Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 34, Issue 3, August 1988, Pages 253-266
Hearing Research

Comparative anatomy of the cochlea and auditory nerve in mammals

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(88)90006-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The numbers and structure of hair cells; afferent, efferent, and reciprocal synapses as seen at the base of hair cells; innervation patterns of first order cochlear neurons; and number and morphology of spiral ganglion cells will be discussed and compared in the guinea pig, rat, cat, monkey and man.

Despite many similarities both in the organ of Corti and the spiral ganglion in these species, there are a number of differences which may have important physiologic implications. In the organ of Corti, the major differences among species are the length and width of the basilar membrane, the number of inner and outer hair cells, and the length of hairs on both inner and outer hair cells. Significant differences in the innervation pattern of the inner hair cell among these species include the number of afferent nerve terminals per inner hair cell, the degree of branching of afferent fibers, and the number of synapses per afferent nerve terminal. Among outer hair cells, the number of afferent nerve terminals per outer hair cell, presence or absence of a pre-synaptic body, presence or absence of reciprocal synapses, the number of efferent terminals per outer hair cell, and the presence of dendodendritic synapses in outer spiral bundles may be differences important physiologically. In the spiral ganglion, there are significant differences in the number of spiral ganglion cells, the number of cochlear nerve fibers, the percentage of spiral ganglion cells which are myelinated, and the presence of synapses on spiral ganglion cells.

References (50)

  • H. Engstrom

    Electron microscopic studies of the receptor cells of the organ of Corti

  • H. Engstrom et al.

    The ultrastructure of the cochlea

  • H. Engstrom et al.

    Structure and functions of the sensory hairs of the inner ear

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1962)
  • C. Fernandez

    The innervation of the cochlea (guinea pig)

    Laryngoscope

    (1951)
  • R.R. Gacek et al.

    Fiber analysis of the statoacoustic nerve of guinea pig, cat, and monkey

    Anat. Rec.

    (1961)
  • S.R. Guild

    The width of the basilar membrane

    Science

    (1972)
  • S.R. Guild et al.

    Correlations of differences in the density of innervation of the organ of Corti with differences in the acuity of hearing, including evidence as to the location in the human cochlea of the receptors for certain tones

    Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.)

    (1931)
  • H. Held

    Die Cochlea der Sauger und der Vogel, ihre Entwicklung und ihr Bau

  • H.A. Howe

    The reaction of the cochlear nerve to destruction of its end organs: a study on deaf albino cats

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1935)
  • D. Ishii et al.

    Distribution of efferent nerve endings in the organ of Corti. Their graphic reconstruction in cochleae by localization of acetylcholinasterase activity

    Acta Otolaryngol.

    (1968)
  • S. lurato

    Precisazioni sulla struttura microscopica e sulle variazioni diametriche della membrana basilare dell'organo del Corti

    Anat. Anz.

    (1958)
  • S. lurato

    Submicroscopic structure of the membranous labyrinth-II. The epithelium of Corti's organ

    Z. Zellforsch.

    (1961)
  • M.E. Keithley et al.

    Spiral ganglion cell counts in an age-graded series of rat cochleas

    J. Comp. Neur.

    (1979)
  • M.E. Keithley et al.

    Hair cell counts in an age-graded series of rat cochleas

    Hear. Res.

    (1982)
  • N.Y.S. Kiang et al.

    Afferent innervation of the mammalian cochlea

  • Cited by (106)

    • Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models

      2022, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, for Type I spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) the area of the SGN body, the diameters of the peripheral and central axons, the number of internodal compartments preceding the SGN body, and the internodal length vary substantially across mammalian species (Liberman and Oliver, 1984; Nadol, 1988; Felix et al., 1992; Rattay et al., 2001a; Rattay et al., 2013; Kroon et al., 2017; Ramekers et al., 2020), which affects the conduction velocities of action potentials. More importantly, in contrast to other mammalian species, cell bodies of all standard Type II and the majority of Type I SGNs, as well as their pre- and post-somatic segments, are not tightly myelinated in humans (Ota and Kimura, 1980; Nadol, 1988; Liu et al., 2012; Rattay et al., 2013), which could result in remarkable differences in spike generation and spike conduction between humans and other mammalian species (Rattay et al., 2001a; Rattay et al., 2013). Second, the volume of the cochlea is larger in humans than many nonhuman animals (e.g., Kirk and Gosselin-Ildari, 2009; Trinh et al., 2021) which affects compound AN response amplitudes and excitation patterns due to resulting differences in the electrode-neuron distance and the spread of electrical current within the cochlea (Kopsch et al., 2022).

    • The role of aquaporins in hearing function and dysfunction

      2022, European Journal of Cell Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The human cochlea is a central component of the bony labyrinth located within the petrous portion of the temporal bone. It represents the peripheral organ of hearing that converts sound energy into electrical signals (Nadol, 1988). In mammals, the cochlea is a coiled tube filled with fluid.

    • Advances in genome editing for genetic hearing loss

      2021, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      This rigid structure divides cochlea into two interior canals and vibrates sensitively in response to sound. The basilar membrane length negatively correlates to the audible frequency range [150,151]. Consequently, the shorter length of the basilar membrane of mice (~7 mm) relative to that of humans (~35 mm) results in a higher range of audible frequencies of mice (1–100 kHz) than that of humans (0.02–20 kHz) [152,153].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text