Elsevier

Human Movement Science

Volume 9, Issue 2, April 1990, Pages 149-176
Human Movement Science

Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90025-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Prehension in adults is a highly developed motor skill that affords the study of how components of a movement are coordinated to produce the near endless variety of acts that serve to acquire objects in near body space. This study used three-dimensional movement analysis to describe the kinematic characteristics and coordination of the transport (the reach) and the manipulation (the grasp) components of prehension. Six subjects reached for and grasped 10 different sized wooden disks. Results indicated that the initial phase of the prehension movement could be considered as structured in advance of the movement in that, over the ten disk sizes, time of limb transport was a constant up to peak deceleration. The time after peak deceleration to object contact, however, increased as disk size decreased. This led to the movement trajectories being uniquely shaped for each disk size and as such did not support a proportional duration based model of motor programming. Other findings indicated that maximum grip aperture was reached progressively sooner as disk size was decreased and that maximum grip aperture was highly related to the size of the to-be-grasped disk. In terms of the coordination between the transport and grasp components, support was not found for a temporal linkage between them nor did their coordination appear to be dependent on a motor program. Rather, from an analysis of the spatial variability of the transport and grasp components, evidence was found for supporting the idea that the coordination between these two components was achieved by a sensorimotor process. Through this process, and given the goal of a prehension movement, it was argued that the two components are linked functionally rather than temporally or spatially. These results are discussed in terms of current sensorimotor models of motor control and prehension.

References (28)

  • M. Anderson et al.

    Motor control in dart throwing

    Human Movement Science

    (1986)
  • J.H. Abbs et al.

    Control of complex motor gestures: Orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speed

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1984)
  • J.H. Abbs et al.

    Control of multimovement coordination: Sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor programming

    Journal of Motor Behavior

    (1984)
  • M.A. Arbib

    Perceptual structures and distributed motor control

  • M.A. Arbib

    Schemas for the temporal organization of behavior

    Human Neurobiology

    (1985)
  • M.A. Arbib et al.

    Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand

    Experimental Brain Research Supplement

    (1985)
  • L.G. Carlton

    Movement control characteristics of aiming responses

    Ergonomics

    (1980)
  • K.J. Cole et al.

    Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1986)
  • P.M. Fitts

    The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1954)
  • J.C. Houk et al.

    Neural control of muscle length and tension

  • T. Iberall et al.

    Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements

  • M. Jeannerod

    Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects

  • M. Jeannerod

    The timing of natural prehension movements

    Journal of Motor Behavior

    (1984)
  • M. Jeannerod et al.

    Visuomotor mechanisms in reaching within extrapersonal space

  • Cited by (277)

    • Motor invariants in action execution and perception

      2023, Physics of Life Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Importantly, as already mentioned in section 1.1, the size of the object significantly modulates the grip aperture from the very beginning (∼10%) of the transportation phase [22]. The amplitude of the maximum grip aperture covaries linearly with the object size, i.e. the larger the object the wider the aperture [211,308,165,281,282,88,22], although an interesting modulation related to the ultimate goal of the actions sequence – i.e. grasp-to-eat vs. grasp-to-place identical targets (e.g., see Flindall & Gonzalez [102]) – has been reported as well. Grip aperture is gradually modulated also by the object shape [286], especially whenever undesirable collisions with some of its parts have to be avoided: The higher this risk is, the greater will be the maximum grip aperture (Cuijpers et al. [72]; Verheij et al. [328,327]).

    • Grasping objects with a sensory substitution glove

      2023, International Journal of Human Computer Studies
    • 4.18 - Dorsal and Ventral Streams in the Sense of Touch

      2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference: Volume 1-7, Second Edition
    • Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping

      2024, Cognitive Control of Action: Selected Works of David A. Rosenbaum
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text