Special issue: Interoception and behaviourDetection, discrimination and sensation of visceral stimuli
References (20)
- et al.
Method and apparatus for pressure-controlled distension of the lower gastrointestinal tract and simultaneous recording of electric and contractile responses
Medical Engineering and Physics, London
(1994) Interoception and behavior
(1967)- et al.
Detection of colon distension in colonostomy patients
Psychophysiology
(1990) A new audiometer
Acta Oto-laryngologica
(1947)Threshold studies with tracking procedures
- et al.
Sensory innervation of the viscera
Preconscious processing
(1981)Learning and physiological regulation
(1993)- et al.
Beeinflussung der viszeralen Sensibilität durch somatosensorische Signale. Teil 2: Summation
- et al.
Bestimmung der lokalen Diskrimination viszeraler Dehnungsreize durch adaptive, selbst-kalibrierende Prozeduren
Cited by (40)
Heart rate perception and expectation impact laboratory-induced perceived stress
2024, International Journal of PsychophysiologyVague sensations. About the background and consequences of discordance between actual and perceived physiological changes
2024, Clinical Psychology ReviewInteroceptive anxiety-related processes: Importance for understanding COVID-19 and future pandemic mental health and addictive behaviors and their comorbidity
2022, Behaviour Research and TherapyCitation Excerpt :The act of sensing, interpreting, and integrating information about somatic states is associated with distinct components, including attention, detection, discrimination, and accuracy (Vaitl, 1996). For instance, interoceptive processes includes perceiving somatic-related stimuli in terms of their presence (Pollatos, Kirsch, & Schandry, 2005), sensitivity (Hölzl, Erasmus, & Möltner, 1996), and precision (Fealey, 2013). A large volume of research across several disciplines has indicated that interoception is integral to associative learning, stress modulation, reward learning, decision-making, emotional functioning, and cognitive control (Craig, 2003, 2008).
Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review
2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Beyond tasks measuring interoception from heartbeat perception, a small number of studies have used a measure of gastric distension; Whitehead and colleagues, for example, assessed participants’ ability to detect whether stomach contractions coincided with an exteroceptive light stimulus, as well as their ability to control their gastric motility, and observed a positive relationship between perception of cardiac and gastric signals (Whitehead and Drescher, 1980). Similarly, detection rates and intensity ratings of colon distension have been investigated (Hölzl et al., 1996) and Zaman et al. (2016) measured ratings of esophageal distension intensity, identifying thresholds for initial perception, discomfort and pain. The invasive nature of these tests, however, means that they have not been used extensively.
Gut inference: A computational modelling approach
2021, Biological PsychologyA multidimensional and multi-feature framework for cardiac interoception
2020, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :Indeed, interoception has been mainly studied through HBD tasks because heartbeats are discrete and frequent internal events that can be easily, non-invasively, and objectively measured (Garfinkel et al., 2015) and/or manipulated (Khalsa et al., 2009a). However, interoception is not limited to cardiac sensations, but also includes the monitoring of other internal signals, such as thermoceptive, nociceptive, respiratory, and gastrointestinal (GI) stimuli (Craig, 2002; Khalsa and Lapidus, 2016; Cameron, 2001; Hölzl et al., 1996; Azzalini et al., n.d.; Alfonsi et al., 2016). Based on evidence showing an overlap between cardiac and non-cardiac –particularly GI– interoceptive abilities (Herbert et al., 2012; Whitehead and Drescher, 1980), we hope our results could be extrapolated to other interoceptive modalities.