Forward masking of the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) and the frequency following response (FFR)

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(85)90058-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The forward masking behavior of two averaged neurophonic responses was examined in cats. The auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) was recorded with bipolar electrodes placed on the auditory nerve as it exits the internal meatus. The frequency following response (FFR) was recorded using scalp electrodes placed at the vertex and below the stimulated ear. Masking functions (response amplitude vs masker level) for frequencies both above and below the probe frequency were recorded. From these masking functions, 30% iso-depression contours (forward masking tuning curves, FMTCs) were constructed. The time course of the recovery from forward masking was also examined.

It was found that the forward masking behavior of these neurophonics have many similarities to the behavior of other responses recorded using psychophysical and physiological methods. However, forward masking of the ANN and FFR has a number of unusual features. First, the best masking frequency (BMF), which in most forward masking studies is equal to the probe frequency, can be off-set from the probe frequency by as much as an octave. Second, the masker level at BMF can be as much as 30 dB below the probe level. Third, the magnitude of both of these off-sets is a function of the probe level. Fourth, low level neurophonic response could be enhanced by some forward ‘maskers’.

The features of neurophonic forward masking are discussed and a model of the neurophonics is suggested. This model is based on the spatial distribution of phase and amplitude in the phase-locked activity in the auditory nerve and it can qualitatively account for many of the properties of the neurophonics.

References (44)

  • P.J. Abbas et al.

    Two-tone suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: Extension of a stimulus-response relationship

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1976)
  • E.de Boer

    Synthetic whole nerve action potentials for the cat

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1975)
  • A.C. Coats

    Physiological observations of auditory masking. I. Effects of masking duration

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1964)
  • A.C. Coats

    Physiological observations of auditory masking. II. Effects of masking intensity

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1964)
  • P. Dallos et al.

    Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1976)
  • P. Dallos et al.

    Cochlear mechanics, non-linearities and cochlear potentials

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1974)
  • J.J. Eggermont et al.

    Cochlear adaptation in guinea pigs: A quantitative description

    Audiology

    (1973)
  • C. Elberling

    Simulation of cochlear action potentials recorded from the ear canal of man

  • J. Gardi et al.

    The effects of high-pass noise on the scalp-recorded frequency following response (FFR) in humans and cats

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1979)
  • M.H. Goldstein et al.

    Synchrony of neural activity in electric responses evoked by transient acoustic stimuli

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1958)
  • M.P. Gorga et al.

    Forward-masking AP tuning curves in normal and in acoustically traumatized ears

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1981)
  • M.P. Gorga et al.

    AP measurements of short-term adaptation in normal and acoustically traumatized ears

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1981)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Age-related reduction in frequency-following responses as a potential marker of cochlear neural degeneration

      2022, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) response is the mass potential correlate of phase-locked neural activity across AN fibers recorded near the cochlea, which can be dissociated from the cochlear microphonic (CM) response produced by hair cell activity (Fontenot et al., 2017; Snyder and Schreiner, 1984; Verschooten and Joris, 2014). The ANN shows properties that reflect neural coding not present in the CM, such as rectification and adaptation (e.g., Verschooten and Joris 2014), and these response properties are also present in the scalp FFR (Snyder and Schreiner, 1985). Damage to AN fiber terminals or a suppressed spike generation in the AN abolish both the ANN and the scalp FFR (Fontenot et al., 2017; Henry, 1995; Snyder and Schreiner, 1984).

    • Aging alters envelope representations of speech-like sounds in the inferior colliculus

      2019, Neurobiology of Aging
      Citation Excerpt :

      For scalp-recorded neural synchronization (i.e., EFRs), the speech-like stimulus (described previously) was presented with a repetition rate of 3.1 Hz (leading to an interstimulus interval of 63 ms). Although the interstimulus interval is relatively short (63 ms), we did not expect spill-over effects from one stimulus presentation to the next as the timescale for recovery of forward masking at the auditory nerve, cochlear nucleus, superior olivary complex, and the inferior colliculus in rodents has been estimated to be within 30–50 ms (Gao and Berrebi, 2016; Ingham et al., 2016; Snyder and Schreiner, 1985; Verschooten et al., 2012). Furthermore, the interstimulus interval in previous investigations of the effects of age on EFRs in humans used only slightly longer intervals ranging from 80 to 100 ms (Anderson et al., 2012; Schoof and Rosen, 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text