison of rate-intensity functions at characteristic frequency and at a tail-frequency show that the rate-intensity functions are identical at low firing rates and that the sloping-saturation and straight types deviate from the standard function only at higher firing rates. The frequencies at which the deviations occur, and the change from saturating to sloping-saturation or straight, are closely correlated with the characteristic frequency of the fibre. Using the tail-frequency rate-intensity function as a calibration, it is possible to derive the basilar membrane input-output function at characteristic frequency from the characteristic frequency rate-intensity function. The resulting derived basilar membrane input-output functions are of a simple form and agree well with published direct measurements of basilar membrane motion. They show that the wide dynamic range to which the cochlea responds, about 120 decibels, is compressed by the basilar membrane nonlinearity into a much smaller range of about 30–35 decibels. General characteristics of the derived basilar membrane input-output curves show features which agree well with psychoacoustic studies of loudness estimation.

Reference (33)

  • DelgutteB.

    Peripheral auditory processing of speech information: Implications from a physiological study of intensity discrimination

  • HarrisD.M. et al.

    Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1979)
  • HellmanR.P. et al.

    Monaural loudness function at 1000 cps and interaural summation

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1968)
  • JohnstoneB.M. et al.

    Stimulus-related potassium changes in the organ of Corti of guinea-pig

    J. Physiol.

    (1989)
  • KempD.T.

    The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure — evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics

    Scand. Audiol. Suppl.

    (1979)
  • KiangN.Y.-S.

    Peripheral processing of auditory information

  • Cited by (187)

    • A simplified physiological model of rate-level functions of auditory-nerve fibers

      2021, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fig. 8 shows data from one example ANF (A5-U24) having a CF of 19.8 kHz and a spontaneous rate of 1.2 spikes/s. Fig. 8A shows rate-level functions and model fits for different stimulus frequencies (see legend in Fig. 8B). The spontaneous rate is independent of frequency (apart from random variation) whereas the maximum rate can vary with frequency, in line with previous observations (e.g., Sachs and Abbas, 1974; Yates et al., 1990, 2000; Cooper and Yates, 1994; Temchin and Ruggero, 2010; Sumner and Palmer, 2012). Fig. 8B shows the SPL needed to obtain a given model rate with a tone at CF plotted against the SPLs needed to obtain the same model rate with tones at the other frequencies.

    • Persistent hair cell malfunction contributes to hidden hearing loss

      2018, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, normal CAP thresholds imply normal levels of OHC amplification, and it has been shown that there is a direct correlation between the magnitude of OHC currents (measured as cochlear microphonic) and CAP threshold (Patuzzi et al., 1989a). Furthermore, it is known that the OHC contribution to cochlear vibration amplitudes becomes less at higher sound intensities because of the saturation of the cochlear amplifier effect (Johnstone et al., 1986; Yates et al., 1990, 1992). In addition, although their acoustic trauma regimes were not identical to those used in the present study, Liberman and co-workers (Kujawa and Liberman, 2009; Lin et al., 2011) have reported that I/O functions of the DPOAE (reflecting the electromechanical amplifier function of the OHCs) can fully recover after loud sound exposures that result in hidden hearing loss as detected by supra-threshold neural response amplitude changes.

    • Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus

      2017, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Amplitude modulation (AM) detection thresholds were measured for a 19 Hz AM tone using either a 5 kHz carrier frequency or a 500 Hz carrier frequency, both presented within narrowband background noise (NBN) designed to suppress the contribution of high-SR fibers. The firing rate of high-SR fibers is known to saturate near 40 dB SPL (Yates et al., 1990), which was the spectrum level of the NBN. AM detection thresholds are shown for both groups and carrier frequencies in Fig. 3a.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Present address: M.R.C. Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD U.K.

    View full text